Board Summary Report

Similar documents
A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:

ORDINANCE ARTICLE 2: DEFINITIONS. Amend the definition of Agriculture and add the following definitions:

October 1, 2013 Work Session Discussion Item Potential Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment relating to Animals Animal ordinance research provided by staff

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE # WHEREAS, backyard and urban chickens eat noxious weeds and insects; and

ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

Chapter 60. Animals. Article I. Dogs. Article II. Cats Prohibited Conduct Definitions License

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2007 DEVELOPMENT CODE

hens may be kept on residential lots in excess of

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

CITY OF ELEPHANT BUTTE ORDINANCE NO. 154

TOWNSHIP OF WILKINS ORDINANCE NO.:

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Chicken Ordinance: ORDINANCE DISCUSSION ITEM:

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Village of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, :05 PM

Selected City Codes Regulating Livestock and Fowl. for the City of Ethridge Tennessee

RESIDENTIAL CHICKEN PERMIT APPLICATION LICENSE FEE $25.00

City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DODGEVILLE, IOWA COUNTY, WISCONSIN, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. Introduction Exclusions Title Commencement Interpretation Definitions... 4

SAMPLE OF CITY CODES REGARDING CHICKENS

THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS, CATS, POULTRY AND BEES BYLAW 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SUMMERLAND COUNCIL REPORT

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

WHEREAS, the concept of local sustainability has inspired an interest in backyard and community food production to provide local food sources, and

Reasons: Why consider allowing backyard chickens in the urban and suburban areas of Saanich?

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

CITY OF LIVERMORE ANIMAL FANCIER S PERMIT RULES AND REGULATIONS

FARIBAULT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 20, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

Backyard Chickens. Rules for maintaining chickens in residential zoned areas

Backyard Hens. February 21 & 27, 2018

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Animal Control

Agenda Item No. 9A April 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager

PROVISIONS FOR BACKYARD CHICKENS IN THE CITY LIMITS

CITY OF BROCKTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS- KEEPING OF CHICKENS, OTHER FOWL AND DOMESTIC FARM ANIMALS

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 92 OF TITLE IX OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF EAST GRAND RAPIDS

Animals. Part 2. New Plymouth District Council Bylaw people nearby as many people can find this offensive.

2018 Urban Hens Pilot Registration

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

The Accessory Non-Commercial Raising and Keeping of Small Livestock, Fowl or Poultry

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

CHICKENS & DUCKS IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

TITLE 10 - ANIMAL CONTROL

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

Urban Henfare: A Model Approach to Keeping Chickens Within Residential Areas. Joan Michelle Blazich

TOWNSHIP OF NORTH DUMFRIES DISCUSSION PAPER BACKYARD HENS

CHAPTER 91: ANIMALS. Section. General Provisions

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

CHAPTER THIRTEEN KEEPING OF ANIMALS, POULTRY AND BEES 2007

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CHAPTER 11: ANIMAL CONTROL

Mille Lacs County Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Public Safety Article 3 - Animals

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Ekard Conditonal Use Permit CU

CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS PART 1 PROHIBITING DOGS RUNNING AT LARGE PART 2 ANIMAL NOISE CONTROL PART 3 CONTROL OF ANIMAL DEFECATION

CITY OF CHARLES STURT DOMESTIC LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT BY-LAW By-law No. 6 of 2014

CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS. Part 1. Dogs Running at Large. Part 2. Animal Noise Control. Part 3 Keeping of Certain Animals. Part 4

A tag provided to individuals who are issued a license to maintain an animal. 5. Birds.

AGENDA ITEM. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: July 25, 2017

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL Keeping near a residence or business restricted. No

CITY OF GRACE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 8, 2018

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance

(A) Definition: An area which is used for growing farm products or keeping farm poultry and farm livestock.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

City of Cornelius Agenda Report

Coop License Application Village of Roscoe Return Completed Form to ZoningDepartment, Village of Roscoe Main St.

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapters: 6.04 Running at Large

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS. Part 1. Keeping of Dogs

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHOCOLAY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, September 19, 2016

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Keeping of Certain Animals

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Grant Settle Conditonal Use Permit - PH2018-8

Chapter 4 ANIMALS AND FOWL

CITY OF HOLLISTER CHICKEN PERMIT APPLICATION & COOP SITE PLAN

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Virgin Islands Housing Authority St. Croix

H 7906 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======= LC02744/SUB A ======= STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D.

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS:

UNLISTED ACCESSORY USE DETERMINATION: OUTDOOR OFF-LEASH DOG ENCLOSURE ACCESSORY TO EATING PLACE

Agenda Item No.: Date: January 26, 2010

DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

City Chickens. City Chickens

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

Olney Municipal Code. Title 6 ANIMALS

PRODUCTION BASICS HOW DO I RAISE POULTRY FOR MEAT? Chuck Schuster University of Maryland Extension Central Maryland

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Prohibiting Dogs and Animals Running at Large

NZS 9201:Part 13:1999

6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS

December 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapters: 6.04 Dogs Dog Kennels and Multiple Dog Licenses Vicious Animals. Chapter 6.04 DOGS.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Urban Chickens P U B L I C P A R T I C I P A T I O N R E P O R T

Transcription:

BOCC study session June 19, 2018 Agenda Item Board Summary Report Date: June 1, 2018 To: Through: From: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Jan Yeckes, Planning Division Manager Caitlyn Cahill, Zoning and Animal Control Manager Presenting Survey Results (attached reference document): Complete a brief overview and explanation of the survey completed early 2018 and discuss the results. Requesting Direction: To evaluate citizen feedback regarding a request to allow bee-keeping and chickens on Residential zoned properties (in back yards of homes) in unincorporated Arapahoe County. Direction/Information: Staff requests direction as to whether the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) would like staff to: a) Initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether to incorporate provisions to allow bee-keeping on residentially-zoned lots (in back yards of homes) within the unincorporated county, or b) Initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether to incorporate provisions to allow chickens on residentially-zoned lots (in back yards of homes) within the unincorporated county, or c) Initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether to incorporate provisions to allow both bee-keeping and chickens on residentially-zoned lots (in back yards of homes) within the unincorporated county, or d) Take no further action on the proposals at this time. Request and Recommendation The BOCC Administration Office requested that Communications Services and the Public Works Planning Division staff provide a synopsis of recent survey results, along with basic recommended regulations, during a study session with the BOCC. This study session will consider the request to move forward with code amendments to allow bee-keeping and raising of chickens in residential areas of the unincorporated county. Several Arapahoe County cities and other metropolitan Denver jurisdictions have regulations to allow bee-keeping and/or raising of chickens. Some citizens of unincorporated Arapahoe County would like to have that same opportunity and approached the County Commissioners to reconsider earlier decisions to limit chickens to Agricultural and some Rural Residential zone districts and to expand bee-keeping to properties smaller than one acre. Page 1 Bees and Chickens study session

BOCC study session June 19, 2018 Agenda Item Background Over a period of time, citizens have contacted the Zoning Division to express concerns that Arapahoe County does not have provisions for keeping of back-yard chickens in residential areas and that bee-keeping requires a property of at least one acre. Citizens have spoken at public meetings of the Board of County Commissioners to request consideration of these activities and contacted Commissioners to request that the County change its position on the prohibition of chickens outside agriculturally-zoned properties. Two of the three Rural Residential zone districts (R-A Residential- Agricultural, 2.41-acre lots, and A-2 Agricultural, 9-acre lots) currently allow the keeping of small, non-commercial agricultural animals, such as chickens, for the private use of residents only. Some citizens are also concerned with the one-acre minimum lot size required for bee-keeping. Bee-keeping is currently not addressed in the Land Development Code. An appeal of a use determination by the Zoning Administrator resulted in a determination by the Board of Adjustment that bee-keeping is limited to properties of at least one acre in size. County staff has adhered to this use determination for a number of years. The current citizen-based request would require an amendment to the Land Development Code to address bee-keeping regulations. On July 11, 2016, zoning staff met with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss potential amendments in the Land Development Code allowing for citizens in residential areas to own and keep chickens and bees. Staff was directed to discuss the ongoing benefits and concerns, with other agencies, and to then schedule a follow up Study Session, at a later date. On December 4, 2017, zoning staff met with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss the feedback from other jurisdictions with regard to backyard keeping of bees and chickens. The BOCC directed staff to complete a citizen survey. Staff would then come back at a later date to discuss the survey results and present the BOCC with code amendment details. Discussion Currently: Bees are allowed on residential properties only when the lot is at least one acre in size. Chickens are not allowed on residentially zoned properties or on properties zoned R-E Residential-Estate (minimum 1.61-acre lot size), which is one of three Rural Residential zone districts. Pets, as defined in the County s Land Development Code, do not include chickens, geese, ducks, turkeys or other poultry or domesticated fowl. Small, non-commercial agricultural animals, allowed in the A-E, A-1, A-2 and R-A zone districts, are defined as chickens, geese, other small poultry, and/or rabbits, kept only for the private use of the residents of the property where the animals are raised and not for commercial purposes. Page 2 Bees and Chickens study session

BOCC study session June 19, 2018 Agenda Item AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICTS ANIMALS (maximum per lot) A-E (35-acre) A-1 (19-acre) Pets no limit 4 Agricultural Animals per acre no limit no limit Agricultural Animals, Small, Non-Commercial no limit no limit RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS ANIMALS (maximum per lot) (min lot size) A-2 (9-acre) R-A (2.41-acre) R-E (1.61-acre) Pets 4 4 3 Agricultural Animals per acre no limit 1 NP Agricultural Animals, Small, Non-Commercial no limit no limit NP Benefits/Concerns Benefits cited by those who have previously contacted staff include: Ability to produce local, home-grown food, such as eggs and honey; Opportunity to teach responsibility and urban farming to children in the family; Opportunity to engage in the urban farming movement in more ways than gardening. Concerns have included: Common enforcement concerns include: chickens roaming free on adjacent properties or public right-ofway; welfare/neglect concerns; complaints about predator and rodent infestation; noise complaints. Animal Control is bound by the County Resolution. This Resolution does not have the ability to enforce or address any of these complaints or concerns. Complaints from neighbors about setback violations, sanitation, noise and other concerns. Some of these (chicken coop and bee-hive setbacks) could be addressed under zoning regulations; others could not. Shelters are often impacted by unwanted chickens and roosters that are not allowed. Some jurisdictions use a permit process. This could create administrative costs and challenges to a small Zoning staff. If regulations are developed, the Planning Division would be reluctant to recommend a permit process for these uses. Home Owner Association covenants and restrictions (HOA-CC&Rs) may prohibit or otherwise restrict uses that are considered permissible in the County regulations; these would be privately enforced by the HOA, and the County would enforce only County regulations. Page 3 Bees and Chickens study session

BOCC study session June 19, 2018 Agenda Item Recommended Regulations The below changes are staff recommendations should the Board provide staff with the direction to proceed with a draft code amendment. At this time, staff is not recommending a permitting process for the allowance of either backyard chickens or bees. Chickens (all recommended regulations are for residential, single family detached properties and will not address agriculturally zoned properties): Chickens would be permitted on residentially zoned lots with single-family detached dwelling units Four (4) chickens would be allowed No roosters would be allowed Preferred setback/height requirements: o Behind home o 10 feet from the side and rear property lines o 10 feet maximum in height Alternative Setback options: o Behind the home, corner lots with no contiguous neighbors may place coop in side yard and behind front building line o Must meet accessory building setbacks and height requirements regardless of if a building permit is required or not o If PUD residential developments are silent on accessory buildings, staff would need to specify setbacks and heights to be used in those cases Chickens must be kept in coops and not allowed to roam free between dusk and dawn Chickens must be contained to owners property at all times Slaughtering on residential property would not be permitted Bees (all recommended regulations are for residential, single family detached properties and will not address agriculturally zoned properties): "Bee" means any stage of the common domestic honey bee, Apis mellifera species. Bee does not include Africanized bees and hybrids. "Colony" means a hive and its equipment and appurtenances, including bees, comb, honey, pollen, and brood. Hive boxes would be permitted on residentially zoned lots with single-family detached dwelling units Two (2) hive boxes would be allowed Preferred setback/height requirements: o Behind home o 10 feet from the side and rear property lines o 10 feet maximum in height Alternative Setback options: o Behind the home, corner lots with no contiguous neighbors may place hives in side yard and behind front building line o Must meet accessory building setbacks and height requirements regardless of if a building permit is required or not o If PUD residential developments are silent on accessory buildings, staff would need to specify setbacks and heights to be used in those cases Page 4 Bees and Chickens study session

BOCC study session June 19, 2018 Agenda Item Attachment 2018 citizen survey results for the keeping of bees and chickens within unincorporated Arapahoe County Board Summary Report from the December 4, 2017 study session Citizen feedback since August 2017 Alternatives 1. Direct staff to initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether new or updated regulations to allow bee-keeping and/or chickens would be appropriate; 2. Direct staff to take no further action on these issues at this time (or other direction). Fiscal Impact Currently the keeping of chickens and bees in residential areas must be handled as zoning violations, and staff time is used to explain our regulations and to address concerns over uses that are not allowed. While some time may be needed to explain and enforce new regulations, much of the information could be provided on the County s website. Some jurisdictions use a permit process. This could create administrative costs and challenges to our small Zoning staff. If regulations are developed, the Planning Division would be reluctant to recommend a permitting process. Reviewed By: Dave Schmit, Director of Public Works and Development Robert Hill, Senior Assistant County Attorney Todd Weaver, Budget Manager, Finance Department Page 5 Bees and Chickens study session

Report for Backyard Bees and Chickens Response Counts Complet ion Rat e: 89.9% Complete 1,984 Partial 222 T ot als: 2,20 6 1. Are you in favor of allowing residents in suburban (non-ag ricultural) neig hborhoods to raise backyard chickens and/or bees in hives? 1

14% No to both Chickens and Bees 4% Yes to Chickens only 3% No to Chickens only 7% Yes to Bees only 1% No to Bees only 72% Yes to both Chickens and Bees Value Percent Responses Yes to Chickens only 4.2% 82 No to Chickens only 2.8% 54 Yes to Bees only 6.5% 127 No to Bees only 0.6% 11 Yes to both Chickens and Bees 71.9% 1,404 No to both Chickens and Bees 14.1% 276 T ot als: 1,954 2. If you support backyard chickens and bees in residential areas, how many chickens and/or bee hives would you feel is appropriate? 2

40 30 Percent 20 10 0 Chickens: 3 Chickens: 6 Chickens: 9 Bee Hives: 1 Bee Hives: 2 Bee Hives: 3 None: I don't support chickens or bees Value Percent Responses Chickens: 3 20.1% 388 Chickens: 6 35.0% 676 Chickens: 9 24.3% 470 Bee Hives: 1 19.4% 375 Bee Hives: 2 26.3% 507 Bee Hives: 3 36.9% 713 None: I don't support chickens or bees 14.8% 286 3. Do you have concerns about backyard chickens and bee hives? 3

35% Yes 65% NO Value Percent Responses Yes 34.9% 673 NO 65.1% 1,256 T ot als: 1,929 4. If you have concerns about backyard chickens and bee hives, please explain 4

5. Would you raise backyard chickens or bees in suburban Arapahoe County if a permit or reg istration were required? 50% No 50% Yes 5

Value Percent Responses Yes 50.3% 964 No 49.7% 954 T ot als: 1,918 6. If a permit is required, what fee would you be willing to pay to raise backyard chickens and bees? 16% $100 + 12% $50 - $100 72% $50 or less Value Percent Responses $50 or less 72.2% 1,359 $50 - $100 12.1% 227 $100 + 15.7% 295 T ot als: 1,881 6

7. Please describe the style of neig hborhood/home style that you live in? 10% Attached Town home/condo or Apartments 5% Rural/Agricultural 85% Suburban Detached Home Value Percent Responses Rural/Agricultural 4.9% 93 Suburban Detached Home 85.2% 1,622 Attached T own home/condo or Apartments 9.9% 188 T ot als: 1,90 3 8. Please describe the area of Arapahoe County that you live in? 7

10% Northern: (Glendale, north Aurora, 4 Square Mile area) 4% Eastern: (Watkins, Byers, Strasburg, Deer Trail) 23% Western: (Littleton, Sheridan, Englewood, etc.) 64% Central: (Centennial, Foxfield, Aurora) Value Percent Responses Western: (Littleton, Sheridan, Englewood, etc.) 22.5% 423 Central: (Centennial, Foxfield, Aurora) 63.9% 1,201 Eastern: (Watkins, Byers, Strasburg, Deer T rail) 3.9% 73 Northern: (Glendale, north Aurora, 4 Square Mile area) 9.7% 183 T ot als: 1,880 9. Are there any additional comments, sug g estions or feedback that you would like to provide? 8

9

BOCC drop in December 4, 2017 Agenda Item Board Summary Report Date: November 17, 2017 To: Through: From: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Jan Yeckes, Planning Division Manager Caitlyn Cahill, Zoning and Animal Control Manager Michelle Lantz, Community Compliance Officer Requesting Direction: To evaluate a citizen-based request to allowing bee-keeping and chickens on Residential zoned properties (in back yards of homes) in unincorporated Arapahoe County Direction/Information: Staff requests direction as to whether the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) would like staff to: a) Initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether to incorporate provisions to allow bee-keeping and raising chickens on residentially-zoned lots (in back yards of homes) within the unincorporated county, or b) Take no further action on the proposals at this time. Request and Recommendation The BOCC Administration Office requested that Planning Division staff provide support during a study session requested by citizens to discuss possible opportunities for bee-keeping and raising of chickens in residential areas of the unincorporated county. Several Arapahoe County cities and other metropolitan Denver jurisdictions have regulations to allow bee-keeping and/or raising of chickens. Some citizens of unincorporated Arapahoe County would like to have that same opportunity and approached the County Commissioners to reconsider earlier decisions to limit chickens to Agricultural and some Rural Residential zone districts and to expand bee-keeping to properties smaller than one acre. Background Over a period of time, citizens have contacted the Zoning Division to express concerns that Arapahoe County does not have provisions for keeping of back-yard chickens in residential areas and that beekeeping requires a property of at least one acre. Page 1 Bees and Chickens drop in

BOCC drop in December 4, 2017 Agenda Item Citizens have spoken at public meetings of the Board of County Commissioners to request consideration of these activities and contacted Commissioners to request that the County change its position on the prohibition of chickens outside agriculturally-zoned properties. Two of the three Rural Residential zone districts (R-A Residential-Agricultural, 2.41-acre lots, and A-2 Agricultural, 9-acre lots) currently allow the keeping of small, non-commercial agricultural animals, such as chickens, for the private use of residents only. Some citizens are also concerned with the one-acre minimum lot size required for bee-keeping. Beekeeping is currently not addressed in the Land Development Code. An appeal of a use determination by the Zoning Administrator resulted in a determination by the Board of Adjustment that bee-keeping is limited to properties of at least one acre in size. County staff has adhered to this use determination for a number of years. The current citizen-based request would require an amendment to the Land Development Code to address bee-keeping regulations. On July 11, 2016, zoning staff met with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss potential amendments in the Land Development Code allowing for citizens in residential areas to own and keep chickens and bees. Staff was directed to discuss the ongoing benefits and concerns, with other agencies, and to then schedule a follow up Study Session, at a later date. Discussion Currently: Bees are allowed on residential properties only when the lot is at least one acre in size. Chickens are not allowed on residentially zoned properties or on properties zoned R-E Residential-Estate (minimum 1.61-acre lot size), which is one of three Rural Residential zone districts. Pets, as defined in the County s Land Development Code, do not include chickens, geese, ducks, turkeys or other poultry or domesticated fowl. Small, non-commercial agricultural animals, allowed in the A-E, A-1, A-2 and R-A zone districts, are defined as chickens, geese, other small poultry, and/or rabbits, kept only for the private use of the residents of the property where the animals are raised and not for commercial purposes. AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICTS ANIMALS (maximum per lot) A-E (35-acre) A-1 (19-acre) Pets no limit 4 Agricultural Animals per acre no limit no limit Agricultural Animals, Small, Non-Commercial no limit no limit RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS ANIMALS (maximum per lot) (min lot size) A-2 (9-acre) R-A (2.41-acre) R-E (1.61-acre) Pets 4 4 3 Page 2 Bees and Chickens drop in

BOCC drop in December 4, 2017 Agenda Item Agricultural Animals per acre no limit 1 NP Agricultural Animals, Small, Non-Commercial no limit no limit NP Benefits/Concerns Some benefits cited by those who have previously contacted staff include: Ability to produce local, home-grown food, such as eggs and honey; Opportunity to teach responsibility and urban farming to children in the family; Opportunity to engage in the urban farming movement in more ways than gardening. Potential concerns may include: Common enforcement concerns include: chickens roaming free on adjacent properties or public right-of-way; welfare/neglect concerns; complaints about predator and rodent infestation; noise complaints. Animal Control is bound by the County Resolution. This Resolution does not have the ability to enforce or address any of these complaints or concerns. Complaints from neighbors about setback violations, sanitation or other concerns. Some of these (chicken coop and bee-hive setbacks) could be addressed under zoning regulations; others could not. Shelters are often impacted by unwanted chickens and roosters that are not allowed. Some jurisdictions use a permit process. This could create administrative costs and challenges to a small Zoning staff. If regulations are developed, the Planning Division would be reluctant to recommend a permit process for these uses. Home Owner Association covenants and restrictions (HOA-CC&Rs) may prohibit or otherwise restrict uses that are considered permissible in the County regulations; these would be privately enforced by the HOA, and the County would enforce only County regulations. Attachment Synopsis of how other jurisdictions are handling these two topics, in addition to a list of feedback from other jurisdictions through the State of Colorado are included in this report. Alternatives 1. Direct staff to initiate a Land Development Code amendment process to consider whether new or updated regulations to allow bee-keeping and chickens would be appropriate; 2. Direct staff to take no further action on these issues at this time (or other direction). Fiscal Impact Currently the keeping of chickens and bees in residential areas must be handled as zoning violations, and staff time is used to explain our regulations and to address concerns over uses that are not allowed. While some time may be needed to explain and enforce new regulations, much of the information could be provided on the County s web site. Page 3 Bees and Chickens drop in

BOCC drop in December 4, 2017 Agenda Item Some jurisdictions use a permit process. This could create administrative costs and challenges to our small Zoning staff. If regulations are developed, the Planning Division would be reluctant to recommend a permit process. These uses could be defined in the Land Development Code as accessory to the principal residential use occurring on the same property and could include specific provisions, such as setbacks for the use, or structures associated with the use, and maximum number of chickens per lot. Reviewed By: Dave Schmit, Director of Public Works and Development Robert Hill, Senior Assistant County Attorney Todd Weaver, Budget Manager, Finance Department Page 4 Bees and Chickens drop in

Arapahoe County cities that allow the keeping of chickens and bees on most residential property include Aurora, Centennial, Littleton, Englewood and Greenwood Village. Zoning regulations in these areas have similar language to prevent nuisance issues from occurring. Examples of these common regulations are; Limiting the number of hens allowed per household. Prohibiting roosters Specific types of enclosures (fully enclosed / predator resistant) Size and location of the enclosure Odor, waste and drainage must be maintained as to not constitute a nuisance Feedback from other jurisdictions: Agency Pros Cons Denver Limited issues with citizens that maintain Food Producing Animal Permit (limits number of chickens/ducks and prohibits roosters) -Continuing to have issues with roosters -Number of birds owned Westminster Thornton -produce fresh eggs - Experience raising chickens Spent more time enforcing the prohibition of chickens Steamboat Springs Residents are happy to own chickens -Chickens not being contained -Noise concerns -Dogs or other predators breaking in to chicken coops Lone Tree Not allowed. City has had to enforce on citizens keeping chickens unlawfully. Englewood Commerce City Does not have a limit on number of chickens or roosters. Struggles with issues of cleanliness and noise. Does not allow chickens or bees in residential areas. Golden -Promotes self-sufficiency and agricultural learning opportunities - Honey bees are beneficial to the environment. -Population control (too many bees) -Noise from chickens -predator control (chickens) 1

Chicken and Beekeeping restrictions and regulations in surrounding jurisdictions ADAMS COUNTY Chickens and Bee Keeping Limits on chickens and bees are based on livestock unit calculations per acre. Chickens and bees not permitted on properties under 1 acre. DOUGLAS COUNTY Chickens (4) Chickens are allowed in all zone categories (properties greater than 2.3 acres can have more) No Roosters Shall be properly housed and shall be located in accordance with the required accessory use set back Bee Keeping Code is silent. No regulations and no language prohibiting bee keeping JEFFERSON COUNTY Chickens The keeping of chickens on single family detached, Two family dwelling or duplex residential lots. The maximum total number which may be kept shall be 6. Roosters are not permitted. A Permit must be obtained from Planning and Zoning for the keeping of chickens. For this use, the permit shall only be applicable to the current owner or lessee and does not run with the property. Chicken coop enclosures must be predator resistant. Coops and runs may not be located within the front yard. Chickens are to be kept for personal use. Adjacent lots and any registered HOA shall be notified in writing of the use. Lot and Building Standards Coops and runs shall meet all setback requirements, unless they meet the following conditions: No openings of the coop structure shall be allowed that exceed the height of the screening on sides of the coop which are adjacent to other property boundaries; The coops and enclosure are screened from neighbors view by a minimum 5 foot high solid, closed fence. Bee Keeping Keeping of bees on single family detached, Two-family dwelling or Duplex residential lots. A permit must be obtained from Planning and Zoning for the keeping of bees. Size and location of hive meeting applicable setbacks of zone district Hives shall meet all setback requirements, unless they are screened from neighbors' view by a minimum 5 foot high closed fence. 2

(2) Two hives shall be permitted on lots with a minimum of 4,000 square feet. One additional hive shall be permitted for each 4,000 square feet of lot area exceeding 4,000 square feet. CITY OF BRIGHTON Chickens (6) Chickens per household No roosters Shelters shall meet the height and setback standards required by current zoning Bee Keeping Only the common honeybee (apis mellifera) may be kept and raised. Keeping any other type of bee is strictly prohibited. Non aggressive queens shall be selected for the generation of a colony. A convenient water source must be provided within the fly path of the hive. Hives must be at least 15 from any property line or public right of way, unless a flyway is provided, and kept in the backyard. Flyways are a 6 tall fence, wall, or thick hedge that directs the path of the bee up and out of the property. The hive shall also be oriented to face in towards the property so that the bees have a 10 clear flight path in front of the hive. Number of hives: Properties that are ½ acre or smaller (21,780 SF) can have a maximum of 2 hives Properties that are ½ 1 acre (21,780 43,560 SF) can have a maximum of 4 hives, or Properties that are larger than 1 acre (43,560 SF) can have a maximum of 8 hives. Hives that are more than 200 from any property line shall not be limited in number. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD Chickens Chickens are allowed in all zone categories. No limit on number of chickens or roosters. Bee Keeping Bee keeping requires a permit with a limit of (3) hives per premises. Applicant must have: 1. Prior experience, experienced mentor, active membership in a beekeeping organization or classes in apiculture. 2. A backyard fenced with a six foot privacy fence or hedges high enough to encourage bees to overfly neighboring properties. Or signed affidavits from contiguous neighbors indicating they approve of the hives w/o fencing or hedges. 3. A water source in the backyard 4. At least (2) contact names and numbers in the event of swarms or other issues. 3

CITY OF DENVER Chickens No more than 8 chickens and ducks combined per zone lot. No structure used to house the animals may be closer than 15 feet to: (1) a structure on an abutting zone lot containing a dwelling unit, and (2) a dwelling unit not the residence of the animal keeper(s) and located in a primary structure on the same zone lot. On any residential zone lot, the animals shall be maintained in the rear 50% of the Zone Lot Depth. Slaughtering of the animals as part of keeping such animals is prohibited Bee Keeping 2 hives per zone lot; Hives must be in rear 1/3 of zone lot with a 5 foot setback from side and rear zone lot lines; Hives must be screened so that the bees must surmount a 6 foot barrier, which may be vegetative, before leaving the property; No outdoor storage of any bee paraphernalia or hive materials not being used as a part of a hive. CITY OF LITTLETON Chickens (4) Chickens allowed. No Roosters. Allowed in most residential zones. Chickens may not run at large in the City and upon the property of others or upon the streets, alleys or other public places within the City. Chickens: As accessory to a single family residential use in the R 1, R 2, R 3, and R E zone districts, a maximum of not more than four (4) chicken hens are permitted, subject to the following standards: The chicken hens must be provided with a covered predator resistant chicken house that is properly ventilated and designed to be easily accessed, cleaned and maintained. The chicken house must have a minimum of two (2) square feet of floor space per bird with an attached outdoor enclosure. The outdoor enclosure must have a minimum of ten (10) square feet per bird. Neither the chicken house nor the outdoor enclosure may be located less than fifteen feet (15') from any abutting property line. Roosters are prohibited. No person may own or keep a rooster in R 1, R 2, R 3, and R E zone districts. The chicken hens may not be killed by or at the direction of the owner or keeper thereof, except pursuant to lawful order of an appropriate state, county, or city official, or for the purpose of euthanasia when surrendered to a licensed veterinarian or the Humane Society for such purpose, or as otherwise expressly permitted by law. Odor, dust, waste, and drainage must be controlled so as not to constitute a nuisance, safety hazard or health problem to adjoining property or uses. (Ord. 4, Series of 2010) 4

Bee Keeping Definitions: The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have meanings APIARY: A place where one or more beehives are kept. BEE: The adult stage of the common domestic honeybee, Apis mellifera species. BEEKEEPER: Any person who owns or maintains a bee colony. COLONY: A hive and its equipment and appurtenances, including bees, comb, honey, pollen, and brood. HIVE: A structure intended for the housing of one bee colony. A hive, including the attached honey supers, shall not exceed twelve (12) cubic feet in size. ROBBING: The pilfering of honey from a weak colony by other honeybees or insects. TRACT: A contiguous parcel of land under common ownership. (B) Hives: All bee colonies shall be kept in hives with removable combs, which shall be kept in sound and usable condition.(c) Setback: All hives shall be located at least five feet (5') from any adjoining property with the back of the hive facing the nearest adjoining property. (D) Fencing Of Flyways: In each instance in which any colony is situated within twenty five feet (25') of a developed public or private property line of the tract upon which the apiary is situated, as measured from the nearest point on the hive to the property line, the beekeeper shall establish and maintain a flyway barrier at least six feet (6') in height consisting of a solid wall or fence parallel to the property line and extending ten feet (10') beyond the colony in each direction so that all bees are forced to fly at an elevation of at least six feet (6') above ground level over the property lines in the vicinity of the apiary. (E) Water: Each property owner or beekeeper shall ensure that a convenient source of water is available at all times to the bees so that the bees will not congregate at swimming pools, bibcocks, pet water bowls, birdbaths or other water sources where they may cause human, bird or domestic pet contact. The water shall be maintained so as not to become stagnant. (F) Maintenance: Each property owner or beekeeper shall ensure that no bee comb or other materials that might encourage robbing are left upon the grounds of the apiary site. Upon their removal from the hive, all such materials shall promptly be disposed of in a sealed container or placed within a building or other bee proof enclosure. (G) Queens: In any instance in which a colony exhibits usually aggressive characteristics by stinging or attempting to sting without due provocation or exhibits an unusual disposition towards swarming, it shall be the duty of the beekeeper to requeen the colony. Queens shall be selected from stock bred for gentleness and nonswarming characteristics (H) Colony Densities: 1. it shall be unlawful to keep any colony on a multiple family lot or to keep more than the following number of colonies on any tract within the city, based upon the size or configuration of the tract on which the apiary is situated: (a) Less than one half (1/2) acre lot size: Four (4) colonies; (b) One half (1/2) acre or more but less than one acre lot size: Six (6) colonies; (c) One acre or larger lot size: Eight (8) colonies; 5

(d) Regardless of lot size, where all hives are situated at least two hundred feet (200') in any direction from all property lines of the lot on which the apiary is situated, there shall be no limit to the number of colonies. 2. For each two (2) colonies authorized under colony densities, subsection (H)1 of this section, there may be maintained upon the same tract one nucleus colony in a hive structure not exceeding one standard nine and five eighths inch (95/8") depth ten (10) frame hive body with no supers attached as required from time to time for management of swarms. Each such nucleus colony shall be disposed of or combined with an authorized colony within thirty (30) days after the date it is acquired. CITY OF CENTENNIAL Chickens A total of (6) chickens, provided that chickens must be contained in a covered enclosure between dusk and dawn. Any Rooster over the age of 6 months is prohibited in all zones. Requirements for Accessory Buildings or Structures for the Keeping of Chickens Height. Height shall not exceed 10 feet to the peak of the roof. Setbacks Front: Behind the principal building. Street Side: Equal to the street side setback required for the principal building. Interior Side: 10 feet. Rear: 10 feet. Bee Keeping Requirements for Accessory Buildings or Structures for Beekeeping. Permitted Lots. Hive boxes are only permitted on residentially and agriculturally zoned lots with singlefamily detached dwelling units. Hive Box Height and Area. Hive boxes and any ground mounted appurtenances are permitted to be a combined height of up to six (6) feet above ground level and up to ten (10) cubic feet in area. Setbacks. Front: Behind the principal building. Street Side: Equal to the street side setback required for the principal building. Interior Side: Ten (10) feet. Rear: Ten (10) feet. Hive Boxes. All bee colonies shall be kept in hive boxes with movable combs or frames. Hive Box Maximums. Maximum hive boxes permitted per residential and agricultural zone lot: Lots less than one quarter acre in size: Two (2) hive boxes. Lots between one quarter acre and less than one half acre in size: Four (4) hive boxes. Lots between one half acre and less than one acre in size: Six (6) hive boxes. Lots between one acre and less than two acres in size: Eight (8) hive boxes. Lots two acres and greater in size: Twelve (12) hive boxes. 6

Exception: For lots where all hive boxes are situated at least two hundred fifty (250) feet in any direction from all property lines of the lot, there is no limit as to the maximum hive boxes permitted per residential lot. CITY OF AURORA Chickens Chickens are allowed in residential areas with an approved permit from the city. Owners can have no more than 6 chickens at any given time; roosters are prohibited on resident property. For all single family residential properties upon lots of 20,000 or more square feet in size up to 8 chicken hens will be allowed, but no roosters. Chickens must be provided a chicken house and an adjacent 6 square foot or larger enclosure; chickens must have access to such house and enclosure during daylight hours. Chickens must be secured in the chicken house from dusk to dawn. Chickens may not run at large. HOUSE REQUIREMENTS: House must be covered and predator resistant. House may be located in rear yard only. House must be at least 2 square feet per chicken in floor space, but not greater than 120 square feet. House must be properly ventilated and designed to be easily accessed, cleaned, and maintained Setbacks: Structure must be located at least 15 feet from the property line of any abutting properties. If Owner wishes the structure to be closer than 15 feet to an abutting property, Owner must get written consent from the property owner(s) of the affected properties. Bee Keeping Setback. All hives shall be located at least five feet from any adjoining property with the back of the hive facing the nearest adjoining property. Fencing of flyways. In each instance in which any colony is situated within 25 feet of a developed public or private property line of the tract upon which the apiary is situated, as measured from the nearest point on the hive to the property line, the beekeeper shall establish and maintain a flyway barrier at least six feet in height consisting of a solid wall or fence parallel to the property line and extending ten feet beyond the colony in each direction so that all bees are forced to fly at an elevation of at least six feet above ground level over the property lines in the vicinity of the apiary. Water. Each beekeeper shall ensure that a convenient source of water is available at all times to the bees so that the bees will not congregate at swimming pools, bibcocks, pet water bowls, birdbaths or other water sources where they may cause human, bird or domestic pet contact. The water shall be maintained so as not to become stagnant. Maintenance. Each beekeeper shall ensure that no bee comb or other materials that might encourage robbing are left upon the grounds of the apiary site. Upon their removal from the hive, all such materials shall promptly be disposed of in a sealed container or placed within a building or other bee proof enclosure. Queens. In any instance in which a colony exhibits unusually aggressive characteristics by stinging or attempting to sting without due provocation or exhibits an unusual disposition towards swarming, it 7

shall be the duty of the beekeeper to re queen the colony. Queens shall be selected from stock bred for gentleness and nonswarming characteristics. Colony densities: It shall be unlawful to keep more than the following number of colonies on any tract within the city, based upon the size or configuration of the tract on which the apiary is situated: One quarter acre or less tract size Two colonies; More than one quarter acre but less than one half acre tract size Four colonies; One half acre or more but less than one acre tract size Six colonies; One acre or larger tract size Eight colonies; Regardless of tract size, where all hives are situated at least 200 feet in any direction from all property lines of the tract on which the apiary is situated, there shall be no limit to the number of colonies. 8

Caitlyn Cahill From: Sent: Subject: Attachments: Caitlyn Cahill Wednesday, February 28, 2018 10:46 AM Regulation Feedback: Unincorporated Arapahoe County HOA Bee&Chicken Feedback.pdf Hello: You are receiving this email because you are listed as the point of contact in our HOA database for one of the single family Homeowners Associations, within unincorporated Arapahoe County. If you are receiving this email by mistake, please let me know and we will update our records. If you manage multiple HOAs, please provide feedback based on each specific HOA. Arapahoe County has received a number of requests to allow the keeping of backyard chickens and bees in unincorporated suburban areas of Arapahoe County. This year, the Board of County Commissioners asked County staff to research nearby zoning rules and draft a proposed set of regulations for consideration that would allow backyard chickens and bees in Arapahoe County. Please see the attached letter requesting information from the Homeowners Associations most affected by this potential change in regulations. All email responses should go to zoning@arapahoegov.com and should be provided no later than March 31, 2018. Thank you, Caitlyn Cahill Zoning & Animal Control Manager 6924 South Lima Street, Centennial, CO 80112 Zoning: 720 874 6711 Animal Control: 720 874 6750 Direct: 720 874 6753 ccahill@arapahoegov.com http://www.arapahoegov.com 1

From: To: Subject: Date: Scott Kemmeries Michelle Lantz; Zoning; Kathleen Conti Backyard chickens and bee keeping in Arapahoe County Wednesday, May 30, 2018 12:48:59 PM I understand there is an upcoming meeting regarding zoning for raising backyard chickens and bees. I live in the unincorporated Holly Hills neighborhood and would like to request you change the law/zoning regulations to allow residents the option to do both. In general, I believe that unincorporated areas should generally have fewer restrictions than incorporated ones. In recent years a great many people around the country have begun successfully raising chickens or keeping bees in cities and suburbs, and I believe the overall results have been positive. Regarding chickens, I support efforts to allow raising chickens, with proper process and restrictions similar to what Denver and many other cities have done. I understand concerns many have regarding odors or other problems, but like any other right or privilege, if you don't follow the law you can be punished or have your rights taken away from you. I feel strongly that those who can follow the law and prevent disturbances or harm to others should be allowed to proceed with what makes them happy. It's not like we're talking about cattle or tigers. Many others jurisdictions have shown it can work, and government should attempt to reduce restrictions and regulations where it makes sense, and in this case I think it does. Regarding bees, similar reasoning applies, with the additional benefit to the environment considering the terrible reduction in bee population across the country. Sincerely, Scott Kemmeries 3013 Robin Way Denver, CO 80222 Arapahoe County

From: To: Subject: Date: Tom Tanner Zoning bees and chickens Tuesday, May 8, 2018 8:34:48 AM Good morning! I read that the County is comparing other County rules and questionnaire was to be submitted by March 1. Have Commissioners via your office made any decision yet. I ask as I serve on Saddle Rock Ridge HOA board which is in unincorporated Arapahoe and we have owners submitting requests of us but we wish to know County rules. Tom Tanner

From: To: Subject: Date: Darrin Rynders Zoning bees and chickens Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:21:56 PM Hi, I just filled out your survey for allowing bees and chickens in the county. My concern on the survey is why there was not an option for "no permit required". Why do the powers that be feel the need to forcibly extract money from citizens where no service if given in return? Thanks for your time and have a great day! Darrin Rynders

From: To: Subject: Date: Jim Morsman Zoning Bees and chickens Thursday, January 25, 2018 3:40:54 PM As a free man I do not need your permission to raise chickens and bees responsibly in my backyard. Obtaining fresh, healthy food for my family is my right as a human being. I am having trouble seeing why a person in Denver on a tiny, tiny lot (.10 acres or less) is allowed to have 6 chickens, bees and a goat and I can have nothing on my half acre lot. That is ridiculous. People in Littleton city limits.3 miles from me can have bees, chickens and goats. But I can not. The narrative behind not allowing such creatures is ignorant. People talk about smell. Smell is not a concern when you only have 6 chickens. One regular sized dog will put out more and smellier poop than 6 chickens. What about roosters? No one is advocating for roosters. Predation? Responsibly kept chickens do not increase or attract predators. Noise? Chickens make less noise than dogs, geese and most birds. Property values? There is no correlation between allowing chickens and a lowered property value. I am surprised no one has sued Arapahoe county over this nonsense. Again, I am a free man and an American citizen. I do not need the permission of the government to responsibly raise chickens and bees. Obtaining healthy food for my family is my right as a human being. I would love to talk to a conservative that does not agree with me. Jim Morsman Free Man

Caitlyn Cahill From: Sent: To: Subject: Charlotte Bucher <dgbucher@aol.com> Friday, March 2, 2018 12:00 PM Caitlyn Cahill Re: RE: chichens or bees Personal opinion. In a message dated 3/1/2018 12:50:01 PM Mountain Standard Time, CCahill@arapahoegov.com writes: Good Afternoon Char, Thank you for the feedback. Yesterday I sent out an email to all the HOAs that we had on file requesting their feedback. Is your email based on that request and the position of the HOA or a personal opinion as a resident? I would just like to make sure that I represent your feedback accurately. Thank you, Caitlyn Cahill Zoning & Animal Control Manager 6924 South Lima Street, Centennial, CO 80112 Zoning: 720 874 6711 Animal Control: 720 874 6750 Direct: 720 874 6753 ccahill@arapahoegov.com http://www.arapahoegov.com From: Charlotte Bucher [mailto:dgbucher@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:25 AM To: Zoning <Zoning2@arapahoecounty365.onmicrosoft.com> Subject: chichens or bees 1

I think that the homes in Huntington Estates are too close together to have to also ahare space with chickens unless the owners are scrupulous about picking up after them, like others do for the dogs. Bees are good for the pollination of the flowers which all grow during the summer, but the addition of wasps is not lovely for walkers. Char Bucher 2

From: To: Subject: Date: Gary Abrams Zoning chickens and bess in Huntington Estates Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:17:19 PM Please enforce your existing laws than ban chickens and bees in parts of Arapahoe County unincorporated. We live at 9359 E. Evans Place Denver Colorado 80231. The property directly across the street located at 9358 E. Evans Place Denver Colorado 80231 is raising chickens and bees. We live in a suburban area that over time is becoming more of a close-in urban area. Our property values have the potential to appreciate. Having chickens making a constant racket will hurt our property values. I know this because I have been a realtor for the last 41 years. The additional bees do present a health hazard to those (some of whom are children in our neighborhood) who may be allergic to them. Gary Abrams 9359 E. Evans Pl. Denver, CO 80231 303-671-8415 Office 303-671-7912 Fax 303-898-1850 Mobile realestate@exclusivecompanies.com

From: To: Subject: Date: Kristi Stanlis Michelle Lantz; Zoning; Nancy Sharpe Chickens, please! Thursday, May 31, 2018 9:09:25 AM To Whom This May Concern; I am writing to express my support in zoning backyard chickens and bee-keeping in unincorporated Arapahoe county. I am a resident of Willow Trace who support my neighbors' and community s interest in having backyard chickens and/or bee-keeping. I believe a healthy community is one that allows families to live more sustainably. Raising backyard chickens and bee-keeping are examples of this. I do not see this any differently than responsibly raising dogs or cats. In fact, chickens and bees create far less noise, smell, waste, and annoyance. Many neighboring communities to me allow backyard chickens and bee-keeping because they recognize the value it brings to their community. Backyard chickens provide fresh eggs, healthy composting and an opportunity to teach children responsibility, empathy for animals and a lesson in where our food comes from. With responsible owners, backyard chickens are wonderful pets and members of the family. Bee-keeping offers rewards far beyond harvesting honey and increasing pollination for a beautiful garden. It s nectar-gathering impact extends into the community allowing them to pollinate an extended area. This pollination helps the ecosystem remain diverse and sustainable. I sincerely hope you will move forward with zoning to allow backyard chickens and bee-keeping in unincorporated Arapahoe County. Also, some guidance in dealing with the nearly impossible to alter HOA covenants would be helpful. Thank you for your consideration. Kristi Stanlis 20579 E. Saratoga Pl Aurora, CO 80015

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: PCMS Corp Office Zoning Caitlyn Cahill FW: FW: Regulation Feedback: Unincorporated Arapahoe County Wednesday, March 28, 2018 12:43:09 PM image001.png Caitlyn Please see comments below from a resident at The Farm at Arapahoe County Homeowners Association. Thank you Jessica Moser PCMS Thanks for the heads up. This idea of chicken farming (and bee harvesting) is a horrible idea for our community. I don't have a lot of time to dig really deep on this but will take the time if this becomes a looming threat. Chickens require roosters. Roosters crow in the early morning. It would be a disastrous and dirupting idea. Further, because we have spilt rail fences here, our neighbors disaster would quickly be on display. Raising chickens in a suburban setting imposes unacceptable risks to the stability of a covenant community while inviting a lot of unintended consequences. These include housing them in a way that is congruent with the surrounding community. Lots of unapproved structures can arise that compromises covenant enforcement, foments ill-will within the community, suppresses house values, invites more predators, can spread disease, cause nuisance noises and complaints among neighbors to both homeowner associations, the city, county, and gaming officials. Property destruction of the homeowner as well as surrounding homes will increase. Noise, property damage, garbage and waste disposal, smells that are offensive, inevitable chicken death and disposal, disruption of community peace, increased vandalism, use of bb guns to control the nuisance, strained neighbor relations, reduced property values, and the inevitable return to banning suburban animal/agricultural production are all reasons to forbid chicken (and other animal/agricultural production) from suburban tract communities. This has caused problems in the Denver area already as seen in the Denver Post: https://www.denverpost.com/2013/05/28/backyard-chicken-issues-continue-to-ruffle-featherson-front-range/ Here are even some more reasons. 1)Diminishing Production. Hens start laying eggs after about five months. Production, however, wanes at the age of two. Hens can live for well over a decade. Many backyard hen owners are as reluctant to keep a non-productive hen as they are to turn her into chicken soup. The upshot has been a sharp rise in abandoned birds. In 2001, according to the Associated Press, Minneapolis Chicken Run Rescue fielded six calls from individuals looking to find homes for forsaken chickens. By 2012, that number reached almost 500. 2) Commercial Hatcheries. Raising hens in the backyard seems like an obviously humane alternative to factory farming. In some ways, it is. However, on this point, two closely related