Trilateral Committee Meeting May 16-19, 2016 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Update

Similar documents
Mission Partnering for over Twenty Years: Flat-tailed Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) Management. Robert E. Lovich & Michel Remington

Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Project Monthly Update May 1-31, 2016

[Docket No. FWS-R2-ES ; FXES FF09E42000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revision to the Regulations for

Oregon Wolf Management Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, January 2016

Landscape-level models of potential habitat for Sonoran pronghorn

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Revision to the. Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION, NOMENCLATURE, DESCRIPTION, RANGE

SLOW DOWN, LOVE WIZARD. HERE S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE HORNED LIZARD.

Rio Sonoyta Mud Turtle

Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Project Monthly Update March 1-31, 2015

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF APACHE COUNTY P.O. BOX 428 ST. JOHNS, ARIZONA TELEPHONE: (928) FACSIMILE: (928)

RECOMMENDED STANDARD MITIGATION MEASURES FOR PROJECTS IN SONORAN DESERT TORTOISE HABITAT

Re: Proposed Revision To the Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf

Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: Progress Report 7. Reporting Period: January 1 December 31, 2004

Recognizing that the government of Mexico lists the loggerhead as in danger of extinction ; and

More panthers, more roadkills Florida panthers once ranged throughout the entire southeastern United States, from South Carolina

Structured Decision Making: A Vehicle for Political Manipulation of Science May 2013

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

Loss of wildlands could increase wolf-human conflicts, PA G E 4 A conversation about red wolf recovery, PA G E 8

MODULE 3. What is conflict?

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION, NOMENCLATURE, DESCRIPTION, RANGE

Mexican Gray Wolf Endangered Population Modeling in the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area

Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction

Mexican Wolf Experimental Population Area Initial Release and Translocation Proposal for 2018

Dr. Nicki Frey, Utah state University

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

A Slithering Success Story

OPINIONS BY MARK C. JORGENSEN MAY 2, 2012

Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: Progress Report #18. Reporting Period: January 1 December 31, 2015

Wolf Recovery Survey New Mexico. June 2008 Research & Polling, Inc.

Tagging Study on Green Turtle (Chel Thameehla Island, Myanmar. Proceedings of the 5th Internationa. SEASTAR2000 workshop) (2010): 15-19

Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management 2014 Annual Report

Promoting One Health : the international perspective OIE

WILD HORSES AND BURROS

Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: Progress Report #8. Reporting Period: January 1 December 31, 2005

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Animal Abstract Element Code: ARACF13010 Data Sensitivity: No

Comments on Black-footed Ferret Recovery Plan Second Revision (Docket #: FWS R6 ES 2013 N017)

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. California Part 1. December 2015

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION, NOMENCLATURE, DESCRIPTION, RANGE

The Peregrine Falcon. BY: Alicia Saichareune

LEAST TERN AND PIPING PLOVER NEST MONITORING FINAL REPORT 2012

Oakland Police Department. Bureau of Services. Animal Services

A.8 AMERICAN PEREGRINE FALCON (FALCO PEREGRINUS ANATUM)

May Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor,

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge 2004 Bald Eagle Nesting and Productivity Survey

110th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1464

Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge s Ocelots

Antimicrobial resistance: the challenges for animal health

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme

Conservation Genetics. Taylor Edwards University of Arizona Human Origins Genotyping Laboratory

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 53, No th March, NOTICE THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SPECIES (OLIVE RIDLEY TURTLE) NOTICE, 2014

1 Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Inc. v. Servheen, 665 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 2011). Heather Baltes I. INTRODUCTION

Lower Snake Spring Chinook

Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: Progress Report 5. Reporting Period: January 1 December 31, 2002

Regulating the scientific use of animals taken from the wild Implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU

Gopher Tortoise Minimum Viable Population and Minimum Reserve Size Working Group Report

ODFW Non-Lethal Measures to Minimize Wolf-Livestock Conflict 10/14/2016

Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project (FERC No ) Desert Tortoise Study Plan

Whose side are they on? Four States Efforts to Derail Wolf Recovery

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-month Finding on a Petition to List

Erin Maggiulli. Scientific Name (Genus species) Lepidochelys kempii. Characteristics & Traits

Commercial Pink Shrimp Fishery Management

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii),

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study

Mississippi Shrimp Summary Action Plan Marine Advancement Plan (MAP)

Madagascar Spider Tortoise Updated: January 12, 2019

Making Peace with Geese. Presented by: Jessica Blackledge, District Manager Eastern RI Conservation District

Since 1963, Department of Fisheries (DOF) has taken up a project to breed and protect sea Turtles on Thameehla island.

Florida s Imperiled Species Management Program Overview

OIE global strategy for rabies control, including regional vaccine banks

Internship Report: Raptor Conservation in Bulgaria

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Area-Specific Wolf Conflict Deterrence Plan Silver Lake Wolves Area 10/24/2016

Third Annual Conference on Animals and the Law

Motuora island reptile monitoring report for common & Pacific gecko 2016

Marine Turtle Research Program

Title of Project: Distribution of the Collared Lizard, Crotophytus collaris, in the Arkansas River Valley and Ouachita Mountains

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Dall s Sheep Distribution and Abundance Study Plan Section Initial Study Report

People around the world should be striving to preserve a healthy environment for both humans and

Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes

NAP on AMR: Singapore

DRAFT PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN. POPS Advisory Committee October 30, 2017

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

PROJECT DOCUMENT. Project Leader

DEPARTMENT 4 - SHEEP HEALTH RULES FOR SHEEP

Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project Interagency Field Team Annual Report Reporting Period: January 1 December 31, 2005

Kori Bustard Husbandry. Sara Hallager, Biologist, Smithsonian National Zoological Park

A California Education Project of Felidae Conservation Fund by Jeanne Wetzel Chinn 12/3/2012

Island Fox Update 2011

A New Approach for Managing Bovine Tuberculosis: Veterinary Services Proposed Action Plan

Rapid City, South Dakota Waterfowl Management Plan March 25, 2009

FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

Koala Monitoring Program

A.13 BLAINVILLE S HORNED LIZARD (PHRYNOSOMA BLAINVILLII)

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE THE AUSTRALIAN CONTEXT. Professor Brendan Murphy Australian Government Chief Medical Officer

High Risk Behavior for Wild Sheep: Contact with Domestic Sheep and Goats

Field report to Belize Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society

Transcription:

Trilateral Committee Meeting May 16-19, 2016 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Update

Binational Cooperators Arizona Game and Fish Department FWS - Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge NPS - Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument DOD - Barry M. Goldwater Range / Yuma Proving Grounds Pinacate Biosphere Reserve (CONANP) Comisión de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable de Sonora (CEDES) Dirección General de Vida Silvestre (DGVS) Border Patrol, BLM, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, Phoenix Zoological Park, Los Angeles Zoological Park.

Historical and Current Range of Sonoran Pronghorn

Drastic declines of Sonoran Pronghorn in Arizona 1994-2002

Kofa NWR Current Distribution Cabeza Prieta NWR

Captive Breeding Program - CPNWR In 2004, a semi-captive breeding program was started at CPNWR (1 sq mile / two halves) with some animals from Mexico. 6ft tall livestock fence 4ft strip of shade (visual barrier) Double electrified wire fence CPNWR

Captive Breeding Program - KNWR In 2011, a second breeding pen was established at KNWR (halfsquare mile) KNWR KNWR

Captive Breeding Activities 1) In the pen BOMAS separation of the yearlings born last year in one section, are captured, ear tagged and moved into a different section to decrease the harassment to pregnant females and young fawns born this year 2) Water projects 3) Forage enhancements

Population monitoring within and outside pens

Translocations from the pens to other areas in southwestern Arizona

Sonoran Pronghorn Released from Captive Breeding Pens in Arizona Year Total Released Total Survived 2006/07 4 4 2007/08 5 2 2008/09 12 7 2009/10 23 10 2010/11 18 11 2011/12 11 9 2012/13 18 13 2013/14 37 35 2014/15 32 32 2015/16 49 47 TOTAL 209 170

Successful Captive Breeding Program As of March of 2016 there are 75 pronghorns in the pens at CPNWR and 40 in the pen at Kofa NWR. Total = 115 Approximately 375 animals in the wild (Grand Total in AZ = 490 from 21 in 2002).

Aerial Surveys in Sonora (2015) The range-wide survey in Sonora was completed November 18 21, 2015 In Quitovac the population estimate was 862. The population estimate in El Pinacate was 117.

2015 Sonora Fawn Recruitment Surveys AGFD and CEDES personnel conducted fawn recruitment surveys on June 15-17, in the Quitovac area, east of Highway 8. A total of 99 pronghorn were observed in 33 groups. In areas classified as having habitat in good condition, 23 fawns were seen with 27 does for an 85.1 fawn/100 to doe ratio. In areas classified as having fair or poor habitat quality, only 5 fawns were seen with 18 does, for a ratio of 27.7 fawns/100 does. Overall, the fawn to doe ratio was 62.2 fawns per 100 does. A second fawn survey was conducted in Sonora in October of 2015. In the Quitovac area the fawn to doe ratio was 75:100. In the Pinacate area, 14 adult pronghorn were observed but no fawns.

Water Projects Arizona and Sonora

Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Initiatives in Sonora (El Pinacate Biosphere Reserve) 28 water projects constructed in 2014

Wildlife Crossings & Water Projects 28 Water spots

Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Initiatives in Sonora 14 wildlife crossings were constructed as part of the Highway 2 expansion project

2014 Pronghorn PACE Update Workshop AZ Contributed to update the Mexican Conservation Action Program (PACE) for the Pronghorn, including all the subspecies present in Mexico. AZ provided information on captive breeding, forage enhancement plots, supplemental feeding, and water projects. Special thanks to Mexico!

Multi-species collaborations March 19, 2015 Meeting Pinacate-ORPI-CPNWR-BP-AGFD

Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Plan update with binational components The recovery goal is to conserve and protect the Sonoran pronghorn and its habitat so that its long-term survival is secured, and it can be removed from the list of threatened and endangered species (delisted).

Recovery Objectives Ensure multiple viable populations of Sonoran pronghorn rangewide (10% probability of extinction over 50 years and a positive growth rate). Ensure that there is adequate quantity, quality, and connectivity of Sonoran pronghorn habitat to support populations. Minimize and mitigate the effects of human disturbance on Sonoran pronghorn. Identify and address priority monitoring needs. Identify and address priority research needs.

Recovery Objectives Maintain existing partnerships and develop new partnerships to support Sonoran pronghorn recovery. Secure adequate funding to implement recovery actions for Sonoran pronghorn. Practice adaptive management, in which recovery is monitored and recovery tasks are revised by the Service in coordination with the Sonoran Pronghorn Recovery Team as new information becomes available.

Recovery Criteria At least three of the four current free-ranging populations are viable for at least five out of seven years. A minimum of 90% of current Sonoran pronghorn habitat is retained, contiguous and protected. Threats to Sonoran pronghorn habitat quality in three out of four management units are stable or decreasing. Human disturbance is alleviated such that a minimum of 90% of Sonoran pronghorn habitat can be occupied by Sonoran pronghorn. Genetic diversity has been retained or increased from current levels. Laws are in place to ensure that killing of Sonoran pronghorn is prohibited or regulated.

2014 Population Estimates vs. Delisting Criteria

Requested Specific Outcomes 1) Continued support for the range wide surveys and research using GPS collars. 2) Continued support to maintain and expand the number of populations in AZ, as well as protect populations in Sonora. 3) Approval of necessary permits to conduct aerial surveys and to evaluate genetic diversity within remaining populations (U.S. and Mexico) 4) Continue with binational meetings every two years to discuss conservation efforts for pronghorn in Mexico.

Questions?