REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS:

CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS

City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Ekard Conditonal Use Permit CU

Request Conditional Use Permit (Commercial Kennel) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Marchelle Coleman

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Agenda Item No.: Date: January 26, 2010

5 September 10, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

The requested zoning amendment is to allow for day sitting of dogs and domestic cats as a Home Occupation.

2 August 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: BARBARA L. TYNES

TOWNSHIP OF WILKINS ORDINANCE NO.:

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Grant Settle Conditonal Use Permit - PH2018-8

December 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

UNLISTED ACCESSORY USE DETERMINATION: OUTDOOR OFF-LEASH DOG ENCLOSURE ACCESSORY TO EATING PLACE

6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS

WHEREAS, the concept of local sustainability has inspired an interest in backyard and community food production to provide local food sources, and

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION USE ON REVIEW REPORT

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Title 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS

PLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE NO

A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

121 E 3200 N (Upper Loop Road) Highway Corridor (HC); Agricultural Protection (AP)

TAUNTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET POLICY

PLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING FAIRFIELD A CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0724 APPLICANTS: David John and Debra E. Sirois CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MATOACA DISTRICT

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SUMMERLAND COUNCIL REPORT

Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision

PLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING FAIRBOURNE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT

Contact the Community Safety and Enforcement Division at or access relevant background material at

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

NOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER. c/o Bruce Lisser P. O. Box 1109 Mount Vernon, WA 98273

SUMMER VILLAGE OF JARVIS BAY BY-LAW #

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Animal Control

Plainville Dog Park. Proposal and Information

FARIBAULT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 20, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

2018 Urban Hens Pilot Registration

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION. April 8, 2014

Dog Control Bylaw 2018

Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit request by Krapu for a Dog Kennel August 30, 2004 reconvened September 7, 2004 Eureka Town Hall

Town of Whitby By-law #

ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

Waitomo District Dog Control Bylaw 2015

CONTROL OF DOGS BYLAW

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

K E N N E L L I C E N S E A P P L I C A T I O N

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

WESTLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL DOG CONTROL BYLAW

MINUTES TOWN BOARD MEETING AUGUST 20, 2018

BARRE TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

ORDINANCE # WHEREAS, backyard and urban chickens eat noxious weeds and insects; and

APPEAL CASE A- Broadview Acres Canine Resort; and APPEAL CASE A-Continued-Watch Ur Paws.

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING WORTHINGTON ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD WORTHINGTON MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION October 11, 2018

hens may be kept on residential lots in excess of

ORDINANCE NO DANGEROUS ANIMALS, ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITED ANIMALS

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

MANSFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, October 3, 2016

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF LUDLOW, VERMONT DOG ORDINANCE

Sweet Pea Kennels New Client Documents. Please to or fax to Name (First and last) Address

Village of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, :05 PM

ocpetinfo.com (714) Tips for owners of Barking Dogs:. The key to silencing barking is understanding

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

Please read the following information completely prior to completing the applications. Please Print Neatly!

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

WESTLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL DOG CONTROL BYLAW

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Anthony Richard/Kendra Richard 6885 Mesa Ridge Pkwy. #169 Fountain, CO Phone: March 19, 2018

RESIDENTIAL CHICKEN PERMIT APPLICATION LICENSE FEE $25.00

Item No: 3 Reference: B/16/00999/FUL. Parish: SHOTLEY Ward Members: Cllrs. Peter Patrick and Derek Davis

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS, CATS, POULTRY AND BEES BYLAW 2018

Mille Lacs County Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Public Safety Article 3 - Animals

TOP DOG DAYCARE ADMISSION PACKET. Client Name Home Mobile Work. Client Name Home Mobile Work. Address.

ORDINANCE NO

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Grand Rapids Housing Commission Ransom Tower Pet and Service Animal Policy

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

CITY OF ELEPHANT BUTTE ORDINANCE NO. 154

Phone: Fax: Page 1

Urban Henfare: A Model Approach to Keeping Chickens Within Residential Areas. Joan Michelle Blazich

Grey District Council Dog Control Bylaw 2015

August 1, RE: McBark Park Dog Park Renewal

5 June 13, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CARES, INC.

Draft for Public Hearing. Town of East Haddam. Chapter (Number to be Assigned) CONTROL OF ANIMALS ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

1904 Clubhouse Drive Sun City Center, FL Phone: Fax:

PET POLICY. Family Housing: Anderson Lane Apartments & Meadow Lane Apartments

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existing ordinances regulating dogs is inadequate and in need of substantial revision,

2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance

A regular meeting of the Village of Victor Planning Board was held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at the Village Hall, 60 East Main Street.

Transcription:

Department Approval: TP Item Description: REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 1.0 REQUESTED ACTION: DATE: 12/05/07 ITEM NO: 5b Agenda Section: PUBLIC HEARING Request by Faegre and Benson (on behalf of PetSmart) for a TEXT AMENDMENT to Section 1005 of the Roseville City Code and consideration of an AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PF07-063). 1.1 Faegre and Benson (on behalf of PetSmart) seeks approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT to Section 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code pertaining to Dog Kennels and boarding of animals and an AMENDMENT to PetSmarts CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow the boarding of cats and dogs at their proposed site in Rosedale Commons, 2480 Fairview Avenue. PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY Application Submitted and Determined Complete: October 10, 2007 60 Day Review Deadline: December 9, 2007 60-Day Extension: February 7, 2008 Project Report Recommendation: December 5, 2007 Planning Commission Consideration: December 5, 2007 Anticipated City Council Action: January 14, 2008 2.0 SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 The Planning Division recommends approval of a ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT to Sections 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code and an AMENDMENT to the PetSmart CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow the pet boarding and doggie daycare within the PetSmart facility at Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, subject to the conditions 3.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3.1 BY MOTION, approve the request by Faegre and Benson on behalf of PetSmart for a ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT and an AMENDMENT to the PetSmart CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow the pet boarding and doggie daycare within the PetSmart facility at Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue (see Section 8 for detailed action). PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 1 of 6

4.0 BACKGROUND: 5.1 In June 2007, Rosedale Commons LP received approval of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for a PetSmart store to occupy the former CompUSA tenant space within Rosedale Commons, the mall across County Road B2 from Rosedale. 5.2 The approved CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT did not support the inclusion of a doggie day camp or daycare or the boarding of cats and dogs, because of concerns/issues raised pertaining to the number anticipated by PetSmart and the number acceptable by the Community Development Department. The applicant and PetSmart were encouraged to apply for an amendment should they continue to desire said uses within the site. 5.3 Since that date, staff has been working with Faegre and Benson LLP (attorneys for PetSmart) on the necessary Code modifications to consider allowing pet boarding and doggie day care. The City Planner with the assistance of the City Attorney has concluded that the definition of Dog Kennel must be modified and that pet boarding and doggie day camp and/or daycare be added as accessory uses to Pet and Pet Supply Store in order to be allowed via an approved CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 5.0 REVIEW of REQUEST: 5.1 Faegre and Benson seeks approval of a TEXT AMENDMENT to Section 1002 (Definitions) pertaining to Dog Kennels and Section 1005 (Use Table) allowing pet boarding as an accessory use in a Pet and Pet Supply Store. The Applicant further seeks an AMENDMENT to the previously-approved CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to support the boarding of up to 108 dogs, 15 cats and a doggie day camp/daycare facility capable of accommodating up to 70 dogs. 5.2 PetSmart will occupy the 25,870 sq. ft. (approximately) former Comp USA tenant space at Rosedale Commons Shopping Center 2480 Fairview Avenue. Rosedale Commons Shopping Center has a Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning map designation of SC, Shopping Center. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT: 5.3 The 1959 definition of a Dog Kennel reads: Any premise where three or more dogs, over four months of age are owned, boarded, bred, and/or offered for sale. 5.4 In 1988 the definition of Dog Kennel was amended to read: Any premises where three or more dogs, four months of age are kept except where a special multiple dog license (three or four dogs) is issued pursuant to Section 145.135, which read: Special Multiple Dog License. Upon issuance of a special dog license, three or four dogs over four months of age may be kept at a licensed premises upon compliance with the following: a. The filing of written approval of the occupants of residential property abutting the licensed premises. PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 2 of 6

b. The yard of the licensed premises is fenced in such a manner to restrain dogs on the premises from leaving the yard c. Dogs kept on the licensed premises do not create a nuisance by excessive barking or by creating unsanitary conditions. d. Payment of a yearly license fee pursuant to Section 100.030, paragraph 49 of the Code. 5.6 In 1992 Section 145.135 was amended to include a paragraph E, which reads: The Chief of Police may deny requests for renewal of a special multiple dog license based upon complaints received during the proceeding year. In the event of such a denial, the applicant may, within ten days of being advised of the denial, request, in writing, a hearing before the City Council on the denial. 5.7 In 1995 the City Code was codified by Sterling Codifiers, Inc. which process renumbered all previous Code references. This is reflected by the added clause amd. 1995 Code at the end of the Dog Kennel definition in Section 1002 and by the fact that Section 145.135 has become Section 501.20. 5.8 Currently, Section 1002.02 defines a dog kennel as: Any premises where three or more dogs over three months of age are kept, except where special multiple dog license (3 or 4 dogs) is issued pursuant to 501.20 of this Code. 5.9 The Planning Division is of the opinion that there may have initially been the notion of a broader form of dog kennel regulation. However, subsequent amendments to the original definition, specifically eliminating the reference to owned, boarded, bred, and/or offered for sale and the added language referencing residential neighbor s support for kennels of three or four dogs, and fenced in yards, leads the Planning Division to conclude that there is a need to differentiate between a kennel that supports dogs running/exercising outside and the boarding of pets in a controlled indoor environment. 5.10 The City Planner and City Attorney support the amendment of the definition of a Dog Kennel to read: Any premises where three or more dogs over three months of age are kept, except where special multiple dog license (3 or 4 dogs) is issued pursuant to 501.20 of this Code, excluding pet boarding and/or dog day care as an accessory use to pet and pet supply store. 5.11 The City Planner and City Attorney also support the inclusion of pet boarding and/or pet day care as a conditional use in all zoning districts where pet and pet supply stores are permitted or conditional uses. This involves adding those uses to the chart in Section 1005.015 of the City Code and identifying them CUP. PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 3 of 6

5.12 In support of both the TEXT AMENDMENT and the CUP AMENDMENT are four attachments submitted on behalf of PetSmart by Faegre and Benson. They include a written narrative for each application, analysis of odors at Petsmarts/PetHotels, and a noise survey. 6.0 REVIEW OF CUP AMENDMENT: 6.1 Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a Conditional Use Permit: a. Impact on traffic b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous properties d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare f. Compatibility with the City s Comprehensive Plan 6.2 Rosedale Commons is an existing retail center with ample parking, established ingress/egress, and other site improvements required when the Center was initially approved by the City (January 14, 1985). No site improvements are requested nor required for PetSmart to occupy the premises, however the City Planner has determined that review of such a request is not unique in the context of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT criteria due to the potential impacts created from boarding 108 dogs and 15 cats, and a doggie daycare for up to 70 dogs. 6.3 Traffic. The Community Development Department has concluded that the impacts created by a change in use (pet store with doggie day care and pet boarding) would be negligible. Our experience is that such new uses would add few vehicles to peak hour movements. That being said the 2004, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on County Road B2 was 18,100 and on Fairview Avenue it was 15,500. 6.4 Compatibility. Had the proposal been to allow outdoor kennel runs for dogs, staff most certainly would conclude that such a use is not compatible in this location and its proximity to residents. However, the proposal is for a fully-enclosed pet (dog and cat) boarding area within the PetSmart store that includes a separate interior access. The facility includes acoustical insulation to eliminate noise created by barking dogs and screeching cats. The facility also includes state-of-the-art waste removal, to eliminate odors for the outside. Thus the City planner has determined the proposed use is an appropriate use for the site and is compatible with surrounding uses. 6.5 Health, Safety, General Welfare. Because the boarding of dogs and cats will occur within the facility with no outdoor exposure, and measures will be implemented to address noise and pet waste, the City Planner has concluded that there appears to be no impact on general public health, safety, and welfare. PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 4 of 6

6.6 Comprehensive Plan. The additional use, one that has been determined to be accessory to the principal use, is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation as a shopping center use. STAFF FINDINGS: 6.7 Section 1013.01 outlines the process and standards for issuance of a conditional use permit. In reviewing this request, staff has made the following findings: a. The use of the property as proposed will have little or no impact on traffic in the area. b. The use of the property as proposed will not have an impact on parks, streets and other public facilities. c. The use of the property as proposed will be compatible with contiguous properties. d. The use of the property as proposed will not have an adverse impact on the market value of contiguous properties. e. The use of the property as proposed will not have an adverse impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. f. The use of the property as proposed is consistent with the City of Roseville s Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning), including the City s design standards. 7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 6 of this report, staff recommends approval of a ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT to Sections 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code and an AMENDMENT to the PetSmart CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow the pet boarding and doggie daycare within the PetSmart facility at Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, subject to the following conditions: A. Pet boarding within PetHotel shall be limited to accommodations for 108 dogs and 15 cats within a 5,012 (+/-) sq. ft. fully enclosed indoor facility. B. There shall be no after-hours pick-up/delivery of pets for boarding purposes; all boarding of pets within PetHotel shall be limited to regular store hours. C. Doggie Day Camp (daytime boarding) shall be limited to 70 dogs and the hours of Monday Friday 7 am to 7 pm and Sunday from 9 am to 5 pm. PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 5 of 6

D. No outdoor pet exercising/activity shall be allowed. E. The tenant space shall be constructed and/or improved in a manner that does not cause nuisances outside of the premises and which meets the City s noise ordinance. F. Pet waste will be handled in compliance with applicable building and/or health code requirements. 8.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 8.1 BY MOTION, RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a ZONING TEST AMENDMENT to Section 1002 Definitions Dog Kennel to exclude pet boarding and/or day care as an accessory use to pet and pet supply store and Section 1005.015 Use Chart to include pet boarding and/or pet day care as a conditional use in all zoning districts where pet and pet supply stores are permitted or conditional uses, for Rosedale Commons LP and PetSmart within Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments in Section 5 of the project report dated December 5, 2007; and 8.2 BY MOTION, RECOMMEND APPROVAL of an AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Rosedale Commons LP and PetSmart allowing pet boarding and a doggie day camp within Rosedale Commons shopping center, 2480 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments findings of Section 6 and conditions of Section 7 of the project report dated December 5, 2007 Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (651-792-7074) Attachments: Location map, narrative, and site plan PF07-063_RPCA_120507.doc Page 6 of 6

1680 1705 IRVIEW AVE N EACON ST Attachment A: Location Map for Planning File 07-063 2550 2551 2552 2551 2550 2551 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 2544 LR / R1 2545 LR / R1 2544 LR / R1 2545 2545 LR / R1 2544 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 2545 2544 LR / R1 2545 LR / R1 2544 LR / R1 LR / R1 OAKCREST AVE 1860 / 2525 B / I1 LR / R1 1810 1796 1790 1782 1762 1722 1716 1694 W / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 LR / R1 1802 1776 1770 1756 1728 1708 1700 1686 LR / R1 B / I1 SC / SC 2495 B / I1 2501 C / I1 2480 SC / SC 1647-1655 SC / SC 2481-2487 2465-2471 B / B3 B / B3 FAIRVIEW AVE N 2480 SC / SC 1723 SC / SC 1715 SC / SC AMERICAN ST 1901 B / I1 SC / SC COUNTY ROAD B2 W 2440 B / SC 1875 B / B2 SC / SC W 2441 B / I1 1705 SC / SC 1700 SC / SC Location Map B / PUD Prepared by: Community Development Department Printed: November 26, 2007 Site Location Comp Plan / Zoning LR / R1 Designations Data Sources & Contacts: * Ramsey County GIS Base Map (10/31/2007) For further information regarding the contents of this map contact: City of Roseville, Community Development Department, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 651-792-7085. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. 0 50 100 150 200 Feet mapdoc: planning_commission_location.mxd

AIRVIEW AVE N MILLWOOD AVENUE W Attachment B: Aerial Map of Planning File 07-063 OAKCREST AVE AMERICAN ST (Priv) FAIRVIEW AVE N COUNTY ROAD B2 W Location Map Data Sources & Contacts: Prepared by: Community Development Department Printed: November 26, 2007 Site Location * Ramsey County GIS Base Map (10/31/2007) * Aerial Data: Ramsey County and Martinez Corp (4/2006) For further information regarding the contents of this map contact: City of Roseville, Community Development Department, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 651-792-7085. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. 0 50 100 150 Feet