Isolation and Characterization of Campylobacterjejuni and

Similar documents
Epidemiology of campylobacteriosis in a cohort of rural population near Calcutta

Project Summary. Emerging Pathogens in US Cattle

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

11-ID-10. Committee: Infectious Disease. Title: Creation of a National Campylobacteriosis Case Definition

The prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter species in food animals in Jimma Zone, southwest Ethiopia

OCCURRENCE OF CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI AND CAMPYLOBACTER COLI AND THEIR BIOTYPES IN BEEF AND DAIRY CATTLE FROM THE SOUTH OF CHILE

Dept. of Dairy Science, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai , India. Received : Accepted :

Short information about the ZOBA. Participating on proficiency tests. Monitoring programme

Campylobacter species

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

The surveillance programme for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs in Norway 2017

2010 EU Summary Report on Zoonoses: overview on Campylobacter

THE BOVINE MILK MICROBIOME. Mark McGuire

TOC INDEX. Salmonellosis in Feedlot Cattle. Jane Pritchard. Take Home Message. Introduction

A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter

Multiple Species Certification

Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in Nigerian Indigenous Chicken in Sokoto State Northwestern Nigeria.

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

Surveillance of animal brucellosis

EVALUATION OF CE TREATMENT AGAINST CAMPYLOBACTER REGARDING THE GENETIC POULTRY STRAIN

IZSVe: Microbiological investigation. on the didactic farm. July 2015

Presence of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Meat contamination by Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia enterocolitica and EHEC O157 in Belgium

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERN OF YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA ISOLATED FROM MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS*

Food-borne Zoonoses. Stuart A. Slorach

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Quality Milk. got milk? Milk Quality. Why Bacteria in Milk Matters. Bacteria in Milk. Milk.One of Mother Nature s Most Perfect Foods

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Animal Antibiotic Use and Public Health

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CAMPYLOBACTER IN IRELAND

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

Global Overview on Antibiotic Use Policies in Veterinary Medicine

Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in small holder dairy farms in Selale, North Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia

Modernisation of meat inspection: Danish experience regarding finisher pigs

Microbial Hazards in Dairy Industry Ceren Zeytinci

Walid Alali Assistant Professor, Food Safety Epidemiology

Quad Plate User s Manual

Campylobacter infections in EU/EEA and related AMR

2 nd UK-Russia Round Table on AMR. Christopher Teale, Animal and Plant Health Agency. Moscow, st February 2017.

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance: Do we know everything? Dr. Sid Thakur Assistant Professor Swine Health & Production CVM, NCSU

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

ESTONIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

FAO-APHCA/OIE/USDA Regional Workshop on Prevention and Control of Neglected Zoonoses in Asia July, 2015, Obihiro, Japan.

CHOICES The magazine of food, farm and resource issues

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Original Paper Vet. Med. Czech, 47, 2002 (1): 26 31

Marrakech, Morocco, January 2002

Safefood helpline from the South from the North The Food Safety Promotion Board Abbey Court, Lower Abbey Street, Dublin 1

THE EVALUATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM RAW MEAT

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on the request from the Commission related to Campylobacter in animals and foodstuffs 1

CONSTRUCTION OF VETERINARY HOSPITAL COMPLEX

Good hygienic practices

Questions and answers about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Prevalence and Antibiotics Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni in Retail Chickens in Oyo State, Nigeria

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152(4)(b) thereof,

Prevalence and Drug Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus in Lactating Dairy Cow s Milk in Wolayta Sodo, Ethiopia

Activities of the Centre for Zoonoses, Animal Bacterial Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance (ZOBA) in Switzerland

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

The Salmonella story by Integrated Surveillance

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Luxembourg IN 2015 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

FSIS DIRECTIVE /31/04

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

Campylobacter spp among Children with acute diarrhea attending Mulago hospital in Kampala - Uganda

Policy # MI_ENT Department of Microbiology. Page Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

DOWNLOAD OR READ : VIRAL DISEASES OF CATTLE 2ND EDITION PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

Preliminary investigation of antibiotic resistant and susceptible Campylobacter in retail ground beef in the United States.

Controlling Salmonella in Meat and Poultry Products

CHAPTER 36:03 LIVESTOCK AND MEAT INDUSTRIES

Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in broilers and the adhesion and invasion abilities

Trends and sources of Campylobacter in the EU, covered by EFSA s Community zoonoses summary report

Twenty Years of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Where Are We And What Is Next?

UPDATE ON DEMONSTRATED RISKS IN HUMAN MEDICINE FROM RESISTANT PATHOGENS OF ANIMAL ORIGINS

The EFSA s BIOHAZ Panel perspective on food microbiology and hygiene

Salmonella control programmes in Denmark

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN SALMONELLA ISOLATED FROM PORK, CHICKEN MEAT AND HUMANS IN THAILAND

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Antibiotic Symposium National Institute of Animal Agriculture Atlanta, Georgia

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

Inhibition of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by Antibiotics Used in Selective Growth Media

SWEDEN TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Johne's disease infectious diarrhea of cattle

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

Key words: Campylobacter, diarrhea, MIC, drug resistance, erythromycin

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

Aabo, Søren; Ricci, Antonia; Denis, Martine; Bengtsson, Björn; Dalsgaard, Anders; Rychlik, Ivan; Jensen, Annette Nygaard

Chasing Chickens: 40 Years of Pecking and Scratching. Nelson A. Cox ARS-PMSRU Russell Research Center, Athens GA 30607

Transcription:

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Oct. 1983, p. 855-859 0099-2240/83/100855-05$02.00/0 Copyright C 1983, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 46, No. 4 Isolation and Characterization of Campylobacterjejuni and Campylobacter coli from Domestic and Wild Mammals in Norway 0. ROSEF,1'3 B. GONDROSEN,1 G. KAPPERUD,l 2* AND B. UNDERDAL1 Department of Food Hygiene, The Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo 11; Norwegian Defence Microbiological Laboratory, Oslo 42; and The Food Inspection Service in Aust-Agder, 4800 Arendal,3 Norway Received 6 June 1983/Accepted 8 August 1983 A total of 1,262 domestic and wild mammals from Norway were surveyed for fecal carriage of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Of the five species of domestic mammals examined, the highest isolation rate was recorded among swine (100.0%), followed by sheep (8.1%) and cows (0.8%). No strains were recovered from horses or goats. Among wild mammals, C. jejuni was isolated from 1 of 23 hares, and no isolates were obtained from three species of cervids and three species of rodents. Of the 133 Campylobacter strains isolated, 114 were classified as C. coli, 18 were C. jejuni biotype 1, and 1 belonged to C. jejuni biotype 2. All 114 strains from swine were C. coli. Milk samples from 113 domestic mammals with clinically diagnosed mastitis (106 cows, 5 sheep, 1 horse, and 1 pig) were negative for campylobacters. Campylobacterjejuni and Campylobacter coli (synonym Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, Campylobacterjejuni, "thermophilic" campylobacters) have been encountered in the intestinal contents of a wide variety of warm-blooded animals, including domestic species and freeliving and captive wild animals (3, 5, 9, 13, 16). Although this bacterial group has been convincingly shown to be one of the most important etiological agents of acute enteritis in humans, in other mammalian species the bacteria are present in an apparently healthy carrier state in a majority of cases (3, 14, 22). However, it is becoming increasingly evident that C. jejuni and C. ccli can cause enteritis in several species of animals other than humans (5, 16). Moreover, epidemiological data have provided strong evidence that animals and food products of animal origin are the main reservoirs for human infection (9, 14, 22). Hence, Campylobacter enteritis constitutes a zoonosis of major concern in public health and, indeed, has been shown to be a greater problem than salmonellosis in several countries (1, 14, 22, 28). Among domestic livestock, high fecal carriage rates of C. jejuni and C. coli have been reported for poultry, pigs, cattle, and sheep (3, 9, 13, 16). Eviscerated carcasses at slaughter are frequently contaminated (2, 6, 9, 26, 30), and it is also evident that both poultry and red-meat products at the retail sale stage may carry campylobacters (21, 22, 29, 30). Raw milk is also a recognized vehicle for contamination (4, 18, 22). Wild birds constitute an extensive reservoir of C. jejuni and C. coli (3, 8, 12, 13). However, few attempts have been made to isolate these organisms from nonavian wildlife. An understanding of wildlife diseases is an important aspect of natural resource management programs. Demands for outdoor recreation have focused attention on the epidemiological relationship between humans and wildlife. Moreover, the spreading of infectious diseases between wild animals and domestic livestock may result from fecal contamination of habitats in which both forest and farm animals graze and drink. In the present study, wild and domestic mammals from Norway were surveyed for fecal carriage of C. jejuni and C. coli. In addition, the presence of these bacteria in milk from dairy cows and three other species of domestic mammals was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rectal swabs and stool specimens. During February through October 1982, rectal swabs or stool specimens were collected from a total of 1,262 mammals representing twelve species (see Table 1) in Norway. All animals were apparently healthy and showed no signs of enteritis or other illness. Of the total of 1,262, 720 samples were obtained from five species of domestic mammals, whereas the remaining 542 samples originated from seven species of wild mammals. The domestic animals examined represented more than 60 herds (see Table 1). Pigs and sheep originated from the county of Aust-Agder, and horse samples were obtained from the counties of Oslo and Akers- 855

856 ROSEF ET AL. hus. Also included in this study were cows representing 36 herds in Aust-Agder, Akershus, and Oslo. Samples were obtained from goats from five different herds in the county of M0re og Romsdal. All wild animals originated from Aust-Agder, except reindeer, which inhabited the mountain areas surrounding the district of Tynset, Hedmark County. For each of the five sheep herds examined, samples were collected from both ewes and suckling lambs less than 1 month old. With this exception, all wild and domestic mammals incorporated in this study were adults. Rectal swabs were collected from all swine, sheep, goats, hares, moose, reindeer, roedeer, and from 183 of the cows examined (see Table 1). All wild animals (except small rodents, see below) were killed by shooting, and rectal swabs were taken immediately. All domestic animals were sampled alive, except swine, which were sampled at the slaughterhouse immediately after death. Rectal swabs from both wild and domestic animals were stored on SIFF transport medium (20), brought to the laboratory, and kept at 4 C before cultivation within 1 to 3 days after collection. There was no significant difference in the transport or storage of specimens from wild and domestic animals. The SIFF transport medium is a modification of Stuart's medium (20). When stored on this medium, pure cultures of C. jejuni and C. coli remained viable for at least 1 week at room temperature and for at least 2 weeks at 4 C (unpublished data). Fresh stool specimens were collected from all horses and from 71 of the cows. Stools were brought to the laboratory in sterile plastic bags within 1 to 2 h after collection. Samples were taken with swabs which were streaked on a selective agar medium (see below). Small rodents were trapped alive, killed with ether, and kept at -20 C for 1 week. The rodents were subsequently thawed, and 2 cm of rectum and colon was dissected aseptically. Intestinal contents were sampled with swabs and plated immediately. Milk samples. During May through August 1982, milk samples were collected from 113 domestic mammals (106 dairy cows, 5 sheep, 1 horse, and 1 pig) with clinically diagnosed mastitis in the counties of Akershus and Oslo. The 106 cows under study belonged to 53 different herds. Separate samples from all teats of an infected udder were collected and examined individually. Milk (10 ml) was collected aseptically and stored at 4 C. Cultivation was usually carried out within 20 h, although a few samples were stored for 2 days. Isolation procedure. Rectal swabs, stool specimens, or loopfuls of milk were plated onto colistin-amphotericin-keflin agar. This selective medium consisted of the gonococcus agar base described previously by 0degaard (15), defibrinated horse blood (70 ml/liter), IsoVitaleX enrichment (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.), and the antimicrobial agents colistin (Colimycin; Lundbeck & Co., Copenhagen, Denmark) (10 IU/ml), amphotericin B (E. R. Squibb & Sons Ltd., Liverpool, England) (1,ug/ml), and cefalotin (Keflin; Eli Lilly France S. A., Fegersheim, France) (15,ug/ml). Plates were incubated at 42 to 43 C in anaerobic jars without catalysts, using gas-generating sachets (no. BR 38; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) to achieve the proper microaerobic atmosphere. Plates were read after 24 and 48 h. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL. Identification of campylobacters. All colonies showing morphology similar to that of Campylobacter spp. were examined by phase-contrast microscopy (xl,000). Bacteria exhibiting the typical motility and cell morphology suggestive of Campylobacter spp. were subjected to cultural and biochemical examination as follows. The ability to grow under aerobic or anaerobic conditions was assessed after incubation at 37 C for 48 h. Growth at 25 C was tested in a microaerobic atmosphere. Catalase activity was tested on microscope slides by the addition of 1 drop of H202. Oxidase activity was examined on filter paper with 1% aqueous solution of tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride. The parameters listed above formed the basis for identification of the isolated strains according to established criteria (25). Biochemical classification. All isolated strains identified as thermophilic campylobacters were tested for hippurate hydrolysis, H2S production, and susceptibility to nalidixic acid. These parameters formed the basis for allocation to C. jejuni biotype 1 or 2, C. coli, or nalidixic acid-resistant thermophilic campylobacters, as proposed by Skirrow and Benjamin (23). Before biochemical examination, all strains were grown on blood agar plates for 18 to 24 h in a microaerobic atmosphere (see above). Hydrolysis of hippurate was tested by the method of Hwang and Ederer (7). H2S production was examined by using the iron-containing FBP medium described by Skirrow and Benjamin (23). Susceptibility to nalidixic acid was evaluated on blood agar plates with commercial antibiotic disks (Neo-Sensitabs; A/S Rosco, Taastrup, Denmark) containing 130,ug of nalidixic acid. Bacteria showing inhibition zones of -28 mm after incubation at 37 C for 24 h under a microaerobic atmosphere were considered susceptible. RESULTS Isolation frequencies. C. jejuni and C. coli were isolated from rectal swabs or stool specimens from 133 (10.5%) of the 1,262 mammals examined (Table 1). Isolates were obtained from 132 (18.3%) of 720 domestic mammals. The highest rate of isolation was recorded among swine (100.0%), followed by sheep (8.1%) and cows (0.8%). No strains were recovered from horses or goats. The number of herds harboring campylobacters is presented in Table 1. Although campylobacters were obtained from all individuals belonging to 19 different swine herds, considerable variation in the carriage rate was detected among the sheep herds. The carriage rates observed in two of the five sheep herds examined were 30.0% (15 of 50) and 2.0% (1 of 50), whereas no isolates were obtained from the remaining three herds (25, 31, and 41 sheep in each herd). One of the sheep herds showed a significantly higher (X2 = 15.11) isolation rate among adults than among suckling lambs. Isolates were obtained from 13 of 25 ewes, whereas only 2 of 25 lambs yielded campylobacters. An insufficient number of isolates was obtained

VOL. 46, 1983 CAMPYLOBACTERS IN MAMMALS 857 TABLE 1. Isolation rates of C. jejuni and C. coli from feces of domestic and wild mammals Individuals Herds Species Species With With ~~~~Total campylobacters Total campylobacters no. no. No. % No. % Domestic mammals Swine 114 114 100.0 19 19 100.0 Sheep 197 16 8.1 5 2 40.0 Cows 254 2 0.8 36 2 5.6 Goats 110 0 0 5 0 0 Horses 45 0 0 a Wild mammals Blue hares (Lepus timidus) 23 1 4.3 Moose (Alces alces) 372 0 0 Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) 94 0 0 Roedeer (Capreolus capreolus) 8 0 0 Bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) 24 0 0 Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) 20 0 0 Beavers (Castor fiber) 1 0 0 a Data not available. from the remaining herds to justify conclusions about age distribution. Fecal samples from a total of 542 wild mammals yielded only one isolate of C. jejuni (Table 1). This strain was recovered from 1 of the 23 hares examined, and no campylobacters were isolated from three species of cervids and three species of rodents. No Campylobacter isolates were obtained from milk samples collected from 113 domestic mammals with clinically diagnosed mastitis. The etiological agent was identified in 67 (59.3%) of these cases. Biochemical characterization. The 133 strains of C. jejuni and C. coli isolated in this study could be assigned to three biochemically distinct taxa. All 114 strains from swine were classified as C. coli. Of the 16 strains isolated from sheep, 15 belonged to C. jejuni biotype 1, and 1 strain was C. jejuni biotype 2. Two isolates from cows and one from a Blue hare were classified as C. jejuni biotype 1. No strains were resistant to nalidixic acid. DISCUSSION Published rates of isolation of C. jejuni and C. coli from the intestinal contents of domestic livestock reveal considerable intra- and interspecific variation. Most workers have reported high carriage rates of C. coli among healthy pigs, providing evidence that C. coli is a normal component of the intestinal flora of these animals (9, 13, 16, 27). The present results support this conclusion (Table 1). C. jejuni is recognized as the most important causal agent of human Campylobacter enteritis, whereas C. coli is less commonly involved in human infection (11, 22, 24). C. coli accounted for 13% of the cases of human infection in Norway (G. Kapperud, J. Lassen, S. Lauwers, and 0. Rosef, submitted for publication). The contamination of pig carcasses during the slaughter process represents a potential source of human infection. Rosef (19) isolated C. coli from 56% of the cut surfaces and 43% of the liver surfaces of 100 fresh pig carcasses in Norway. However, a causal relationship between this extensive porcine reservoir and the prevalence of C. coli among human cases cannot be established at this time. Determination of the relevance of the various animal isolates in terms of their pathogenicity for humans will require further study. Raw and improperly pasteurized milk from cows has been incriminated as the infectionbearing vehicle in several outbreaks of milkborne campylobacteriosis (18, 22). Since cows may be intestinal carriers of the bacteria concerned, the fecal contamination of milk represents a potential route leading to human infection. The carriage rate detected among Norwegian cows was low (Table 1). Other workers have reported isolation rates ranging from 0 to 100% (4, 9, 16). In Britain, Robinson (17) found a marked seasonal variation in fecal carriage among lactating cows. C. jejuni could be isolated from 10% of each herd in the summer, declining to 0% during the winter, and reemerging in the spring. Since all samples incorporated in our study were collected during May through August, it seems unlikely that the low carriage rate detected represents an underestimation associated with seasonal variation. Lander and Gill (10) were able to produce fairly severe clinical mastitis in lactating cows

858 ROSEF ET AL. by intramammary inoculation of C. jejuni. The syndrome resulted in the shedding of large numbers of campylobacters in milk, enabling effective dissemination of the organism to consumers of unpasteurized milk. However, attempts to isolate campylobacters from milk from cows with mastitis have not been successful. More than 600 foremilk samples collected throughout England from cows with mastitis were negative (31). Our results are similar. In Norway, the distribution of unpasteurized milk to the general public is prohibited, and the pasteurization process is strictly controlled. Furthermore, the absence of reported milkborne outbreaks, together with the low fecal carriage rate among lactating cows, indicates that milk is not an important vehicle of C. jejuni and C. coli in Norway. Wild mammals comprise popular game species of considerable economic and recreational value. The handling and consumption of meat from such animals represent potential sources of human infection. In Norway, the number of moose and reindeer consumed each year totals tens of thousands. The present results indicate that C. jejuni and C. coli were virtually absent in the populations of moose and reindeer examined, in contrast to the high carriage rates among certain domestic mammals. This difference may, at least in part, reflect the environments in which the animals live. Domestic mammals are subjected to crowded conditions and the consequent frequent exposure to fecal excrements, thereby providing an ample opportunity for intra- and interspecific cross contamination. Although the population densities of moose, reindeer, and small rodents may be high, the epidemiological situation cannot be compared with that existing in herds of domestic animals. On the other hand, it is highly probable that mammalian species may differ in their susceptibility to intestinal colonization by C. jejuni and C. coli, regardless of the degree of exposure to these bacteria. This circumstance may also help to explain the different carriage rates detected in this and similar studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Kari Dommarsnes for excellent technical assistance and 0yvin 0stensvik for helpful cooperation during the collection of reindeer samples. LITERATURE CITED 1. Blaser, M. J., J. G. Wells, R. A. Feldman, R. A. Pollard, J. R. Allen, and the Collaborative Diarrheal Disease Study Group. 1983. Campylobacter enteritis in the United States. A multicenter study. Ann. Intern. Med. 98:360-365. 2. Bolton, F. J., H. C. Dawkins, and L. Robertson. 1982. Campylobacterjejunilcoli in abattoirs and butchers shops. J. Infect. 4:243-245. 3. Butzler, J. P., and M. B. Skirrow. 1979. Campylobacter enteritis. Clin. Gastroenterol. 8:737-765. 4. Doyle, M. P., and D. J. Roman. 1982. Prevalence and APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL. survival of Campylobacter jejuni in unpasteurized milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:1154-1158. 5. Fox, J. G. 1982. Campylobacteriosis-a "new" disease in laboratory animals. Lab. Anim. Sci. 32:625-637. 6. Gill, C. O., and L. M. Harris. 1982. Contamination of redmeat carcasses by Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:977-980. 7. Hwang, M.-N., and G. M. Ederer. 1975. Rapid hippurate hydrolysis method for presumptive identification of group B streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:114-115. 8. Kapperud, G., and 0. Rosef. 1983. Avian wildlife reservoir of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, Yersinia spp., and Salmonella spp. in Norway. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:375-380. 9. Kist, M. 1983. Infektionen durch Campylobacter jejunil coli. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 108:67-72. 10. Lander, K. P., and K. P. W. Gill. 1980. Experimental infection of the bovine udder with Campylobacter coli/jejuni. J. Hyg. 84:421-428. 11. Lior, H., J. A. Edgar, and D. L. Woodward. 1982. A serotyping scheme for Campylobacterjejuni, p. 92-95. In D. G. Newell (ed.), Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, 12. Luechtefeld, N. A. W., M. J. Blaser, L. B. Reller, and W.-L. L. Wang. 1980. Isolation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni from migratory waterfowl. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12:406-408. 13. Luechtefeld, N. W., and W.-L. L. Wang. 1982. Animal reservoirs of Campylobacterjejuni, p. 249-252. In D. G. Newell (ed.), Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, 14. Newell, D. G. (ed.). 1982. Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, 15. 0degaard, K. 1971. Trimethoprim for the prevention of overgrowth by swarming Proteus in the cultivation of gonococci. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B 79:545-548. 16. Prescott, J. F., and D. L. Munroe. 1982. Campylobacter jejuni enteritis in man and domestic animals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 181:1524-1530. 17. Robinson, D. A. 1982. Campylobacter infection in milking herds, p. 274. In D. G. Newell (ed.), Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, 18. Robinson, D. A., and D. M. Jones. 1981. Milk-borne campylobacter infection. Br. Med. J. 282:1374-1376. 19. Rosef, 0. 1981. Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni as a surface contaminant of fresh and chilled pig carcasses. Nord. Veterinaermed. 33:535-538. 20. Sandven, P., 0. Solberg, K. 0degaard, and G. Myhre. 1982. Improved medium for the transportation of gonococcal specimens. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B 90:73-77. 21. Simmons, N. A., and F. J. Gibbs. 1979. Campylobacter spp. in oven-ready poultry. J. Infect. 1:159-162. 22. Skirrow, M. B. 1982. Campylobacter enteritis-the first five years. J. Hyg. 89:175-184. 23. Skirrow, M. B., and J. Benjamin. 1980. Differentiation of enteropathogenic campylobacter. J. Clin. Pathol. 33:1122. 24. Skirrow, M. B., and J. Benjamin. 1982. The classification of "thermophilic" campylobacters and their distribution in man and domestic animals, p. 40-44. In D. G. Newell (ed.), Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster, 25. Smibert, R. M. 1974. Genus II. Campylobacter, p. 207-212. In R. E. Buchanan and N. E. Gibbons (ed.), Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore. 26. Stern, N. J. 1981. Recovery rate of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on eviscerated pork, lamb, and beef carcasses. J. Food Sci. 46:1291-1293. 27. Sticht-Groh, V. 1982. Campylobacter in healthy slaughter

VOL. 46, 1983 pigs: a possible source of infection for man. Vet. Rec. 30:104-106. 28. Svedhem, A., and B. Kaijser. 1980. Campylobacter fetus subspeciesjejuni: a common cause of diarrhea in Sweden. J. Infect. Dis. 142:353-359. 29. Svedhem, A., B. KaUser, and E. Sjogren. 1981. The occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in fresh food and survival under different conditions. J. Hyg. 87:421-425. CAMPYLOBACTERS IN MAMMALS 859 30. TurnbuU, P. C. B., and P. Rose. 1982. Campylobacter jejuni and salmonella in raw red meats. A public health laboratory service survey. J. Hyg. 88:29-37. 31. Waterman, S., and R. W. A. Park. 1982. Aspects of Campylobacterjejuni in relation to milk, p. 275. In D. G. Newell (ed.), Campylobacter. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and biochemistry. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster,