Salmonella (sero)types and their resistance patterns isolated from pig faecal and post-mortem samples in

Similar documents
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2015

TOC INDEX. Salmonellosis in Feedlot Cattle. Jane Pritchard. Take Home Message. Introduction

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2016

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

The occurrence and epidemiology of Salmonella in European pig slaughterhouses

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN SALMONELLA ISOLATED FROM PORK, CHICKEN MEAT AND HUMANS IN THAILAND

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

The Menace of Typhoid / Paratyphoid Fever The Abuja Experience: A 5 Year Retrospective Study

BLUETONGUE The Netherlands 2006

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

Investigation of ill thrift in the adult ewe - how can we help? Lynn Gibson

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

Coccidiosis in Lambs. Dr Fiona Lovatt. Flock Health Ltd. RCVS Recognised Specialist in Sheep Health & Production

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

Seroprevalence of antibodies to Schmallenberg virus in livestock

Abstract. Introduction. Materials and methods

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN COMMENSAL E. COLI FROM LIVESTOCK IN BELGIUM: Veterinary Epidemiology

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

Urban Water Security Research Alliance

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Enteric Clostridia 10/27/2011. C. perfringens: general. C. perfringens: Types & toxins. C. perfringens: Types & toxins

Proceedings of. The 15 th Chulalongkorn University Veterinary Conference CUVC 2016: Research in Practice. April 20-22, 2016 Bangkok, Thailand

Typhoid fever - priorities for research and development of new treatments

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

CROATIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Antibiotics & Resistance

Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen Veterinarian

Salmonella control programmes in Denmark

The Responsible and Prudent use of Antimicrobials on Irish Pig Farms. Denis Healy

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

Enteric Clostridia. C. perfringens: general

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

GREECE TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Origins of Resistance and Resistance Transfer: Food-Producing Animals.

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

Salmonella Heidelberg: An Emerging Problem in the Dairy Industry

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

Medical Bacteriology- Lecture 14. Gram negative coccobacilli. Zoonosis. Brucella. Yersinia. Francesiella

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

2 nd UK-Russia Round Table on AMR. Christopher Teale, Animal and Plant Health Agency. Moscow, st February 2017.

Enteric Bacteria. Prof. Dr. Asem Shehabi Faculty of Medicine University of Jordan

4.5. Special precautions for use Special precautions to be taken by person administering the veterinary medicinal product to animals

Effect of heifer-raising practices on E. coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Aabo, Søren; Ricci, Antonia; Denis, Martine; Bengtsson, Björn; Dalsgaard, Anders; Rychlik, Ivan; Jensen, Annette Nygaard

Presence of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella serotypes isolated from human and animals in Sudan

VETERINARY BACTERIOLOGY FROM THE DARK AGES TO THE PRESENT DAY

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

VLA ANTIMICROBIAL SENSITIVITY REPORT 2003

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

Medical bacteriology Lecture 8. Streptococcal Diseases

The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

Country Report Myanmar

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

GREECE TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

CZECH REPUBLIC TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

VPM 201: Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology 26-27/10/2011. LABORATORY 8a - URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS (UTIs)

Borzoi Pedigree Breed Health Survey

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Antibiotic resistance of bacteria along the food chain: A global challenge for food safety

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Finland IN 2016 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

Training Module No 8

The epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance and the link between human and veterinary medicine

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

Himani B. Pandya, Ph.D (medical microbiology) Tutor, S.B.K.S Medical College and Research Institute Gujarat, INDIA

ANTIBIOTICS USED FOR RESISTACE BACTERIA. 1. Vancomicin

RECOVERY OF SALMONELLA USING A COMBINATION OF SELECTIVE ENRICHMENT MEDIA AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE OF ISOLATES IN MEAT IN THAILAND

Antimicrobials & Resistance

Drd. OBADĂ MIHAI DORU. PhD THESIS ABSTRACT

NZQA unit standard version 4 Page 1 of 5. Demonstrate understanding of post-mortem examination of animal products used for human consumption

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Understanding your pet s LIVER CONDITION

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Luxembourg IN 2015 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Prevalence, quantity and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica in response to antibiotic use early in the cattle feeding period

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

The surveillance and control programme

Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); August 2017

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Malta IN 2015 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Luxembourg IN 2014 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Trends en voorkomen van resistenties bij Salmonella, Campylobacter en E. coli geïsoleerd uit de voeding

Transcription:

Salmonella (sero)types and their resistance patterns isolated from pig faecal and post-mortem samples in 2000-2003. P.J. van der Wolf Animal Health Service, Pig Health Dept., P.O.Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, The Netherlands. Corresponding author: p. vd. wolf@qddeventer.com Abstract The purpose of this survey was to describe the porcine Salmonella isolates derived from faecal samples and post-mortem material (PMM) during years 2000-2003. Salmonella was isolated by direct inoculation on BGANO-plates (faeces, intestinal content) or sheep blood agar (organs). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the agar diffusion method. Salmonella was isolated in 3.2% of all porcine submissions received at the Animal Health Service. A total of 960 salmonellae were isolated from a total of 589 submissions from 488 different herds. S. Typhimurium was the most frequently isolated serotype (N= 808, 92.6% of 873 isolates typed), and Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 was the most frequently determined phagetype (N=98, 29.6% of 333 S. Typhimurium typed). Resistance to antimicrobials occurred in 52.5% of all isolates, mainly in the multiresistant phagetype DT1 04. In less than half of the submissions (44%), other pathogens were isolated as well. In cases of clinical diarrhoea, multiple pathogens and pathogens with multiple antimicrobial resistance may be involved and therapy and preventive measures should be adjusted accordingly. Introduction Results from continuous monitoring of prevalent Salmonella serotypes and the antimicrobial reststance patterns of Salmonellae isolated from faecal samples and from material for post-mortem examtnalion from pigs can be used in various ways. First of all it helps veterinarians in choosing an effective treatment of clinical cases. Secondly, Salmonella monitoring results can be used to asses the risk for the human population of salmonellae circulating in the p1g population, also because multiresistant strams can complicate the therapy of human salmonellosis. Finally, there is a possibility the resistance is transferred to other bacteriae in the human gut flora. Using this mformation, it should be kept in mind that these data are not based on a random sampling of the pig population and that extrapolation of these data to the general pig population is therefore hazardous. Purpose of this paper is to review the sero- and phagetypes and resistance patterns of Salmonellae that were isolated from pig faeces and post-mortems at the laboratory of the Animal Health Serv1ce in the period 2000-2003. Comparable data have been collected over the period 1996-1999 as described previously (1 ). Material and Methods Faecal samples and dead p1gs were submitted to the laboratories by p1g owners or their veterinarians for diagnostic investigation into the cause of the disease or the cause of death Faecal samples were cultured for Salmonella if Salmonella isolation or general bacteriological investigation was requested at submission. In case of a post-mortem exammation, bactenologtcal examination of the intestines always included direct culturing for Salmonella. Culturing of faeces and mtestinal contents 1s done by direct inoculation onto a bnlliantgreen agar plate containing 5 mg/l novobiocin, a selective medium for Salmonella isolation. Material from organs was maculated on sheep blood agar Suspect colonies were agglutinated with polyvalent anti-salmonella serum, sera-group A to G or A to S Positives were tested by sera-group spec1fic 0-antisera Isolates belonging to sera-groups 8 and 0 were tested with H-ant1sera Each isolate was tested in triple sugar 1ron. sulphide indol mot1hty urea and lys1nedecarboxylase agar tube Isolates were sent to the National Salmonella Reference Laboratory for serotyping and m case of Salmonella Typh1munum phagetypmg. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli were Isolated by aerobic cultunng on 10n 6 Antnmcrob1 I res1st nee Sa epork 2007 -Verona (Italy 389

sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar Suspect colon1es were agglutmated w1th polyvalent ant1serum and if applicable w1th monovalent antiserum. The presence of Brachysp1ra spp. was tested by Immuno-Fluorescence Test (1FT). PRRS was tested by e1ther body OUid in an ELISA or by PCR. Porc1ne Circo-virus-2 was tested e1ther by histology or PCR. Antim1crob1al susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1solates was done by the agar diffusion method, usmg lsosensitestagar and Neosens1tabs Salmonella-Isolates were cons1dered sens1t1ve to ant1m1crob1als 1f the Inhibition zones were equal or larger than 28 mm for amp1cillin and the comb1nat1on of amox1cillln with clavulan1c ac1d, Kana- Neomycm (22 mm), Spectlnomycin (22 mm), Colistin (polymyxin E) (22 mm), tnmethopnm-sulfamethoxazole (28 mm), and equal or larger than 24 mm for numequm. Results From a total of 589 Salmonella pos1t1ve subm1ss1ons from 488 d1fferent herds, 960 Salmonella isolates were detected. Of these, 261 subm1ss1ons consisted of one or more faecal samples (max. 40) and 324 cons1sted of one to a max1mum of 9 carcasses. Four subm1ss1ons were 1ntest1nes only. Out of a total of 488 herds, 414 herds (84,8%) submitted material only once 1n those four years. 56 herds subm1tted matenal twice, 12 herds three times, 3 herds 4 times and 3 herds 5 t1mes during these years These 488 herds were about 5% of all p1g herds in The Netherlands m that period On average, Salmonellae were isolated m 14 6 percent of all submissions of p1g faecal samples. An average of 2 7% of all PMM subm1ss1ons was pos1t1ve for Salmonellae (Table 1) Table 1 Total number of submissions of faecal material and post mortem matenal and number and percentage of subm1ss1ons pos1t1ve for Salmonella and total number of samples of faecal material and PMM and number and percentage of samples pos1t1ve for Salmonella in the penod 2000-2003 mclus1ve Faecal Total Positive Percent Total material submissions submissions positive samples 2000 684 98 14.3 2362 2001 339 55 16.2 1061 2002 375 71 18.9 1175 2003 387 37 9.6 1440 Total 1785 261 14.6 6038 Positive samples 214 112 137 71 534 Percent positive 9.1 10.6 11.7 4.9 8.8 PMM 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Total submissions 4470 2820 2429 2067 11786 Positive Percent Total submissions positive samples 107 2.4 9212 87 3.1 6431 71 2.9 4677 59 2.9 4065 324 2.7 24385 Positive samples 142 112 92 80 426 Percent positive 1 5% 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 17% In 333 Salmonella-positive faecal samples, also isolation of pathogenic E coli was attempted In 23 faecal samples (6 9%) pathogenic E. coli was found. In 428 Salmonella-pos1t1ve faecal samples Brachysplra spp. detection attempts were made by Immuno-Fluorescence Test Brachysp1ra spp were detected 162 (37.9%) times or a total of 422 Salmonella-positive post-mortem e ammalions, salmonellosis was the only diagnosis given in 181 cases (42 9%) In 20 cases (4 7%), Salmonella was an mcidental finding and the mortality was due to other reasons or les1ons e g herma or torston of (part of) the intestines, cardiac defects or mortality as a result of stress In respectively 35 3%, 13% and 3 8% one, two or three additional causes of death were g1ven 390 1fopork 2007 V ron (It ly)

Table 2. Number and percentage of the different symptoms I pathogens that were diagnosed besides Salmonella during post-mortem examinations from pigs. symptom I pathogen Numbe Numbe Percentage r tested r positive of positive tested Brachyspira spp. 222 81 36.5% Porcine Circa virus 2 217 58 26.7% Enteropathogenic E. coli 277 40 14.4% PRRS 25 12 48.0% Lawsonia intracel/ularis 12 4 33.3% Pneumonia 422 75 17.8% Streptococci infection 422 28 6.6% Organ systems* 422 43 10.2% organ systems included hernia or torsion of (part of) the intestines, cardiac defects, gastric ulcers, mortality as a result of stress, etc. In table 2 the number and percentage of the different symptoms or pathogens that were diagnosed during post-mortem examinations from pigs are presented. When comparing the submissions where only Salmonella was found to cause the symptoms with the submissions where also other causes were found, a significantly higher percentage of the samples within a submission were positive 1n the "only Salmonella"-group than in the "also other infections"-group (P<O.OOO, two samples t-test, 65.2% versus 53.5% respectively, see also table 3). Table 3 Comparison between the submissions with only Salmonella as diagnosis and those with also other pathogens/pathology for the number of samples I carcasses that was positive for Salmonella. Only More faeces PMM salmonella than 1 sample Yes Yes 69% 59% positive. positive samples samples No Yes 60% 50% positive positive samples samples P-value 0.057 0.02 In those cases where Salmonella was found to be the single cause of the clinical symptoms and where more than one sample or carcass was submitted within a submission on average only 69% of the faecal samples and only 59% of the carcasses were positive for Salmonella. Clinical symptoms were reported on 505 of 589 submission forms (85 7%), in 215 cases for faecal material and 1n 290 cases for PMM. Vary1ng from 1 to 6 different symptoms were given but mostly (55%) only one for faeces (diarrhoea) or one or two for PMM. Death, poor growth I runts, poor appetite or inappetence and other symptoms were significantly more often reported for PMM then for faecal samples Diarrhoea and fever were reported significantly (P<0.05) more often for faecal samples then for PMM. In PPM different materials were cultured for detection of Salmonella. These were colon (299 pos. out of 323 tested 92.6%), jejunum (288/269=84 8%), lungs (23/136=16.9%), brains (6/76=7.9%), spleen (23/73=31 5%), kidney (15/42=35.7%), JOints (3/1 4=21 4%), hart (2/1 4=14.3%), serous membranes (4/9=44 4%), stomach (7/8=87 5%), mesenteric lymphnodes (5/8=62.5%), caecum (5/5=100%), liver (4/5=80%) nose (0/4) and uterus (0/2). During post-mortem examination mostly ss on nt1m crob1::j r s1stnnc Safepork 2007 - Verona (Italy 391

2 organs were cultured (39. 7%) up to a maximum of 6 per carcass (1.1 %). Mostly one culture was posit1ve for Salmonella {61 %) but up to a maximum of 5 per carcass (0.2%). Table 4. Serovars of Salmonella found in faeces and post-mortem matenal. Faeces PMM serovar Freq % Freq % Typhimurium 471 93.3 337 91.6 Derby 7 1.4 11 3.0 Brandenburg 6 1.2 4 1.1 London 6 1.2 2 0.5 Livingstone 5 1.0 1 0.3 Bovismorbificans 3 0.6 2 0.5 Goldcoast 2 0.4 1 0.3 Panama 0 0.0 2 0.5 Falkensee 1 0.2 0 0.0 Kedougou 1 0.2 0 0.0 lnfantis 1 0.2 4 1.1 Dublin 1 0.2 0 0.0 Ohio 0 0.0 1 0.3 enterica 1 0.2 3 0.8 Total 505 99.1 368 100.0. In table 4 the different serovars of Salmonella that were found are presented. S. Typh1munum was the most frequently isolated serotype (N= 808, 92 6% of 873 isolates typed), and Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 was the most frequently determmed phagetype (N=98, 29 4% of 333 S Typh1murium typed) Over the years the percentage of DT1 04 phage type mcreases significantly from 21.5% 1n 2000 to 37.3% in 2003 (Table 5.) Table 5. Number and percentage of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 isolated per ear for the eriode 2000-2003. Year Salmonella DT10 % P<O.OS* Typhimuriu 4 m 2000 93 20 21.5 a 2001 95 25 26.3 ab 2002 86 31 36.1 b 2003 59 22 37.3 b * Number of DT1 04 per year with different letters differ significantly at the given level Next to DT1 04, corresponding to the Dutch phagetypes 506 and 401 37 other Dutch phage types were identified (N=235) Mam phagetypes were 507 (N=30), 1 (N=28), 510 (N=27), 350 (N=17}, 296 (N=16}, 353 (N=13), 80 (N=12), and 655 (N=11). Res1stance to antimicrobials was found 1n 52 5% of all ISolates that were tested (N=592) The number of ant1m1crob1als that isolates were resistant to vaned from 1 to 4, with respectively 21 %, 20%, 9% and 2% for 1 through 4 resistances Ampicillin was res1stant 1n 37 4% of all tested isolates (223/597=37 4%), amox1cillin with clavulamc ac1d 1n 10 7% mostly Intermediate resistant (64/597=10 7%), kan a-/neomycm 1n 0 2% intermediate resistant (1 /594=0 2%), spect1nomyc1n 1n 25 3% res1stant (150/593=25 3%}, colistin 1n 0 3% intermediate resistant (2/593=0 3%), trimethoprim sulfa combination in 22 8% res1stant (136/597=22 8%) and 392 afcpork 2007- Verona (Italy) Soss1on 6. AnUrnt rob al ro 1 1 nee

numequin in 0.5% intermediate resistant (3/592=0.5%). Res1stance for ampicillin, amoxicillin with clavulan1c acid, spectinomycin and TMPS mcreased over the years (table 6). Table 6. Frequency of resistant strains over the years for ampicillin, amoxicillin, spectinomycin and Trimethoprim sulfa combination (TMPS). 2000 2001 2002 2003 N = 209 N = 14 N = 145 N = 99 4 Ampicillin 27.8 3 31.9 3 44.1 45.5 Amoxicillin 6.7 3 2.8 3 11.0 29.3c Spectinomyci 18.7 3 22.5 30 29.9 27.6 30 n TMPS 22.5 3 20.1 3 20.0 3 30.3 Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (P<0.05) Discussion These data show that Salmonella is found in a small minority of the faecal samples and the postmortem material that is submitted to the Animal Health Service for diagnostic purposes. Most of the ISolated Salmonella's are Salmonella Typh1murium and within Salmonella Typhimunum the phagetype DT104 shows a growing prevalence over the years Clinical symptoms reported at submission are almost exclusively diarrhoea for faecal samples but more divers symptoms are reported for post-mortem material like death, diarrhoea, poor growth I runt, and other symptoms like lameness of nervous symptoms When more than one faecal sample or carcass 1s submitted not all samples are positive for Salmonella. Th1s means that submitting only 1 sample or carcass is a waste of money and effort m respectively 30 or 40% of the cases JUSt as a result of chance because even though Salmonella appears to be the cause of the symptoms not all samples are pos1t1ve. Th1s also means that the prevalence of Salmonella m cllmcal samples is underestimated because in many cases only one sample or carcass is submitted About two thirds of all isolated Salmonella's were resistant to at least one antimicrobial but with a maximum of res1stance to 4 ant1m1crob1als Res1stance was found ma1nly for amp1cillin, TMPS, spect1nomycm and amox1c11hn w1th clavulan1c ac1d. Resistance to these ant1m1crob1als appears to be mcreasmg over the years. Th1s increase is partly due to the increasing number of phagetype DT104 of Salmonella Typhimurium but the increase in res1stance to TMPS 1s a result of an Increase of res1stance m other serovars because DT104 is hardly resistant to TMPS Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank Jan Lommerse for h1s contnbut1on in entering the data. the National Reference Centre for Salmonella for typing the Salmonella isolates, and the Ammal Health Serv1ce for the opportunity to write this article Reference (1) van der Wolf PJ Peperkamp NHMT Salmonella (sero)types and their resistance patterns isolated from pig faecal and post-mortem samples Vet Q 2001 23(4 ).175-181 n Ant 393