Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria from industrially produced dairy products

Similar documents
There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

VETERINARSKI ARHIV 81 (1), 91-97, 2011

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Antimicrobial resistance and serotyping of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolated from poultry in Croatia

Performance Information. Vet use only

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

DOI: /AVB H UDK :579.84:

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

Prevalence and Drug Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus in Lactating Dairy Cow s Milk in Wolayta Sodo, Ethiopia

Antibiotics & Resistance

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility of different lactic acid bacteria strains

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Background and Plan of Analysis

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Safety of Lactic Starter Cultures used in Algerian Dairy Industry Case Study: Antibiotic Resistance

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Antimicrobial resistance in food safety perspective - current situation in Croatia

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

VETERINARSKI ARHIV 86 (2), , 2016

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic sensitivity of three isolates of lactic acid bacteria from fermented fish product, Budu

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Chapter 2. Disk diffusion method

Antimicrobials & Resistance

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

CROATIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Short Report. R Boot. Keywords: Bacteria, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, quality, diagnostic laboratories, proficiency testing

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERN OF YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA ISOLATED FROM MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS*

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

FOLIA VETERINARIA, 47, 3 : 2003 STANDARDS IN POULTRY MEAT AND AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF AMURIL PLV. SOL.

METHODS FOR THE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE DETECTION IN MICROORGANSIMS ISOLATED FROM FOOD

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods

Objectives. Antibiotics uses in food animals 3/25/2018. California Dairy Productions. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Animal Production Environment

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Nova Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences Page: 1

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

BIOLACTAM. Product Description. An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Canine Urinary Tract Infections

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital

Please distribute a copy of this information to each provider in your organization.

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

Himani B. Pandya, Ph.D (medical microbiology) Tutor, S.B.K.S Medical College and Research Institute Gujarat, INDIA

SAMPLE. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018, 5(1): Research Article

RESISTANCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS TO VANCOMYCIN IN ZARQA, JORDAN

Detection and Quantitation of the Etiologic Agents of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Endotracheal Tube Aspirates From Patients in Iran

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

THE EVALUATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM RAW MEAT

CLSI vs. EUCAST. What is EUCAST? Structure of EUCAST CLSI. Where they fit? SASCM WORKSHOP 5/24/2014

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Salmonella species from various antibiotic

Antibiotics are widely used in dairy cattle management

Tel: Fax:

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA PRODUCING ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS FROM SMALL INTESTINE OF CHICKEN

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2016

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Saxena Sonal*, Singh Trishla* and Dutta Renu* (Received for publication January 2012)

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Transcription:

30 N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) Original scientific paper - Izvorni znanstveni rad UDK: 637.35/579.678 Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria from industrially produced dairy products Nevijo Zdolec 1, Vesna Dobranić 1, Goran Zdolec 2, Dražen Đuričić 3 1 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene, Technology and Safety, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2 Veterinary station Vrbovec d.o.o., Kolodvorska 68, 10340 Vrbovec, Croatia 3 Veterinary station Đurđevac d.o.o., Malinov trg 7, 48350 Đurđevac, Croatia Summary Received - Prispjelo: 27.12.2012. Accepted - Prihvaćeno: 15.02.2013. In this research, the susceptibility to clindamycin, tetracycline, amikacin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, enrofloxacine, vancomycin, trimethoprim + sulphametoxazol, tobramycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, penicillin and trimethoprim was tested in coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=78) and lactic acid bacteria (n=30) by means of disk diffusion test and E-test. The isolates were collected from soft and hard cheeses, butter and brine. All isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci were susceptible to clindamycin, amikacin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, enrofloxacine, vancomycin, chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin according to CLSI breakpoints. A total of 30 staphylococci isolates (38.46 %) were resistant to erythromycin, 18 to penicillin (23.07 %), 4 to tetracycline (5.12 %), and one isolate to trimethoprim, tobramycin and trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (1.28 %). Among 78 tested staphylococci, 35 of them were resistant to at least one antimicrobial substance (44.87 %). The rate of resistant isolates in different types of soft cheese ranged from 22 to 70 %, while resistant staphylococci were absent in hard cheese and brine. The growth of lactic acid bacteria was not influenced by trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (n=29), vancomycin (n=29), trimethoprim (n=28), amikacin (n=10) and tobramycin (n=10). The results show that significant part of apathogenic microbiota in different dairy products is phenotypically resistant to antimicrobial agents. Key words: resistance, dairy products, apathogenic microbiota, coagulase-negative staphylococci, lactic acid bacteria Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most important issues of veterinary public health. Besides pathogenic bacteria, this resistance is common in apathogenic microbiota which could transfer resistance genes through a food chain. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are recognized as technologically/hygienically very important bacteria in food production and preservation (Hadžiosmanović et al., 2005; Šušković et al., 2010), however some health hazards could occur in the presence of strains that produce biogenic amines or enterotoxins and specially transfer antimicrobial resistance determinants (Dobranić et al., 2013; Zdolec et al., 2013a). In Croatia, only few studies were conducted in respect to prevalence of resistant food CNS and LAB, mainly autochthonous foodstuffs - fresh cow cheese and dry fermented sausages (Zdolec et al., 2011; Zdolec et al., 2012ab; Zdolec et al., 2013b). On the other hand, that kind of research was not performed in industrially produced dairy products. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibi- *Corresponding author/dopisni autor: Phone/Tel.:+385 1 239 0192; E-mail: nzdolec@vef.hr

N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) 31 lity of CNS and LAB from fresh cheeses, brine, hard cheeses and butter produced in industrial facilities. Material and methods Isolates of CNS (n=78) and LAB (n=30) were collected from fresh cheeses produced from pasteurized milk, cheese brine, hard cheeses and butter. Samples were prepared for microbiological analyses following standard procedure (HRN ISO 7218:1999). Samples (0.1 ml) of selected decimal dilutions were plated on Manitol Salt Agar (MSA, biomerieux, France) and de Man, Ragosa Sharpe agar (MRS, Merck, Germany) and incubated for 48 at 37 and 30 C, respectively. MSA colonies were transferred to Brain Hearth Infusion broth (BHI, biomerieux) and incubated for 24 hours at 37 C. Bacterial culture was streaked again onto MSA, incubated (24 h, 37 C), Gram stained and tested for coagulase activity (Bactident Coagulase, Merck). Gram positive, coagulasenegative cocci were selected for testing the antibiotic susceptibility. MRS colonies were grown in MRS broth (24-48 h at 30 C), streaked onto MRS agar, Gram stained and tested for catalase. Gram positive, catalase-negative bacilli and coccobacilli were taken for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Selected CNS and LAB isolates were tested for susceptibility towards following antimicrobial agents: clindamycin (2 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (30 µg), enrofloxacine (5 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), trimethoprim + sulphametoxazol (25 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), penicillin (10 IU) and trimethoprim (5 µg) by means of disk diffusion method (antibiotic disks, Biorad, France) on Mueller-Hinton agar (biomerieux, France). Additionally, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) were evaluated for 30 selected CNS using E-test (biomerieux, France) for erythromycin, penicillin and tetracycline. Following incubation (24 h, 35±2 C) inhibition zones were measured, as well as MICs (E-test), and results were interpreted according to CLSI criteria (Table 1; CLSI, 2008; 2010). Antibiotic susceptibility of LAB was tested only by disk diffusion method, and criterion of sensitivity was the occurrence of inhibition zone. Table 1. Interpretative standards for resistance/sensitivity of staphylococci towards selected antimicrobial agents Group Zone of inhibition (mm) MIC (µg/ml) Resistant Sensitive Resistant Sensitive Lincosamines Clindamycin 14 21 4 0.5 Tetracyclines Tetracycline 14 19 16 4 Aminoglycosides Amikacin 14 17 64 16 Tobramycin 12 15 16 4 Enrofloksacin 16 23 - - Glycopeptides Vancomycin - - 16 2 Sulfonamides Trimethoprim + sulphametoxazol 10 16 4 2 Trimethoprim 10 16 16 8 Chloramphenicol Chloramphenicol 12 18 32 8 2 nd generation Quinolones Ciprofloxacin 15 21 4 1 Macrolides Erythromycin 13 23 8 0.5 Penicillins Penicillin 28 29 0.25 0.12 Aminopenicillins + β-lactamase inhibitors Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 19 20 8 4 - Standard is not setted

32 N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) Results and discussion Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing of CNS are shown in tables 2-4. According to CLSI criteria related to disk diffusion method, all isolates were sensitive to clindamycin, amikacin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, enrofloxacin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. The most isolates were resistant to erythromycin, than penicillin and tetracycline. These isolates were additionally tested using E-test to determine MIC for mentioned antibiotics. Results shown in table 2 indicate that MIC and inhibition zones correlated completely regarding interpretation of erythromycin, penicillin and tetracycline sensitivity/resistance. Results and interpretation of disk diffusion method could be influenced by several factors including bacterial species and strain, growth condition (time, temperature), ph of media and Table 2. resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) according to testing method resistants (n=78) Disk diffusion test Range of inhibition zones (mm) resistants (n=78) E-test MIC* (µg/ml) Erythromycin 30 0-10 30 8-32 Penicillin 18 14-20 18 0.5-1 Tetracycline 4 0-12 4 16-32 Trimethoprim 1 8 / / Trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole 1 8 / / Tobramycin 1 0 / / *minimal inhibitory concentration /not tested Table 3. Number and percentage of resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) toward specific antimicrobial agents Percentage (%) of isolates resistant isolates resistant isolates Erythromycin 78 30 38.46 Penicillin 78 18 23.07 Tetracycline 78 4 5.12 Trimethoprim 78 1 1.28 Trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole 78 1 1.28 Tobramycin 78 1 1.28 Table 4. Number and percentage of resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) in different dairy products Dairy product isolates resistants Percentage (%) of resistants Fresh cheeses from pasteurized milk 58 32 55,2 Brine 9 0 0 Butter 3 3 100 Hard cheeses 8 0 0 Total 78 35 44.87

N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) 33 Table 5. Number and percentage of resistant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolates resistants Inhibition zones (mm) Percentage of resistance (%) Amikacin 30 10 0 30.00 Tobramycin 30 10 0 30.00 Vancomycin 30 29 0 96.66 Trimethoprim 30 28 0 93.33 Trimethoprim + sulfametoxazole 30 29 0 96.66 recommended interpretative criteria (Bubonja et al., 2008). Despite E-test is not official CLSI method, our results showed its reliability compared to disk diffusion, as reported by others (Baker et al., 1991; Mayrhofer et al., 2008). Our results show a high number of resistant CNS from industrially produced dairy products, mainly fresh cheeses produced from pasteurized milk (44.87 %; n=78) which is potential hazard for consumers related to resistance genes transfer. The percentage of resistant strains in fresh cheeses ranged 22 to 70 % of tested staphylococci, while hard cheeses and brine were free of resistant staphylococci. Our results are in accordance with other studies that report the most frequent CNS resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline and penicillins (Simeoni et al., 2008; Resch et al., 2008; Even et al., 2011). The occurrence of penicillin-resistant staphylococci in dairy products is probably the consequence of their persistence in raw milk, as reported by Sampimon et al. (2011) and Kalmus et al. (2011). The presence of resistant staphylococci in milk and dairy products could be expected due to uncritical use of penicillins and tetracyclines in mastitis treatment or prevention (Zdolec et al., 2006; Vragović et al., 2012ab). However, our results show domination of erythromycin resistance, the antimicrobial agent that is not used intramammary. Thus, it could be assumed that high occurrence of erythromycin resistant strains is related to environmental factors (cross-contamination) or horizontal gene transfer. The susceptibility of LAB to antimicrobials was tested only by disk diffusion method, and the absence of inhibition zones was used as criterion of resistance. All LAB isolates were sensitive to clindamycin, tetracycline, penicillin, erythromycin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, enrofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin. The growth of most isolates was not influenced by trimethoprim + sulfametoxsazole (n=29), vancomycin (n=29) and trimethoprim (n=28), and ten isolates (30 %) was resistant to amikacin and tobramycin (table 5). Our results are in agreement with other studies were the most frequently reported resistance of food-related LAB was to glycopeptides and aminoglycosiedes (Zhou et al., 2005; Klein, 2011; Zdolec et al., 2011). Džidić et al. (2008) emphasize that acquired antimicrobial resistance is not evaluated sistematicaly in LAB, which could be transfered to other bacteria. Conclusion Microbiologically acceptable milk for further processing must reach set criteria of total viable count and sommatic cells, while dairy product must fulfill the food safety and food hygiene criteria. These criteria recognize only coagulase-positive staphylococci and staphylococcal enterotoxins as hazardous in fresh cheeses. However, our results show that cheeses produced from pasteurized milk contain coagulase-negative staphylococci resistant to antibiotics. Despite the fact these cheeses are microbiologically safe products according to current legislation, we think that antimicrobial resistance of non pathogenic dairy microbiota should be evaluated more in terms of potential health risk. Risk assessment implies more data about the use of veterinary drugs in mastitis control, residues in milk and related occurrence of resistant CNS in raw milk, environment and dairy products. Acknowledgements This study was suported by Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia. (grant 053-0532052-2040).

34 N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) Otpornost na antimikrobne tvari koagulaza-negativnih stafilokoka i bakterija mliječne kiseline iz industrijskih mliječnih proizvoda Sažetak U ovom radu istražena je osjetljivost koagulazanegativnih stafilokoka (n=78) i bakterija mliječne kiseline (n=30) na klindamicin, tetraciklin, amikacin, amoksicilin + klavulanska kiselina, enrofloksacin, vankomicin, trimetoprim + sulfametoksazol, tobramicin, kloramfenikol, ciprofloksacin, eritromicin, penicilin i trimetoprim primjenom disk-difuzijskog testa i/ili E-testa. Izolati su izdvojeni iz industrijski proizvedenih mekih i tvrdih sireva, maslaca i salamure. Svi izolati stafilokoka bili su osjetljivi na klindamicin, amikacin, amoksicilin + klavulansku kiselinu, enrofloksacin, vankomicin, kloramfenikol i ciprofloksacin prema CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) kriterijima. Ukupno 30 izolata (38,46 %) stafilokoka bilo je otporno na eritromicin, 18 na penicilin (23,07 %), 4 na tetraciklin (5,12 %), te po jedan izolat na trimetoprim, tobramicin i trimetoprim + sulfametoksazol (1,28 %). Od ukupno 78 testiranih izolata stafilokoka, njih 35 bilo je rezistentno na najmanje jednu antimikrobnu tvar (44,87 % izolata). Udio rezistentnih izolata u mekim sirevima kretao se od 22 do 70 % testiranih stafilokoka, dok u tvrdom siru i salamuri rezistentnih izolata nije bilo. Na rast bakterija mliječne kiseline nisu utjecali trimetoprim + sulfametoksazol (n=29), vankomicin (n=29), trimetoprim (n=28), amikacin (n=10) i tobramicin (n=10). Dobiveni rezultati ukazuju na to da značajan udio nepatogene mikroflore različitih mliječnih proizvoda s hrvatskog tržišta pokazuje fenotipsku rezistenciju na antimikrobne tvari. Klječne riječi: rezistencija, mliječni proizvodi, nepatogena mikroflora, koagulaza-negativni stafilokoki, bakterije mliječne kiseline References 1. Baker, C.N., Stocker, S.A., Culver, D. H., Thornsberry, C. (1991): Comparison of the E test to Agar Dilution, Broth Microdilution, and Agar Diffusion Susceptibility Testing Techniques by Using a Special Challenge Set of Bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29, 533-538. 2. Bubonja, M., Mesarić, M., Miše, A., Jakovac, M., Abram, M. (2008): Utjecaj različitih čimbenika na rezultate testiranja osjetljivosti bakterija disk difuzijskom metodom. Medicina 44, 280-284. 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standards, third edition. CLSI document M31- A3. Wayne, PA. 4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2010): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne, PA. 5. Dobranić, V., Zdolec, N., Račić, I., Vujnović, A., Zdelar- Tuk, M., Filipović, I., Špičić, S. (2013): Determination of enterotoxin genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci from autochthonous Croatian fermented sausages. Veterinarski arhiv, u tisku. 6. Džidić, S., Šušković, J., Kos, B. (2010): Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria: Biochemical and Genetic Aspects. Food Technology and Biotechnology 46, 11-21. 7. Even, S., Leroy, S., Charlier, C., Zakour, N.B., Chacornac, J.P., Lebert, I., Jamet, E., Desmonts, M.H., Coton, E., Pochet, S., Donnio, P.Y., Gautier, M., Talon, R., Leloir, Y. (2010): Low occurrence of safety hazards in coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from fermented foodstuffs. International Journal of Food Microbiology 139, 87-95. 8. Hadžiosmanović, M., Gasparik-Reichardt, J., Smajlović, M., Vesković-Moračanin, S., Zdolec, N. (2005): Possible use of bacteriocins and starter cultures in upgrading of quality and safety of traditionally fermented sausages. Tehnologija mesa 46, 194-211. 9. Kalmus, P., Aasmäe, B., Kärssin, A., Orro, T., Kask, K. (2011): Udder pathogens and their resistance to antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Estonia. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53, 4. 10. Klein, G. (2011): Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Probiotic and Clinical Lactobacillus Strains in Relation to Safety Aspects of Probiotics. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 8, 267-281. 11. Mayrhofer, S., Domig, K.J., Mair, C., Zitz, U., Huys, G., Kneifel, W. (2008): Comparison of Broth Microdilution, ETest and Agar Disk Diffusion Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Lactobacillus acidophilus Group Members. Applied and Environmental MIcrobiology 74, 3745-3748. 12. Sampimon, O.C., Lam, T.J.G.M., Mevius, D.J., Schukken, Y.H., Zadoks, R.N. (2011): Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Veterinary Microbiology 150, 173-179.

N. ZDOLEC et al.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria, Mljekarstvo 63 (1), 30-35 (2013) 35 13. Simeoni, D., Rizzotti, L., Cocconcelli, P., Gazzola, S., Dellaglio, F., Torriani, S. (2008): Antibiotic resistance genes and identification of staphylococci collected from the production chain of swine meat commodities. Food Microbiology 25, 196-201. 14. Šušković, J., Kos, B., Beganović, J., Leboš Pavunc, A., Habjanič, K., Matošić, S. (2010): Antimicrobial activity - the most important property of probiotic and starter lactic acid bacteria. Food Technology and Biotechnology 48, 296-307. 15. Resch, M., Nagel, V., Hertel, C. (2008): Antibiotic resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with food and used in starter cultures. International Journal of Food Microbiology 127, 99-104. 16. Vragović, N., Bažulić, D., Zdolec, N. (2012): Dietary exposure assessment of ß-lactam antibiotic residues in milk on Croatian market. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology 4, 81-84. 17. Vragović, N., Bažulić, D., Jakupović, E., Zdolec, N. (2012): Dietary exposure assessment of strepromycin and tetracycline in food of animal origin on the Croatian market. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part B: Surveillance 5, 236-240. 18. Zdolec, N., Hadžiosmanović, M., Kozačinski, L., Cvrtila, Ž., Filipović, I. (2006): Ostatci biološki štetnih tvari u mlijeku. Mljekarstvo 56, 191-202. 19. Zdolec, N., Filipović, I., Cvrtila Fleck, Ž., Marić, A., Jankuloski, D., Kozačinski, L., Njari, B. (2011): Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented sausages and raw cheese. Veterinarski arhiv 81, 133-141. 20. Zdolec, N., Dobranić, V., Filipović, I. (2012a): Nalaz rezistentnih koagulaza-negativnih stafilokoka u mesnim i mliječnim proizvodima. Zbornik radova 5. Hrvatski veterinarski kongres, Tuheljske toplice, 71-76. 21. Zdolec, N., Dobranić, V., Filipović, I., Marcincakova, D. (2012b): Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from spontaneously fermented wild boar sausages. Folia veterinaria 56, Suppl. 1, 60-62. 22. Zdolec, N., Dobranić, V., Horvatić, A., Vučinić, S. (2013): Selection and application of autochthonous functional starter cultures in traditional Croatian fermented sausages. International Food Research Journal 20, 1-6. 23. Zdolec, N., Račić, I., Vujnović, A., Zdelar-Tuk, M., Matanović, K., Filipović, I., Dobranić, V., Cvetnić, Ž., Špičić, S. (2013): Antimicrobial resistance of coagulasenegative staphylococci isolated from spontaneously fermented sausages. Food Technology and Biotechnology, u tisku. 24. Zhou, J.S., Pillidge, C.J., Gopal, P.K., Gill, H.S. (2005): Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. International Journal of Food Microbiology 98, 211-217.