The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain

Similar documents
Table1. Target lamb pre-weaning daily live weight gain from grazed pasture

GROWTH OF LAMBS IN A SEMI-ARID REGION AS INFLUENCED BY DISTANCE WALKED TO WATER

Feeding dairy ewes. Sam Peterson Institute of veterinary, animal and biomedical sciences Massey University

Late pregnancy nutrition the key to flock profitability

Extra. Feed planning for ewes in late pregnancy and early lactation, during the housed period. Take a stepped approach to feed planning.

Effect of level of intake on methane production per kg of dry matter intake. MAF Technical Paper No: 2011/95

Winter feeding changing labour requirements and productivity

Effect of supplementary feeding to ewes and suckling lambs on ewe and lamb live weights while grazing wheat stubble

Silage Analysis and Ration Planning: Benefits of knowing what you re feeding your stock. Mary McDowell Trainee Livestock Nutritionist

Finishing lambs from grazed pasture The options and the facts. Dr. Tim Keady

High sward height (6 cm) Weaning weight (kg) Drafted at weaning (%) Age at sale (days) Creep intake (kg)

EverGraze: pastures to improve lamb weaning weights

The effect of weaning weight on subsequent lamb growth rates

The effect of condensed tannins in Lotus corniculatus upon reproductive efficiency and wool production in sheep during late summer and autumn

Extended grazing its potentials and limitations

pasture feeding and ewe reproduction Spring and summer and wool growth

INFLUENCE OF FEED QUALITY ON THE EXPRESSION OF POST WEANING GROWTH ASBV s IN WHITE SUFFOLK LAMBS

EDUCATION AND PRODUCTION. Layer Performance of Four Strains of Leghorn Pullets Subjected to Various Rearing Programs

LAMB GROWTH AND EWE PRODUCTION FOLLOWING ANTHELMINTIC DRENCHING BEFORE AND AFTER LAMBING

Ben Anthony, Diana Fairclough and Lesley Stubbings SHAWG Conference 16 November 2016

Improving sheep welfare for increased production

10/3/2016. NRC reqt s for Replacement Ewes. Developing Replacement Ewe Lambs. Differences in Feeding Market Lambs vs Replacement Ewe Lambs

Practical Lucerne Grazing Management

AN INITIATIVE OF. Wean More Lambs. Colin Trengove. Member SA Livestock Consultants EVENT PARTNERS: EVENT SUPPORTERS:

Sheep performance on perennial lupins over three years at Sawdon Station, Lake Tekapo

FEEDING EWES BETTER FOR INCREASED PRODUCTION AND PROFIT. Dr. Dan Morrical Department of Animal Science Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

PROJECT SUMMARY. Optimising genetics, reproduction and nutrition of dairy sheep and goats

The change in the New Zealand flock and its performance

SHEEP. Finishing hill lambs Latest Teagasc research on finishing hill lambs on autumn pastures and on an all-concentrate diet.

Time of lambing analysis - Crossbred Wagga NSW

Managing to maximise lamb performance regardless of season. Doug Alcock

Effects of extended grazing during mid, late or throughout pregnancy, and winter shearing of housed ewes, on ewe and lamb performance

Optimising lamb growth rate from birth to slaughter

Planning Spring/Summer 2018

Ewe Management Handbook

Lifetime Wool. Optimising ewe nutrition to increase farm profit

BETTER Farm Sheep Programme DAVID AND LINDA MCLAUGHLIN, HILLHEAD, SHROOVE, GREENCASTLE, Co. DONEGAL. HILL SHEEP FARM WALK. THURSDAY FEBRUARY 21st 2013

Extending the season for prime lamb production from grass

7. IMPROVING LAMB SURVIVAL

Assessment Schedule 2017 Subject: Agricultural and Horticultural Science: Demonstrate knowledge of livestock management practices (90921)

Suckler cow management. Dai Grove-White.

Effects of ewe age and season of lambing on proli cacy in US Targhee, Suffolk, and Polypay sheep

Lactational and reproductive effects of melatonin in lactating dairy ewes mated during spring

AUTUMN AND SPRING-LAMBING OF MERINO EWES IN SOUTH-WESTERN VICTORIA

Lower body weight Lower fertility Lower fleece weight (superfine) (fine)

The wool production and reproduction of Merino ewes can be predicted from changes in liveweight during pregnancy and lactation

Ewe Management Handbook. Optimising Merino ewe nutrition to increase farm profit for the high rainfall zone. lifetimewool

Ewe Management Handbook. Optimising Merino ewe nutrition to increase farm profit for southern slopes NSW and north central Victoria.

Key Information. Mountain Hill Vs Lowland Production. Breeding Strategy

Age of Weaning Lambs

Ewe Management Handbook. Optimising Merino ewe nutrition to increase farm profit for the cereal-sheep zone. lifetimewool

Duddingtonia flagrans What is it?

Body Condition Scoring Ewes

EFFECT OF PADDOCK SIZE, STOCKING RATE, ANTHELMINTICS, AND TRACE ELEMENTS ON THE WEIGHT GAIN OF YOUNG CATTLE

Adjustment Factors in NSIP 1

"Our aim is to improve the health and productivity of livestock through evidence based collaborative research, knowledge and experience"

An assessment of the benefits of utilising Inverdale-carrying texel-type rams to produce crossbred sheep within a Welsh context

Richard Ehrhardt, Ph.D. Sheep and Goat Extension Specialist Michigan State University

Wean more lambs. John Webb Ware Mackinnon Project University of Melbourne

Susan Robertson, Edward Clayton and Michael Friend Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

Effect of concentrate supplement and sward height on twin-bearing ewe body condition and the performance of their offspring

Factors Affecting Breast Meat Yield in Turkeys

For more information, see The InCalf Book, Chapter 8: Calf and heifer management and your InCalf Fertility Focus report.

Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Drag spring forward, with Tyson.

This is an optional Unit within the National Certificate in Agriculture (SCQF level 6) but is also available as a free-standing Unit.

Crossbred lamb production in the hills

Evaluation of terminal sire breeds in hair sheep production systems

Breeding and feeding for more lambs. Andrew Thompson & Mark Ferguson

Local Grains and Free-Choice Feeding of Organic Layer Hens on Pasture at UBC Farm Introduction

Sheep Breeding in Norway

SHEEP. nd if appropriate/applicable)

Breeding strategies within a terminal sire line for meat production

Glenkilrie Climate Change Focus Farm meeting

Digestive physiology and feeding behaviour of equids a comparative approach

PASTURE CONSTRAINTS TO SHEEP PRODUCTION

Level 1 Agricultural and Horticultural Science, 2017

Maximising subterranean clover in Marlborough s hill country is key to weaning 80% of sale lambs prime

Saskatchewan Sheep Opportunity

CLUSTERING AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF BODY RESERVES CHANGES THROUGHOUT PRODUCTIVE CYCLES IN MEAT SHEEP

E. Alava, M. Hersom, J. Yelich 1

Developing parasite control strategies in organic systems

Dryland Pastoral Research at Ashley Dene

Josefina de Combellas, N Martinez and E Gonzalez. Instituto de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay

RURAL INDUSTRIES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FINAL REPORT. Improvement in egg shell quality at high temperatures

Like to see more lambs?

7. Flock book and computer registration and selection

Genetic approaches to improving lamb survival under extensive field conditions

Mona I. Mohammady, A.H. Hammam and N. H. Ibrahim

THE VETERINARIAN'S CHOICE. Compendium clinical Trials. Introducing new MILPRO. from Virbac. Go pro. Go MILPRO..

Dr. Jerry Shurson 1 and Dr. Brian Kerr 2 University of Minnesota, St. Paul 1 and USDA-ARS, Ames, IA 2

BETTERRETURNS. Feeding the ewe A manual for consultants, vets and producers

An evaluation of two grassland-based systems of mid-season prime lamb production using prolific ewes of two genotypes

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WEIGHTS AND CALVING PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS IN A HERD OF UNSELECTED CATTLE

Economic Significance of Fasciola Hepatica Infestation of Beef Cattle a Definition Study based on Field Trial and Grazier Questionnaire

Over feeding rams. Ian McDougall MRCVS. Farmgene Ltd.

Level 1 Agricultural and Horticultural Science, 2011

New Zealand Society of Animal Production online archive

Tab 1a. Pigs Data Entry and Assumptions

Transcription:

The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures in northern Spain K. Osoro, M. OlivaÂn, R. Celaya and A. MartõÂnez Servicio Regional de Investigacio n y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain Abstract The effect of the proportion of Calluna vulgaris cover on diet composition, intake and performance of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain is examined. A total of 591 non-lactating Gallega ewes grazed for ve consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) on replicated plots of hill pastures (1700 m.a.s.l.) composed principally of Festuca, Agrostis, Nardus and Calluna spp. but with different proportions of Calluna vulgaris cover, either 0á3 (C 0á3 )or0á7 (C 0á7 )of the total area. In 1 year, twenty-eight ewes suckling single lambs also grazed the plots. The mean stocking density over the 5 years was 8á7 ewes ha ±1. On treatment C 0á3, daily liveweight gains (33 g d ±1 ) of nonlactating ewes were signi cantly (P <0á001) greater than on treatment C 0á7 (12 g d ±1 ). Likewise in lactating ewes the difference in mean daily liveweight change was 40 g d ±1 (±5 vs. ±45 g d ±1 for C 0á3 and C 0á7 treatments respectively; P <0á001). Liveweight gains of lambs were only 80±100 g d ±1 from June to August and lambs only maintained live weight during August and September. The effect of lactational status on liveweight changes was not signi cant. Liveweight gains of non-lactating ewes increased signi cantly (P <0á001) from the rst to the last year of the experiment on both treatments. The composition of the diet was signi cantly affected by treatment (P < 0á001), with a higher proportion of grass species on the C 0á3 treatment and a higher digestibility of the diet in the rst half of the grazing season (P <0á001). The proportion of C. vulgaris in the diet was signi cantly (P <0á001) higher on the C 0á7 Correspondence to: Dr K. Osoro, Servicio Regional de Investigacio n y Desarrollo Agroalimentario, Apdo. 13, 33300 ± Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain. E-mail: KOLDOOO@princast.es 1 Received 22 March 1999; revised December 1999 treatment and increased signi cantly (P < 0á001) from July to September on both treatments. There were no signi cant differences in the composition of the diet selected by lactating and non-lactating ewes. The results demonstrate that on hill vegetation communities, in which the grass components (Festuca rubra, Agrostis capillaris, and Nardus stricta) cover at least 0á3 of the area and on which the preferred grass component (Festuca and Agrostis spp.) is maintained at a sward height of at least 2á5 cm, non-lactating ewes can increase their live weight and body condition, but this increase is in uenced by the proportion and quantity of species of grass in the diet, which is affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain their live weight and body condition except when Calluna cover was 0á3 and grass height was more than 3á5 cm. It is concluded that these indigenous vegetation communities can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures at other times of year. In particular, they can be utilized during the non-lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn. Introduction Heather (Calluna vulgaris) is an important component of hill pastoral resources in large areas of Europe (e.g. northern Spain, Scotland). In many areas, C. vulgaris occurs with mosaics of grass species such as Agrostis and Festuca spp. and Nardus stricta. Milne (1974) showed the low intake, digestibility and nutritive value of C. vulgaris. Milne (1974) also showed that only the shoots of the current season harvested in July provided suf cient intake of digestible organic matter (DOM) to maintain the live weight of sheep. The proportion of green shoots available is related to the level and pattern of utilization in the previous season (Grant et al., 1978; 1982). Nevertheless, the 300 Ó 2000 Blackwell Science Ltd. Grass and Forage Science, 55, 300±308

Calluna vulgaris cover in hill pastures and the performance of ewes 301 voluntary intakes of Calluna are much lower than would be predicted for grasses and legumes at similar levels of digestibility, because of the presence of tannins in heather (Milne, 1974). However, heather intakes increase slightly with the proportion of grass in the diet (up to a proportion of 0á30), as a consequence of the nitrogen available from grass (Milne and Bagley, 1976). Thus, a proportion of grass in the diet of sheep grazing heather-dominant hills is important. A diet containing a proportion of at least 0á50 of grass is likely to provide a total daily intake that is at least equivalent to the requirements for maintenance of non-productive sheep (Milne and Bagley, 1976). Also Maxwell et al. (1986) suggested that to meet the energy and nitrogen requirements for sheep for maintenance of live weight, 0á50 of the diet would require to be derived from grass with a dry-matter digestibility of 0á70 and, if this is not possible, supplementary feeding is necessary. Therefore the performance of ewes grazing heather will be greatly in uenced by the proportion of grass in the diet and this may in turn be in uenced by the proportion of the grazed area covered by grass and by heather, as well as by the species of grass available. The objective of this work was to study the effect of the proportion of C. vulgaris cover on liveweight changes, intake and dietary components of sheep grazing hill vegetation communities in northern Spain. The C. vulgaris heathland comprised either 0á3 or 0á7 of the grazed area while the remainder comprised an Agrostis± Festuca±Nardus grassland. Materials and methods Experimental site and design The experiment was conducted at Cueva Palacios Research Station in Quiro s, Asturias, Spain (latitude 43 02 N, longitude 5 56 W), on a 20-ha site at an altitude of 1600±1800 m above sea level. The principal species in the vegetation communities were Festuca rubra, Agrostis capillaris, N. stricta and C. vulgaris. One-half of the site was dominated by the herbaceous species and the other by C. vulgaris. Four plots of 5 ha each were established, two comprising 0á3 C. vulgaris and 0á7 grass species by area ( C 0á3 ), and two on an area with 0á7 C. vulgaris and 0á3 grass species ( C 0á7 ), providing two replicates of each pasture combination. The experiment was conducted over ve consecutive grazing seasons (June to September) from 1990 to 1994. Animals The experimental animals comprised, over 5 years, a total of 591 mature non-lactating Gallega ewes and, in 1 year only, twenty-eight lactating ewes of the same breed. The Gallega breed is local to Galicia (NW Spain). The ewes had all lambed during January and February and grazed low-ground pasture (75 m above sea level) with their lambs from March to June. After weaning in June, the ewes were transferred to the experimental site. In 1 year only (1991), twenty-eight lactating ewes were also transferred with their single lambs to the experimental site. The mean live weight and age of the lambs at this time was 13á3 kg (s.e.d. 0á50) and 93 d (s.e.d. 6á1) respectively. The ewes were allocated to the experimental treatments (C 0á3 and C 0á7 ) and replicates on the basis of live weight and body condition score at the beginning of each of the ve grazing seasons. During 1992, 1993 and 1994, a total of 242 nonexperimental ewes also grazed the plots. No measurements were made on these sheep, but they were present to maintain the required stocking rate. The number of ewes on each plot and the stocking rates are given in Table 1. Minor differences occurred in stocking rates within years because of deaths or removal of ewes because of ill health. Measurements Vegetation The mean sward surface heights of the grass community were estimated weekly, using an HFRO sward stick (Barthram, 1986) taking 80 readings at random in each plot. Animal live weight and body condition Ewe live weights were recorded at the beginning, middle (except in 1990 and 1994) and end of each grazing season. Body condition score was assessed to the nearest 0á25 score on the 0±5 scale of Russel et al. (1969) by the same operator at the same time as the live weight was recorded. Lamb live weights were recorded at the same time as those of their mothers (beginning, middle and end of the grazing season in 1991). Herbage intake Daily herbage dry-matter intake (DMI) and digestible DMI (DDMI) were estimated on two occasions (during the rst 2 weeks of July and September) in 1991 and 1992, using the modi cation of the n-alkane technique (Mayes et al., 1986) made by Olivan and Osoro (1999). In 1991, on each occasion, twenty-eight ewes from each treatment (fourteen lactating and fourteen nonlactating ewes) and in 1992 fourteen non-lactating ewes from each treatment were dosed once daily between 08.00 and 11.00 h for 11 d with a paper pellet containing 45á1 2á3 mg n-tetracontane (C 24 ),

302 K. Osoro et al. Table 1 Number of animals and stocking rate on each replicate of the two treatments (C 0á3, cover of 0á30 of C. vulgaris in total area and C 0á7, cover of 0á70 of C. vulgaris in total area) in the experiment. C 0á3 C 0á7 Replicate 1 2 1 2 No of ewes Stocking rate (ewes ha )1 ) No of ewes Stocking rate (ewes ha )1 ) No of ewes Stocking rate (ewes ha )1 ) No of ewes Stocking rate (ewes ha )1 ) 1990 37 7á4 54 10á8 37 7á4 43 8á6 1991 40 + 7* 9á4 40 + 7* 9á4 40 + 7* 9á4 40 + 7* 9á4 1992 31 + 21 ² 10á4 30 + 24 ² 10á8 31 + 21 ² 10á4 30 + 24 ² 10á8 1993 18 + 21 ² 7á8 19 + 21 ² 8á0 18 + 21 ² 7á8 19 + 21 ² 8á0 1994 16 + 17 ² 6á6 16 + 17 ² 6á6 16 + 17 ² 6á6 16 + 17 ² 6á6 * Lactating ewes in each replicate. ² Non experimental dry ewes. 50á7 1á7 mg n-dotriacontane (C 32 ) and 50á3 1á9 mg n-hexatriacontane (C 36 ). Faecal grab samples were collected from the rectum for the last 5 d of each dosing period. Intake was estimated using the C 32 /C 33 alkane pair, based on the whole-diet (from the estimated diet composition) and faecal concentrations of these alkanes and the C 32 dosing rate. Diet digestibility Diet digestibility was estimated from the calculated intake (based on the C 32/ C 33 alkane pair) and the calculated faecal output, estimated using the C 36 alkane as an external marker. Diet composition Samples of the three principal vegetation components (C. vulgaris, F. rubra + A. capillaris, and N. stricta) were collected by hand plucking, to simulate grazing, on four occasions during each dosing period. The proportions of the three vegetation components in the diet were calculated by a least-squares method which determines the combination of dietary components which best matches the observed pattern of faecal alkane concentrations, after an adjustment for incomplete faecal alkane recovery (OlivaÂn and Osoro, 1999). Statistical analysis Analyses of variance were carried out, using Genstat V (Lawes Agricultural Trust, 1984) to test the main effects of treatment, year and replicate and their interactions on ewe live weight and body condition score and changes in live weight and body condition score in the rst half (period 1), second half (period 2) and for the whole grazing season. Because there were signi cant (P < 0á001) differences between years in the mean live weight and body condition of ewes at the beginning of the grazing season, both these variables were introduced in the model as a covariate. The main effects of treatment, replicate, year and season (July and September) on herbage intake, diet digestibility and dietary composition (expressed as proportion of different components) of the ewes were analysed by analyses of variance. For 1991, the effect of lactational status was also included as a factor in the statistical model. Results Sward height Mean sward surface heights of the grass community in each treatment for period 1 (20 June±9 August), period 2 (9 August±29 September) and for the whole grazing season in each of the 5 years, are presented in Table 2. Over the 5 years, there were signi cant (P < 0á05) differences in the mean sward height for the whole grazing season between treatments C 0á3 (3á6 cm) and C 0á7 (2á9 cm) (s.e.d. 0á26). The differences between treatments were less in period 2, when mean sward height in treatments C 0á3 and C 0á7 were 2á3 and 1á8 cm, respectively (s.e.d. 0á09; P < 0á001), while in period 1 they were 4á4 and 3á3 cm (s.e.d. 0á34; P < 0á01). This led to a signi cant (P < 0á01) interaction between

Calluna vulgaris cover in hill pastures and the performance of ewes 303 Table 2 Mean sward surface height (cm) of the grass community on each treatment for each period and for the whole season. treatment and period. There were no signi cant differences in mean grass height between replicates. There were highly signi cant (P <0á001) differences between years in the mean grass height for whole grazing season, ranging from 4á2 cm in 1990 to 2á6 cm in 1992, but the interaction between treatment and year was not signi cant. The interaction between year and period was signi cant (P < 0á01). Liveweight changes C 0á3 C 0á7 s.e.d. : 1990 Overall 4á3 4á0 0á39 1991 Period 1 4á8 3á3 0á36 Period 2 2á4 1á8 0á10 Overall 3á6 2á6 0á30 1992 Period 1 3á8 2á7 0á23 Period 2 2á2 1á7 0á13 Overall 3á0 2á2 0á24 1993 Period 1 4á8 4á0 0á87 Period 2 2á5 2á0 0á21 Overall 3á6 3á0 0á54 1994 Overall 3á5 2á7 0á41 See Table 1 for treatment abbreviations. There were no signi cant differences between replicates of the same treatment, in any of the analyses. Liveweight changes of dry ewes were signi cantly (P <0á001) affected by C. vulgaris cover in both periods and over the whole grazing season (Table 3). In period 1, all ewes gained live weight, but liveweight gains were higher on treatment C 0á3. In period 2, while ewes on treatment C 0á3 maintained live weight, those on treatment C 0á7 lost live weight. Over the whole grazing season, ewes on both treatments increased in live weight, although at the end of the grazing season the live weight of ewes on the C 0á3 treatment was signi cantly (P <0á001) greater as a consequence of the differences in liveweight changes. Changes in body condition score were related to the changes in live weight, with greater increases in body condition score on treatment C 0á3. Liveweight changes of lactating ewes were also signi cantly (P < 0á001) affected by treatment in period 1 (Table 4), being 35 g d ±1 on treatment C 0á3 and ±20 gd ±1 on treatment C 0á7. However, during period 2, all the ewes lost live weight and, although the difference was not signi cant, those on the C 0á7 treatment tended to lose more live weight. Lamb liveweight gains were signi cantly higher on treatment C 0á3 during period 1 (99 g vs. 80 g d ±1 ; s.e.d. 7á6; P <0á05) and period 2 (11 vs. ±19 g d ±1 ; s.e.d. 6á3; P <0á001), with the lamb liveweight gains for the overall grazing season being 58 and 39 g d ±1 on the C 0á3 and C 0á7 treatments respectively (s.e.d. 5á2; P < 0á01). Ewe liveweight gains over the whole grazing season increased signi cantly (P < 0á001) from year to year, increasing from 27 g d ±1 in the rst year to 70 g d ±1 in the fth year on treatment C 0á3 and from 15 to 40 g d ±1 on treatment C 0á7. In general, changes in body condition score re ected changes in live weight, although in the rst year the increase in body condition score was greater relative to liveweight gains, possibly because of the signi cant lower body condition of the ewes at the beginning of the grazing season in that year. The correlation of body condition score at the beginning of the grazing season with body condition score change was ±0á34 (s.e.d. 0á036; P <0á001). Lactational status There were no signi cant differences in ewe liveweight changes in either period as a consequence of lactational status of the ewes, although in period 1 there was a tendency (P <0á1) for the lactating ewes to have lower liveweight gains. Body condition score showed a similar pattern to that of liveweight changes (Table 4). Dry-matter intake and digestibility Overall daily DMI by non-lactating ewes (1991 and 1992) was not signi cantly different between treatments (Table 5). However, the dry-matter digestibility was signi cantly (P <0á05) higher on treatment C 0á3 (0á59) than on treatment C 0á7 (0á56; s.e.d. 0á012). Daily

304 K. Osoro et al. Table 3 Effect of treatments (C0á3 or C0á7) on live weight and body condition of dry ewes. C 0á3 C 0á7 Signi cance 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Mean 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Mean s.e.d. ² Interaction At the beginning of season: Live weight (kg) 29á5 30á4 33á0 32á7 35á4 31á0 29á6 31á7 30á9 32á7 36á7 31á0 1á25 NS *** NS Body condition score 2á30 2á69 2á76 2á55 2á90 2á56 2á36 2á70 2á77 2á57 2á90 2á59 0á063 NS *** NS Liveweight change (g d )1 ) Period 1 ± 37 67 93 ± 59 ± 8 52 64 ± 35 8á6 *** *** NS Period 2 ± )14 9 24 ± 2 ± )45 0 )18 ± )24 7á5 *** *** *** Total 27 10 40 60 70 33 15 19 26 24 40 12 5á4 *** *** *** Body condition change 0á46 0á07 0á26 0á30 0á54 0á30 0á44 )0á03 0á07 0á01 0á28 0á16 0á054 *** *** ** At the end of season: Live weight (kg) 34á4 32á3 35á4 37á3 37á9 34á8 33á2 29á9 34á0 33á9 35á1 32á8 0á52 *** *** NS Body condition score 3á07 2á67 2á86 2á91 3á25 2á91 3á04 2á58 2á67 2á62 2á88 2á77 0á052 *** *** ** ² s.e.d. of the overall means. NS, not signi cant; **P <0á01; ***P <0á001. See Table 1 for treatment abbreviations.

Calluna vulgaris cover in hill pastures and the performance of ewes 305 Table 4 Effect of treatment (C 0á3 or C 0á7 ) and lactational status on live weight and body condition of ewes (1991 only). C 0á3 C 0á7 Signi cance Lactational status Lactating Dry Lactating Dry s.e.d. Lactational status At the beginning of season: Live weight (kg) 32á0 32á5 29á5 33á7 2á50 NS NS Body condition score 2á6 2á8 2á5 2á9 0á10 NS *** Liveweight change (g d )1 ) Period 1 35 52 )20 1 15á2 *** NS Period 2 )41 )47 )67 )62 22á8 NS NS Total )5 0 )45 )32 13á9 *** NS Body condition change )0á05 )0á04 )0á27 )0á18 0á09 *** NS NS, not signi cant; ***P < 0á001. See Table 1 for treatment abbreviations. DDMI was signi cantly (P <0á05) higher in nonlactating ewes on the C 0á3 treatment (314 g d ±1 ) than in those on C 0á7 treatment (281 g d ±1 ; s.e.d. 15á2). Season The difference in daily DMI between July and September was not signi cant, but because the dry-matter digestibility of the diet was signi cantly (P < 0á001) higher in July (0á64) than in September (0á51; s.e.d. 0á012), daily DDMI (323 vs. 272 g d ±1 ) and DDMI per metabolic live weight (26 vs. 21 g d ±1 kg LW ±0á75 ) were signi cantly (P <0á001) higher in July than in September. There were no differences between years in daily DMI and in daily DDMI of non-lactating ewes. However, dry-matter digestibility (0á56 vs. 0á59; s.e.d. 0á012) and DDMI per metabolic weight (23 vs. 26 g d ±1 kg LW ±0á75 ; s.e.d. 1á19) were signi cantly (P < 0á01) lower in 1991 than in 1992. Interactions Signi cant (P <0á01) interactions between treatment and season in dry-matter digestibility and daily DDMI per metabolic weight were observed (Table 5). There were no signi cant interactions between treatments and year for any of the intake variables and only drymatter digestibility showed an interaction between season and year (P <0á05). Lactational status Lactating ewes had signi cantly higher intakes in July than non-lactating ewes (598 vs. 495 g d ±1 ; P <0á001). Although the dry-matter digestibility of the diet was not signi cantly different, the DDMI was also signi cantly (P <0á001) higher in lactating (301 g d ±1 ) than in nonlactating ewes (257 g d ±1 ). In September, the difference in DMI between lactating and non-lactating ewes was less but lactating ewes still had a signi cantly higher (P <0á05) daily DMI (592 g d ±1 ) and daily DMI per metabolic live weight (24á6 gd ±1 kg LW ±0á75 ; P <0á001) than non-lactating ewes (514 g d ±1 and 19á8 gd ±1 kg LW ±0á75 ). There were no signi cant interactions between lactational status and treatment and season. Diet composition Overall the proportion of C. vulgaris in the diet of dry ewes on treatment C 0á7 (0á24) was higher than on treatment C 0á3 (0á15; s.e.d. 0á013; P <0á001). Likewise the proportion of N. stricta was higher in treatment C 0á7 (0á18) than in C 0á3 (0á11; s.e.d. 0á021; P <0á001). As a consequence, the proportion of preferred grasses (F. rubra + A. capillaris) in the diet was lower on the C 0á7 treatment (0á58 vs. 0á74; s.e.d. 0á023; P <0á001). Season The proportions of C. vulgaris and N. stricta in the diet were higher (P <0á001) in September than in July and the proportion of preferred grasses (F. rubra + A. capillaris) was lower (0á49 vs. 0á83; s.e.d. 0á227; P < 0á001).

306 K. Osoro et al. Table 5 Effect of treatment (C0á3 or C0á7), period and year on intake and diet composition in non-lactating ewes. 1991 1992 C 0á3 C 0á7 C 0á3 C 0á7 Signi cance Period July September July September July September July September s.e.d. (T) Period (P) (Y) T P T Y P Y DMI (g d )1 ) 485 585 506 442 521 533 507 541 31á8 NS NS NS NS NS NS DDMI (g d )1 ) 299 320 337 194 340 302 323 280 21á8 * *** NS *** NS NS DDMI (g d )1 kg LW )0á75 ) 23á8 24á3 26á5 15á3 28á1 23á5 29á3 23á4 1á68 NS *** ** ** NS NS Digestibility of DM 0á62 0á53 0á66 0á43 0á65 0á57 0á64 0á52 0á017 * *** ** *** NS * Diet composition ² C. vulgaris 0á13 0á15 0á04 0á24 0á09 0á23 0á23 0á52 0á018 *** *** *** *** *** *** Preferred grasses 0á87 0á58 0á87 0á32 0á91 0á63 0á63 0á48 0á033 *** *** NS NS NS *** N. stricta 0á00 0á27 0á09 0á44 0á00 0á14 0á14 0á00 0á030 *** *** *** NS ** *** ² Proportion of each component. NS, not signi cant; *P <0á05; **P <0á01; ***P <0á001. DMI, dry-matter intake; DDMI, digestible dry-matter intake; see Table 1 for treatment abbreviations. The proportion of C. vulgaris in the diet was higher in 1992 than in 1991 (0á27 vs. 0á14; s.e.d. 0á013; P <0á001) and the proportion of N. stricta was lower (0á07 vs. 0á20; s.e.d. 0á021; P <0á001), but there was no difference in the proportion of (F. rubra + A. capillaris). Interactions There were signi cant (P < 0á001) interactions between treatments, seasons and years in the proportion of C. vulgaris in the diet. The interaction between season and year was also signi cant (P <0á001) for the proportions of (F. rubra + A. capillaris) and N. stricta in the diet (Table 5). The proportion of (F. rubra + A. capillaris) in the diet in July was signi cantly different between treatments in the second year (it was lower on the C 0á7 treatment) but was similar in the rst year. The proportion of C. vulgaris was signi cantly different between seasons, except for the rst year (1991) on treatment C 0á3. The proportion of C. vulgaris in the diet was much higher (P <0á001) in year 2, especially on the C 0á7 treatment in September (0á52), and the proportion of N. stricta was lower. Lactational status There was no signi cant effect of lactational status on diet composition, nor were there any signi cant interactions between lactational status, treatment and season. Discussion The results show clear evidence of the effect of the proportion of C. vulgaris cover on grass height, diet composition and digestibility and on herbage intakes and therefore on liveweight changes of lactating and non-lactating ewes. Milne and Bagley (1976) provided evidence for the effect of the proportion of grass in the diet on intake. DMI and diet digestibility, in general, were substantially higher on the grass-dominant treatment (C 0á3 ) than on that dominated by C. vulgaris (C 0á7 ). The decrease in both DMI and diet digestibility, which occurred with advancing season and decreasing availability of grass (as de ned by sward height) were greater on the C. vulgaris-dominant treatment (C 0á7 ), as would be expected from the work of Hodgson et al. (1991). The seasonal decline in diet digestibility from July to September is attributed to an increase in the proportion of dead plant material consumed, as observed by Grant et al. (1985) and to an increase in the proportion of less digestible species, such as C. vulgaris and N. stricta in the diet.

Calluna vulgaris cover in hill pastures and the performance of ewes 307 The daily DDMIs of the ewes grazing the grassdominant (C 0á3 ) treatment (9á4±11á7 gkg ±1 d ±1 ) were lower than the 22á6 gkg ±1 d ±1 of DOM observed by Hodgson et al. (1991) on Agrostis spp. communities grazed by Scottish Blackface ewes (56 kg LW). On the C. vulgaris-dominant (C 0á7 ) treatment, however, DDMIs in period 2 (8á7±9á4 gkg ±1 d ±1 ) were higher than those 4á7 gkg ±1 d ±1 of DOM found by Hodgson et al. (1991) on monospeci c C. vulgaris moor and illustrate the low nutritive value of C. vulgaris noted by Milne et al. (1979). The dry-matter digestibility of the diet in July (0á60± 0á66) was slightly lower than the 0á69 observed for Agrostis±Festuca communities but much higher than the 0á41 estimated for C. vulgaris, by Hodgson et al. (1991). In September, the dry-matter digestibility of the diet in treatment C 0á7 was only 0á43±0á48, but the mean sward height of the (F. rubra + A. capillaris) component was low at 1á8 cm. The liveweight changes corroborate the observation of Maxwell et al. (1986) that to meet the energy and nitrogen requirements for maintenance of live weight, 0á50 of the diet would require to be derived from grass with a dry-matter digestibility of 0á70. In the present work, the proportion of grass in the diet was higher than 0á50 in both July and September although the dry-matter digestibility of the diet was lower than 0á70, especially in September. C. vulgaris as the sole component of the diet would not support the maintenance of live weight of the ewes (Milne, 1974). It is assumed that the ewes will increase their DMI by around 0á25 during lactation (Maxwell et al., 1986) and the difference in total DMI between lactating and non-lactating ewes in this study was 0á20 in July; in September the difference was lower because of the reduction in milk production. The mean stocking rate applied from June to September over the 5 years (8á7 ewes ha ±1 ) in both treatments, was higher than those (four ewes ha ±1 ) suggested by Maxwell et al. (1986) for areas where the grass component produces 1800 kg DM ha ±1 year ±1, and much higher than the 0á20±0á70 ewes ha ±1 common for areas with predominantly C. vulgaris cover in Scotland under current farming practice. However, this stocking rate of 8á7 ewes ha ±1 is very similar to that suggested by Maxwell et al. (1986) for C. vulgaris communities with areas reseeded with grass species. They found that, if a C. vulgaris and grass mosaic is stocked between weaning and premating at a level to achieve utilization of heather of 0á30, then 8á75 ewes ha ±1 can be grazed on the area during a 90-d period and the ewes will gain live weight of around 50 g d ±1. The optimum stocking rate will be dependent on the area and dry-matter production of the grass species and level of heather utilized (Maxwell et al., 1986). Milne and Grant (1978), working on vegetation with adjacent areas of C. vulgaris and reseeded grass, in order to achieve effective use of C. vulgaris without incurring unacceptable nutritional penalties to the grazing sheep, suggested that these objectives could be achieved where the ratio of grass to C. vulgaris by area was 0á30:0á70 and where herbage mass on the grass area was maintained at 1000±1500 kg DM ha ±1, although the balance is likely to vary with the time of year and the condition of C. vulgaris. In the present work, the ratio of grass to C. vulgaris cover was also 0á30:0á70 under treatment C 0á7 and the average herbage mass on the grass area during the grazing season was higher than 1000± 1500 kg DM ha ±1, according to the relationship between sward height and herbage mass for these pastures established by Celaya (1998). The non-lactating ewes maintained or increased live weight and body condition (average liveweight gains over ve grazing seasons 12 g d ±1 ). However, in the second half of the grazing season, when the sward height on the grass area was lower than 2á5 cm, corresponding to a herbage mass lower than 1500 kg DM ha ±1, non-lactating ewes were not able to maintain their live weight when the ratio of grass to C. vulgaris was 0á30:0á70 and they lost 24 g d ±1. Under similar low (less than 1500 kg DM ha ±1 ) herbage masses, but where the ratio of grass to C. vulgaris cover was 0á70:0á30 (treatment C 0á3 ), non-lactating ewes were able to maintain live weight (liveweight change 2 g d ±1 ) in spite of the low herbage mass. The results of this work indicate that non-lactating ewes are able to maintain or increase live weight when sward height of the preferred grass species is higher than 2á5 cm, irrespective of whether C. vulgaris cover is 0á3 or 0á7 of the total area, although the liveweight gains are higher with higher grass cover. The increases in liveweight changes from year to year on both treatments are probably, at least in part, a consequence of the changes in vegetation, especially in the physiological status of C. vulgaris, which were observed by Celaya (1998) on this site. The nutritive value of the grass species and of C. vulgaris shoots increased during the experiment: crude protein content increased from 110 to 150 g kg ±1 DM in the grass species and from 70 to 90 g kg ±1 DM in C. vulgaris, while acid-detergent bre content decreased from 380 to 340 g kg ±1 DM in the grass species and from 460 to 350 g kg ±1 DM in C. vulgaris. The proportion of green shoots and nutritive value of C. vulgaris is related to the level and season of utilization in previous years (Grant et al., 1978; 1982). The level of utilization is affected by the amount of grass available, and the ratio of grass to C. vulgaris, as was shown by Maxwell et al. (1986). This explains the differences in the present experiment between the C 0á3 and C 0á7 treatments in the level of liveweight change.

308 K. Osoro et al. In conclusion, on hill vegetation communities in which the grass components (Festuca, Agrostis and Nardus spp.) cover at least 0á3 of the area and on which the Festuca±Agrostis component is maintained at a sward height of at least 2á5 cm, non-lactating ewes will increase their live weight and body condition. The magnitude of the increase will be in uenced by the proportion of grass in the diet, which will be affected in turn by the species of grass available and their nutritive quality. However, ewes suckling lambs were not able to maintain live weight and body condition except when C. vulgaris cover was 0á3 and grass height higher than 3á5 cm. These hill vegetation communities of northern Spain can be used in sheep production systems to complement the use of improved pastures. In particular they can be utilized during the non-lactating period (summer) to increase body condition before the beginning of the mating period in autumn. Acknowledgments The authors are indebted to the staff of the Meat Production and Grazing Ecology Research programme of Asturias for their work, often undertaken in dif cult conditions, in the conduct of the experiment. The nancial support of projects GAN 88-0294 and GAN 91-0623 by CICYT is also gratefully acknowledged. References BARTHRAM G.T. (1986) Experimental techniques: the HFRO swardstick. Hill Farming Research Organisation Biennial Report, 1984±85, pp. 29±30. CELAYA R. (1998) DinaÂmica vegetal de pastos y matorrales de la montanäa cantaâbrica sometidos a diferentes estrategias de pastoreo por rumiantes (Vegetation dynamics in grasslands and heathlands of the Cantabrian Mountains under different grazing strategies with ruminants). Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Oviedo. GRANT S.A., BARTHRAM G.T., LAMB W.I.C. and MILNE J.A. (1978) Effects of season and level of grazing on the utilization of heather by sheep. 1. Responses of the sward. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 33, 289±300. GRANT S.A., MILNE J.A., BARTHRAM G.T. and SOUTER W.G. (1982) Effects of season and level of grazing on the utilization of heather by sheep. 3. Longer-term responses and sward recovery. Grass and Forage Science, 37, 311±320. GRANT S.A., SUCKLING D.E., SMITH H.K., TORVELL L., FORBES T.D.A. and HODGSON J. (1985) Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle: the hill grasslands. Journal of Ecology, 73, 987±1004. HODGSON J., FORBES T.D.A., ARMSTRONG R.H., BEATTIE M.M. and HUNTER E.A. (1991) Comparative studies of the ingestive behaviour and herbage intake of sheep and cattle grazing indigenous hill plant communities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 205±227. LAWES AGRICULTURAL TRUST (1984) Genstat V, Mark 4.04b. Harpenden, Hertfordshire: Rothamsted Experimental Station. MAXWELL T.J., GRANT S.A., MILNE J.A. and SIBBALD A.R. (1986) Systems of sheep production on heather moorland. Proceedings of a Hill Land Symposium, Galway, 1984, pp. 187±211. MAYES R.W., LAMB C.S. and COLGROVE P.M. (1986) The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 107, 161±170. MILNE J.A. (1974) The effects of season and age of stand on the nutritive value of heather (Calluna vulgaris L. Hull) to sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 83, 281±288. MILNE J.A. and BAGLEY L. (1976) The nutritive value of diets containing different proportions of grass and heather (Calluna vulgaris L. Hull) to sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 87, 599±604. MILNE J.A. and GRANT S.A. (1978) Better use of heather hills for sheep production. Hill Farming Research Organisation 7th Report, 1974±77, pp. 41±48. MILNE J.A., CHRISTIE A. and RUSSEL A.J.F. (1979) The effects of nitrogen and energy supplementation on the voluntary intake and digestion of heather by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 92, 635±643. OLIVAN M. and OSORO K. (1999) Effect of temperature on alkane extraction from faeces and herbage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 132, 305±312. RUSSEL A.J.F., DONEY J.M. and GUNN R.G. (1969) Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 72, 451±454.

This document is a scanned copy of a printed document. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material.