The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Similar documents
Mastitis: The Canadian Perspective

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Benchmarking Health and Management across the Canadian Dairy Herd

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

The use of on-farm culture systems for making treatment decisions

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Pathogen Identification And Incidence Rates Of Clinical Mastitis On Organic And Conventional Dairy Farms

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Bulk Milk Data and Udder Health

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Actions and Outcomes of Wisconsin Dairy Farms Completing Milk Quality Teams

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Last 2-3 months of lactation

MASTITIS PATHOGENS IN MILK OF DAIRY COWS IN SLOVAKIA

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

Milking Management II - Mastitis 1

TECHNOTE 8. Practise good hygiene during milking 8.1 LACTATION. Wear gloves when milking. Hands

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

On- farm milk culture training workshop

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Evaluation of the use of dry cow antibiotics in low somatic cell count cows

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Evaluation of a new qpcr test to specify reasons behind total bacterial count in bulk tank milk

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

On-farm milk culture training workshop. Christina Petersson-Wolfe Department of Dairy Science Virginia Tech

Understanding the Sources, Transmission Routes, and Prognoses for Mastitis Pathogens

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Trevor DeVries Dr. Trevor DeVries is an Associate Professor in the Department of Animal and Poultry Science at the University of Guelph.

Economics of mastitis. Kirsten Huijps and Henk Hogeveen

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

BIOSECURITY ON DAIRIES... ARE WE DOING ENOUGH?

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Clinical mastitis: incidence, etiology and treatment in organic and converting dairy herds

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

Quad Plate User s Manual

Norwegian mastitis control programme

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Controlling Highly Prevalent Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis from the Dairy Farm

The Environment And Mastitis Control. What If the USA Lost the War in Iraq??? Dr. Andy Johnson. Western Canadian Dairy Conference Red Deer, Alberta

Udder Health and Milk Quality: from science to practice From Science to Practice Implementation of udder health PROFIT TEAMS

Ren Tip # 84 11/6/15

Practical and Sensible Dairy Farm Biosecurity

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

J. Dairy Sci. 90: doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

The Uncommon. Bacillus cereus Clost. Perfringens Nocardia spp. Mycoplasma spp. Moulds and yeasts Pseudomonas spp.

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

Analysis of the microbial population that most often causes mastitis in dairy cows

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

8. MILK Udder health and milk quality is important to farm productivity and profitability. Every farm stands to gain from less mastitis.

cure was 0.79 for ceftiofur-treated cows and 0.76 for control-treated cows, whereas the overall bacteriological

Cepravin and Combination Dry Cow Therapy Trial Work

Udder Health in an International Perspective

Dairy Calf, BVDv-PI Dead & Chronic Monitoring Program

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Transcription:

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand? Richard Olde Riekerink and Herman Barkema 1 Québec City December 11, 2007

Mastitis Most expensive disease on a dairy farm discarded milk, treatment, Antibiotic residues Quality shelf life cheese making qualities Animal welfare 2

Mastitis pathogens Contagious Strep. agalactiae Staph. aureus Mycoplasma spp. Strep. dysgalactiae Environmental E. coli Klebsiella spp. Strep. uberis Not clear cut Environmental E. coli Strep. uberis Strep. dysgalactiae Contagious Strep. agalactiae 3

Clinical mastitis Abnormal milk / udder Incidence rate > numerous studies worldwide Distribution different among countries / regions 4

Subclinical mastitis No clinical signs Somatic Cell Count (SCC) indicator Fast and cheap indicator for IMI 5

Monitoring tool Milk quality Bacteria Subclinical mastitis Cheap Convenient Bulk tank milk 6

Mastitis control 5-point plan (Neave et al., 1969) focused on contagious pathogens proper milking technique and well functioning milking machine treatment clinical cases whole herd dry cow treatment post-milking teat disinfection culling chronically infected cows 10-point recommended control program (NMC) also environmental pathogens 7

Current situation in Canada Incidence of clinical mastitis British Columbia (van Dorp et al., 1999) Ontario (Sargeant et al., 1998; McLaren et al., 2006) Herd prevalence contagious pathogens Mycoplasma (Ruhnke et al., 1976) Staph. aureus (Kelton et al.,1999) Strep. agalactiae (Keefe et al., 1997) 8

Canadian Bovine Mastitis Research Network Founded 2001 Mobilize national and international scientific and financial resources to decrease the incidence of mastitis, reduce financial losses, and maintain milk quality through concerted research, and effective and rapid transfer to end-users 9 www.mastitisnetwork.org

Objectives To determine in Canada: Overall and pathogen-specific IRCM Risk factors associated with IRCM Adoption of mastitis prevention management practices Herd-level prevalence of contagious pathogens and associated risk factors 10

Specific objectives (#1) To determine: Incidence of clinical mastitis (IRCM) on Canadian dairy farms Regional and pathogen-specific IRCM Association of pathogen-specific IRCM with bulk milk SCC and barn type 11 R.G.M. Olde Riekerink, H.W. Barkema, D.F. Kelton, D.T. Scholl. 2007. Incidence Rate of Clinical Mastitis on Canadian Dairy Farms. J. Dairy Sci. submitted.

Sample collection & laboratory 116 Herds in 10 provinces All clinical mastitis abnormal milk and / or abnormal udder Min. 1 year collection Vets and CQMP coordinators Courier to Atlantic Vet College 12

Results 101 herds completed questionnaire free-stalls tie-stalls herd-size 106 (23 649) 3,033 cultures Mean herd IRCM = 23 cases / 100 cow-years Median IRCM = 16.7, range 0.3 97 Different among provinces 13

Distribution of pathogens n = 3,033 Staph. aureus 11% E. coli 8% Strep. uberis 6% CNS 5% Culture-negative 43% Klebsiella spp. 4% Strep. dysgalactiae 4% Enterococcus spp. 2% 14 Contamination 8% Other 4% Streptococcus spp. 2% Yeast 2% A. pyogenes 1%

IRCM by BMSCC class Pathogen < 150 BMSCC 151 to 250 > 250 Staph. aureus 2.78 2.26 3.97 E. coli 1.97 1.92 0.71 Strep. uberis 1.83 1.06 2.02 Coag.-neg. staphylococci 1.11 1.18 0.99 Strep. dysgalactiae 0.63 0.97 1.08 Klebsiella spp. 0.47 0.83 0.40 Streptococcus spp. 1.03 0.81 0.36 Culture-negative 6.09 6.43 2.23 15 Overall IRCM 22.6 24.9 16.2

IRCM by region Pathogen Region Western provinces (n =31 ) Ontario (n =16 ) Québec (n =26 ) Atlantic provinces (n = 33) Staph. aureus 1.80 3.11 3.98 2.70 E. coli 1.37 3.02 1.53 1.36 Strep. uberis 0.76 2.06 1.60 2.00 CNS 0.90 1.59 1.69 0.70 Strep. dysgalactiae 0.27 1.43 1.69 0.66 Klebsiella spp. 1.01 0.85 0.27 0.53 Streptococcus spp. 0.39 0.66 1.20 0.92 Culture-negative 4.25 8.26 6.62 4.44 16 Overall IRCM 15.6 32.5 30.4 18.7

IRCM by barn type 17 Pathogen Staph. aureus E. coli Strep. uberis CNS Strep. dysgalactiae Klebsiella spp. Streptococcus spp. Culture-negative Overall IRCM Tie-stall (n = 43) 4.04 1.36 2.19 1.58 0.89 0.40 1.21 5.45 26.6 Barn type for lactating cows Free-stall (n= 39) 1.62 2.08 0.67 0.68 0.87 1.00 0.37 5.73 19.1 Other (n= 6) 1.62 1.27 2.65 0.74 1.34 0.28 0.56 4.32 19.5

Discussion Selected herds Veterinarians, vet. students, CQMP coordinators Compliance of producers Compliance of collectors 18

Specific objectives (#2) To determine: Risk factors associated with overall IRCM pathogen-specific IRCM 19

Same herds Questionnaire Study design Mail, phone, on-farm Tested, translated 10 categories 20

Associations with IRCM Dry cow therapy All, E. coli Strip All, S. aureus, S. dys., Culture-negative Soft stall base S. aureus Straw bedding S. uberis Long dry period E. coli 21

Conclusions Certain management practices associated with IRCM, e.g.: blanket dry cow treatment strip Producers attitude 22

Specific objectives (#3) To estimate: Adoption mastitis preventive management practices Herd-level prevalence of contagious pathogens Associations of certain management practices with being positive in the bulk tank for contagious mastitis pathogens 23

Random sample Study design stratified per province member of DHI 66% positive response = 291 farms 4 seasonal samples DHI data 2 questionnaires 24

Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Ontario Québec New Brunswick Prince Edward Island 25 100 80 60 40 20 British Columbia 0 Barn type per province Nova Scotia T ie-stalls Free-stalls Other Percentage (%)

Prevalence (n=282) Sample Stratified by province Staph. aureus 73% 74% Strep. agalactiae 1.8 % 4.7% (5 farms) Mycoplasma spp. 0 % 0 % 26

27 Staph. aureus per province 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 27 Prevalence (%) British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Ontario Québec New Brunswick Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia

28 Bulk milk SCC per province Strep. ag 500 300 200 150 100 50 positive! Bulk milk SCC (x 1,000 cells/ml) British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba Ontario Québec New Brunswick Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia

Adoption management practices Management practice Tie stalls Free stalls All (%) Pre-milking teat disinfection 48 61 55 Post-milking teat disinfection 95 98 96 Blanket dry cow treatment 68 76 72 Computerised cow records 16 50 32 Milks mastitis cows last and/or with separate cluster 87 32 59 Wear latex gloves during milking 50 74 62 29

Staph. aureus - management Practice P Ration balanced 2x / yr 0.02 Feed company representative balances ration 0.03 Blanket dry cow treatment 0.03 Soft stall base (rubber or mattress) < 0.01 Milking equipment checked 1x / yr 0.02 30

Discussion & Conclusion Prevalence Staph. aureus as expected Strep. agalactiae low, seems trend Mycoplasma spp. no,...method? Management practices Certain practices associated with Staph. aureus 31

Summarizing IRCM 23 cases / 100 cow-years Differences among regions and barn types Staph. aureus and E. coli most frequently Staph. aureus on nearly all farms Strep. agalactiae nearly extinct 32

There is no excuse for a high bulk milk somatic cell count Analyse the situation and make a plan involving your vet and, if necessary, other specialists 33

How to approach this? Culture high SCC and clinical mastitis samples Know who the millionaires are If mostly contagious pathogens: prevent infection of the low SCC cows Reduce the number of high SCC cows 34

Prevention of new infections Milking order One cow per towel Post-milking teat dipping Blanket dry cow treatment Good nutrition 35

Reduction of old infections Culling of problem cows Don t breed chronic S. aureus cows Blanket dry cow treatment Treatment during lactation Check if heifers calve with a high SCC 36

Funding Dairy Farmers of Canada National Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canadian Bovine Mastitis Research Network Atlantic Veterinary College 37

38 Questions