Activity of Three Aminoglycosides and Two Penicillins Against

Similar documents
Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

available. and P. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin by standardized disk testing (1) in the Microbiology Laboratory

In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin

University, New York, New York Received for publication 7 May was measured by the broth dilution method as previously

Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates

Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci

Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli

Disk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

VOL. XXIII NO. II THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 559. ANTIBIOTIC 6640.* Ill

Emergence of Gentamicin- and Carbenicillin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Hospital Environment

Discrepancy Between Carbenicillin and Ampicillin Activities Against Enterococci and Listeria

Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing

RELIABLE AND REALISTIC APPROACH TO SENSITIVITY TESTING

An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Synergy Between Cephalosporin and Aminoglycoside

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Resistance of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci

Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Mechanism of Chloramphenicol-Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Tel: Fax:

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

New Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Against Cephalothin-Resistant

Staphylococcus aureus with the Disc

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

IN VITRO COMBINATION EFFECTS OF NORFLOXACIN, GENTAMICIN, AND Ĉ- LACTAMS ON Ĉ- LACTAM RESISTANT PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA

Factors affecting plate assay of gentamicin

Fg/ml into the gentamicin and tobramycin panels, and 12 and 24 pig/ml into the amikacin. panels. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)

MICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to

Pharm 262: Antibiotics. 1 Pharmaceutical Microbiology II DR. C. AGYARE

by adding different antibiotics to sera containing

JAC Bactericidal index: a new way to assess quinolone bactericidal activity in vitro

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

of Staphylococcus aureus

Hospital Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Surveillance of Resistance

Susceptibility Tests for Methicillin-Resistant (Heteroresistant) Staphylococci

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Staphylococcus aureus

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Antimicrobials & Resistance

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Evaluation of MicroScan MIC Panels for Detection of

Influence of ph on Adaptive Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Aminoglycosides and Their Postantibiotic Effects

R-factor mediated trimethoprim resistance: result of two three-month clinical surveys

Effeet on Bacterial Growth

coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare the susceptibility of 297 strains of anaerobic and a new broad-spectrum semisynthetic

Antibiotics & Resistance

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

Microbiology ( Bacteriology) sheet # 7

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018, 5(1): Research Article

Bactericidal and Bacteriostatic Action of Chloramphenicol

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Impact of Spores on the Comparative Efficacies of Five Antibiotics. Pharmacodynamic Model

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Brief reports. Decreased susceptibility to imipenem among penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Performance Information. Vet use only

Derivative, 4'-Deoxy, 6'-N-Methylamikacin

Comparison of the Inhibitory and Bactericidal Activity of Aztreonam and Amikacin Against Gram Negative Aerobic Bacilli

GENTAMICIN: ACTIVITY IN VITRO AGAINST GRAMNEGATIVE ORGANISMS AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCES IN THE TREATMENT OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS

Effects of Minocycline and Other Antibiotics on Fusobacterium necrophorum Infections in Mice

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

SELECT NEWS. Florfenicol Monograph: Injectable & Oral Therapy for Swine

In Vitro Susceptibility of Brucella

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Doripenem: A new carbapenem antibiotic a review of comparative antimicrobial and bactericidal activities

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Cell Wall Inhibitors. Assistant Professor Naza M. Ali. Lec 3 7 Nov 2017

Mili Rani Saha and Sanya Tahmina Jhora. Department of Microbiology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Antibacterial Spectrum

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Received 5 February 2004/Returned for modification 16 March 2004/Accepted 7 April 2004

Brief reports. Heat stability of the antimicrobial activity of sixty-two antibacterial agents

Improved Susceptibility Disk Assay Method Employing an

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

SELECT NEWS. Florfenicol Monograph: Injectable Therapy for Cattle

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

THE STABILITY OF E1VROFLOXA CIN University Undergraduate Research Fellow. A Senior Thesis. Texas ASM University.

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Treatment of Gram-negative infections in patients before and after

NAFCILLIN AND OXACILLIN COMPARATIVE ANTISTAPHYLOCOCCAL ACTIVITY IN MICE. J. A. YURCHENCO, M. W. HOPPER, T. D. VINCE and G. H.

Acquired and Native Resistance of Staphylococcus

Transcription:

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Feb. 1975, P. 172-178 Copyright @ 1975 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 7, No. 2 Printed in U.S.A. Activity of Three Aminoglycosides and Two Penicillins Against Four Species of Gram-Negative Bacilli RALPH J. WEINSTEIN, LOWELL S. YOUNG,* AND WILLIAM L. HEWITT Department of Medicine, University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90024 Received for publication 7 October 1974 Three aminoglycoside antibiotics and two penicillins were compared for their in vitro activity against 60 isolates of Serratia, Pseudomonas, Proteus mirabilis, and indole-positive Proteus sp. Testing was done by the agar dilution method using Mueller-Hinton broth solidified with 1.5% agar. The activity of amikacin, aminodeoxybutirosin, and gentamicin against Proteus and Pseudomonas, as related to their peak blood levels, showed no significant differences. Amikacin was the most active against Serratia marcescens. Results using Mueller-Hinton media in broth dilution tests correlated with the agar dilution method except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The minimal inhibitory concentration for aminoglycosides in agar was considerably greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration in Mueller-Hinton broth, and the disparity was reldted to the higher divalent cation concentration of agar. BL-P1654 and carbenicillin were similar except that carbenicillin was much more active against indole-positive Proteus sp. Additionally, the ratio of bactericidal to bacteriostatic concentrations of BL-P1654 was considerably greater than for carbenicillin. Gentamicin and carbenicillin, used alone or in combination, are now among the most widely used antibiotics for the treatment of serious, hospital-acquired, gram-negative bacillary infections. Although the activity by weight of gentamicin against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is comparable to other aminoglycosides, several problems have been associated with its clinical use. First, the mean peak blood level obtained with gentamicin at commonly recommended dosages (1.5 mg/kg) is about 4 pg/ml, whereas the trough level is often less than 1 Ag/ml. This peak level may barely exceed the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of many gram-negative isolates and it is likely that larger doses will be associated with greater toxicity. Second, clinically significant gentamicin-resistant organisms are being reported with increasing frequency (14, 19). Carbenicillin is the only clinically available penicillin with activity against P. aeruginosa, Serratia, and indole-positive Proteus sp. However, a number of reports have documented the rapid development of carbenicillin resistance during therapy (12, 13). For these reasons, new antimicrobial agents of the aminoglycoside or semisynthetic penicillin classes continue to be investigated for their in vitro activity against those gram-negative bacilli which are difficult to treat. In this report, we have compared the activity of gentamicin to amikacin (BB-K8) and amino- 172 deoxybutirosin (A-butirosin) and carbenicillin to a new semisynthetic penicillin, BL-P1654, against approximately 60 clinical isolates of Proteus mirabilis, indole-positive Proteus, P. aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens. The in vitro testing was performed in accord with the methods recommended by the International Collaborative Study (ICS) on antimicrobial testing sponsored by the World Health Organization (8). Standard reference strains from the Pasteur Institute Collection (among ghose reviewed by the ICS) were used so that the results of this study can be compared with data from other laboratories using standard methods and these reference strains. (This paper was presented in part at the 14th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, Calif., 11 to 13 September, 1974.) MATERIALS AND METHODS In vitro testing. In vitro susceptibility to various agents of approximately 60 clinical isolates each of P. aeruginosa, S. marcescens, indole-positive Proteus sp, and P. mirabilis were determined by the agar dilution method as outlined by the ICS (8). The organisms were isolated from clinical specimens since 1971 from the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (Memorial Hospital), New York; Univ. of Califomia (CHS), Los Angeles; and Wadsworth VA Hospital, Los Angeles. They were identified by standard criteria (3). Tube

VOL. 7, 1975 dilution testing was performed in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) (Difco, lot no. 075701) and agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) prepared from MHB solidified with 1.5% agar (Difco, lot no. 014001). MHA for testing Proteus sp. contained 4% agar to prevent swarming. Gentamicin was obtained from George Acieri of the Schering Corp., amikacin and BL-P1654 were from Edward Yevak of Bristol Laboratories, aminodeoxybutirosin was from M. W. Fisher of Parke-Davis and Co., and carbenicillin was from B. Horn-Bostel of Roerig Division, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. Plastic petri dishes containing serial twofold dilutions of antibiotics in agar were prepared within 48 h of use. An inoculum of approximately 1 x 10' organisms diluted from an overnight broth culture was used. The organisms were delivered to dry agar surfaces using the inoculum replicating device of Steers et al. (20). The Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentration of the media was determined by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer and expressed in milligram percent. Broth MIC was determined by inoculating 1 x 10 organism from an overnight culture into MHB and recording the lowest concentration of antibiotic which yielded a clear tube at 24 h. All clear tubes were subcultured onto blood agar and the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was that concentration which yielded less than 5 colonies at 24 h. Standard reference strains Escherichia coli 53.153 and P. aeruginosa 58.38 obtained from the collection of the Pasteur Institute were kindly provided by Yves Chabbert. Each plate was inoculated with 30 clinical isolates and both reference strains. Criteria for susceptibility. Isolates were considered susceptible if they were inhibited at or below the peak serum level achieved during administration of drug to patients or normal volunteers. For gentamicin, this was 4 ug/ml at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg; for amikacin and aminodeoxybutirosin, 16,g/ml at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg; and for carbenicillin and BL-P1654, 128 jg/ml for a dose of 4 g and 1 g, respectively. The inhibitory index refers to the ratio between the mean peak serum levels given above and the MIC for at least M of each species tested (22). RESULTS Each isolate was tested a minimum of three times by the agar dilution method to determine the MIC. The two standard reference strains were tested on each plate as an internal ACTIVITY AGAINST GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLI 173 control. Reference strains were thus rechecked more than 20 times each, and showed no greater than a one dilution variation. Susceptibility of clinical isolates to three aminoglycosides. The in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of four different species are represented in Fig. 1-4. The concentration of gentamicin to inhibit 50% of the isolates of P. mirabilis was 1.5 jig/ml; for amikacin, 4 ug/ml; and for aminodeoxybutirosin, 8 xg/ml (Fig. 1). Over 95% of isolates were inhibited by all three drugs within their 0 = m z - FIG. 1. The activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin against 58 clinical isolates of Proteus mirabilis. n z at 80 60 - Amikocin * Aminodeoxybutirosin - Gentomicin _.- 40- A / AmiA kocin A 20 - AminodeoxybutiIirosin o mlicin - Gentan 0 0.5 2 4 8 16 32 s 128 FIG. 2. The activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin against 57 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. therapeutic range. Inhibition of 50% of isolates of P. aeruginosa by gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin was achieved at 4, 16, and 32 ug/ml, respectively (Fig. 2). With these agar dilution tests, the curve representing cumulative percent inhibition of P. aeruginosa by gentamicin and amikacin showed its greatest increment at one dilution above the mean peak serum levels for each drug. Fifty percent of indole-positive Proteus sp. was susceptible to gentamicin at 1 gg/ml, amikacin at 2,ug/ml, and aminodeoxybutirosin at 4 jig/ml (Fig. 3). At the mean peak serum levels, 81% of isolates were inhibited by gentamicin, 95% were inhibited by amikacin, and 96% were inhibited by el

174 WEINSTEIN, YOUNG AND HEWIAG ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. C, 80- m - 60- D 40-20 - Amikocin A Aminodeoxybutirosin o Gentamicin - FIG. 3. The activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin against 58 clinical isolates of indole + Proteus sp. z 80- -~40- A0 Amikac'n 20- Aminodeoxybutirosin o _1lo Gentamicin - 0- J 0.25 05 2 4 8 16 32 <64 FIG. 4. The activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin against 57 clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens. aminodeoxybutirosin. Fifty percent of the Serratia strains were susceptible to 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 Mg/ml of gentamicin, amikacin, and aminodeoxybutirosin, respectively. At mean peak serum levels, gentamicin inhibited 77% of these strains, amikacin 74% of strains, and aminodeoxybutirosin 75% of strains. Susceptibility of clinical isolates to two penicillins. At 8 Mg/ml for BL-P1654 and between 16 to 32,g/ml for carbenicillin, approximately 50% of P. aeruginosa strains were inhibited. At 128 Mug/ml (peak serum level), 95% of strains were inhibited by both agents (Fig. 5). Fifty percent of S. marcenscens was inhibited by 16 mg/ml of BL-P1654 and carbenicillin, and at 128,ug/ml the MIC for 90% of isolates was exceeded by both drugs. Both carbenicillin and BL-P1654 were quite active against P. mirabilis, as greater than 90% of isolates were inhibited by either agents at only 4 Mg/ml (Fig. 7). In contrast, the activity of the two agents against indole-positive Proteus sp. differed markedly (Fig. 7). The concentration of 4 Mg of carbenicillin per ml, compared with 128 Mg of BL-P1654 per ml, inhibited 50% of indole-positive Proteus sp. Inhibitory index. The relevance of activity by weight of an antimicrobial agent may be less 80 - Z 60 C 40- a -, 20 Carbenicillin o- BL-Pl654 *- 4 8 16 32 64 128 <256 FIG. 5. The activity of BL-P1654 and carbenicillin against 57 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 100 80- Z 60- < 40- Corbenicillin o 70 / /BL P1654-2 4 8 16 32 64 128 '256 FIG. 6. The activity of BL-P1654 and carbenicillin against 57 clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens.

VOL. 7, 1975 ACTIVITY AGAINST GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLI 175 meaningful than the relationship between in vitro activity and the achievable peak serum levels. The inhibitory index is defined as the ratio of the mean peak serum level to the lowest antibiotic concentration required to inhibit twothirds of the isolates (Table 1). Thus, the greater the ratio the higher the blood levels are in relation to the pattern of MICs. Viewed in this manner, the three aminoglycosides are comparable except that amikacin appears to offer an advantage over gentamicin against Serratia and carbenicillin is distinctly superior to BL-P1654 against indole-positive Proteus sp. Comparison of MBC/MIC for BL-P1654 and carbenicillin. The tube dilution method, performed according to the ICS guidelines to determine the MIC and MBC of 12 representative clinical isolates and both reference strains, indicated that for Pseudomonas and some Serratia the MBC/MIC ratio for BL-P1654 was much greater than for carbenicillin (Table 2). No difference was seen for Proteus sp. Comparison of methods and effect of media. The MIC was determined for 12 clinical isolates and both standard reference organisms by the tube dilution method in Mueller-Hinton broth and compared with those obtained by the agar dilution method (Table 3). Except for C - -1-1 T - T '---- r I T r 2 4 8 16 32 64 128S256 2 4 8 16 32 64 128<256 K1ll,1IAUAM I%H1BI10RY CO',C[%TRATIO', 1%. Ce 1Il FIG. 7. The activity of BL-P1654 and carbenicillin against Proteus sp. (Left) Against indole + Proteus sp. carbenicillin showed significantly greater activity. (Right) Against P. mirabilis the activity of the two penicillirns was similar. Pseudomonas, the results were comparable and did not differ by more than a single dilution. For P. aeruginosa, the aminoglycosides were least active on 1.5% agar, and most active in MHB probably reflecting the differences in the concentration of Ca2+ + Mg24 in the media (Table 4). DISCUSSION The spectrum of these aminoglycoside antibiotics was similar but on a weight basis gentamicin was clearly the most active, amikacin intermediate, and aminodeoxybutirosin least active. This order of activity against the four species of bacteria tested was in agreement with previous reports (22, 23). To factor for the differences in pharmacokinetics between amikacin and gentamicin (6), inhibitory indices were calculated to relate potency by weight with achievable serum levels (22). Using this approach, amikacin appears to offer no theoretical advantage over gentamicin, except against isolates of S. marcescens. It should be borne in mind, however, that highly gentamicin-resistant strains are often susceptible to amikacin, whereas the few strains studied which are resistant to amikacin are also gentamicin resistant (5, 18). Amikacin is effective against, bacterial strains resistant to other aminoglycqsides because it is a poor substrate for enzymes that inactivate aminoglycosides by phosphorylation, or adenylation (2, 18). Comparative clinical studies will be required to determine whether one of these agents has any therapeutic advantages over the other. Aminodeoxybutirosin is a chemical modification of butirosin, the latter being obtained from fermentation filtrates of Bacillus circulans. Butirosin and aminodeoxybutirosin resemble amikacin in activity and pharmacokinetics (7, 11). A previous report showed aminodeoxybutirosin to have greater activity against Pseudomonas and Serratia than butirosin (personal communication, M. W. Fisher, Parke-Davis and Co.), TABLE 1. Inhibitory index: Ratio of mean peak serum leuel per concentration to inhibit '/3 of isolates (gg/ml) Gentamicin Amikacin Aminodeoxybuti- Carbenicillin BL-P1654 Determinants (4Pa (16)a rosin (16)0 (128)a (128)a Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.5 (4/8) 0.5 (16/32) 0.25 (16/64) 4 (128/32) 4 (128/32) (57 isolates) Serratia marcescens (57 1 (4/4) 4 (16/4) 2 (16/8) 4 (128/32) 4 (128/32) isolates) Indole + Proteus sp. (58 2 (4/2) 2 (16/8) 2 (16/8) 128 (128/1) 64 (128/2) isolates) Indole - Proteus sp. (58 2 (4/2) 4 (16/4) 2 (16/8) 32 (128/4) < 1 (128/ > 128) isolates) a Mean peak serum level.

176 WEINSTEIN, YOUNG AND HEWWfANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. TABLE 2. Comparison of MBC-MIC ratio between carbenicillin and BL-P1654 in 14 clinical isolates Determinants Carbenicillin BL-P1654 MBC/MIC Ratio MBC/MIC Ratio Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pasteur Institute 58.38 128/64 2 512/16 32 Escherichia coli Pasteur Institute 54.127 8/4 2 16/2 8 Serratia marcescens 66-1 256/64 4 128/64 2 S. marcescens 829 64/64 1 256/32 8 S. marcescens 688 16/8 2 62/32 2 S. marcescens 670-5 64/64 1 1024/32 32 P. aeruginosa 1887 512/256 2 512/32 16 P. aeruginosa 2120 126/64 2 512/16 32 P. aeruginosa 2395 16/16 1 512/16 32 P. aeruginosa 3559 128/28 1 512/32 16 Proteus rettgeri 120 8/4 2 32/32 1 Proteus morganii 130 1/1 1 4/2 2 Proteus mirabilis 383 2/2 1 4/4 1 P. mirabilis 241 2/2 1 4/2 2 TABLE 3. Comparison of methods and effect of media on the activity of three aminoglycosides Gentamicin Amikacin Aminodeoxybutirosin Agar Broth dilution Agar Broth dilution Agar Broth dilution Determinants dilution dilution dilution (MHB MHB (MHB MHB (MHB MHB + 4% + 1.5% MHB + 4% + 1.5% MHB + 4% + 1.5% MHB agar) agar agar) agar agar) agar Escherichia coli Pasteur Institute 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 2 2 1 54.127 Pseudortr nas aeruginosa Pasteur 16 4 1 16 8 2 16 8 2 Institute 58.38 P. aeruginosa 2120 4 1 8 2 8 2 P. aeruginosa 1887 4 1 4 4 8 2 P. aeruginosa 3556 4 2 8 2 64 16 P. aeruginosa 3286 4 1 8 4 Serratia marcescens 07 1 1 8 16 4 4 S. marcescens 670-5 1 2 2 4 4 4 Proteus morganii 130 1 1 4 8 4 8 Proteus rettgeri 16 16 8 16 64 32 TABLE 4. Divalent cation concentration in three types of media as determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry Determinants Determnants Ca2+ Mg2S Ca2+ + (mg%) (mg%) (mg%) Mg2+ MHB + 4% agar 3.7 6.0 9.7 MHB + 1.5% agar 2.0 4.0 6.0 MHB 1.9 0.73 2.63 Normal human serum 10 2.4 12.4 but our results showed no advantage of aminodeoxybutirosin over amikacin. Cross-resistance between gentamicin and butirosin (and presumably aminodeoxybutirosin) commonly occurs (18). The effect of divalent cation concentration in culture media on the activity of gentamicin against Pseudomonas has been extensively investigated and is confirmed in this report (9, 10, 15). The interaction of Ca2+ and Mg2+ with the bacterium probably occurs at the cell wall and this increases the structural stability of the cell wall resulting in increased resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics (24). Based upon broth dilution susceptibility in this study and average peak serum levels, greater than 95% of the Pseudomonas would be susceptible to gentamicin and amikacin. An important question is whether the rather high degree of resistance encountered in this study compared to earlier reports from this and other laboratories can be reconciled on the basis of technical differences and/or the use of media with varying divalent cation content. Since one dilution variation of MICs in relation to peak serum levels dramati-

VOL. 7, 1975 cally changes the prevalence of resistant strains and since as much as eightfold differences are observed between broth and agar tests, these factors probably explain the variations that have been encountered. The interpretation of this data with regard to the physiologic state of the host is even more important. Since the effect of Mg2+ is greater than that of Ca2+, and since the concentration of Mg2+ in MHA is closer to that in human serum, the results of tests using MHA may be more clinically relevant than those using MHB. The two penicillins compared in this study have a comparable spectrum. Bodey and Stewart (4) and Price et al. (16) have shown BL-P1654 to be more active in vitro than carbenicillin against Pseudomonas and Serratia, but Adler and Finland could demonstrate no significant difference against Pseudomonas (1). Our data agree with the latter study. The reason for the difference in results is probably related to the marked effect of culture media on BL-P1654 (17, 21). The weakly basic BL-P1654 has up to a 40-fold reduction in activity on MHA as compared to nutrient broth. Carbenicillin, which is acidic, does not show this variation. MHA is a more reliable indicator of the relative in vivo potency of BL-P1654 and carbenicillin than nutrient agar (17). The action of carbenicillin is markedly greater than BL-P1654 against indole-positive Proteus sp. in agreement with previous work (4). Further, in testing of BL-P1654, a wide discrepancy was observed between MIC and MBCs. Overall, BL-P1654 compared to carbenicillin appears no more active against P. aeruginosa and S. marcescens as determined by the agar dilution method, has markedly less bactericidal activity against these two species and is less active against indole-positive Proteus sp. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported in part by Public Health Service training grant AI-309 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and by Bristol Laboratories, Schering Corporation, and Parke-Davis. The expert technical assistance of Nalinee Linpisal, Shahnaz Raza, and Dorothy Kelly is gratefully acknowledged. LITERATURE CITED 1. Adler, J. L., and M. Finland. 1971. Susceptibility of recent isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin, polymyxin, and five penicillins, with observations on the pyocin and immunotypes of the strains. Appl. Microbiol. 22:870-875. 2. Benveniste, R., and J. Davies. 1973. Aminoglycoside antibiotic-inactivating enzymes in actinomycetes similar to those present in clinical isolates of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:2276-2280. ACTIVITY AGAINST GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLI 177 3. Blair, J. E., E. H. Lennette, and J. P. Truant. 1970. Manual of clinical microbiology, p. 151-190. American Society for Microbiology, Bethesda, Md. 4. Bodey, G. P., and D. Stewart. 1971. In vitro studies of semi-synthetic alpha (substituted-ureido) penicillins. Appl. Microbiol. 21:710-717. 5. Bodey, G. P., and D. Stewart. 1973. In vitro studies of BB-K8, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2:186-192. 6. Cabana, B. E., and J. G. Taggart. 1973. Comparative pharmacokinetics of BB-K8 and kanamycin in dogs and humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 3:478-483. 7. Dion, H. W., P. W. K. Woo, N. E. Willmer, D. L. Kern, J. Onaga, and S. A. Fusari. 1972. Butirosin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic complex: isolation and characterization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2:84-88. 8. Ericsson, H. M., and J. C. Sherris. 1971. Antibiotic sensitivity testing: report of an international collaborative study. Acta Pathol. Microb. Scand. Sect. B 217: 64-68. 9. Garrod, L. P., and P. M. Waterworth. 1969. Effect of medium composition on the apparent sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin. J. Clin. Pathol. 22:534-538. 10. Gilbert, D. N., E. Kutscher, P. Ireland, J. A. Barnett, and J. Sanford. 1971. Effect of the concentrations of magnesium and calcium on the in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin. J. Infect. Dis. 124(Suppl):S37-S45. 11. Howells, J. D., L. E. Anderson, G. L. Coffey, G. D. Senos, M. A. Underhill, D. L. Vogler, and J. Ehrlich. 1972. Butirosin a new aminoglycoside antibiotic complex: bacterial origin and some microbiological studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2:79-83. 12. Lowbury, E. J. L., A. Kidson, H. A. Lilly, G. A. J. Ayliffe, and R. J. Jones. 1969. Sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics: emergence of strains highly resistant to carbenicillin. Lancet 2:448-452. 13. Marks, M. I., and T. C. Eickhoft. 1970. Carbenicillin: a clinical and laboratory evaluation. Ann. Intern. Med. 73:179-187. 14. Martin, C. M., N. S. Ikari. V. Zimmerman, and A. V. Waitz. 1971. A virulent nosocomial klebsiella with a transferable R factor for gentamicin. J. Infect. Dis. 124(Suppl):S24-S29. 15. Medeiros, A. A., T. F. O'Brien, W. E. C. Wacker, and N. F. Yulug. 1971. Effect of salt concentration on- the apparent in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas and other gram-negative bacilli to gentamicin. J. Infect. Dis. 124(Suppl):S59-S64. 16. Price, K. E., F. Leitner, M. Misiek, D. R. Chisholm, and T. A. Pursiano. 1971. BL-P1654, a new broad-spectrum penicillin with marked antipseudomonal activity, p. 17-29. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1970. 17. Pursiano, T. A., M. Misiek. F. Leitner. and K. E. Price. 1973. Effect of assay medium on the antibacterial activity of certain penicillins and cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 3:33-39. 18. Price, K. E., T. A. Pursiano, M. D. DeFuria, and G. E. Wright. 1974. Activity of BB-K8 (amikacin) against clinical isolates resistant to one or more aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 5:143-152. 19. Snelling, C. F. T., A. R. Ronald, C. Y. Cates. and W. C. Forsythe. 1971. Resistance of gram-negative bacilli to gentamicin. J. Infect. Dis. 124(Suppl):S264-S27t). 20. Steers, E., E. L. Foltz, and B. S. Graves. 1959. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antibiot. Chemother. 9:307-311. 21. VanScoy, R. E., E. Warren, and J. A. Washington II.

178 WEINSTEIN, YOUNG AND HEWITT 1971. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a new semisynthetic penicillin BL-P1654 (6- [R alpha- (guanylureido)phenylacetamido]-penicillanic acid) p. 12-16. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1970. 22. Young, L. S., and W. L. Hewitt. 1973. Activity of five aminoglycoside antibiotics in vitro against gram-negative becilli and Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 4:617-625. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHFR. 23. Yu, P. K. W., and J. A. Washington II. 1973. Comparative in vitro activity of three aminoglycoside antibiotics: BB-K8, kanamycin, and gentamicin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 4:133-139. 24. Zimelis, V. M., and G. G. Jackson. 1973. Activity of aminoglycoside antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Specificity and site of calcium and magnesium antagonism. J. Infect. Dis. 127:663-669.