Svalbard Pink-footed Goose. (Anser brachyrhynchus) AEWA European Goose Management Platform

Similar documents
AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS

1 st MEETING OF THE AEWA EUROPEAN GOOSE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP December 2016, Kristianstad, Sweden

SVALBARD PINK-FOOTED GOOSE

Taiga Bean Goose. (Anser fabalis fabalis) AEWA European Goose Management Platform

Getting started with adaptive management of migratory waterbirds in Europe: The challenge of multifaceted interests

Taiga Bean Goose. (Anser fabalis fabalis) AEWA European Goose Management Platform

TAIGA BEAN GOOSE POPULATION STATUS REPORT

Autumn staging behaviour in Pink-footed Geese; a similar contribution among sexes in parental care

European Goose Management Platform (EuroGMP)

International AEWA Single Species Action Planning. Taiga Bean Goose (Anser f. fabalis) management, conservation status and possible actions in

ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A EUROPEAN GOOSE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM UNDER AEWA ( )

7 th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES December 2018, Durban, South Africa

WWT/JNCC/SNH Goose & Swan Monitoring Programme survey results 2015/16

7 th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES December 2018, Durban, South Africa

13 th MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE July 2018, The Hague, the Netherlands

Food preferences by spring migrating Pink-footed geese (Anser brachyryhnchus) in Central Norway

Landscape selection by migratory geese: implications for hunting organisation

Regional Management of Farmland Feeding Geese Using an Ecological Prioritization Tool

Tundra Bean Geese Anser fabalis rossicus in central and southern Sweden autumn 2009 spring 2012

Optimal management of a goose flyway: migrant

Snow conditions as an estimator of the breeding output in high-arctic pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus

Moult and moult migration of Greylag Geese Anser anser from a population in Scania, south Sweden

Marrakech, Morocco, January 2002

ANSER BRACHYRHYNCHUS AN D G REYLAG A. ANSER

Global Strategies to Address AMR Carmem Lúcia Pessoa-Silva, MD, PhD Antimicrobial Resistance Secretariat

Project Lesser White-fronted Goose

Studies on the effects of disturbances on staging Brent Geese: a progress report

Kevin Kuhlmann Clausen 1 Jesper Madsen. Keywords Site fidelity Site faithfulness Habitat loss Waterbirds Restoration Migration

Greylag Geese Anser anser depart earlier in spring: an analysis of goose migration from western France over the years

AEWA Single Species Action Planning Workshop for the Taiga Bean Goose (Anser f. fabalis), Tuusula, Finland12 14November 2013

Effects of agricultural change on abundance, fitness components and distribution of two arctic-nesting goose populations

Naturalised Goose 2000

SCIENTIFIC REPORT. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in turkey flocks, in the EU,

Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net)

PICTORIAL GUIDANCE FOR PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERIZATION OF CHICKENS AND DUCKS

Integrated Management of Invasive Geese Populations in an International Context: a Case Study

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial Resistance

Population and Distribution of Taiga Bean Geese in the Slamannan Area 2015/2016

International AEWA Single Species Action Planning. Taiga Bean Goose (Anser f. fabalis)

This document is available on the English-language website of the Banque de France

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

RESPONSIBLE ANTIMICROBIAL USE

GOOSE POPULATION STUDIES,

Geese in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Comparison of different methods to validate a dataset with producer-recorded health events

Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) research & monitoring Breeding Season Report- Beypazarı, Turkey

Better Training for Safer Food

AEWA INTERNATIONAL SINGLE SPECIES ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE TAIGA BEAN GOOSE (ANSER FABALIS FABALIS)

European Antibiotic Awareness Day: Promoting prudent antibiotic use in Europe

Sheep Breeding in Norway

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Islay Sustainable Goose Management Strategy. Baseline information summary document

4. OTHER GOOSE SPECIES IN THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY AND LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER

Aabo, Søren; Ricci, Antonia; Denis, Martine; Bengtsson, Björn; Dalsgaard, Anders; Rychlik, Ivan; Jensen, Annette Nygaard

Saving Posts by Making Markets

Franck Berthe Head of Animal Health and Welfare Unit (AHAW)

12 The Pest Status and Biology of the Red-billed Quelea in the Bergville-Winterton Area of South Africa

Recording of claw and foot disorders in dairy cattle: current role and prospects of the international harmonization initiative of ICAR

GeesePeace a model program for Communities

Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone: Park Visitor Attitudes, Expenditures, and Economic Impacts

Weights and measurements of Greylag Geese in Scotland

Swan & Goose IDentification It s Important to Know

Citation for published version (APA): Prop, J. (2004). Food finding: On the trail to successful reproduction in migratory geese. Groningen: s.n.

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 8-11, 2019

Identification of gulls in the field can be both difficult and challenging.

The fall and the rise of the Swedish Peregrine Falcon population. Peter Lindberg

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Survey of the feeding areas, roosts and flight activity of qualifying species of the Caithness Lochs Special Protection Area; 2011/12 and 2012/13

Responsible Antimicrobial Use

Genetic Achievements of Claw Health by Breeding

2017 ANIMAL SHELTER STATISTICS

STAT170 Exam Preparation Workshop Semester

HOW CAN TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS INFLUENCE MODERN ANIMAL BREEDING AND FARM MANAGEMENT?

Recommendation for the basic surveillance of Eudravigilance Veterinary data

Short Report Key-site monitoring on Hornøya in Rob Barrett & Kjell Einar Erikstad

INGUNN M. TOMBRE 1 *, HANS TØMMERVIK 1, NILS GULLESTAD 2 & JESPER MADSEN 3. Abstract

WILDLIFE DISEASE AND MIGRATORY SPECIES. Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its Tenth Meeting (Bergen, November 2011)

European Medicines Agency role and experience on antimicrobial resistance

The feeding behaviour of Greylag and Pink-footed Geese around the Moray Firth,

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

GHSA Prevent-1 (AMR) road map: Progress and implementation plan Dr. Anders Tegnell, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Sweden

Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008

Validation of the Nordic disease databases

Global Monthly October 2016

January 2017 NKVet symposium Oslo, Norway

Marine Debris and its effects on Sea Turtles

Health traits and their role for sustainability improvement of dairy production

A case study of harbour seals in the southern North Sea

European Regional Verification Commission for Measles and Rubella Elimination (RVC) TERMS OF REFERENCE. 6 December 2011

Waterfowl managers now believe that the continental lesser snow goose population may exceed 15 million birds.

Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation a tool for practical breeding with red breeds

FINAL REPORT ON ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL OF THE POULTRY FARMING IN GAMBIA

FALL 2015 BLACK-FOOTED FERRET SURVEY LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS DAN MULHERN; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

She is best known for her Newbery Medal-winning novel for young adults, Hitty, Her First Hundred Years, published in 1929.

GEESE AND FLIGHT SAFETY IN DENMARK

Mate protection in pre-nesting Canada Geese Branta canadensis

OECD WORK ON AMR: TACKLING THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ON HUMAN HEALTH. Michele Cecchini OECD Health Division

Effects of Heat Stress on Reproduction in Lactating Dairy Cows

Zimbabwe Poultry Association

Transcription:

Svalbard Pink-footed Goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) AEWA European Goose Management Platform EGMP Technical Report No.4 Population Status Report 2016-2017

AEWA European Goose Management Platform Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 Anser brachyrhynchus EGMP Technical Report No. 4 Prepared by the AEWA European Goose Management Platform Data Centre

Compiled by: Jesper Madsen 1, Gitte Høj Jensen 1, Fred Cottaar 2, Ole Amstrup 3, Tommy Asferg1, Mogens Bak 3, Johnny Bakken 4, Thorsten T.J. Balsby 1, Thomas Kjær Christensen 1, Kevin K. Clausen 1, John Frikke 5, Ove Martin Gundersen 6, Klaus Günther 7, Jørgen Peter Kjeldsen 8, Kees Koffijberg 9, Helmut Kruckenberg 10, Eckhart Kuijken 11, Johan Månsson 12, Per Ivar Nicolaisen 4, Henrik Haaning Nielsen 13, Leif Nilsson 14, Tore Reinsborg 4, Jorma Pessa 15, Paul Shimmings 16, Ingunn Tombre 4, Christine Verscheure 11 1 Aarhus University, Denmark, 2 Independent Collaborator, the Netherlands, 3 Amphi Consult, Denmark, 4 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway, 5 Nationalpark Vadehavet, Denmark, 6 Norwegian Farmers Union, Norway, 7 Schutzstation Wattenmeer, Germany, 8 ornit.dk, Denmark, 9 SOVON, the Netherlands, 10 Institute for Wetlands and Waterbird Research e.v., Germany, 11 Independent Collaborator, Beernem, Belgium, 12 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Grimsö Research Station, Sweden, 13 Avifauna Consult, Denmark, 14 University of Lund, Sweden, 15 Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, Finland, 16 Birdlife International, Norway. Recommended citation: Madsen J., Høj Jensen G., Cottaar F., Amstrup O., Asferg T., Bak M., Bakken J., Balsby T. T. J., Christensen T. K., Clausen K. K., Frikke J., Gundersen O. M., Günther K., Kjeldsen J. K., Koffijberg K., Kruckenberg H., Kuijken E., Månsson J., Nicolaisen P. I., Nielsen H. H., Nilsson L., Reinsborg T., Pessa J., Shimmings P., Tombre I., Verscheure C. (Compilers). 2017. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 (Anser brachyrhynchus). AEWA EGMP Technical Report No. 4. Bonn, Germany. Picture on the cover: Magnus Elander First published: Meeting document at the 2 nd meeting of the AEWA European Goose Management International Working Group, Doc AEWA/EGM IWG 2.5 on 8 June 2017. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/CMS and UNEP/AEWA concerning the legal status of any State, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers and boundaries.

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 1. Contents 1. Summary... 4 2. Aim... 4 3. Population estimate 2016/17... 4 4. Productivity... 8 5. Harvest in Norway and Denmark 2016/17... 9 6. Spring weather conditions in Svalbard 2017... 12 7. Discussion... 13 8. Bibliography and references... 13 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 3

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 1. Summary This report compiles annual monitoring data on the population status of the Svalbard pink-footed goose for the season 2016/17. This information is used to assess the population development and provides input for the modelling of an optimal harvest strategy for the population for the coming hunting season (2017/18). This is part of an adaptive harvest management framework, set up to support the implementation of the AEWA International Species Management Plan (ISMP) for the population. The estimated population size in spring 2017 was record high with 88,000 individuals, supported by a count of 88,000-104,000 geese in mid-november 2016 and an estimation of 100,700 geese based on marked birds. The increase followed a good breeding season in 2016 (19.6% juveniles in the autumn), which is in line with predictions based on temperatures in Svalbard in May 2016. The number of Pink-footed Geese harvested in Norway and Denmark in the 2016/17 hunting season was c. 16,143 which is record high and primarily related to the re-opening of shooting in Denmark in January 2017. The breeding output in 2017 is predicted to be relatively low due to cold conditions in Svalbard in May. 2. Aim The aim of this report is to compile annual monitoring data on the population status of the Svalbard Pink-footed Goose for the season 2016/17. This information is used to assess the population development and provide input data for the modelling of an optimal harvest strategy for the population for the coming hunting season (2017/18). This is part of an adaptive harvest management framework set up to support the implementation of the AEWA ISMP for the population (see Madsen and Williams 2012; Madsen et al. 2017). Data from the previous seasons 2012/13-2015/16 have been published in separate annual reports. Previous reports and further information about the ISMP process can be found on the website http://pinkfootedgoose.aewa.info/. We thank the national volunteer networks who contributed with counts to this report as well as the Danish Environmental Protection Agency and Statistics Norway for supplying preliminary hunting bag statistics. 3. Population estimate 2016/17 Internationally coordinated population counts were performed on 13 November 2016 and 30 April 2017. Counts were coordinated as closely as possible to these dates. Flocks were either counted when they were leaving roost sites in the morning, arriving at roost sites in the evening, or alternatively on fields. The main known sites were covered by a network of trained observers who coordinated the coverage and timing of counts. Additional information was retrieved from internet reporting portals, where birdwatchers had reported flocks in areas outside the main areas (http://artsobservasjoner.no/; http://artportalen.se/; http://dofbasen.dk/; https://www.tiira.fi/). In mid-november 2016, the population was distributed throughout most of the non-breeding range, from Trøndelag in mid Norway in the north, Denmark, the Netherlands and south to Belgium, as well as scattered flocks in southern Sweden and Germany. Unfortunately, one important area, i.e. the Danish part of the Wadden Sea (SW Jutland), was not fully covered on the count date, and the count was not carried out until a week later. It cannot be excluded that there have been some movements between W Jutland and SW Jutland between the count dates. The population was estimated to be within the range of 88,000-104,000 geese (Table 1). The uncertainty is due to the delayed count in SW Jutland. By mid- November, there had been little snowfall and frost in the lowlands in mid Norway, and nearly 11,000 Pinkfeet (c. 11% of the total population) remained in Norway, which is unusual so late in the autumn. The extended staging period in Norway can also be a positive outcome of better hunting organization in Trøndelag, causing reduced disturbance to geese. The trend from previous years continued, with a large proportion of the population remaining in Denmark (c. 70%), and consequent reduced numbers in Friesland, the Netherlands (11%) but relatively high numbers for November for Flanders, Belgium (8%). Another trend which has been confirmed is that Pinkfeet staging in Sweden in autumn 4 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 move to SE Denmark in autumn (615 geese recorded). This has been confirmed by a neckbanded goose (white AJ9) observed in Sweden in late September and turning up on Lolland, SE Denmark in November 2016 (and, moving onwards from there to NW Jutland in March, and then across to Oulu, Finland in April-May 2017). In late April/early May 2017, the population was estimated at c. 88,000 individuals (Table 1). The large majority was concentrated in Trøndelag, mid Norway (c. 93%), while only small numbers remained in Denmark (<1%) (Figure 1). The use of Sweden and Finland in spring continued, with 2,600 staging in the Oulu region, Finland (3%). It is also noticeable that several flocks were staging in Gudbrandsdalen between Oslofjorden and Dovre in south Norway, which is on the traditional spring migration route. Furthermore, many scattered flocks were observed in Sweden and southern Finland. The spring estimate of 88,000 geese is used as the estimate for the 2016/17 season (Table 1). The population size was thus record high since the start of the monitoring of the population (Figure 2). Table 1. Results of synchronized counts of Pink-footed Geese in autumn 2016 and spring 2017 Country Region Numbers 13 Nov. 2016 30 April 2017 Norway Nord-Trøndelag 8565 81482 Vesterålen 0 558 Sør-Trøndelag 2275 430 Other sites 74 1893 Denmark N Jutland 9640 389 W Jutland 38780 56 SW Jutland 8000-24335* 0 SE Denmark 615 5 Finland Oulu region 0 2592 Various sites 0 86 Sweden Various sites 187 462 Germany Schleswig-Holstein + various sites 49 2 Lower Saxony 3 0 Netherlands Friesland 11317 0 Other sites 20** 0 Belgium Flanders 8449 0 TOTAL 87,974-104,309 87,955 * Counted on 20-21 November 2016. Data from Vlaardingen still missing. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 5

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 Figure 1. Distribution of Pink-footed Geese on 30 April 2017 6 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017

Numbers EGMP Technical Report No. 4 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year (winter season) Figure 2. Development of the size of the Svalbard population of the Pink-footed Goose, 1965/66-2016/17 To obtain an alternative estimate of total population size of Pink-footed Geese, we used a capturerecapture approach on sightings of geese marked with neck collars in Denmark, Norway and Svalbard. The estimation is based on the ratio of total geese per marked goose and the total number of marked geese in the population (cf. Sheaffer and Jarvis 1995). Recordings of marked versus unmarked individuals in flocks were started in 1991 (Ganter and Madsen 2001). In the first 20 years, recordings were made on relatively few flocks (average number of flocks scanned annually was 28; range 1-153); since 2012, the recordings have been intensified to increase the sample size (average number of flocks scanned was 320, range 287-383). For each year during 1991-2017 we estimated a weighted mean ratio of marked to unmarked geese for all flocks with marked birds. Number of geese checked was used for weighting, and the average ratio was corrected for the number of flocks without marked birds (individuals in marked flocks/ total number of individuals checked). The number of marked geese alive was estimated based on the number of geese seen at least two times in an observation window covering mid-march to mid-may (corresponding to a period with coordinated observation efforts), corrected for the detection rate of marked birds alive. Detection rate was estimated using the program MARK (White and Burnham 1999). As the detection rate of the last year in a time series is not estimable, we assumed the detection rate and the variance for the most recent year to be identical to the previous year, as the variation between subsequent years have been moderate. The total population size was estimated as the number of geese alive divided with the corrected estimate of the ratio. The confidence limits were estimated based on the variance estimate for the population. The population estimate derived from sampling of neckbanded geese was performed in W and NW Jutland, Denmark during October-November 2016 and March-April 2017. The estimated population size was 100,700 individuals (± 12,666 95% CL). As shown in Figure 3, the Lincoln index based on marked individuals generally produces higher mean estimates compared to the counts, however, throughout time series within the confidence limits. Furthermore, there seems to be no divergence between the two ways of estimation as the population has grown. In recent years, there has been a relatively good accordance between the population counts and the Lincoln index estimate. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 7

Numbers EGMP Technical Report No. 4 140000 120000 Survey estimate Lincoln estimate 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year (winter season) Figure 3. Comparison of population estimates based on surveys and Lincoln sampling based on marked individuals (average ± 95% CL). During 1991-2011, the number of goose flocks scanned for marked/unmarked birds was relatively low, but since 2012 it has increased, which is the reason for the decrease in variance. In years with fewer than 10 flocks scanned (1998, 2010), the confidence limits have not been shown. 4. Productivity Age counts, i.e. recording of the proportion of juvenile birds in random flocks during autumn, were performed in Trøndelag, Norway, NW and W Jutland, Denmark, Friesland, Netherlands and Flanders, Belgium, during 13 October and 4 November 2016. In previous years, the proportion of juveniles has been highest in Norway; in autumn 2016, the highest proportion was found in Friesland (Table 2). The weighed estimate of 19.6% is above the long-term average for the population (Table 2; Figure 4). The high breeding output is in line with the predictions made on basis of weather conditions in Svalbard (May temperatures 2016); hence, 2016 was an early season (see Madsen et al. 2016 and Fig. 8). 8 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017

% juveniles in population EGMP Technical Report No. 4 Table 2. Age counts in autumn 2016 and a weighed estimate for the entire population, based on the age counts and numbers in each region in mid-november (see Table 1). Geese staging in Sweden have been merged with geese from Denmark. For Denmark, the average number of the range in numbers has been used. Region No. Juvs No. Adults Total sample % juv Numbers November per region Trøndelag, Norway 627 2,483 3,110 20.2 10,914 2,200 Jutland, Denmark 2,674 12,158 14,832 18.0 65,390 11,789 Friesland, the Netherlands 1,351 3,391 4,742 28.5 11,340 3,231 Flanders, Belgium 754 3,326 4,080 18.5 8,449 1,561 Total 5,406 21,358 26,764 96,093 18,781 Weighed proportion of juveniles 19.6 Estimated no. juvs per region 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Figure 4. Proportion of juveniles in the autumn population of the Svalbard Pink-footed Goose, 1980-2016. Horizontal line shows the long-term average 5. Harvest in Norway and Denmark 2016/17 Following the optimal harvest strategy for the hunting season 2016/17 (Johnson and Madsen 2016), the International Working Group for the ISMP recommended to increase the harvest of Pink-footed Geese in order to reduce the population towards the 60,000 target. In consequence, in Denmark, the hunting season was extended to include January 2017 (the year before, January was closed). In Norway, the attempt to improve the organization of goose hunting progressed. Data on hunting bags from Norway has been supplied by Statistics Norway (www.ssb.no) (communicated via the Norwegian Environment Agency). Hunting bags from Denmark have been derived from the National Hunting Bag Statistics (Danish Environmental Protection Agency; Aarhus University) (http://bios.au.dk/videnudveksling/til-jagt-og-vildtinteresserede/vildtudbytte). In both Norway and Denmark, reporting the harvest is mandatory, and hunters report their bags online. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 9

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 However, since not all hunters in Norway and Denmark may yet have reported their hunting bags (as of 20 May 2017), the data for 2016/17 is still preliminary (Table 3). For Denmark, the proportion of hunters having reported their bag by 20 May was 90%; however, it is highly likely that the remaining 10% of hunters are not representative, but shoot little. Therefore, the harvest has not been corrected for lacking response. In Norway, a total of 2,808 Pink-footed Geese were reported shot, mainly from Nord-Trøndelag. This is higher than in previous years (Table 3; Figure 5) which can be explained by the extended staging period in Norway as well as increasingly better organization of the hunting. The numbers of Pink-footed Geese reported shot in Denmark was 13,335. This is slightly higher than in 2014/15 when January shooting was also allowed (Table 3). In total, the number of harvested geese was 16,143 which is record high (Figure 5). Table 3. Hunting bags of pink-footed geese in Norway and Denmark, hunting seasons 2012/13-2016/17 (preliminary data) Country 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Norway 2,169 1,819 1,594 2,460 2,808 Denmark 8,580 9,262 13,200 8,761 13,335 TOTAL 10,749 11,081 14,794 11,221 16,143 To analyse the effect of the January season extension further, the monthly distribution of shot birds was examined. This was done on the basis of wing collection and recoveries of ringed geese reported shot. In Denmark, wings from shot waterbirds are collected for analysis of age composition. Both the collection of wings from shot geese in Denmark as well as recoveries of shot ringed geese show that the extension of the hunting season to include January was effective. Based on the wing collection sample, 37% of the geese harvested in Denmark were shot in January (Figure 6), while based on recoveries, 46% of Danish shot geese were taken in January (Figure 7). In 2014/15 when January hunting was also allowed, 47% of all geese were shot in January. 10 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017

Number of wings reported EGMP Technical Report No. 4 Figure 5. Development in the harvest of Pink-footed Geese in Norway and Denmark, 1990-2016. Harvest data for Norway was available from 1992 onwards 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sep I Sep II Oct I Oct II Nov I Nov II Dec I Dec II Jan I Jan II Figure 6. Number of wings of Pink-footed Geese collected from hunters in Denmark in the 2016/17 hunting season, divided into half-monthly intervals. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 11

Days with temperatures >0 o C Numbers recorded shot EGMP Technical Report No. 4 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Norway (n=4) Denmark (n=41) Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Figure 7. Number of marked Pink-footed Geese recorded as shot in the 2016/17 hunting season in Denmark and Norway 6. Spring weather conditions in Svalbard 2017 For the modelling of optimal harvest strategy for the hunting season 2017/18, we use the weather conditions in May in Svalbard as a predictor of the production of young (Jensen et al. 2014). The mean daily temperatures are derived from Ny Ålesund and Svalbard Airport meteorological stations (www.yr.no). In May 2017, Ny Ålesund had 3 thaw days and Svalbard Airport had 4 thaw days. For further analysis, an average of 3.5 thaw days will be used which is below the long-term average for 1990-2017 (8.1 days) (see Figure 8). Hence, we predict the 2017 breeding season to be below the longterm average (which has on average resulted in 14% juveniles in the autumn population). The optimal harvest strategy is reported separately (Johnson & Madsen 2017). 25 20 15 10 5 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Figure 8. Number of thaw-days (days with average temperatures above 0 o C) in May on Svalbard, expressed as an average for Ny Ålesund and Longyearbyen, Svalbard Airport. Horizontal line shows long-term average. data source: Norwegian Meteorological Institute 12 Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017

EGMP Technical Report No. 4 7. Discussion The observed population increase in 2016/17 followed a good breeding season in Svalbard. Despite the uncertainty about the November 2016 numbers, there is a good correspondence between the counted numbers in late April 2017 and November 2016, taking into account that there was a natural mortality and a hunting mortality reducing numbers between the two dates. Hence, hunting mortality between the two count dates is estimated at 9,200 individuals, based on the relative distribution of collected wings. The count estimates are in correspondence with an independent estimate based on marked individuals. The trend of Pinkfeet using Sweden and SE Denmark as alternative migration route and staging areas in the autumn has continued. Likewise, the trend towards more Pinkfeet migrating via Sweden to Oulu in Finland has been confirmed. The spread of the population poses an increasing challenge to the monitoring of the population, and it is recommended that the alternative method of estimating the population on the basis of marked individuals is strengthened and that a standard protocol for recording is developed. 8. Bibliography and references Ganter, B. and Madsen, J. 2001. An examination of methods to estimate population size in wintering geese. Bird Study 48: 90-101. Jensen, G.H., Madsen, J., Johnson, F.A. and Tamstorf, M. 2014. Snow conditions as an estimator of the breeding output in high-arctic pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus. Polar Biology 37: 1-14. Johnson, F.A. and Madsen, J. 2016. Adaptive Harvest Management for the Svalbard Population of Pink-footed Geese. 2016 Progress Summary. Aarhus University, Danish Centre for Environment and Energy (DCE), 24 pp. Technical Report from DCE Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 86. Johnson, F.A. and Madsen, J. 2017. Adaptive Harvest Management for the Svalbard Population of Pink-footed Geese. 2017 Progress Summary. Draft report. AEWA EGMP Data Centre. UNEP/AEWA, Bonn. Madsen, J., Cottaar, F., Amstrup, O., Asferg, T., Bak, M., Bakken, J., Frikke, J.,Goma, V., Gundersen, O.M., Günther, K., Kjeldsen, J.P., Kruckenberg, H.,Kuijken, E., Månsson, J., Nicolaisen, P.I., Nielsen, H.H., Nilsson, L., Reinsborg,T., Shimmings, P., Tapio, T., Tombre, I., Verscheure, C. and Ødegård, P-I. 2016. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose. Population Status Report 2015-16. Aarhus University, DCE, 14 pp. Technical Report from DCE Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 82. Madsen, J., Williams, J.H., Johnson, F.A., Tombre, I.M., Dereliev, S. and Kuijken, E. 2017. Implementation of the first adaptive management plan for a European migratory waterbird population: The case of the Svalbard pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus. Ambio (Suppl. 2): 275-289. Madsen, J. and Williams, J.H. 2012. International Species Management Plan for the Svalbard population of the pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus. AEWA Technical Report No. 48. Sheaffer, S. E. and Jarvis, R. L. 1995. Bias in Canada Goose Population-Size Estimates from Sighting Data. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 464-473. White, G. C. and Burnham, K. P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-139. Svalbard Pink-footed Goose Population Status Report 2016-2017 13

UNEP/AEWA Secretariat UN Campus Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 53113 Bonn Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 228 815 2413 Fax: +49 (0) 228 815 2450 aewa.secretariat@unep-aewa.org www.unep-aewa.org