CHAIR AND MEMBERS ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING ON JULY 18,2005

Similar documents
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16

ONTARIO REGULATION 157/05 made under the DOG OWNERS LIABILITY ACT. Printed in The Ontario Gazette: April 16, 2005 PIT BULL CONTROLS GENERAL

Pit Bull Dog Licensing By-law

SCHEDULE A. Bill No By-law No.

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY-LAW NUMBER

AND WHEREAS by motion 13-GC-253 the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Bracebridge deems it expedient to amend By-law ;

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF PORT HOPE BY-LAW NO. 48/2015

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW

Companion Animals Amendment Act 2013 No 86

BY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS

REVISED BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING AND REGULATION OF PIT BULL DOGS IN THE CITY OF LONDON RECOMMENDATION IJ

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

DOG CONTROL POLICY 2016

CYPRESS COUNTY BYLAW 2016/09 A BYLAW OF CYPRESS COUNTY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESTRAINING AND REGULATING DOGS.

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

DOG LICENCING BYLAW NO EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 24, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

These Regulations may be cited as the City of Corner Brook Animal Regulations.

B Y - L A W N U M B E R Passed the 27th day of September, 2004.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS

Be it enacted, by the Council of the Town of Wolfville under the authority of Sections 172 and 175 of the Municipal Government Act, as amended:

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS Dog Control Bylaw

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE SALMO. BYLAW #585 As Amended by Bylaw #624, 2011

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 17, 30th January, No. 1 of 2014

BY-LAW NUMBER (As amended by 53-11, & 71-16) -of- THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

Section 2 Interpretation

TOWN OF ECKVILLE BYLAW #701/10 DOG CONTROL BYLAW

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

TOWN OF LUMSDEN BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, CONTROLLING, REGULATING AND IMPOUNDING OF DOGS.

CONSOLIDATION OF DOG ACT. R.S.N.W.T. 1988,c.D-7. (Current to: May 29, 2011)

TOWN OF LEROY BYLAW NO. 5/07 A BYLAW RESPECTING ANIMAL CONTROL

BYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.

Department of Code Compliance

VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.

ORDINANCE NO

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383

BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WELLINGTON NORTH

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

The Corporation of the Township of Atikokan. By-law No (as amended)

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL


SUMMER VILLAGE OF JARVIS BAY BY-LAW #

BYLAW NUMBER

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

WHEREAS, The Municipalities Act, 2005, provides that a Council may by bylaw:

THE CORPORATION OF TOWN OF PETROLIA. BY-LAW NO. 10 of 2009

BYLAW NUMBER

CITY OF MELVILLE BYLAW NO. 09/2008 A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF CATS AND DOGS IN THE CITY OF MELVILLE.

CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013

BYLAW NO SUMMER VILLAGE OF YELLOWSTONE DOG AND CAT CONTROL BYLAW

BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CORNWALL AS FOLLOWS:

TOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

Corporation of the Town of Bow Island Bylaw No

BYLAW NUMBER

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

CHAPTER XII ANIMALS. .2 ANIMAL. Animal means every living creature, other than man, which may be affected by rabies.

BY-LAW A By-law of the town of Rothesay Respecting Animal Control, Enacted Under the Municipalities Act, Section 96(1), R.S.N.B. 1973, c.

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW

BYLAW NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Town of Banff, in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled, enacts as follows:

Section 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.

(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

CITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ENDERBY BYLAW NO. 1469

Dog Licensing Regulation

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

DOGS (JERSEY) LAW 1961

Town of Preble Local Law umber 4 of the Year 2010 A LOCAL LAW PROVIDI G FOR THE LICE SI G A D THE CO TROL OF DOGS I THE TOW OF PREBLE

93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.

BYLAW NO TOWN OF VEGREVILLE

TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322

BYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE TOWN OF STETTLER.

CURRENT TEXAS ANIMAL LAWS

TITLE 17 B HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 7 ANIMAL CONTROL

Transcription:

J 1 I! TO: FROM: CHAIR AND MEMBERS ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING ON JULY 18,2005 PAT McNALLY, P.Eng. DIRECTOR, WATER, ENVIRONMENT 8 CUSTOMER RELATIONS!I SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT #2 -AMENDMENTS TO THE DOG OWNERS LIABILITY ACT (DOLA) AND THE BAN ON PIT BULLS I RECOMMENDATION I1 That, on the recommendation of the Director, Water, Environment & Customer Relations, the following report BE RECEIVED for information. PREVIOUS REPORTS PERTINENT TO THIS MATTER Relevant reports that can be found at http://www.london.ca/council/meetincipackacies.htm include:

2 This is consistent with a number of Ontario municipalities that have been recently contacted as noted in the next section. For the September 26, 2005 ETC meeting, additional license fee recommendations for all dogs and cats will be presented along with some other items that have been previously identified in ETC reports. The new licensing and cat identification fees are required to assist the Environmental & Engineering Services Department to meet the 0% increase in budget for 2006 (Le., a budget reduction of approximately $2.5 million). In addition, increased licensing and identification fees can be used to offset the costs of providing additional animal control enforcement services (e.g., DOLA requirements) and to create additional capacity to participate in community-based animal welfare promotion, education and management programs (e.g., off-leash dog parks, spay-neuter programs). These initiatives are also currently being examined by the Companion Animal Welfare Task Force. The Task Force will be presenting an interim report in August. Discussion: This section includes details under the following headings: 1. Dog Owners Liability Act Amendments 2. Regulation under Dog Owners Liabilify Act - Pit Bull Controls 3. Highlights from Other Ontario Communities 4. Next Steps Involving Pit Bulls in London and Other Aspects of DOLA 1. Dos Owners Liability Act Amendments Bill 132, the Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005, received Royal Assent on March 9, 2005. This Act amends two pieces of legislation: the Dog Owners LiabiMy Act, and the Animals for Research Act. These amendments are to come into force on August 29, 2005. The Act amends the Dog Owners Liabilify Act to do, among other things, the following: 0 Authorizes the commencement of a proceeding against a dog owner where the dog poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals or against a person who contravenes the Act, the regulations made under the Act or a court order made under the Act. Can obtain an order to destroy the dog, or require owner to muzzle, leash, etc. Prohibits owning, breeding, transferring, abandoning, importing and training to fight pit bulls, except as permitted by the Act or regulations under it. Provides grandfathering provisions for pit bulls - restricted pit bulls. These are pit bulls owned by an Ontario resident when the Act comes into force and pit bulls born in Ontario within 90 days of the Act coming into force. Owners of restricted pit bulls must ensure compliance with the provisions of the Act and regulations relating to restricted pit bulls. Provides for search and seizure of dogs under a warrant, in exigent circumstances or, in specified circumstances, in a public place. Provides that both police officers and municipal law enforcement officers are peace officers for the purposes of the Act (e.g., for search warrants, seizing in public place). Provides for matters relating to proof as to whether a dog is a pit bull for the purposes of prosecutions for offences under the Act. A veterinarian s certificate attesting that a dog is a pit bull is evidence of that fact. Provides for delivery of seized or abandoned pit bulls to a pound operated by or on behalf of a municipality, Ontario, or a designated body. Creates an offence to contravene the Act or the Regulation; maximum fine of $10,000 andlor to imprisonment for maximum 6 months; maximum fine for a corporation $60,000; court may order compensation or restitution upon conviction. The Act also makes related amendments to the Animals for Research Act with respect to the disposition of pit bulls under that Act.

3 Currently in London, only London Police Services enforces DOLA. The City s contract with the London Animal Care Centre (LACC) currently does not provide for the enforcement of DOLA. There is an established working relationship between the Police and LACC on City by-law matters. The Police and the Middlesex-London Health Unit are the two agencies that lay charges under DOLA. Civic Administration has been in discussion with LACC and London Police Services regarding enforcement and administrative matters associated with the amendments to DOLA. These discussion are on-going. 2. Requlation under Dou Owners Liabilitv Act - Pit Bull Controls In addition to the amendments to the Dog Owners Liability Act, the Province has filed a Regulation under that Act with respect to Pit Bull Controls, which is also to come into force on August 29, 2005. Among other things, this Regulation provides that: commencing October 28, 2005, pit bull owners are required to have their dogs muzzled and leashed, unless within the owner s enclosed property, or within enclosed property of someone who consents to dog being unmuzzled and unleashed: leash must be a maximum of 1.8 metres long; by October 28,2005, pit bull owners are required to have their dog sterilized, or if younger than 36 weeks, when the dog reaches the age of 36 weeks: and, there are limited exemptions for sanctioned dog shows. Attached to this report are Appendix A - a copy of information available at the Ministry of the Attorney General s Website which summarizes the Dog Owners Liability Act amendments; and, Appendix B - a copy of Ontario Regulation 157/05 to the Dog Owners Liability Act entitled Pit Bull Controls. 3. Hiahliahts from Other Ontario Communities City staff contacted a few other Ontario municipalities to inquire as to how they enforce (will enforce) DOLA and whether they anticipate any changes to their local by-laws. Mississauga Yamilton Toronto Guelph Windsor No changes to the local by-law are anticipated. City Animal Control Services enforce DOLA. The police also enforce DOLA. No changes to the local by-law are anticipated. City Animal Control Services enforce DOLA. The police also enforce DOLA, when required. No changes to the local by-law are anticipated. City Animal Control Services enforce DOLA. The police also enforce DOLA, when required. No changes to the local by-law are anticipated. The Humane Society enforces DOLA at present. They have one dedicated officer. Their contract with the City requires that they enforce DOLA but does not require that they enforce breed specific provisions. They advise that they will require contract re-negotiation (and additional funding) to enforce the breed specific provisions. Currently the Humane Society enforces DOLA where the incident involves a dog and another animal or where the human involvement is not serious. The police are involved only where there is serious human involvement. The Humane Society has provided assistance to the Police with respect to court procedures under DOLA. They report that this relationship has worked well. Guelph does not anticipate any changes to their by-law as a result of the changes to DOLA. They report that they had considered changes in the past to address dogs with a history of attacking or biting but are now content to rely upon DOLA. No changes to the local by-law are anticipated. Pit bull by-law the enforcement is split. Animal control issues, for example pit bulls running loose, are handled by the Humane Society. Compliance with the by-law, including the requirements to register pit bulls, leashing and muzzling requirements, etc. are enforced by the City s by-law enforcement forces, specifically licensing enforcement. In most cases the licensing officers will handle the initial work with the Humane Society in most cases handling the animal control aspects. (continued1

4 With respect to identifying pit bulls, the City s licensing appeals committee has the final say. Once the new DOLA provisions come into effect, licensing enforcement expects that they will have assistance from the Humane Society and/or the police if it becomes necessary to seize dogs. A review of several other municipal websites - Burlington, Brampton, Ottawa, Brantford. Cambridge - turned up no additional information on how DOLA will be enforced and/or rolled out in these municipalities. 4. Next Stem lnvolvina Pit Bulls in London and Other Asoects of DOLA Activities in the next month include: 0 Identify and develop, if required, any new reporting details that will be required for DOLA. Notify approximately 850 owners of pit bulls of the new requirements under DOLA. Post details on the City s website (questions and answers - What Londoners Need to Know) with respect to the impact of DOLA. Prepare the by-law amendments to the City Animal Control By-law (PH-3) and/or the Dog Licensing & Control By-law (PH-4). Identify and estimate the cost of DOLA in the first year of implementation and subsequent years including a reporting structure. Prepare ETC report outlining actions and proposed new license fees for pit bulls. Conclusions: The new amendments to DOLA will change how pit bulls are owned across the Province of Ontario. DOLA also provides tougher enforcement measures for owners of dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs. The impact of DOLA on the City of London s Animal Care and Control Program is difficult to predict at this point as there is little precedent in the Province. It is anticipated that additional information will be available from other municipalities in the next 4 to 8 weeks. PROGRAMS 8 CUSTOMER RELATIONS PAT McNALLY. P.Ena. // 11 DIRECTOR, WATER, ENVIRONMENT MWSTOMER RELATIONS July 7,2005 /JSY.\Sharsd\SolWaste\ETC-BoC Reporls\REP070705 doc Appendix A Appendix B a copy of information available at the Ministry of the Attorney General s Website Information on The Dog Owners Liability Act and Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 a copy of Ontario Regulation 157105 to the Dog Owners Liability Act entitled Pit Bull Controls c Pete Steblin, P.Eng., General Manager & City Engineer, Environmental & Engineering James P. Barber, City Solicitor

5 @ Ontario APPENDIX A Ministry of cha Attorney General htto://www.attomevaeneral.ius.aov.on.c~en~lish/abouffoubs/dola-~ubsffv/dola-~ubs~.as~#toc 02 Information on The Dog Owners' Liability Act and Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 - Highlights On October 26, 2004 the McGuinty government introduced Bill 132 to amend the Dog Owners' Liability Act (DOLA), with related amendments to the Animals fur Research Act (ARA). Bill 132 was passed by the Legislative Assembly as the Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 on March 1, 2005. It received Royal Assent on March 9. 2005. The legislation bans pit bulls in Ontario, places restrictions on existing pit bulls, and toughens the penalties for the owners of any dog that poses a danger to the public. Ontario's pit bull ban takes effect on August 29, 2005. All dog owners must comply with the current requirements of DOLA and other provisions of law After the pit bull ban takes effect, pit bull owners may keep their existing dogs, as long as they comply with certain requirements. The recent amendments to DOLA also contain tough new penalties for the owners of all potentially dangerous dogs, regardless of breed or type. Regulations made under the DOLA, as amended, will also come into effect on August 29, 2005. These regulations set out pit bull controls in detail. The regulations can be found at httu://www.e-1aws.eov.un.ca The information below is provided to aid understanding of the legislation and does not constitute legal advice. Transition Period The act received Royal Assent on March 9, 2005. However, the effective date of August 29, 2005, allows municipalities time to ensure that the legislation is applied effectively. This transition period will also allow pit bull owners time to determine what they have to do to comply with the new requirements (see below: "Grandfathered" or Restricted Pit Bulls). It will also allow all dog owners to familiarize themselves with the existing and new requirements of DOLA that apply to dogs. Pit Bulls The amendments to DOLA will prohibit individuals from owning, breeding, transferring, importing or abandoning pit bulls. Training a pit bull to fight or allowing a pit bull to stray will also be prohibited. There are exceptions to the restrictions on ownership, transfer and importing in the case of "grandfathered" pit bulls (see below: "Grandfathered" or Restricted Pit Bulls). "Grandfathered" or Restricted Pit Bulls Individuals who already own pit bulls will be able to keep them, provided they comply with requirements set out in the amendments and the regulations. Pit bulls kept legally after the ban will be known as "grandfathered" or restricted pit bulls. In order for a pit bull to qualify as a "grandfathered" or restricted pit bull, it must be: Owned by an Ontario resident on August 29. 2005., or Born in Ontario within 90 days after August 29,2005. GrandfatheredlRestricted Pit Bulls - Owners' Responsibilities Pit bull owners will be required to ensure their pit bulls are in compliance with the amendments and regulations.

6 The full text of the regulations can be found on the & website. The text below summarizes certain key elements of the regulations and is not authoritative. Within 60 days of August 29, 2005 (by October 28. 2005) pit bull owners will have to have their dogs leashed and muzzled in public and comply with sterilization requirements. The regulations stipulate that restricted pit bulls be muzzled and leashed unless the dogs are on their owners' enclosed property or on enclosed property occupied by another person who consents to the pit bull being without a muzzle or leash. Among other specific requirements, a leash may be a maximum of 1.8 metres long Muzzles should be humane, but strong enough and well-fitted enough to prevent the pit bull from biting, without interfering with the breathing, panting, or vision of the pit bull or with the pit bull's ability to drink. All pit bulls must be sterilized within 60 days of August 29, 2005 (by October 28. 2005) If this would require a pit bull to be sterilized before it reaches 36-weeks of age, the owner may wait until the dog reaches that age to have it sterilized. There are limited exemptions to the sterilization requirement if, in the written opinion of a veterinarian, a pit bull is physically unfit to be anaesthetized because of old age or infirmity. See the regulations for further details. Dog Owners' Liability Act (DOLA) Proceedings This section describes DOLA proceedings as they exist before amendments to the legislation become effective on August 29, 2005. The amendments to the legislation make some changes to the Part IX proceedings and the offence proceedings. Those changes are discussed in subsequent sections. Civil Proceedings If a dog bites you, you may bring a civli action against the dog's owner for damages The Act states that the owner of a dog is liable for damages resulting from a bite or attack and that liability does not depend on the ownerls fault. negligence or knowledge of the propensity of the dog to bite or attack. Proceedings under Part IX of the Provincial Offences Act (Part IX Orders or Part IX Proceedings) DOLA provides that any individual can start a court proceeding u nderw of the Provincial Offences Act (POA1. In these proceedings. an Individual can seek a court order related to a dog. These orders can provide for destruction of the dog or require that the dog's Owner take certain measures in relation to the dog such as requiring that the dog be muzzled or leashed. Offence Proceedings under Part 111 of the Provincial Offences Act (Offence Proceedings) Vioiations of various Ontario statutes. Including DOLA, constitute provincial offences and may be prosecuted under the Provlncial Offences Act. After charges are laid. a Crown attorney presents the case in court Part IX Proceedings and Pit Bulls In Part IX proceedings, an individual may seek a court order in relation to a dog (see above: Doe. Owners' Liability Act (DOLA) Proceedings). Where a court is convinced that a pit bull has bitten or attacked or posed a menace in a Part IX proceeding, a mandatory destruction order must be issued. Where a pit bull owner is found to have contravened a provision of the DOLA, the regulations, or a court order in relation to the pit bull, a mandatory destruction order must be issued in a Part IX proceeding. Pit Bull Ban - Dog Show Exceptions There are limited exceptions to certain requirements of the pit bull ban to allow the participation of pit bulls in dog shows. "Dog show" is defined in the regulations. See for more information Dog shows must be sanctioned, in writing, by one or more of the following dog registries: Canadian Kennel Club, United Kennel Club, American Kennel Club or American Dog Breeders Association. There are different exceptions for restricted Ontario pit bulls and pit bulls not owned by Ontario residents.

7 Details of these limited exceptions are set out in the regulations. None of these exceptions permit breeding of pit bulls, under any circumstances. Importing Pit Bulls When the amendments to the Act come into effect, no one will be allowed to import pit bulls into Ontario. An individual who leaves Ontario with a restricted pit bull and returns to Ontario with that pit bull within three months will not be considered to be importing that pit bull into Ontario. An individual who owns a pit bull on August 29, 2005, and is legally resident in Ontario on that day, but is not present in Ontario on that day will not be importing a pit bull into Ontario if he or she returns to Ontario with that pit bull within three months of August 29, 2005. The regulations will allow some pit bulls to come into Ontario for recognized dog shows in certain limited circumstances (see above: Pit Bull Ban - Doe Show Exceutions). Acquiring Restricted Pit Bulls after the Ban Comes into Effect Pit bulls kept legally after the ban will be known as "grandfathered or restricted put bulls After the ban comes into effect, a person who did not own any pit bulls on August 29, 2005, will be able to acquire one restricted pit bull. A person who owned one or more pit bulls on August 29, 2005 will be able to acquire more restricted pit bulls so long as the effect would not be to leave the person with more pit bulls than he or she owned on August 29.2005. Pounds and humane societies will be able to adopt out restricted pit bulls after August 29, 2005, provided that the transfer of the pit bull to a new owner would not lead to a violation of the restrictions on acquisition. All Dangerous Dogs The amendments to DOLA contained in the Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 will come into effect on August 29,2005. If court proceedings take place after August 29. 2005, but the events that the proceedings are based on took place before that date, the law will apply as it existed before August 29, 2005. Expanded Part IX Proceedings: After August 29,2005, it will be possible to commence Part IX proceedings where it is alleged that: A dog has bitten or anacked The dog has behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the safely of persons or domestic animals An owner did not exercise reasonable precauuons to prevent a dog from biting or altacking or posing a menace to the safely of persons or domestic animals An existing order has been breached Part IX Orders: In Part IX proceedings arising after August 29, 2005, the existing legislation and amendments will provide that if a court finds that a dog has bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal or that the dog's behaviour constitutes a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals, the court may make the following orders if satisfied that they are necessary for protection of the public: Destruction ordei Order that dog owner take specified wntroi measures Order prohibiting funher dog owneffihlp for a specified period of time. Control Measures: The existing legislation and amendments provide some examples of the sort of Part IX orders that the courts may make in cases arising after August 29.2005. Examples include: Confinement of dog lo ownefs properly Restraint of dog by leash andlor muzzle Posting of warning signs. Mandatory Sterilization: After August 29, 2005, any dog subject to a Part IX Order (other than a destruction order) must be spayed or neutered within 30 days of the order or within a different period of time, if the court specifies one

8 Expanded Offence Proceedings: After August 29,2005 it will be an offence to contravene a provision of the DOLA or the regulations or any order made under the DOLA or regulations. Specific offences will include: Failing to exercise reasonable precautions to prevent a dog fmm biting or attacking a person or domestic animal Failing to exercise reasonable precautions to prevent a dog from behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals. Penalties for Offences: After August 29, 2005, penalties in DOLA offence proceedings will be as follows: $10,000 flne ($60,000 for corporations); andlor Six months imprisonment: andlor In addition to any other penalties. he wurl nil1 be able to make restitution orders requiring convicted persons to make compensation or restitution to victims. New Powers for Animal Control Personnel The amendments to DOLA provide that police officers, special constables, First Nations Constables, auxiliary police, municipal law enforcement officers, OSPCA inspectors and OSPCA agents are all designated as peace officers for the purposes of DOLA. Designated peace officers will be able to obtain warrants to seize a dog from a particular location where it is not desirable in the interests of public safety that the dog be so located. In exigent circumstances, designated peace officers will have a right of entry without warrant. Exigent circumstances include circumstances where there are reasonable grounds to believe that entry without warrant is necessary to prevent imminent bodily harm or death to any person or domestic animal. There are also provisions for seizure in public places. Municipal Pounds As of August 29, 2005, the definition of pound for the purposes of DOLA and the Animals for Research Act (ARA), will be "premises that are used for the detention, maintenance or disposal of dogs or cats that have been impounded pursuant to a by-law of a municipality or the Dog Owners' Liability Act, but does not include any premises, or part thereof, that are not used by any person or body of persons, including the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals or any society affiliated therewith, for the detention, maintenance or disposal of dogs or cats so impounded." Pounds will be able to keep and adopt out any number of restricted pit bulls so long as they are kept in accordance with the DOLA and any regulations. Animal shelters and facilities that are pounds will have the same status as any other pit bull owners. They will be able to own, acquire and, transfer restricted pit bulls in accordance with the requirements. After the ban comes into force, only pounds and ARA registered research facilities will be legally able to own or acquire prohibited pit bulls. Amendments to the ARA provide a system for dealing with such pit bulls including sending prohibited pit bulls (Le., pit bulls that are not "restricted" or grandfathered) out of Ontario. Frequently Asked Questions 1. Now that the amendments are law, do I have to send my pit bull out of Ontario or have it euthanlzed? No. Owners of pit bulls may keep their pit bulls, provided they keep them in compliance with the requirements of the new legislation and any regulations made under it. The new legislation will take effect on August 29.2005. 2. Is my dog a pit bull? Under the amendments to DOLA, pit bull is defined as: A pit bull terrier A Staffordshire bull terrier An American Staffordshire terrier An American pit bull terrier A dog that has an appearance and physical characteristics substantially similar to any of those dogs. 3. Who decides whether or not a dog Is a pit bull? The amendments provide that in a Part IX proceeding the onus of proving that the dog is not a pit buh will lie with the owner of the dog. In offence proceedings, the amendments provide that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a

9 reasonable doubt and that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, a veterinarian's certificate attesting that a dog is a pit bull is evidence of that fact. Part IX proceedings and offence proceedings are heard before the Ontario Court of Justice. 4. What sort of documentation do I need to travel with my pit bull? The amendments do not deal with customs documentation regarding shipping of dogs to Canada from foreign jurisdictions and dogs that are in transit destined for other countries. The legislation bans pit bulls and their importation into Ontario. After the ban comes into effect on August 29.2005. it will be the responsibility of an owner to show that a pit bull is not being imported into Ontario in contravention of the ban. 5. What if I am just passing through Ontario with my pit bull? You wiii be in contravention of the law if you are found to have imported a pit bull into the province following the amendments coming into force. Your pit bull may be subject to seizure and you may be subject to a fine andlor jail time. Please note that exceptions exist for Ontario residents who are out of the province with their pit bulls for less than three months. Limited exceptions also exist for individuals coming to Ontario for purposes of participating in recognized dog shows. 6. Do I have to have my pit bull muzzled and leashed? Prior to August 29, 2005: While DOLA does not require you to muzzle and leash your pit bull at this time, municipal by- laws may have such requirements. Check with your iocai municipality for further information. After October 28, 2005: Regulations provide that pit bull owners must comply with leash and muzzle requirements within 60 days of August 29, 2005 (by October 28, 2005). 7. What if I want to complain about a dog? Who do I contact? Municipalities are responsible for animal control and you should generally contact your local animal control or by-law enforcement office in relation to animal control issues. In emergency situations, the police should be contacted. Please note that after October 28, 2005, owners of existing pit bulls must ensure that their dogs are sterilized and that they are muzzled and leashed while walking them in public. 8. Do I have to register my pit bull? There is no provincial plan for dog registration as animal control is a municipal responsibility. You should license and register your dog in compliance with requirements set by your local municipality. 9. I am being harassed when walking in public with my pit bull. What should I do? The Ontario government's amendments to DOLA are designed to make all Ontarians safer. The fact that the government has chosen to ban pit bulls is no justification for harassment of pit bulls owners or cruelty to animals. Pit bull owners are allowed to keep their dogs and walk them in public, as long as they obey the law as it applies to all dog owners. However, pit bull owners walking their dogs in public after October 28. 2005, must comply with certain requirements, such as keeping the dog muzzled and on leash. Pit bull owners who are subject to harassment that may constitute criminal activity andlor fear for their safety should contact the Dolice. IO. Our municipality already has a pit bull ban in place (or is thinking of implementing one) with no grandfather clause. Do the new amendments mean that pit bull owners can bring their dogs into our community regardless of our by-law? No. The new section 11 of DOLA will provide that if there is a conflict between the provincial requirements and a municipal by-law. the more restrictive provisions in relation to pit bulls will prevail.

10 APPENDIX B ONTARIO REGULATION 157/05 made under the DOG OWNERS LIABILITY ACT Made: March 30,2005 Filed: March 30,2005 Printed in The Ontario Gazette: April 16,2005 PIT BULL CONTROLS GENERAL Control of pit bulls 1. (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), an owner of a restricted pit bull shall ensure that the pit bull is at all times equipped with a muzzle and secured by a leash in accordance with subsection (5). (2) Subsection (1) does not apply when a pit bull is within enclosed property occupied by the owner of the pit bull. (3) When a pit bull is within enclosed property occupied by a person who consents to the pit bull being off leash or off muzzle, subsection (1) does not apply to the extent of that consent. (4) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), a pit bull is within enclosed property when the property is enclosed in a way that can be relied on to prevent the pit bull from breaking out of the property. (5) For the purposes of subsection (I), a pit bull shall be equipped with a muzzle and secured by a leash in accordance with the following rules: 1. The pit bull shall be fitted with a collar or harness that is properly fitted to and placed on the dog. 2. The movement of the pit bull shall be controlled by a person by means of a leash attached to the collar or harness on the pit bull. 3. The leash is not more than 1.8 metres in length and is attached to the collar or harness. 4. The collar or harness, the leash and the attachment between the leash and the collar or harness are all strong enough to prevent the pit bull from breaking any of them. 5. The mouth of the pit bull is covered by a muzzle that is humane and that is strong enough and well-fitted enough to prevent the pit bull from biting, without interfering with the breathing, panting or vision of the pit bull or with the pit bull s ability to drink. (6) Every owner of a pit bull shall ensure that the requirements of this section are complied with on and after the day that is 60 days after the day on which this Regulation comes into force. Sterilization 2. (I) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), every owner of a restricted pit bull shall ensure that the pit bull is sterilized by a veterinarian on or before the day that is 60 days after the day on which this Regulation comes into force. (2) If the effect of subsection (1) would be to require sterilization of a pit bull before it reaches the age of 36 weeks, every owner of the pit bull shall instead ensure that it is sterilized on or before the day on which it reaches that age.

A 14 Ky enda Item # 11 (3) An owner of a restricted pit bull is exempt from complying with subsection (1) if, in the written opinion of a veterinarian, the pit bull is physically unfit to be anaesthetized because of old age or infirmity. (4) If a veterinarian gives a written opinion based on infirmity, the veterinarian shall state, in the written opinion, whether, in his or her opinion, the infirmity may not be permanent. (5) Where the veterinarian states that an infirmity may not be permanent, he or she shall specify, in the written opinion, a date by which the owner should have the pit bull re-examined by a veterinarian to determine whether the pit bull is fit to be anaesthetized. (6) An exemption based on a written opinion that specifies a date under subsection (5) ends on that date, but a further written opinion under subsection (3) may be sought in respect of the pit bull on or before that date. (7) In this section, Veterinarian means a member of the College of Veterinarians of Ontario. DOG SHOWS Approved dog shows 3. (1) In this section and sections 4 and 5, dog show includes a conformation show, an agility trial, an obedience trial, a tracking test and an earth dog test. (2) For the purposes of sections 4 and 5, a dog show is an approved dog show if it is an event, whether held in Ontario or elsewhere, that is sanctioned, in writing, by one or more of the following dog registries: 1. The Canadian Kennel Club. 2. The United Kennel Club. 3. The American Kennel Club. 4. The American Dog Breeders Association. Exemptions, restricted pit bulls 4. (1) The exemptions set out in subsection (3) apply in respect of restricted pit bulls within the meaning of subsection 7 (1) of the Act, as long as the conditions set out in subsection (2) are met. (2) The following are the conditions referred to in subsection (1): 1. The restricted pit bull is registered as a Staffordshire bull terrier, an American Staffordshire terrier or an American pit bull terrier with one or more of the dog registries named in subsection 3 (2). 2. The owner of the restricted pit bull has given written notice to one of the dog registries named in subsection 3 (2) stating the owner s intention that the restricted pit bull participate in approved dog shows. 3. Except in the circumstances described in paragraph 4, the restricted pit bull has participated in at least one approved dog show during the 365-day period ending on the day this Regulation comes into force. 4. In the case of a restricted pit bull that was unborn or below the age of 36 weeks on the day this Regulation comes into force, the pit bull has participated in at least one approved dog show during the period ending on the day on which the pit bull reaches the age of 36 weeks.

A 13 ndailem# 12 5. The restricted pit bull has participated in an approved dog show at least once in every 365-day period since the dog s first participation in such a show during the period that applies to the pit bull under paragraph 3 or 4, as the case may be. (3) The following are the exemptions referred to in subsection (1): 1. The requirements of subsections 1 (I), (5) and (6) do not apply while the pit bull is on the site of and participating in an approved dog show. 2. The requirements of section 2 do not apply. Exemptions, pit bulls not owned by Ontario residents 5. (1) The exemptions set out in subsection (3) apply in respect of pit bulls that are not owned by a resident of Ontario, as long as the conditions set out in subsection (2) are met. (2) The following are the conditions referred to in subsection (1): 1. The pit bull is registered as a Staffordshire bull terrier, an American Staffordshire terrier or an American pit bull terrier with one or more of the dog registries named in subsection 3 (2). 2. The owner of the pit bull has given written notice to one of the dog registries named in subsection 3 (2) stating the owner s intention that the pit bull participate in approved dog shows. 3. Beginning on the day on which this Regulation comes into force, the pit bull has not been present in Ontario except during 14-day periods that include an approved dog show in which the pit bull participated. (3).The following are the exemptions referred to in subsection (1): 1. Subsections 1 (l), (5) and (6) do not apply while the pit bull is on the site of and participating in an approved dog show. 2. Section 2 does not apply. 3. Clause 6 (a) of the Act does not apply during the 14-day periods mentioned in paragraph 3 of subsection (2). 4. Clause 6 (f) of the Act does not apply if the pit bull is brought into Ontario within the 14-day period preceding an approved dog show in Ontario and the dog is registered as a participant in that show. Interpretation 6. Nothing in section 4 or 5 of this Regulation shall be interpreted as a Iimit on the prohibition, in clause 6 (b) of the Act, against breeding pit bulls. Commencement 7. This Regulation comes into force on August 29,2005.