Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish Biological Status Review Report

Similar documents
Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

Supplemental Information for the Florida Brown Snake (Lower Keys Population) Biological Status Review Report

Florida (Peninsula) Ribbon Snake Biological Status Review Report

Supplemental Information for the White-Crowned Pigeon Biological Status Review Report

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for. Hine's Emerald (Somatochlora hineana)

Key terms and concepts in the IUCN Red List Criteria. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Criteria for Selecting Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Short-tailed Snake Biological Status Review Report

Marsupial Mole. Notoryctes species. Amy Mutton Zoologist Species and Communities Branch Science and Conservation Division

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA

Supplemental Information for the Short-tailed Snake Biological Status Review Report

Small-mouthed Salamander Ambystoma texanum

IUCN Red List. Industry guidance note. March 2010

Scanned by CamScanner

Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes

Timber Rattlesnake Crotalus horridus

Pacific Gopher Snake Pituophis catenifer catenifer

Guidelines for including species of conservation concern in the Environmental Assessment process

Desert Nightsnake Hypsiglena chlorophaea

ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST SOUTH FLORIDA-CARIBBEAN CESU NETWORK NUMBER W912HZ-16-SOI-0007 PROJECT TO BE INITIATED IN FY 2016

Conservation status of New Zealand bats, 2012

Revised Status of Rare and Endangered Unionacea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas

From raw data to Red List: The Red List assessment process and role of the Red List Assessor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Southern Maidenhair Fern Adiantum capillus-veneris

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

Re: Proposed Revision To the Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf

IUCN SSC Red List of Threatened Species

July 28, Dear Dr. Nouak,

Introduction. Chapter 1

Transfer of the Family Platysternidae from Appendix II to Appendix I. Proponent: United States of America and Viet Nam. Ref. CoP16 Prop.

Florida s Imperiled Species Management Program Overview

Eastern Ribbonsnake. Appendix A: Reptiles. Thamnophis sauritus. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Reptiles 103

May Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor,

Blue Racer Coluber constrictor foxii

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form. for. Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma jeffersonianum)

Proponent: Switzerland, as Depositary Government, at the request of the Animals Committee (prepared by New Zealand)

RED LIST ASSESSMENT. Questionnaire (please complete one questionnaire per taxon, extra sheets may be used)

Lithuania s biodiversity at risk

Introduction. Chapter 1

Cyprus biodiversity at risk

THE RED BOOK OF ANIMALS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Re: Improving protection measures for Maui s and Hector s dolphins

Gopher Tortoise Minimum Viable Population and Minimum Reserve Size Working Group Report

Structured Decision Making: A Vehicle for Political Manipulation of Science May 2013

Types of Data. Bar Chart or Histogram?

Fringilla coelebs all others

Lecture 15. Biology 5865 Conservation Biology. Ex-Situ Conservation

Metadata Sheet: Extinction risk (Indicator No. 9)

Endangered and Endemic Species of India (8 Marks)

II, IV Yes Reptiles Marine Atlantic, Marine Macaronesian, Marine Mediterranean

Madagascar Spider Tortoise Updated: January 12, 2019

Nomination of Populations of Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) for Schedule 1 Part 2 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995

Biodiversity and Extinction. Lecture 9

Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Prof. Neil. J.L. Heideman

Title of Project: Distribution of the Collared Lizard, Crotophytus collaris, in the Arkansas River Valley and Ouachita Mountains

5/10/2013 CONSERVATION OF CRITICALLY ENDANGERED RUFFORD SMALL GRANT. Dr. Ashot Aslanyan. Project leader SPECIES OF REPTILES OF ARARAT VALLEY, ARMENIA

A Species Action Plan for the Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Final Draft November 1, 2013

Living Planet Report 2018

IUCN Red List Categories

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for. Blue Racer (Coluber constrictor foxii)

Northern Copperhead Updated: April 8, 2018

1 Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Inc. v. Servheen, 665 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 2011). Heather Baltes I. INTRODUCTION

Mexican Gray Wolf Endangered Population Modeling in the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area

Conservation status of New Zealand Onychophora ( peripatus or velvet worm), 2018 NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 26

Writing: Lesson 31. Today the students will be learning how to write more advanced middle paragraphs using a variety of elaborative techniques.

Human Impact on Sea Turtle Nesting Patterns

Proceedings, The Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Workshop, September 5-6, 2002, Manhattan, Kansas

Global comparisons of beta diversity among mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians across spatial scales and taxonomic ranks

TERRAPINS AND CRAB TRAPS

Taseko Prosperity Gold-Copper Project. Appendix 5-6-D

A.13 BLAINVILLE S HORNED LIZARD (PHRYNOSOMA BLAINVILLII)

Everglades Invasive Reptile and Amphibian Monitoring Program 1

Administrative Rules GOVERNOR S OFFICE PRECLEARANCE FORM

Why should we care about biodiversity? Why does it matter?

Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone: Park Visitor Attitudes, Expenditures, and Economic Impacts

Lower Snake Spring Chinook

Natural Selection. What is natural selection?

The Importance Of Atlasing; Utilizing Amphibian And Reptile Data To Protect And Restore Michigan Wetlands

Rio Sonoyta Mud Turtle

PETITION TO LIST THE Virgin Islands Coqui (Eleutherodactylus schwartzi)

Tortoises And Freshwater Turtles: The Trade In Southeast Asia (Species In Danger) By Martin Jenkins READ ONLINE

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF ROADS AND ASSOCIATED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON SNAKE POPULATIONS IN EASTERN TEXAS

Carleton Montgomery and Theresa Lettman, Pinelands Preservation Alliance

California Bighorn Sheep Population Inventory Management Units 3-17, 3-31 and March 20 & 27, 2006

Fact Sheet: Oustalet s Chameleon Furcifer oustaleti

Assessment of Public Submissions regarding Dingo Management on Fraser Island

May 10, SWBAT analyze and evaluate the scientific evidence provided by the fossil record.

European Red List of Habitats

Florida Field Naturalist

November 6, Introduction

ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Original language: English PC22 Doc. 10 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

11-ID-10. Committee: Infectious Disease. Title: Creation of a National Campylobacteriosis Case Definition

FINAL Preliminary Report for CSP Project New Zealand sea lion monitoring at the Auckland Islands 2017/18

Romania s biodiversity at risk

Amphibian Ark Conservation Needs Assessment - Cuba, March 2011 Page 1

Transcription:

Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish Biological Status Review Report The following pages contain peer reviews received from selected peer reviewers, comments received during the public comment period, and the draft report that was reviewed before the final report was completed March 31, 2011

Table of Contents Peer review #1 from Dr. Keith Crandall... 3 Peer review #2 from Dr. Dale Jackson... 4 Copy of the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish BSR draft report that was sent out for peer review... 6 Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 2

Peer review #1 from Dr. Keith Crandall Evaluation of the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish Procambarus erythrops 1) Completeness and accuracy of the biological information and data analysis The evaluation of the Sim s Sink Crayfish is thorough and has consulted all the published data I am aware of on this crayfish. The conclusion is a listing of Threatened which seems justified by the data and methodology. The IUCN listing is Endangered which is consistent with the listing proposed here due to the restricted geographic range. There are well documented threats to this species that coupled with the restricted range justify the listing as Threatened. The BSR clearly documents extirpated populations and extremely limited geographic range. 2) Reasonableness and justifiability of assumptions, interpretations of data, and conclusions The assumptions of the assessment are reasonable and the interpretations of the data appropriate and therefore the conclusion of Threatened is also a well-justified conclusion. The species has a small geographic range, small population size, and has clear threats to the limited habitat. More information on the population structure and gene flow across karst systems would help in understanding the population size and threats of this species (e.g., Buhay and Crandall, 2005). Nevertheless, the proposed status of Threatened is justified by the available data. In the BSR Information Findings document, under data for population size reduction, there is listed no data supporting xx% decline. Note that there is no data supporting that the population is stable either. This suggests that the conclusion is we assume populations are stable when we have no data. This is a dangerous approach to conservation biology and, I think, ill conceived. You should make conclusions based on what data you have, not on data you do not have. In this case, the data clearly indicate that the species is threatened. Buhay, J. E., and K. A. Crandall. 2005. Subterranean phylogeography of freshwater crayfishes shows extensive gene flow and surprisingly large population sizes. Molecular Ecology 14:4259-4273. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 3

Peer review #2 from Dr. Dale Jackson From: DaleJackson [mailto:djackson@fnai.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:32 PM To: Cook, David Subject: P. pictus review plus replacement erythrops review Dave, I noticed that I had not included my name on the erythrops comments I sent yesterday, so please substitute this one, which otherwise is unchanged. Thanks for the other replies, which I ll dig into next week and use to update our database. I ll be back at FNAI on Monday if you need to reach me. Dale Dale R. Jackson, Ph.D. Senior Research Zoologist Florida Natural Areas Inventory Florida State University 1018 Thomasville Road, Suite 200-C Tallahassee, FL 32303 Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 4

January 25, 2011 1018 Thomasville Road Suite 200-C Tallahassee, FL 32303 850-224-8207 fax 850-681-9364 www.fnai.org Procambarus erythrops Final Draft BSR review Dale R. Jackson, Ph.D. Senior Research Zoologist, FNAI In general, I concur with the conclusions and have no additional data to offer. I provide a few comments below. Common name: Following the FCREPA second edition (1994) and based on the species occurrence at several sites besides Sims Sink, FNAI adopted the common name of Santa Fe Cave Crayfish, which would seem appropriate for FWC to use as well. Perhaps in the taxonomic classification section you could also say that The species has also been denoted as the Sims Sink Cave Crayfish and the Red-Eyed Cave Crayfish. You should use the same case (upper or lower) for both cave and crayfish, as the former is not referring to a specific cave. I do not believe that Sims has an apostrophe (not in FCREPA). Florida Resources and Environmental Analysis Center Institute of Science and Public Affairs The FNAI database identifies only 5 element occurrences as well and ranks only two (Sims Sink, Azure Blue) of these highly, though data are not recent. Information is drawn from the same Franz references you cite as well as unpublished data he provided earlier. All 5 sites are in Suwannee County and within ca. 7 km of each other (which would be valuable to state). The draft BSR cites Columbia County as well, however. What is the source (Tom Morris?)? Any Suwannee County site would increase the total sites to at least 6 (as stated in the table), which is not clear in the text; perhaps add Cave diver [karst specialist?] Tom Morris (give affiliation) more recently identified a sixth location in southern Columbia County or something to that effect. FNAI (attention Dale Jackson) would welcome any such reports from FWC (Tom Morris has generously shared data with us multiple times, though not about this species; I ll drop him an e-mail as well). NatureServe data are drawn from FNAI, so please also cite FNAI as a source where you cite NatureServe. Regarding the potentially extirpated population, how thorough are the data? Better to say may have been rather than has apparently been unless there have been comprehensive surveys. The table states that no subpopulation has >1000 individuals, but evidence for this is not adequately cited in the text. Can you add something persuasive in Pop. Status & Trend? Why do you think this? Something like you note in Dd1 would help. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 5

Copy of the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish BSR draft report that was sent out for peer review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Biological Status Review for the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave Crayfish (Procambarus erythrops) The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) directed staff to evaluate all species listed as Threatened or Species of Special Concern as of September 1, 2010. Public information on the status of the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish (Procambarus erythrops) was sought from September 17 to November 1, 2010. The members of the biological review group (BRG) met on November 18, 2010. Group members were David Cook (FWC lead), Paul Moler (retired FWC biologist, serving as an independent consultant), and Richard Franz (retired University of Florida/Florida Museum of Natural History biologist, serving as an independent consultant). In accordance with rule 68A-27.0012 Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), the BRG was charged with evaluating the biological status of the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe crayfish using criteria included in definitions in 68A-27.001(3) and following the protocols in the Guidelines for Application of the IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels (Version 3.0) and Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 8.1). Please visit http://www.myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/imperiledspp_listingprocess.htm to view the listing process rule and the criteria found in the definitions. The BRG concluded that this species met three criteria: Criterion B (geographic range), Criterion C (population size and trend), and Criterion D (population very small or restricted). Staff recommends that the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish, Procambarus erythrops, be included on the State-designated Threatened list because it meets criteria for listing as described in 68A-27.001(3). This work was supported by a Conserve Wildlife Tag grant from the Wildlife Foundation of Florida. BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION Life History References Franz 1982, Franz 1994, Streever 1996, FNAI 2001, NatureServe 2010 Taxonomic Classification The current scientific name for the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish is Procambarus (Ortmannicus) erythrops, with no recognized subspecies (Relyea and Sutton 1975). It is a member of the lucifugus complex (Franz and Lee 1982). Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 6

Population Status and Trend This species is known historically from 5 sites, although it has apparently been extirpated at one site due to the dumping of garbage (Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994). Only 2 sites contain significant populations. One is the type locality, Sim s Sink, which is owned and managed by The Nature Conservancy; the other site, Azure Blue Sink, may need protection (Franz 1994, NatureServe 2010). Geographic Range and Distribution This species is endemic to Florida and is known only from sites in southern Suwannee and southwestern Columbia counties (Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994, NatureServe 2010, Tom Morris pers. comm.). Quantitative Analyses We are not aware of a population viability analysis that has been done for the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish. BIOLOGICAL STATUS ASSESSMENT Threats Potential threats include changes in hydrology and detrital flow (Franz 1982, Franz 1994, NatureServe 2010), garbage dumping, and mining (FNAI 2001). A kill and post-kill recovery of a related cave crayfish, P. pallidus, was reported for a Suwannee County cave due to physicochemical changes associated with flushing of contaminants or Suwannee River water during a flood event (Walsh 2001). Statewide Population Assessment The BRG concluded that this species met three criteria: Criterion B (geographic range), Criterion C (population size and trend), and Criterion D (population very small or restricted). This assessment is specifically written as B1+2ab(ii,iii,v); C2a(i); D2. Specific findings from the BRG, including justification and pertinent references, are included in the Biological Status Review Information Findings tables below. LISTING RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Sim s Sink or Santa Fe Cave crayfish, Procambarus erythrops, be listed as a Threatened species because it meets criteria for listing as described in 68A-27.001(3) F.A.C. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 7

Biological Status Review Information Findings Species/taxon: Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish (Procambarus erythrops) Date: 11/18/10 Assessors: David Cook, Paul Moler, Richard Franz Generation length: unknown, but est. average 15 yrs; 3 generations = 45 yrs Criterion/Listing Measure Data/Information Data Criterion Type* Met? References *Data Types - observed (O), estimated (E), inferred (I), suspected (S), or projected (P). Criterion met - yes (Y) or no (N). (A) Population Size Reduction, ANY of (a)1. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population No data supporting 50% decline N size reduction of at least 50% over the last 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is longer, where the causes of the 1 reduction are clearly reversible and understood and ceased (a)2. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population No data supporting 30% decline N size reduction of at least 30% over the last 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased or may not be understood or may 1 not be reversible (a)3. A population size reduction of at least 30% projected or If hydrology and water quality stay the P N suspected to be met within the next 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years) 1 same, projection of 30% decline not anticipated. (a)4. An observed, estimated, inferred, projected or suspected No data supporting 30% decline N population size reduction of at least 30% over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased or may not be understood or may 1 not be reversible. 1 based on (and specifying) any of the following: (a) direct observation; (b) an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon; (c) a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat; (d) actual or potential levels of exploitation; (e) the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors or parasites. (B) Geographic Range, EITHER (b)1. Extent of occurrence < 20,000 km 2 (7,722 mi 2 ) OR Southern Suwannee County, southwestern E Columbia County; estimated EOO < 375 2 mi (b)2. Area of occupancy < 2,000 km 2 (772 mi 2 ) Southern Suwannee County, southwestern E Columbia County; estimated EOO < 375 2 mi AND at least 2 of the following: Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 8 Y Y Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994, FWC staff 2010, Tom Morris pers. comm. Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994, FWC staff 2010, Tom Morris pers. comm.

a. Severely fragmented or exist in 10 locations 6 known localities, some of which may be considered to be the same location; < 6 locations b. Continuing decline, observed, inferred or projected in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence; (ii) area of occupancy; (iii) area, extent, and/or quality of habitat; (iv) number of locations or subpopulations; (v) number of mature individuals c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence; (ii) area of occupancy; (iii) number of locations or subpopulations; (iv) number of mature individuals (C) Population Size and Trend Population size estimate to number fewer than 10,000 mature individuals AND EITHER (c)1. An estimated continuing decline of at least 10% in 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future) OR (c)2. A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following: Continuing decline in area of occupancy (ii), quality of habitat (iii), and number of individuals (v) based on ongoing mining activity O Y Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994, FWC staff 2010, Tom Morris pers. comm. O, P Y FNAI 2001, P. Moler pers. obs. No extreme fluctuations O N R. Franz unpub. data Population estimated to be substantially < 10,000 No data supporting 10% decline Decline in number of individuals inferred based on continuing decline in area of occupancy and quality of habitat E Y Franz 1982; Streever 1996 N I Y P. Moler and R. Franz pers. comm. a. Population structure in the form of EITHER No subpopulation estimated to contain E Y Franz 1982; Streever 1996 (i) No subpopulation estimated to contain more than 1000 mature individuals; OR (ii) All mature individuals are in one subpopulation more than 1000 mature individuals Not applicable N b. Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals No extreme fluctuations N (D) Population Very Small or Restricted, EITHER (d)1. Population estimated to number fewer than 1,000 mature individuals; OR (d)2. Population with a very restricted area of occupancy (typically less than 20 km 2 [8 mi 2 ]) or number of locations (typically 5 or fewer) such that it is prone to the effects of human activities or stochastic events within a short time period in an uncertain future (E) Quantitative Analyses Subpopulation at Sim's Sink estimated to be 500, mostly mature; rangewide population may be >1000 6 known localities, some of which may be considered to be the same location due to potential hydrological connectedness; < 6 locations; cave entrances are energy input zones especially susceptible to local threats E N Franz 1982; Streever 1996 O, I Y Franz 1994, Franz et al. 1994, Tom Morris pers. comm. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 9

e1. Showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 10% within 100 years No probability of extinction model done N Initial Finding (Meets at least one of the criteria OR Does not meet any of the criteria) Meets at least one of the criteria Reason (which criteria are met) B1+2ab(ii,iii,v); C2a(i); D2 Is species/taxon endemic to Florida? (Y/N) If Yes, your initial finding is your final finding. Copy the initial finding and reason to the final finding space below. If No, complete the regional assessment sheet and copy the final finding from that sheet to the space below. Y Final Finding (Meets at least one of the criteria OR Does not meet any of the criteria) Meets at least one of the criteria Reason (which criteria are met) B1+2ab(ii,iii,v); C2a(i); D2 Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 10

SUMMARY OF THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW This will be completed after the peer review. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 11

LITERATURE CITED Florida Natural Areas Inventory. 2001. Santa Fe Cave crayfish, Procambarus erythrops. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. Franz, R. 1982. Species of Special Concern: Red-eyed cave crayfish. Pp. 112-113 in Franz, R. (ed.). Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Volume Six. Invertebrates. University Presses of Florida. Franz, R. 1994. Rare: Santa Fe Cave crayfish. Pp. 195-197 in Deyrup, M. and R. Franz (eds.). Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Volume IV. Invertebrates. University Press of Florida. Franz, R., J. Bauer, and T. Morris. 1994. Review of biologically significant caves and their faunas in Florida and South Georgia. Brimleyana 20: 1-109. Franz, R. and D.S. Lee. 1982. Distribution and evolution of troglobitic crayfishes of Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 28: 53-78. FWC staff. 2010. Created from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_counties_in_florida and http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/library/flcollection/landwater.cfm NatureServe. 2010. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed October 12, 2010.) Relyea, K. and B. Sutton. 1975. A new troglobitic crayfish of the genus Procambarus from Florida (Decapoda: Astacidae). Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany 19: 8-16. Streever, W.J. 1996. Energy economy hypothesis and the troglobitic crayfish Procambarus erythrops in Sim s Sink cave, Florida. American Midland Naturalist 135: 357-366. Walsh, S.J. 2001. Freshwater macrofauna of Florida karst habitats. Pp. 78-88 in E.L. Kuniansky, ed. U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Water- Resources Investigations Report 01-4011. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 12

Appendix 1. Biological Review Group Member Biographies David Cook received his B.S. in Biology from Brown University and his M.S. in Zoology from the University of Florida. He has worked for 24 years as a nongame biologist with GFC/FWC, with primary emphasis on reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates. He currently serves as the Invertebrate Taxa Coordinator in the FWC s Species Conservation Planning Section, and has drafted management plans on the flatwoods salamander, Panama City crayfish, and Miami blue butterfly. Richard Franz received his M.S. at the University of Montana. He is an Emeritus, Associate Scientist in Ecosystem Conservation with the Florida Museum of Natural History and an Emeritus, Affiliate Associate Scientist in Wildlife Ecology and Conservation at the University of Florida. He has been studying the ecology and systematics of Florida crayfish for more than forty years. He has conducted field studies and surveys on both the Black Creek and Santa Fe cave crayfish, and published scientific papers on both of these species. Paul Moler received his B.A. in Biology from Emory University and his M.S. in Zoology from the University of Florida. He worked for 29 years as a research biologist with GFC/FWC, with primary emphasis on reptiles and amphibians. He retired in 2006. Over the last 10 years, he has increasingly focused on research and conservation of Florida s freshwater crayfish and is currently completing a Commission funded genetic assessment of the cave crayfishes of Florida. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 13

Appendix 2. Summary of letters and e-mails received during the solicitation of information from the public. None received. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 14

Appendix 3. Information and comments received from independent reviewers To be added after peer review. Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish 15