International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

Similar documents
Key terms and concepts in the IUCN Red List Criteria. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

Guidelines for including species of conservation concern in the Environmental Assessment process

IUCN SSC Red List of Threatened Species

IUCN Red List. Industry guidance note. March 2010

ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - An Overview

Madagascar Spider Tortoise Updated: January 12, 2019

From raw data to Red List: The Red List assessment process and role of the Red List Assessor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA

Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018

Metadata Sheet: Extinction risk (Indicator No. 9)

Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish Biological Status Review Report

Small-mouthed Salamander Ambystoma texanum

Cyprus biodiversity at risk

Northern Copperhead Updated: April 8, 2018

Marsupial Mole. Notoryctes species. Amy Mutton Zoologist Species and Communities Branch Science and Conservation Division

Lithuania s biodiversity at risk

Criteria for Selecting Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes

Abbreviations and acronyms used by SSC and IUCN

CONTRIBUTION TO THE RED LIST OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF ASTRAGALUS GAHIRATENSIS ALI (FABACEAE-PAPILIONOIDEAE)

Conservation status of New Zealand bats, 2012

European Red List of Habitats

RED LIST ASSESSMENT. Questionnaire (please complete one questionnaire per taxon, extra sheets may be used)

II, IV Yes Reptiles Marine Atlantic, Marine Macaronesian, Marine Mediterranean

Biodiversity and Extinction. Lecture 9

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

CONTRIBUTION TO THE RED LIST OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF GAILLONIA CHITRALENSIS (RUBIACEAE)

Proponent: Switzerland, as Depositary Government, at the request of the Animals Committee (prepared by New Zealand)

THE RED BOOK OF ANIMALS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Romania s biodiversity at risk

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for. Hine's Emerald (Somatochlora hineana)

Malayan Tiger Updated: April 8, 2018

Eating pangolins to extinction

Transfer of the Family Platysternidae from Appendix II to Appendix I. Proponent: United States of America and Viet Nam. Ref. CoP16 Prop.

Timber Rattlesnake Crotalus horridus

Table of Threatened Animals in Amazing Animals in Australia s National Parks and Their Traffic-light Conservation Status

North American Black Bear Updated: February 26, 2018

AMITY. Biodiversity & Its Conservation. Lecture 23. Categorization of Biodiversity - IUCN. By Prof. S. P. Bajpai. Department of Environmental Studies

July 28, Dear Dr. Nouak,

IUCN Red List Categories

Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment - Cuba, March 2011 Page 1

5/10/2013 CONSERVATION OF CRITICALLY ENDANGERED RUFFORD SMALL GRANT. Dr. Ashot Aslanyan. Project leader SPECIES OF REPTILES OF ARARAT VALLEY, ARMENIA

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA

Title: The impact of alternative metrics on estimates of Extent of Occurrence 1 for extinction risk assessment

Southern Maidenhair Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris

PETITION TO LIST THE Virgin Islands Coqui (Eleutherodactylus schwartzi)

Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond

Evolution of Biodiversity

Living Planet Report 2018

Introduction. Chapter 1

Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data

Desert Nightsnake Hypsiglena chlorophaea

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii

TURKISH RED LIST CATEGORIES OF LONGICORN BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) PART I SUBFAMILIES VESPERINAE AND PRIONINAE.

Conservation status of New Zealand Onychophora ( peripatus or velvet worm), 2018 NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 26

Endangered and Endemic Species of India (8 Marks)

Re: Proposed Revision To the Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf

Improvements to the Red List Index

Regional IUCN Red List assessments for South African terrestrial and. marine mammals: An overview

Introduction. Chapter 1

Extinction. Extinction occurs when all individuals of a species are gone and have left no descendants. If all the species within a genus are

Amphibians Research Activities

Pacific Gopher Snake Pituophis catenifer catenifer

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form. for. Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum)

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

A3.23 Photophilic communities dominated by calcareous, habitat-forming algae.

Securing Endangered Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles in the Indo-Burma Region

The state of conservation of sea turtles in the Mediterranean- case study of Greece

Quiz Flip side of tree creation: EXTINCTION. Knock-on effects (Crooks & Soule, '99)

THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN

Revised Status of Rare and Endangered Unionacea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas

Hooded Plover Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act Nomination

Blue Racer Coluber constrictor foxii

The GB Invasive Non-native Species Strategy. Olaf Booy GB Non-native Species Secretariat

State of the Turtle Raising Awareness for Turtle Conservation

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Supplemental Information for the White-Crowned Pigeon Biological Status Review Report

WILDLIFE DISEASE AND MIGRATORY SPECIES. Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its Tenth Meeting (Bergen, November 2011)

26 August :27 UK. Axolotl verges on wild extinction Matt Walker Editor, Earth News. A captive albino axolotl displays its larval gills

The threats to Australia s imperilled species and implications for a national conservation response

The IUCN Red List assessment of aspidochirotid sea cucumbers and its implications

By Dennis A. Thoney, Ph.D.

Risk of extinction and categories of endangerment: perspectives from long-lived reptiles

Local Conservation Action leads to Breeding Success for Critically Endangered BAER S POCHARD at Hengshui Hu.

Re: Improving protection measures for Maui s and Hector s dolphins

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

Original language: English PC22 Doc. 10 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

WILDLIFE HEALTH AUSTRALIA (WHA) SUBMISSION: AUSTRALIA S STRATEGY FOR NATURE (DRAFT)

2019 Herpetology (B/C)

Structured Decision Making: A Vehicle for Political Manipulation of Science May 2013

Snowshoe Hare and Canada Lynx Populations

Some new species are found, but they are endangered too: A selective show and tell of Amphibians and Reptiles of the World.

Silence of the Frogs Lexile 1040L

Between 1850 and 1900, human population increased, and 99% of the forest on Puerto Rico was cleared.

American Samoa Sea Turtles

Driving Questions: How much seagrass does a green sea turtle eat in a year? In its lifetime?

How do dogs make trouble for wildlife in the Andes?

The Importance Of Atlasing; Utilizing Amphibian And Reptile Data To Protect And Restore Michigan Wetlands

Transcription:

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) IUCN Members Commissions (10,000 scientists & experts) 80 States 112 Government agencies >800 NGOs IUCN Secretariat 1,100 staff in 62 countries, led by IUCN s Director General INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE 1

IUCN Red List Unit Management of the IUCN Red List (database, web site) Assessment review Petitions and enquiries Training workshops Assessment workshops Other projects and Red List tools Red List Index Global Species Assessments Regional assessment initiatives Climate change and extinction risk assessment 2

What are we trying to do? Identify and document those species most in need of conservation attention if the global extinction rates are to be reduced. Provide a global index to monitor the status of the world s biodiversity. 3

The IUCN Red List Assessment: An estimate of extinction risk What is the likelihood of a species becoming extinct in the near future, given current knowledge about population trends, range, and recent, current or projected threats? 4

The IUCN Red List Categories & Criteria All materials are freely available on IUCN Red List web site: www.iucnredlist.org 5

The Red List assessment process Outside IUCN Regional/national assessments (endemic species) Other assessors Unreviewed Assessment Assessors Within IUCN Specialist Groups, Red List Authorities Global Biodiversity Assessment projects Regional projects Reviewed Assessment IUCN Red List Unit Checked, reviewed assessments Peer review process 6 Red List Authorities Reviewers At least 2 reviewers for every assessment

Rabb s Fringe-limbed Treefrog Ecnomiohyla rabborum Category: Critically Endangered CR A2ace;B1ab(iii) Criteria & subcriteria 7

The IUCN Categories Extinct (EX) Extinct in the Wild (EW) Critically Endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) Near Threatened (NT) Least Concern (LC) Data Deficient (DD) Not Evaluated (NE) 8

Extinct (EX) A taxon is Extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. Extinct in the Wild (EW) Dodo, Raphus cucullatus A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well outside the past range. 9 Photo Craig Hilton-Taylor Franklinia, Franklinia alatamaha

A taxon is threatened when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for the thresholds stated in one of the three threatened categories: Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable. Critically Endangered (CR) CR taxa are considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild Endangered (EN) EN taxa are considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild Photo Wendy Strahm Mandrinette, Hibiscus fragilis Black-browed Albatross, Thalassarche melanophrys Vulnerable (VU) Photo Tony Palliser VU taxa are considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild 10 Photo Craig Hilton- Taylor Golden Pagoda, Mimetes chrysanthus

Near Threatened (NT) A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for CR, EN or VU now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future. Least Concern (LC) Photo H. Fraga Macaronesian Laurel, Laurus azorica A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for CR, EN, VU or NT. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category. Photo Caroline Pollock Olive Baboon, Papio anumbis 11

Data Deficient (DD) A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. Tree Tomato Solanum [Cyphomandra] betacea Not Evaluated (NE) A taxon is Not Evaluated when it has not yet been evaluated against the criteria 12

Data Deficient (DD) Not Evaluated (NE) Although DD and NE are not threatened categories, taxa classed as DD or NE should NOT be treated as not threatened 13

A The IUCN Red List Criteria CRITERIA Population reduction THREATENED CATEGORIES B Restricted geographic range Critically Endangered (CR) C Small population size & decline Quantitative thresholds Endangered (EN) D E Very small or restricted population Quantitative analysis Vulnerable (VU) 14

15

Criterion B Restricted geographic range and fragmentation, continuing decline or extreme fluctuations 16

Criterion B Based on either of two sub-criteria: B1: Estimated extent of occurrence AND / OR B2: Estimated area of occupancy AND at least TWO of a-c: a. Severely fragmented or few locations b. Continuing decline c. Extreme fluctuations 17

Extent of Occurrence Area of Occupancy Extent of Occurrence is the area contained within the shortest continuous imaginary boundary which can be drawn to encompass all known, inferred, or projected sites presently occupied by the taxon. Area of Occupancy is the area within the extent of occurrence which is actually occupied by the taxon (measured by overlaying a grid and counting number of occupied cells). 18

Extent of Occurrence Comparison of taxa with same AOO but different EOO a single threatening event is more likely to rapidly have a major impact on the taxon with the smaller EOO than the taxon with the larger EOO: Threatening event AOO = 10x4 = 40 km 2 EOO = 34 km² 19 AOO = 10x4 = 40 km 2 EOO = 105 km²

Grid Cells 16 units² Area of Occupancy Problems of Scale Grid Cell = 1 unit² AOO = 3 x 16 = 48 units 2 20 AOO = 10 x 1 = 10 units 2 In many cases, a grid size of 2 km (i.e., cell area 4 km²) is an appropriate scale.

Location Location is a geographically or ecologically distinct area in which a single threatening event can rapidly affect all individuals of the taxon. 21

Location Invasive species 2 locations 22

Location Pollution 4 locations 23

Location 4-5 locations Pollution 24

Criterion B Based on either of two sub-criteria: B1: Estimated extent of occurrence AND / OR B2: Estimated area of occupancy AND at least TWO of a-c: a. Severely fragmented or few locations b. Continuing decline c. Extreme fluctuations 25

Criterion B CR Subcriterion B1 Extent of occurrence estimated to be: < 100 km² Subcriterion B2 Area of occupancy estimated to be: < 10 km² EN < 5,000 km² < 500 km² VU < 20,000 km² < 2,000 km² 26

Criterion B AND at least TWO of a, b or c: CR EN a. Severely fragmented or # locations: 5 VU 10 1 b. Continuing decline in any of the following: (i) EOO (ii) AOO (iii)area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) # locations or subpopulations (v) # mature individuals c. Extreme fluctuation in any of the following: (i) EOO (ii) AOO (iii) # locations or subpopulations (iv) # mature individuals 27

Use any of the criteria A-E Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) AND/OR B2 (area of occupancy) B1.. Extent of occurrence < 100 km² < 5,000 km² < 20,000 km² B2.. Area of occupancy < 10 km² < 500 km² < 2,000 km² AND at least 2 of the following (a) Severely fragmented, OR Number of locations = 1 5 10 (b) Continuing decline in any of: (i) extent of occurrence; (ii) area of occupancy; (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat; (iv) number of locations or subpopulations; (v) number of mature individuals (c) Extreme fluctuations in any of: (i) extent of occurrence; (ii) area of occupancy; (iii) number of locations or subpopulations; (iv) number of mature individuals 28

Case Study Taylor s Salamander Ambystoma taylori 29

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Taxonomy Based on both allozymes and mtdna, this is a very distinctive salamander. The Ambystoma salamanders occurring in other natural lakes around Alchichica are not closely related to this species. Range: Taylor s salamander is endemic to Lake Alchichica, a saline crater lake located in eastern Puebla, Mexico, at 2,290 m above sea level. The Ambystoma salamanders occurring in the other natural lakes around Alchichica are not closely related to this species. The surface area of the lake is 2.3 km². 30

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Population Even at its only known locality this is a rare species, although formerly it was common there. Divers deep in the lake have seen the species recently. Habitat & Ecology This salamander usually does not metamorphose, and most individuals live permanently in water. But, occasional individuals have been known to metamorphose. It breeds in the lake, and is usually found in very deep water, often more than 30 m below the surface. 31

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Threats The most serious threat to the species is water extraction and diversion resulting in the lake becoming even more saline. The water level has dropped many meters over the last two decades. Continued transformation and pollution of the lake is likely to result in the disappearance of this species. Attempts to introduce fish in the lake have failed because of its salinity. Conservation Biology Taylor s salamander does not occur in any protected area. Captive breeding may be an essential short-term measure to save this species, if it is not too late. The protection of the Alchichica lake is an urgent priority. This species is protected under the category Pr (Special protection) by the Government of Mexico. 32

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Is the taxon eligible for Red List assessment? Description of the species has been published (Brandon, Maruska & Rumph, 1981). YES 33

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can criterion A be applied? (Population reduction at a specific rate over 10 years or 3 generations (whichever is longer) in the past, present, and/or future) The species was formerly common and is now rare. BUT, no indication of the time period over which a presumed decline has taken place or data to be able to estimate the scale of population decline. NO 34

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can criterion B be applied? (Restricted geographic range AND severe fragmentation, continuing decline and/or extreme fluctuations) The total lake area = 2.3 km² therefore the Critically Endangered thresholds for extent of occurrence (<100 km²) and area of occupancy (<10 km²) are both met (CR B1+2). Main threats are water extraction and pollution, which affect the whole lake and the whole population: only one location (CR B1a+2a). Habitat quality declining (water extraction causing increased salinity), declining population (now rare, ongoing habitat degradation) (CR B1b(iii,v)+2b(iii,v)). 35 YES CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v)

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can criterion C be applied? (Small population size and continuing decline) Although the population is described as rare, it is difficult to estimate actual numbers of mature individuals from this. NO 36

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can criterion D be applied? (Very small or restricted population) Population size cannot be estimated from the information given. Species is restricted to only one, small location (AOO <10 km², 1 location) (VU D2). Continued transformation and pollution of the lake is likely to result in the disappearance of this species. YES - VU D2 37

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can criterion E be applied? (Quantitative analysis estimating probability of extinction in the wild) No quantitative analysis has been carried out. NO 38

Taylor s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Criterion A: Criterion B: Criterion C: Criterion D: Criterion E: NO CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v) NO VU D2 NO Final assessment: Taylor s Salamander (Ambystoma taylori) is Critically Endangered: CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v) 39

RED LIST DOCUMENTATION An example: Tasmanian Devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) 40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Total number of species on the IUCN Red List (2000-2008) 50,000 Number of species on the Red List is increasing 45,000 NOT all are threatened 40,000 Increasing taxonomic coverage 35,000 Many are reassessments The Past: In 2008, 23,000 processed, of which almost 4,000 were new species to the Red List Not just a list Compendium of rich information including maps to inform conservation work Number of species 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2000 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 48

Terrestrial biodiversity (6,260) (9,990) (5,488) (910) 49

Freshwater biodiversity Darwall et al. 50

The Past: 51

Red List Web Site Assessments and data available for download on the internet - www.iucnredlist.org 52

2000 2009 53