Over 30 Years of Service. Lincoln Animal Control 2008 Annual Report

Similar documents
Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Municipal Animal Control in New Jersey, Best Practices March 2018

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

City of Burleson, Texas

City of Burleson, Texas

Animal Services Department

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

Winnebago County Animal Services

2015 Activity Report City of Greater Sudbury

Animal Control Budget Unit 2760

Winnebago County Animal Services

2017 Super Survey. Agency Information Super Survey. Profile of Your Agency. * 1. Address

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT

ANTIOCH ANIMAL SERVICES

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

Vicious Dog Ordinance

Service Business Plan

TITLE 10 - ANIMAL CONTROL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

Grant ID: 220. Application Information. Demographics.

1999 Severe Animal Attack and Bite Surveillance Summary

1701-definition 1702-Licensing 1703-Permits 1704-Rabies Control 1705-Notice to Licensing Authority and Animal Bites 1706Dog or cats Bitten by Rabid

LEON COUNTY Reference: Reference: COMPREHENSIVE STATE NATIONAL EMERGENCY CEMP RESPONSE PLAN MANAGEMENT PLAN ESF 17 ANNEX 17 ANIMAL ISSUES

Field Services. Timeline. Objectives. ANIMAL SERVICES Original Mission ROCHESTER ANIMAL SERVICES

Truly Targeted Spay/Neuter

Montgomery County Animal Care and Control

TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

City of Grand Island

A Case Study of the Effectiveness of TNR on a Feral Cat Colony

Building Responsible Pet Ownership Communities The Calgary Model. Thursday, October 22, 15

ANIMAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT 201 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA (661)

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Your best friend s best chance to make it home safely is to be properly licensed.

Total Funding Requested: $25, Putnam County Board of County Commissioners.

MORE DOGS THAN BONES DOG OVERPOPULATION ON THE NAVAJO RESERVATION A PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY BY EMMA KISIEL

SEMINOLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANIMAL SERVICES LIMITED REVIEW OF ANIMAL DISPOSITION REPORT NO APRIL 2009

NICK CULLEN INTERIM DIRECTOR

*FB Regulation FB Regulation February Medical Services Animal Control

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

PUBLIC AGENDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ANIMAL CONTROL. Thursday, April 27, 2017, 11:30 a.m. Committee Room E, Ground Floor, City Hall Committee Members:

Animal Care And Control Department

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

September 10, 2013 WORK SESSION AGENDA. 1:00 5:00 p.m. Time Certain

Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS

NICK CULLEN INTERIM DIRECTOR

Department of Code Compliance

ORDINANCE #1 TOWN OF WOLF RIVER DOG ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE

Volunteer Services for Animals, Inc.

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

Stockton Animal Shelter Operations. City Council May 23, 2017 Study Session

MEMORANDUM. The Honorable Carrie M. Austin Chairman, Committee on the Budget and Government Operations

TOWN OF PINE LAKE DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE ORDINANCE #05-02

90.10 Establishment or maintenance of boarding or breeding kennels

CHAPTER 351. LICENSING, REGULATING, AND MAINTENANCE OF DOGS AND CATS.

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF POWASSAN BY-LAW NO ***********************************************************************

A review of the sequence of events and findings for the May 2 animal attack on Antoinette Brown is attached for your review.

NICK CULLEN INTERIM DIRECTOR

Dallas Animal Services Update. Presented to the Quality of Life & Government Services Committee March 23, 2009

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 23, 2013

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE NO DANGEROUS ANIMALS, ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITED ANIMALS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

Organization Business Address: 965 Pondella Rd. State: Florida Zip: Phone (xxx xxx xxxx): Fax:

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

State: FL Zip: Phone (xxx-xxx-xxxx): Dates of Last Fiscal Year: Begin: 01/01/14 End: 12/31/14

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

ARTICLE 5 HEALTH CHAPTER 8 ANIMALS

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

Subject ANIMAL BITES, ABUSE, CRUELTY & SEVERE NEGLECT. 12 August By Order of the Police Commissioner

Total Funding Requested: $25, Pasco County Board of County Commissioners

Animal Control Working Group Public Hearing City Council Chambers 55 West Tompkins Street, Galesburg, Illinois May 8, :00 p.m.

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 7.05 OF THE SPEEDWAY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ANIMALS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE 237 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE IV MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH CHAPTER 1 ANIMAL CONTROL

Selected City Codes Regulating Livestock and Fowl. for the City of Ethridge Tennessee

Transcription:

Over 30 Years of Service Lincoln Animal Control 2008 Annual Report

Animal Control Support City of Lincoln Mayor Chris Beutler City Council Chair Robin Eschliman Vice Chair Doug Emery Members Jon Camp Jonathan Cook John Spatz Ken R. Svoboda Dan Marvin Board of Health President Lisa Peterson, M.D. Vice Presisdent Tony Messineo, City Councilperson Ken R. Svoboda Mayor s Office Rick Hoppe, ex-officio Members Heidi Stark, D.D.S. Rodrigo Cantarero, Ph.D. Karla Lester, M.D. Deb Schorr Hena Roy, M.D. Ed Schneider, O.D. City Attorney Tonya Skinner, ex-officio County Attorney Kristy Mundt, ex-officio Animal Control Advisory Committee Chair Gary Foster Vice Chair Dave Cygan Members Robin Dishman, D.V.M Brad Gengenbach, D.V.M Beth Boal Scott Besch Diane Gritz Lynne Knutzen Dian Quist Sulek Wilma White Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department Health Director, Bruce Dart, Ph.D. Animal Control Division Staff Division Manager Robert Westfall Field Supervisor Scott Lowry Animal Control Officers Kurt Dodd Jesse Dunn DeMon Wimes Cheryl Bomberger Diane Hoy Randy Sipp Kris Johnson Office Manager Denise Bollwitt Office Dispatch/Licensing Sarah Neujahr Hayley Morinelli Patti Buechel Sign Installer/ License Defects Brian Field Media Intern Meghan Francis 2

Animal Control The Lincoln Animal Control Division was formed within the Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department in 1977. The program occupies a unique position within the community. It combines the activities of a law enforcement agency that protects people and their property, with a humane organization that protects animals. Pets can provide significant benefits to families. Yet, when pets are not properly cared for, they can become not only a nuisance, but a threat to the health and safety of surrounding neighbors. Irresponsible pet ownership and pet overpopulation are the main reasons why Lincoln has an Animal Control Division. Mission The mission of the Lincoln Animal Control Division is to promote the quality of life by providing public health and safety enforcement and education. Animal Control also strives to protect the rights of animal owners and non-owners, and seeks to ensure that animals receive proper treatment and care. Goals The Lincoln Animal Control program has set goals to balance the health, safety, and welfare needs of people and animals within the City of Lincoln. The Animal Control Division operates with the following goals in mind: Protect the rights of people from the dangers and nuisances caused by uncontrolled animals. Ensure the legal protection of animals from mistreatment. Promote, motivate, and enforce responsible pet ownership. Provide animal related services to the citizens of Lincoln Educate the public through presentations and public relations. Respond to any citizen question or refer them to the correct agency for the answer. Provide lost and found service for returning lost pets to owners. Provide services and enforcement in a courteous, professional, and effective manner. Visions for the Future Animal Control looks for the day when all citizens, their property, and their neighborhoods will be safe from the dangers and nuisances of irresponsible pet ownership. Animal Control staff hopes that every pet born will be assured a good home and care for all of its natural life and that the spaying/neutering of pets will become a majority choice by owners. Animal Control staff looks for the day when animals will not suffer because of human abuse, neglect, or ignorance. Animal Control staff believes that success will come only when animals will not have to be euthanized, unless it is an escape from suffering or that it is necessary for the safety of people and animals. Animal Control staff hopes that all owners will pick up after their pets so that Lincoln will be a cleaner, healthier place to live. 3

Enforcement and Service Activities The total number of cases for was 16,262 compared to 17,443 for FY 2007, or a 6.8% decrease. Factors contributing to the decrease were the loss of Animal Control officers and a dispatcher, which resulted in decreased weekend service hours. Additionally due to the unresolved kenneling issue, the renting of traps for cats and response to certain stray dog calls were discontinued in May of 2006 to reduce the number of impounded animals. 2,500 Number of Cases or Service Requests Number of Field Cases Processed Made by Animal Control Officers 2,250 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1,429 1,629 1,214 782 1,112 947 1,210 1,100 1,555 1,688 1,936 1,660 FY 2007 1,374 1,331 1,273 1,277 1,369 1,055 1,486 1,533 1,906 1,605 1,751 1,483 FY 2006 1,770 1,781 1,405 1,219 1,182 1,044 1,325 1,524 1,883 1,936 1,595 1,614 FY 2005 1,764 1,674 1,595 1,373 1,112 1,421 1,790 1,717 1,971 2,265 2,142 2,054 4

Major Categories of Service Requests 4,717 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 3,070 3,507 3,549 3,672 2,671 3,436 1,701 1,779 1,941 1,907 744 874 1,049 1,357 1,297 1,443 1,531 1,616 873 808 750 1,007 1,509 1,380 1,555 1,967 2,080 1,321 1,359 1,413 1,546 1,078 1,414 1,556 1,559 309 231 269 289 67 58 39 35 Bite & Attack Invest. Injured Animal Confined Animal At Large -- Owner Known Wildlife Removal Stray -- Owner Unknown Dead Animal Neglect/Cruelty/Abandon Noise Sanitation Poop Scooper 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Note: FY 2005 values reflect changes made in software which documents actual number of investigations required for each request/case. Total Field Responses Made by Officers by Day of Week FY 2003 - Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1297 2846 2866 2751 2591 2147 1174 FY 2007 983 3557 3233 3331 2692 2480 1168 FY 2006 1706 3042 2841 3117 3033 2549 1991 FY 2005 1907 3241 3462 3253 3401 3242 2372 FY 2004 2085 2980 4231 3522 3941 3784 2935 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 FY 2004 Due to budget reduction of staff, hours for Saturday and Sunday were reduced from 7 am-11:30 pm to 8:30 am-5 pm. 5

Monthly Phone Inquiries Received Information & Service Calls 8,000 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 FY 2004 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 3644 3780 3826 2769 2824 2074 3432 4026 4269 3684 3001 3489 FY 2007 3662 3600 3016 2726 2894 2544 3747 3904 4821 4420 3780 2773 FY 2006 3827 4187 3479 3610 3035 2895 3680 3703 4903 5495 3754 3685 FY 2005 3423 3614 3418 3129 2469 2968 3487 4231 4610 4536 4405 4569 FY 2004 5992 4705 3523 3446 3399 3171 3923 4177 4960 5556 4903 3834 NOTE: A total of 40,818 phone calls were received for services and information in vs 41,887in FY 2007 1,176 1,280 1,394 1,421 1,4961,486 Calls by Hour 1,347 952 1,036 790 779 7:00am - 7:59am 8:00am - 8:59am 9:00am - 9:59am 10:00am - 10:59am 11:00am - 11:59am 12:00pm - 12:59pm 1:00pm - 1:59pm 2:00pm - 2:59pm 3:00pm - 3:59pm 4:00pm - 4:59pm 5:00pm - 5:59pm 602 504 437 6:00pm - 6:59pm 7:00pm - 7:59pm 8:00pm - 8:59pm 9:00pm - 9:59pm 10:00pm - 10:59pm 357 241 92 49 32 19 19 15 10 11:00pm - 11:59pm 12:00am - 12:59am 1:00am - 1:59am 2:00am - 2:59am 3:00am - 3:59am 4:00am - 4:59am 5:00am - 5:59am 6:00am - 6:59am 135 6

Impounded Animals The total number of animals impounded in 2008 increased by 7% with dog impoundments increasing by 6.8% and cat impoundments increasing by 9%. The percentage of impounded dogs claimed increased from 59.8% in 2007 to 59.9% in 2008. The claim rate for impounded cats decreased from 10.3% in 2007 to 6.4% in 2008. Dogs Impounded by Month Total Impounded at Shelter 250 200 150 100 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 172 204 150 106 124 131 207 174 203 194 231 178 FY 2007 166 160 138 123 110 119 185 147 234 181 191 200 FY 2006 198 198 205 153 162 132 206 209 206 228 204 193 FY 2005 205 199 175 161 122 180 182 240 213 219 230 205 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 7

70 Claim Rate of Impounded Dogs Dogs Claimed by Owners at Shelter Claim Rate Percentage 65 60 55 50 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 Disposition of Impounded Dogs Animals Claimed, Adopted and Euthanized Claimed 59.9% Claimed 59.8% Euthanized 20.1% Adopted 20.0% Euthanized 16.2% Adopted 24.0% FY 2007-2008 FY 2006-2007 8

Pitbull Impoundment Percentages Purebred and Mixed Breed Stray 31.9% Stray 14.9% At Large 5.4% At Large 10.6% Confined 42.0% Other 20.8% Confined 59.6% FY 2007 Other 14.9% Stray 26.6% At Large 7.7% Other 19.4% Confined 52.0% FY 2006 Other 17.3% At Large 4.1% Stray 27.0% FY 2005 Confined 46.0% Pitbull Impoundment Data Purebred and Mixed Breed FY 2005 19 48 67 114 FY 2006 11 47 72 141 FY 2007 30 42 42 168 18 70 107 141 At Large Stray Confined Other 9

Pitbull Impoundment Data Purebred only FY 2005 18 55 76 38 FY 2006 7 37 52 87 FY 2007 29 32 32 106 14 58 69 102 At Large Stray Confined Other Pitbull Impoundment Percentages Purebred only Stray 28.4% At Large 5.8% Stray 16.1% At Large 14.6% Confined 42.0% Stray 28.4% At Large 3.8% Other 23.9% Confined 53.3% FY 2007 Other 20.2% Stray 29.4% Other 16.1% At Large 9.6% Confined 47.5% Confined 40.6% FY 2006 FY 2005 Other 20.3% 10

300 Cats Impounded by Month Total Impounded at Shelter 250 200 150 100 50 0 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 183 189 141 104 115 100 116 103 142 166 189 165 FY 2007 170 149 123 108 104 63 98 96 133 174 182 159 FY 2006 209 209 183 119 109 50 99 114 123 122 149 162 FY 2005 210 204 184 139 110 115 104 103 141 174 202 185 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 Euthanized 73.2% Disposition of Impounded Cats Animals Claimed, Adopted, and Euthanized Euthanized 63.9% Claimed 6.4% Claimed 10.3% Claim Rate of Impounded Cats Cats Claimed by Owners at Shelter Adopted 20.4% Adopted 25.8% FY 2007-2008 FY 2006-2007 20 Claim Rate Percentage 15 10 5 0 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 According to the Humane Society of the United States, the national claim rate for cats is 2-5%. 11

What Happens to Animals Animal Control Data 57.2% 61.0% 27.5% 6.9% 1.5% 3.3% 3.6% 22.7% 6.8% 1.8% 3.6% 4.1% FY 2007 Delivered to Shelter Dead on Arrival Release to Wildlife Not Apprehended Delivered Home Injured to Vet What Happens to Impounded Animals Animal Control Data 35.3% 32.7% 41.2% 34.9% 5.5% 19.5% 6.6% 24.3% FY 2007 Euthanized Claimed Adopted Delivered Home 12

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007 2006 2005 2004 Bats Tested for Rabies By Month by Fiscal Year September October November December January February March April May June July August 23 4 5 9 15 8 5 5 9 20 18 90 2007 20 7 8 10 10 7 8 2 24 21 17 79 2006 17 4 4 20 8 7 4 10 11 18 15 89 2005 9 1 2 1 4 2 2 5 10 7 6 46 2004 7 5 5 3 1 4 5 3 4 6 3 13 NOTES: : Positive Results: Big Brown Bat September 2, Red Bat September 3, Big Brown Bat October 29, Big Brown Bat May 30, Big Brown Bat July 28, Big Brown Bat August 8 FY 2007: Positive Results: Big Brown Bat July 9, Big Brown Bat August 13, Big Brown Bat August 22, Hoary Bat August 26 FY 2006: No Positive Results FY 2005: Positive Results: Big Brown Bat June 9 FY 2004: Positive Results: Big Brown Bat April 9 and Red Bat July 22 13

Comparison of Animals Claimed Cats & Dogs Claimed and Unclaimed Dogs Claimed 1089 1179 1650 1488 1421 Dogs Unclaimed 751 685 751 732 793 Cats Claimed 208 173 182 155 107 Cats Unclaimed 1531 1367 1352 1556 1725 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Total Animals Impounded Includes Dogs, Cats and Other Animals Comparison of Fiscal Years 3,915 4,145 3,918 3,817 3,644 3,677 3,988 4,248 4,539 4,357 4,065 3,624 3,893 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 Number Impounded 14

Bite Investigations 250 Where Bites Occur FY 2007 200 198 150 155 100 72 50 0 35 48 9 10 30 25 9 12 28 37 8 10 48 15 5 2 11 42 52 Unfenced Backyard Driveway Front Yard Inside Leashed -- Being Walked Off Property Porch Sidewalk -- At Large Tied Up in Yard In Fenced Yard Other Comparison of Bite Causes 57.6% 73.3% 8.3% 1.6% 12.4% 34.1% 12.7% Cats Dogs Unprovoked Provoked Unable to Confirm Unintentionally Provoked 15

Age of Human Victim Bitten by Animal (A bite indicates the skin was broken on victim) 2007 2008 91 Number of Bites 78 53 42 37 32 27 21 64 55 49 50 39 29 38 38 25 24 Dog 78.0% Type of Animal Involved in Biting Incident Data Comparison Dog 73.6% Infant - 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-6061 & Older Victim Age Group NOTE: Of the 345 human victims, 48.4% were females & 51.6% were males in as compared to 48.6% females & 51.5% males in FY 2007 (447 victims). Other Animals 1.9% Other Animals 3.1% Cat 20.1% Cat 23.3% FY 2007 Sex of Identified Biting Animal Fiscal Year 2008 Female Cat 5 14 Unaltered Altered Pet Male Cat 8 17 Female Dog 55 89 Male Dog 60 71 The computer license records indicate the following Dogs Unaltered = 17.4% Cats Unaltered = 2.6% Dogs Altered = 82.6% Cats Altered = 97.4% NOTE: The above may be distorted due to the high percentage of altered animals and animals not found after a bite incident. A total of 43 cats and 57 dogs were not located. 16

100 Age of Dog Involved in Bite Comparison of FY 2005, FY 2006, FY 2007 and 90 80 Frequency of Bites 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Age of Animal (years) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 85 63 41 32 23 22 19 11 7 10 6 4 2 3 2 0 0 FY 2007 89 67 53 39 35 28 18 13 17 12 7 4 0 1 1 1 0 FY 2006 87 79 60 39 35 24 19 17 11 12 13 8 5 5 1 0 0 FY 2005 78 79 64 40 30 27 28 21 8 11 11 8 2 2 2 1 0 80 70 Age of Cat Involved in Bite Comparison of FY 2005, FY 2006, FY 2007 and Frequency of Bites 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Age of Animal (years) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 44 8 6 3 3 2 2 1 3 2 5 0 2 1 2 1 0 FY 2007 61 14 7 11 4 1 2 3 6 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 FY 2006 51 18 2 2 4 8 3 6 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 FY 2005 53 12 6 10 9 5 5 3 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 17

Animal Licensed at Time of Bite Incident 50.6% 17.3% 25.9% 23.5% 36.6% 46.1% Cats Note: Unknown cats and dogs were less than 6 months of age and therefore unlicensed. 29.6% were less than one year of age. Dogs Stray - Not Captured Not Licensed Licensed Rabies Vaccination Current at Time of Bite Incident 50.6% 17.3% 24.5% 30.6% 18.8% 58.2% Cats Dogs Stray - Unknown status Current Not Current 18

Dog Breeds Having Highest Share of Bites Bites Reported vs. Top 10 Breeds Total by License File Fiscal Year 2008 Dog Breed Number of Bites Number of Bites FY 2007 Breed Total (Based on FY 08 License File) Percentage Bites per Breed 2008 Data Reported Attacks by Breed FY 2008 Pitbull 52 44 701 7.4% 16 Labrador-X 19 26 1,775 1.1% 10 Labrador Retriever 19 21 3,673 0.5% 6 German Shepherd-X 11 7 538 2% 3 Rottweiler 11 8 246 4.5% 3 German Shepherd 10 22 701 1.4% 6 Pitbull-X 8 12 157 5.1% 4 Australian Shepherd-X 8 0 190 4.2% 0 Rat Terrier 7 9 853 0.8% 7 Boxer 7 4 852 0.8% 3 NOTE: Bites are incidents in which the skin is broken. Attacks are incidents in which the dog mouthed or threatened the victim. Sex and Age of Human Victim Bitten by Animal Number of Bites 24 15 16 23 27 15 15 17 14 30 25 15 24 17 Female Male 15 12 10 11 13 7 Infant 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61 & Older NOTE: Of the 345 human victims, 48.4% were females & 51.6% were males in FY 2008 as compared to 48.6% females & 51.5% males in FY 2007 (447 victims). 19

Comparison of Bites per Population Inflicted on Humans and Other Animals per 100,000 People Bites Bites/100,000 555 558 516 483 530 531 560 523 545 523 415 259 257 228 215 232 225 235 219 225 217 165 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 Comparison of Reported Bites Total Bites per Fiscal Year - City of Lincoln Number of Reported Bites 544 555 558 516 483 530 531 560 523 545 523 415 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 20

$1,052,550 Revenue Collection and Generation Activity Animal Control Revenue and Funding Services As budgeted for Fiscal Year 2008 $371,703 $65,000 $11,225 $7,500 $10,000 License Fees Fund/Interest Bal. General Fund Permit/Regist. Fees Impoundment Fees Service Fees Cost of Animal Control Services Per Capita (General Tax Fund) $1.49 Animal Control Revenue Comparison Actual User Fees Generated Permit & Services $15,859 Impoundment $51,322 License $1,055,387 Impoundment $59,618 Permit & Services $13,163 License $986,311 FY 2007 21

Animal Control Actual Expenditure Comparison Personnel 57.7% Personnel 57.4% Capital Outlay 0.1% Supplies 4.9% FY 07-08 Services 37.3% Supplies 4.4% Services 38.2% FY 06-07 Summary of Licenses Fiscal Year 2008 September-August Number of Animals by Type and Fee Number of Dogs Licensed Total (Dogs) Number of Cats Licensed Total (Cats) Total Cats and Dogs Licensed Total Whole - Regular Fee 5,543 $175,548.50 510 $15,812.50 6,053 $191,361.00 Neutered - Regular Fee 24,866 $392,672.75 17,462 $277,604.25 42,328 $670,277.00 Whole - Reduced Fee 491 $13,151.00 35 $946.00 526 $14,097.00 Neutered - Reduced Fee 3,734 $49,976.00 2,811 $37,372.00 6,545 $87,438.00 Total Number of License Receipts Issued 34,634 $631,348.25 20,818 $331,734.75 55,452 $963,083.00 Total $5 Late Fees Collected 2,072 $7,920.00 1,257 $4,633.00 3,329 $12,553.00 Total $10 Late Fees Collected 1,164 $8,439.00 807 $5,931.00 1,971 $14,370.00 Total $15 Late Fees Collected 1,835 $21,703.00 1,143 $13,377.00 2,978 $35,080.00 Total License Revenue Collected Average Value of License Collected (Total Revenue/Total Animals Licensed) 34,634 $669,410.25 20,818 $355,675.75 55,452 $1,025,086.00 $19.32 $17.08 $18.48 Donation Amounts 2,101 $16,727.29 22

3,261 3,226 3,227 3,084 3,069 2,966 Sex of Unaltered Licensed Pets Comparison of Fiscal Year 2003 - Fiscal Year 2008 2,463 2,484 2,483 2,424 2,355 2,255 300 339 343 360 333 343 175 181 166 192 170 209 Male Dog Female Dog Male Cat Female Cat FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 FY 2004 FY 2003 License Follow-ups Made by Officers Field Activity - Stops at Residence 5,672 Licenses Sold 4,780 2,725 2,975 2,739 3,046 4,230 3,088 2,557 2,071 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 23

Licenses Sold by Fiscal Year 50,483 51,371 48,241 44,632 44,882 45,508 46,317 53,857 54,942 55,477 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01 FY 01-02 FY 02-03 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 Completed Surgeries from Spay/Neuter Grant 25 Comparison of FY 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 20 15 10 2005 5 2006 2007 0 2008 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2005 19 8 18 8 7 18 12 9 0 * * * 2006 12 11 6 4 4 20 11 5 9 4 5 4 2007 8 13 10 6 7 11 19 10 16 13 7 * 2008 10 9 7 1 9 9 14 20 14 11 4 12 *Note: Grant Funds Expended 24

Fiscal Year Statistics September-August Impoundment Dogs picked up Dogs claimed at shelter Percentage claimed Avg. days impounded Dogs unclaimed Dogs adopted Dogs euthanized Cats picked up Cats claimed at shelter Percentage claimed Avg. days impounded Cats unclaimed Cats adopted Cats euthanized Other animals impounded Cost of aminal per day Calls Cases dispatched/ processed Bite cases reported Attacks (skin unbroken) Dead animals picked up Injured animal responses Neglect Wildlife Animals delivered home Noise complaints Average response time (min.) 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 2,401 2,334* 2,294** 1,954*** 2,074**** 1,650 1,488 1,353 1,079 1,179 68.7% 63.8% 59.0% 55.2% 59.8% 3.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 751 685 667 717 79. 371 337 392 429 395 380 348 275 288 398 1,933 1,871* 1,648** 1,559*** 1,713**** 208 173 174 154 107 10.8% 9.2% 10.6% 9.99% 6.4% 5.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 1,725 1,531 1,202 1,307 1,556 441 383 333 380 339 1,284 1,148 869 927 1,217 205 152 123 110 106 $8.15 $16.31**** $19.80*** $22.77**** $26.23***** 23,811 560 154 2,429 1,342 885 680 300 870 34.0 20,878 543 128 2,398 1,206 980 545 312 869 25.0 18,278 543 141 2,188 949 1,001 396 262 915 38.0 17.433 524 127 1,620 798 879 394 199 633 31.0 15,670 424 115 1,391 651 828 419 261 568 39.0 License Sales and Enforcement Total licenses sold Total license follow-ups Total defect/warning tickets Total citations issued Mileage Total miles driven Permits Pet shops/groom shops Livestock animals & fowl Cat kennel Exhibit/ride Multi cat Rescue organization 50,487 5,672 5,810 1,224 51,371 4,276 4,344 748 53,857 3,088 4,041 523 54,942 2,557 6,969 353 55,477 2,071 4,126 292 146,366 140,879 123,701 102,724 101,751 28 16 6 3 49 7 29 17 15 4 53 5 29 13 12 3 51 5 25 12 8 1 50 5 25 13 6 2 52 5 * Status of 161 dogs and 167 cats were not determined at the time of this report. **Status of 274 and 272 cats were not determined at the time of this report. ***Status of 158 and 98 cats were not determined at the time of this report. ****Status of 102 dogs and 50 cats were not determined at the time of this report. *****Reflects change in computer program which now limits to only days held in city custody. 25