Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

Similar documents
EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Chapter 2. Disk diffusion method

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Detection of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Uropathogens and their Antibiotic Resistance Pattern from a Tertiary Care Centre, Bengaluru, India

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Detection of Inducible AmpC β-lactamase-producing Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Teaching Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR)

What s new in EUCAST methods?

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

Performance Information. Vet use only

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance and Sensitivity with Reference to Ages of Elders

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PHENOTYPIC METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF EXTENDED SPECTRUM b- LACTAMASE (ESBL) IN BACTERIAL ISOLATES FROM TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

Nova Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences Page: 1

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

Original Article. Suthan Srisangkaew, M.D. Malai Vorachit, D.Sc.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN KENYA; What Surveillance tells us

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Prevalence of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae Strains in Latvia

SAMPLE. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Study of drug resistance pattern of principal ESBL producing urinary isolates in an urban hospital setting in Eastern India

EXPERIMENT. Antibiotic Sensitivity-Kirby Bauer Diffusion Test

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Occurrence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases Among Blood Culture Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) are enzymes produced

Mili Rani Saha and Sanya Tahmina Jhora. Department of Microbiology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Background and Plan of Analysis

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2018

Michael Hombach*, Guido V. Bloemberg and Erik C. Böttger

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Detection of extended-spectrum -lactamases in clinical isolates of E. coli and klebsiella species from Udaipur Rajasthan

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. with ALKA VITA (ALKAHYDROXY ) ESCHERICHIA COLI STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (MRSA) PSEUDOMONA AERUGINOSA ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8)

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2016

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract... i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope Definitions... 1

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

INCIDENCE OF BACTERIAL COLONISATION IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

Version 9.1 March 2010

Available Online at International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archives 2011; 2(5): ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

ETX0282, a Novel Oral Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Transcription:

CHN58: ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING (CLSI) 1.0 PURPOSE / INTRODUCTION: 1.1 Introduction Antimicrobial susceptibility tests are performed in order to determine whether a pathogen is likely to be susceptible or resistant to specific antibiotic treatment. Criteria for in vitro testing of isolates have been developed to provide the best guidance for clinical management, and must be used in conjunction with other variables such as drug absorption, penetration of the drug into the appropriate body compartment, and recognized in vivo limitations of some antibiotic-microbe combinations. Correctly identifying an isolate is therefore key to accurate interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility tests. Antibiotic susceptibility testing will follow criteria provided by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and will be based around disk diffusion methodology whenever possible. These criteria are outlined in CLSI document M100-S25. This document and subsequent updates should always be the primary resource for interpretative criteria. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this SOP is to give guidance in performing the antibiotic susceptibility testing. 2.0 SCOPE / RESPONSIBILITY: This SOP is applicable to all trained laboratory technicians/technologists/scientists in the CHAIN study working in the microbiology laboratory. The Principal Investigator (through the study coordinator when applicable) retains the overall responsibility of implementation of these standard procedures. The Study Laboratory Coordinator is responsible for answering questions you may have about the content of this SOP and any other relevant study documentation. Please contact that the Study Laboratory Coordinator through your site coordinator. 3.0 SAFETY/RISK ASSESSMENT: NB: Standard precautions, including personal protective equipment. 3.1. Always wear personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves, lab coats when handling specimen and treat all isolates as potential hazards. 3.2. All used materials e.g. gloves and waste papers should be disposed off in the right biohazard bin for future incineration. 3.3. Care should be taken while handling suspensions to avoid generation of aerosols. 4.0 DEFINITIONS: 4.0 CLSI Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 4.1 MH Mueller Hinton 4.2 MIC Minimum Inhibitory Concentration 4.3 TSB - Trypticase Soy Broth 4.4 ATCC American Type Culture Collection 4.5 ESBL- Extended Spectrum β-lactamase 4.6 CLA - Clavulanic Acid 4.7. QA: Quality Assurance 1

4.8. QC: Quality Control 4.9. AST: Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing 4.9.1 AMP: Ampicillin 4.9.2 AZM: Azithromycin 4.9.3 C: Chloramphenicol 4.9.4 CIP: Ciprofloxacin 4.9.5 CRO: Ceftriaxone 4.9.6 CAZ: Ceftazidime 4.9.7 CN: Gentamicin 4.9.8 CTX: Cefotaxime 4.9. 9 TMP/SMX: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 4.9.10. CAZ/CLA: Ceftazidime/Clavulanate 4.9.11 CTX/CLA: Cefotaxime/Clavulanate 4.9.12 AMC: Amoxicillin-Clavulanate 4.9.13 Cefoxitin 4.9.14 IPM: Imepinem 4.9.15 Cefuroxime 4.9.16 AMK: Amikacin 4.9.17 Meropenem 5.0 SPECIMEN: 5.1 Pure 24-hour isolate on a culture plate. 6.0 EQUIPMENT / MATERIALS/ REAGENTS: 6.1 EQUIPMENT 6.1.1Incubators (C0 2 and 0 2 at 35 0 C and 37 0 C 6.1.2 Vernier calipers or ruler 6.1.3 Antimicrobial disks (store frozen with a desiccant) 6.1.4 Sterile swabs 6.1.5 Forceps 6.1.6 Disc dispenser 6.1.7 Burnsen burner 6.2 MATERIALS 6.2.1 Sterile swabs 6.2.2 Mueller Hinton Agar (MH agar) 6.2.3 Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) or Mueller Hinton broth (MH broth) 6.3 REAGENTS 6.3.1 0.5 McFarland turbidity Standards 6.3.2 Sterile distilled water 6.3.3 Sterile normal Saline 6.3.4 ATCC control strains 6.3.5Antibiotic discs 2

7.0 METHODOLOGY: 7.1 PRINCIPLE The disk diffusion method of susceptibility testing has been standardized primarily for testing of rapidly growing bacteria. To perform the test, filter paper disks containing a specific amount of antimicrobial agent are applied to the surface of an agar medium that has been inoculated with a known amount of the test organism. The drug in the disk diffuses through the agar. As the distance from the disk increases, the concentration of the antimicrobial agent decreases creating a gradient of drug concentrations in the agar medium. At the same time as the drug diffuses through the agar, the bacteria try to multiply and grow across the agar. In areas where the concentration of drug is inhibitory, no growth occurs, forming a zone of inhibition around each disk. Criteria currently recommended for interpreting zone diameters and MIC results for commonly used antimicrobial agents are published by CLSI. Results are reported categorically as Susceptible (S), Intermediate (I), or Resistant (R). Susceptible. An infection due to the strain may be appropriately treated with the dosage of the antibiotic recommended for that type of infection. Intermediate. Zones falling into this range may be considered equivocal. The antibiotic may be used but response will depend on doses used, the site of infection and other factors. Resistant. Not inhibited by the usually achievable systemic concentration of the agent, or have specific microbial resistance mechanisms, e.g. β-lactamases. 7.2 PROCEDURE 7.2.1. Disk diffusion testing is one of several phenotypic assays which can be utilised to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile (antibiogramme) of an organism. Disk diffusion tests estimate in vitro susceptibility. 7.3 Inoculation Note: Prior to AST testing, ensure all the antibiotic discs are removed from the fridge to attain room temperature. After testing is complete, return to the fridge immediately. 7.3.1. Standardization of inoculum 7.3.1.1. Prior to preparing the inoculum, visually examine the agar plates containing the test organism and control strain. 7.3.1.2. If culture appears mixed, a fresh sub-culture will be prepared. 7.3.1.3. With a loop or sterile swab, touch the top of at least 4 to 5 well isolated colonies. 7.3.1.4. Transfer the growth to the tube of saline. Emulsify the inoculum on the inside of the tube to avoid clumping of the cells. 7.3.1.5. Adjust the inoculum standard to a 0.5 McFarland which is equals approximately 108 CFU/mL. 7.3.2. Inoculation of Mueller-Hinton plate 7.3.2.1 Allow the discs to come to room temperature before opening the container. 7.2.2.2 Using the turbidometer or McFarland turbidity standard, prepare a suspension of the test organism in sterile saline equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard using isolated colonies. If there is not enough growth, inoculate the organism into TSB or MH broth, and incubate at 35 C 3

for 2-4 hours or until it reaches the turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard. Use the suspension within 15 mins of preparing it. 7.3.2.3 Using a sterile cotton swab, inoculate the organism onto an appropriate agar plate, streaking in 3 directions over the entire agar surface. For E coli, Salmonella and Shigella organisms that grow rapidly use MH agar. Wait 5-15 mins for the suspension to adsorb into the agar, but no longer. 7.3.2.4 Using forceps or a disk dispenser, apply the appropriate antimicrobial disks onto the agar. Place the discs with an equal distance apart from each other and put no more than 6 disks on a 100mm diameter plate. 7.3.2.5 Incubate the plates aerobically at 35 C for 16-18 hours NOTE: These suspensions should be used within 15 minutes of preparation 7.4 Interpretation After incubation, measure the diameters of the zone of complete inhibition (as judged by the unaided eye) with calipers or ruler. 7.3.3. For MH agar: 7.3.3.1. Measure from the upper surface of the plate. 7.3.3.2 Use transmitted light (plate held up to light source). 7.3.3.3 The zone margin should be considered the area showing no obvious, visible growth that can be detected with the unaided eye. 7.3.3.4 With trimethoprim and the sulfonamides, antagonists in the medium may allow some slight growth; therefore, disregard slight growth (20% or less of the lawn of growth) and measure the more obvious margin to determine the zone diameter. Refer to CLSI Document M100-S25 for the zone size interpretations. Report susceptible, resistant and intermediate as appropriate. The antibiotics to report for each bacteria are listed in the tables in the appendix. 7.4 Screening for Extended Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Production ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (especially E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, and Proteus mirabilis) have become increasingly widespread. ESBL-producing isolates are resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime and ceftazidime, and aztreonam, as well as to penicillins and narrow spectrum cephalosporins. E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, and Proteus mirabilis considered significant enough for susceptibility testing should be screened for ESBL by using a cefotaxime (30µg) disk or ceftazidime (30µg) disk. Zone sizes 27mm for cefotaxime or 22mm for ceftazidime may indicate ESBL production and should be confirmed an additional phenotypic test. The confirmatory procedure (outlined in CLSI Document M100-S25 Table 2A-S25) involves testing the strain against ceftazime, ceftazidime-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, cefotaximeclavulanic acid using standard disk diffusion recommendations. After 16-18 hours incubation at 35±2 C in ambient air, a 5 mm increase in zone diameter for either antimicrobial agent tested in combination with clavulanic acid compared to its zone when tested alone indicates an ESBL 7.5 Quality Assurance / Quality Control 7.5.1 Test the following organisms each time a new batch of MH agar is prepared and once weekly. Subculture the organisms to sheep blood agar the day before setting up the QC. - E. coli ATCC 25922 - P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 - E.coli NCTC 13351 4

See CLSI Document M100-S24 Table 4A for acceptable QC results. For troubleshooting out-of range QC results, see CLSI Document M100-S25 Table 4D. 8.0 REFERENCES Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th Informational Supplement. M100-S24. CLSI, Wayne, Pennsylvania, 2014. Performance standards for antimicrobial testing (twelve int. supplement) Vol 22 No 1. 2002. P.R. Murray, E.J. Baron, M.A. Pfaller, F.C. Tenover, and R.H. Yolken (ed), Manual of Clinical Microbiology,8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. Monica Cheeseborough (ed). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical countries-part 2. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. B.A. Forbes, D.F. Sahm, A.S. Weissfeld. (ed). Bailey and Scott s Diagnostic Microbiology.10th ed. Morsby 9.0 APPENDICES: Antibiotic Susceptibility Panels for CLSI The following antibiotics will be tested for isolates recovered from clinical and research specimens. Enterobacteriaceae ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT DISK CONTENT Sensitive ranges Intermediete ranges Resistance ranges Ampicilin AMP 10ug 17 14-16 13 Azthromicine AZM 15ug 13-12 Chloramphenicol C 30ug 18 13-17 12 Ciprofloxacin CIP a 5ug 31 21-30 20 Ciprofloxacin CIP b 5ug 21 16-20 15 Cetriaxone CRO 30ug 23 20-22 19 Cefotaxime CTX 30ug 26 23-25 22 Ceftazidime CAZ 30ug 21 18-20 <18 Gentamicin CN 10ug 15 13-14 12 Cotrimoxazole 1.25/23.75μg 16 11-15 10 TMP-SMX Augmentin AMC 20/10ug 18 14-17 13 Imipenem IMP 10ug 23 20-22 19 Cefuroxime 30ug 23 15-22 14 Amikacin AMK 30ug 17 15-16 14 Meropenem 10ug 23 20-22 19 Cefoxitin FOX 30ug 18 15-17 14 Notes: CIP a For reporting against salmonellae SPP. CIP b For reporting against Enterobacteriacea other than Salmonellae. 5

Notes: 1. Salmonella species should be interpreted as resistant to Gentamicin and Amikacin irrespective of their susceptibility testing, as it is inactive in vivo. 2. E. coli, Salmonella and Shigella which are resistant to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, or cefotaxime need to be tested for the presence of an Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase (ESBL) before the results of susceptibly to any β-lactam drugs can be used. If an ESBL is confirmed, the isolate will be reported as resistant to all penicillins and cephalosporins regardless of the initial disc diffusion result for each drug. 3. Cefoxitin is not a drug that is used in patient care but it can be a marker for an AmpC cephalosporinase. 4. Ciprofloxacin zone size for Salmonella is categorized as 31 (sensitive), 21-30 (intermediate) and 20 (resistant) Document history Version Author Approved by Dated 1.01 ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING (CLSI) CHN 1.02 Katana Karisa Caroline Tigoi 10/10/2016 Site training record All sites are required to maintain a master copy of this SOP that documents the site staff that have been trained on this SOP. Document History Version Trained Signature of trained Date Trainer s Initials No. staff initials staff 1.01 KDT Example row 1 st Jan 2016 DM 6