MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar documents
Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Economic Review of Transition Cow Management

Mastitis control in bred heifers: Use of dry cow therapy and teat sealant for curing existing intramammary infections and preventing new ones

Managing Mastitis in Dairy Heifers to Improve Overall Herd Health

GENETIC SELECTION FOR MILK QUALITY WHERE ARE WE? David Erf Dairy Technical Services Geneticist Zoetis

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Transition Period 1/25/2016. Energy Demand Measured glucose supply vs. estimated demands 1

Index for Mastitis Resistance and Use of BHBA for Evaluation of Health Traits in Canadian Holsteins

Heifer Mastitis Management Strategies S.C. Nickerson, UGA,

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. August 1, Zoetis Genetics 333 Portage Street Kalamazoo, MI KEY POINTS

Mastitis Prevention and Cure Rates in Heifers Treated with Spectramast Dry Cow Therapy and/or Orbeseal Dry Cow Teat Sealant

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Transition cows have decreased immune function. The transition period. Inflammation, Immune Function, and the Transition Cow.

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

Estimating the Cost of Disease in The Vital 90 TM Days

Evaluating Herd Milk Quality Using DHI Somatic Cell Counts

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Mastitis Resistance in Canada

Managing pre-calving dairy cows: nutrition, housing and parasites

Consequences of Recorded and Unrecorded Transition Disease

2013 State FFA Dairy Judging Contest

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

Comparison of different methods to validate a dataset with producer-recorded health events

Herd health challenges in high yielding dairy cow systems

South West Fertility Field Day. May 2015

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Mastitis Reports in Dairy Comp 305

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

IMMUNOSTIMULATING EFFECTS OF A COMMERCIAL FEED SUPPLEMENT IN DAIRY HEIFERS VACCINATED WITH A STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS BACTERIN VALERIE JOANNE EUBANKS

Advanced Interherd Course

Balancing Dairy Business and Animal Welfare. Franklyn Garry

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Use of a staphylococcal vaccine to reduce prevalence of mastitis and lower somatic cell counts in a registered Saanen dairy goat herd

Herd Health Plan. Contact Information. Date Created: Date(s) Reviewed/Updated: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Farm Manager: Veterinarian of Record:

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Proper Dry Cow Management Critical for Mastitis Control

Vaccination as a Tool to Reduce Mastitis and Improve Milk Quality in Dairy Goats. F.M. Kautz, S. C. Nickerson, and L. O. Ely.

Pre-fresh Heifers. A Might not Equal B. Pre-fresh Heifers Common A = B allegories. Udder edema = dietary salt. Transition (pre-fresh) = 21 d

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

DAIRY HERD INFORMATION FORM

The Condition and treatment. 1. Introduction

, Pamela L. Ruegg

S. P. Oliver, R. A. Almeida, B. E. Gillespie, S. J. Ivey, H. Moorehead, P. Lunn, H. H. Dowlen, D. L. Johnson, and K. C. Lamar

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

Influence of Experimentally- induced clinical mastitis on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle

Barry County 4-H Senior Dairy Project Record Book Ages 15-19

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

New Developments in Mastitis Research

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

Risk factors for clinical mastitis, ketosis, and pneumonia in dairy cattle on organic and small conventional farms in the United States

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

Key words: mastitis, dairy, fertility, animal reproduction

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Adoption of Mastitis Control Technologies in the Southeast to Reduce Mastitis and Improve Milk Quality

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTITIS CAUSED BY SPECIES OF STREPTOCOCCUS AND ENTEROCOCCUS: RISK FACTORS AND CONTROL

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

The Vital 90 TM Days and Why It s Important to a Successful Lactation

Development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine against mastitis in dairy cows. II. Field trial

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

ADVANCED FERTILITY DAY MARTIN BEAUMONT, SHORN HILL FARM

J. Dairy Sci. 94 : doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2011.

Genomics, A New Era. Eric Olstad Dairy Production Specialist Zoetis

DAIRY HERD HEALTH IN PRACTICE

Management factors associated with veterinary usage by organic and conventional dairy farms

In This Issue. News. Workman, Jeffrey D. News ecalving app for touchscreen mobile devices

ChronMast - a model to study functional genetic variation of mastitis susceptibility

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

WisGraph 8.0 Interpretive Manual

1/1/ K BEAT IT!

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Animal Health and You

Differential Somatic Cell Count with the Fossomatic 7 DC - a novel parameter

On-Farm Antibiotic Testing

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

WHY DO DAIRY COWS HAVE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? HOW CAN WE SOLVE THOSE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? Jenks S. Britt, DVM 1. Why Manage Reproduction?

NYSCHAP BASELINE SURVEY Cover Page

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Transcription:

Effects of Feeding OmniGen-AF Beginning 6 Days Prior to Dry-Off on Mastitis Prevalence and Somatic Cell Counts in a Herd Experiencing Major Health Issues S. C. Nickerson 1, F. M. Kautz 1, L. O. Ely 1, A. D. Rowson, D. J. Hurley 1, J. D. Chapman and D. J. McLean 1 University of Georgia, Athens, GA, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Teaneck, NJ ABSTRACT Twenty-two Holstein cows were used in a trial to determine if feeding OmniGen-AF to late lactation cows in a herd experiencing major health issues could be a practical management tool for maintaining normal immune system function prior to and during the early dry period, a time of increased susceptibility to mastitis. cows (n = 11) consumed a ration that contained OmniGen-AF [9 g/1 kg of body weight/day (d)] beginning 6 d prior to dry-off, during the dry period and through 3 d in milk (DIM). cows did not receive OmniGen-AF 6 d prior to dry-off, but did receive the same ration during the dry period through 3 DIM. Body weights, body condition scores (BCS), mastitis prevalence, new intramammary infection (IMI) rates and SCC were measured throughout the trial. At calving, adverse health event data were recorded and milk production was obtained monthly via DHIA testing. No differences were observed between treatments for body weight or BCS throughout the 15-d trial. Adverse health events at calving showed no differences between treatments except for % hyperketonemia, which was lower among treated cows (63.6% vs. 1%). The prevalence of mastitis from calving through 3 DIM for treated cows (6.1%) was lower than controls (11.5%); likewise, the new IMI rate during this time for treated cows (.61%) was lower than controls (5.81%) The SCC from calving through 3 DIM for treated cows (15,/ml) was lower than controls (93,/ml). Average production/d at the first DHIA test (~33 DIM) showed that treated cows produced more milk (39.9 kg) than controls (35.3 kg). Feeding OmniGen-AF 6 d prior to dry-off reduced hyperketonemia and mastitis, lowered SCC and numerically increased milk yield in a herd experiencing major health issues. INTRODUCTION The early dry period of the dairy cow is a time of physiological stress, suppression of the immune system, and heightened susceptibility to mastitis, resulting in elevated SCC at calving and lowered milk production (Burton and Erskine, 3). The development of a management tool designed to help maintain normal immune function prior to and during this time of stress would promote udder health and increase resistance to mastitis, leading to improved milk yield and quality at calving. Providing micronutrients such as selenium and vitamin E that promote the immune response, contributes to reducing the level of mastitis and lowering SCC during early lactation (Erskine, 1993). Likewise, daily feeding of a nutritional product designed to support healthy immune function in dairy cattle (OmniGen-AF ; Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Teaneck, NJ) during the dry period demonstrated a positive role in supporting mammary gland immune function during the periparturient period (Nace et al., 1). Thus, it is believed that feeding OmniGen-AF may enhance resistance to mastitis during times of transition. The objective of this trial was to determine if feeding OmniGen-AF for 6 days (d) prior to dry-off, during the dry period, and through 3 days in milk (DIM) helps supports immune function and therefore results in less mastitis, lower SCC and greater milk yield at calving compared with only feeding OmniGen-AF during the dry period through 3 DIM. MATERIALS AND METHODS At the time the trial was initiated, the University of Georgia Teaching Dairy Herd was experiencing major health issues, which were related to herd management and challenging weather conditions. As a consequence, cow and heifer breeding attempts were not effective, and heifers were older (3 36 months) and heavier than preferred when delivering their first calf. Additionally, several cows were overweight at dry-off, overfed during dry period and calved with elevated body condition scores (BCS). Added to these issues was an on-going drought, resulting in a shortage of home-grown forage, and the subsequent purchase of poor quality forage, leading to nutritional stress. As a result of these stressors, the following health issues surfaced at calving: hyperketonemia, displaced abomasum, metritis, retained placenta, udder edema, clinical mastitis and increased mortality. Consequently, the herd experienced lower daily milk yield, lower fat test, lower milk urea nitrogen test and an elevated bulk tank SCC. Thus, the herd began to feed OmniGen-AF to determine if this nutritional product could help support the immune system of cows, prevent production declines during stress and minimize the metabolic health issues and mastitis level at the time of calving. 1

Twenty-two Holstein cows were assigned to (n = 11) or (n = 11) groups for a 15-d feeding trial. Treatment groups were balanced by parity, previous lactation milk production, SCC and mammary gland infection status. cows consumed a ration that contained OmniGen-AF at 9 g/1 kg of body weight/d starting 6 d prior to dry-off and continued on this ration during the dry period through 3 DIM (d 15). cows received the same ration starting at dry-off (d 6), which continued through 3 DIM. Body weights and BCS were measured throughout the trial. Bacteriology and SCC were examined on each quarter at 6 d prior to dry-off (d ), 3 d prior to dry-off (d 3), at dry-off (d 6), at calving (d 1) and at 3, 1, and 3 DIM. Mastitis prevalence was reported as the percentage of quarters with an IMI at each sampling. A new IMI was reported as a new infection in a previously uninfected quarter. At calving, adverse health event data (displaced abomasum, metritis, hyperketonemia, retained placenta and clinical mastitis) were recorded on individual animals, and milk production was monitored monthly via DHIA testing. Urine samples from all fresh cows were tested for the presence of ketone bodies using the Siemens Multistix 1SG; tests indicating > 15 mg/dl of ketones were considered positive. RESULTS Body weights decreased among cows in control and treated groups from 6 d prior to dry-off (mean 76 kg) through 3 DIM (mean 637 kg), but no differences were observed between groups. Likewise, BCS decreased among cows in both groups from 6 d prior to dry-off (mean 3.6) through 3 DIM (.7), but no differences were observed between groups. An examination of adverse health events at calving showed no differences between groups except for the percentage of cows with hyperketonemia, which was lower (P <.5) among treated cows (63.6%) vs. control cows (1%). The overall prevalence of mastitis during the 15-d trial from 6 d prior to dry-off through 3 DIM for treated cows (.81%) was lower (P <.1) than controls (17.1%; Figure 1); likewise, the overall new quarter IMI rate for treated cows (.35%) was lower (P <.5) than controls during this period (3.%; Figure 1). Figure 1. Overall mastitis prevalence and new intramammary infection (IMI) rate across the 15-d trial. 18 16 17.1 1 1 Percent 1 8 6 P <.1.81 3. P <.5.35 Mastitis prevalence New IMI rate

The average SCC from 6 d prior to dry-off through 3 DIM for treated cows (39,/ml) was lower (P <.1) than controls (59,/ml; Figure ). Figure. Overall SCCx1 per ml across the 15-d trial. SCC x 1 per ml 6 59 5 3 1 Overall SCC P <.1 39 The prevalence of mastitis from calving through 3 DIM for treated cows (6.1%) was lower (P <.1) than controls (11.5%; Figure 3); likewise, the new quarter infection rate during this time for treated cows (.61%) was lower (P <.5) than controls (5.81%; Figure 3). Figure 3. Mastitis prevalence and new intramammary infection (IMI) rate from calving through 3 DIM. 1 1 11.5 Percent 8 6 P <.1 6.1 5.81 P <.5.61 Mastitis prevalence New IMI rate 3

The SCC from calving through 3 DIM for treated cows (15,/ml) was 56% lower (P <.5) than controls (93,/ml; Figure ). Figure. SCCx1 per ml for control and treated cows from calving through 3 DIM. SCC x 1 per ml 5 93 3 1 P <.5 15 SCC Calving through 3 DIM A breakdown of the four post-calving SCC values (Table 1) demonstrated that at each sampling time, SCC were numerically lower in treated cows but were not significantly different from controls due to insufficient numbers of quarters available at each sampling time. Table 1. SCC x1 per ml for individual samplings on d 3, 1, and 3 post-calving. Post-calving day SCC SCC P value 3 8 3.363 1 38.65 571 39.337 3 5 139.118 Average production/d at the first DHIA test (~33 DIM) showed that treated cows produced more milk (39.9 kg) than controls (35.3 kg) but the difference was not statistically significant. No differences in production between groups were observed at the second and third DHIA tests. DISCUSSION Results of this study demonstrate that feeding OmniGen-AF during the final 6 d of lactation, during the dry period and through 3 DIM helps support normal immune function during the stage of the lactation cycle when the innate immune system is typically immunosuppressed and cows are most susceptible to mastitis (Smith et al., 1985). Compared with control cows fed OmniGen-AF only during the dry period through 3 DIM, treated cows fed OmniGen-AF for 6 d prior to dry-off, during the dry period and through 3 DIM exhibited less hyperketonemia and mastitis, lower SCC and numerically greater milk yield at first test. These results support and extend previous findings with OmniGen-AF (Bascom et al., 16; Nace et al., 1; Ryman et al., 13) and the continued study of feeding nutritional products to improve mammary gland health, particularly in herds experiencing health issues.

REFERENCES Bascom, S.S., J.D. Chapman, L.O. Ely, G.A. Holub, J.P. Jarrett, J.S. Lanier, D.J. Kirk, D.E. Nuzback, A.D. Rowson, and T.J. Wistuba. 16. Health, milk yield and milk quality records evaluated in 787 dairy herds before and during OmniGen-AF supplementation to dry and lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99(E-Suppl. 1):69. Burton, J.L., Erskine, R.J., 3. Immunity and mastitis. Some new ideas for an old disease. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Animal Pract. 19:1-5. Erskine, R.J., 1993. Nutrition and mastitis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Animal Pract. 9:551-56. Nace, E.L., S.C. Nickerson, F.M. Kautz, S. Breidling, D. Wochele, L.O. Ely, and D.J. Hurley. 1. Modulation of innate immune function and phenotype inbred dairy heifers during the periparturient period induced by feeding an immunostimulant for 6 days prior to delivery. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 161:-5. Paape, M.J., K. Shafer-Weaver, A.V. Capuco, K. Van Oostveldt, and C. Burvenich.. Immune surveillance of mammary tissue by phagocytic cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 8:59-77. Ryman, V.E., S.C. Nickerson, F.M. Kautz, D.J. Hurley, L.O. Ely, Y.Q. Wang, and N.E. Forsberg. 13. Effect of dietary supplementation on the antimicrobial activity of blood leukocytes isolated from Holstein heifers. Res. Vet. Sci. 95:969-97. Smith, K.L., D.A. Todhunter, and P.S. Schoenberger. 1985. Environmental mastitis: Cause, prevalence, prevention. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1531-1553. Smith, K.L., D.A. Todhunter, and P.S. Schoenberger. 1985. Environmental pathogens and intramammary infection during the dry period. J. Dairy Sci. 68:-17. This information has been prepared for industry technical professionals only and may be presented and discussed with them only upon request. For more information call 8-677-63. Phibro Animal Health Corporation 5