CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY

Similar documents
CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

ORDINANCE NO

Section 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

TOWN OF LUDLOW, VERMONT DOG ORDINANCE

TOWN OF ECKVILLE BYLAW #701/10 DOG CONTROL BYLAW

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 7-1 PUBLIC HEARING. Date: June 17, Subject: Subject Property: Citywide. 1. Declare the Hearing Open: Mayor Duhovic

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BURKE ADOPTED: OCTOBER 1, 2001 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 1, 2001 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

BY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Pitkin County Code Title 5 - Animals Page 1

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

ORDINANCE NO. 91 AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE LICENSING OF DOGS & CATS WITHIN THE CITY OF BROWNTON

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

DOG CONTROL AND LICENSE LAW OF THE TOWN OF CAMPBELL Local Law No. 2 of the Year 2010

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

Olney Municipal Code. Title 6 ANIMALS

Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS

c) Owners walking their dog( s) in public areas are required to pick up and properly dispose of stool waste deposited from their dog( s).

ORDINANCE # AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE IV, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, CHAPTER VIII, ANIMAL CONTROL

Title 8 ANIMALS. Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals. 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs. 8-3 Keeping of Livestock

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

ORDINANCE NO. 15,735

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

SUMMER VILLAGE OF JARVIS BAY BY-LAW #

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

BYLAW NUMBER

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance

Ordinance for the Control of Dogs

BYLAW NUMBER

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOG *

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS

CHAPTER 2.26 ANIMAL CONTROL

the release of feral cats, authorizing their release to qualifying feral cat colonies. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN

BYLAW NUMBER

TOWN OF MAIDSTONE BYLAW NO

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

BYLAW 837/12 Cat Control Bylaw

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.

Animal Control Ordinance

Section 2 Interpretation

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE:

ADDENDUM A CHAPTER 3 ANIMALS ARTICLE I - LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE

Town of Preble Local Law umber 4 of the Year 2010 A LOCAL LAW PROVIDI G FOR THE LICE SI G A D THE CO TROL OF DOGS I THE TOW OF PREBLE

VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.

Town of Groveland Regulation of Dog Control, Licensing & Fees Local Law #

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

CITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City finds the committee needs to be defined so it is clear how the committee is established and its functions;

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CHAPTER 9 LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2015 A LOCAL LAW ENTITLED DOG CONTROL

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS AND CATS. Vaccination against rabies required--vaccination tag.

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

Town of Northumberland LOCAL LAW 3 OF 2010 DOG CONTROL LAW

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SPANISH FORT, ALABAMA

Dog Control Ordinance

MTAS Sample Animal Licensing Regulations

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapters: 6.04 Dogs Dog Kennels and Multiple Dog Licenses Vicious Animals. Chapter 6.04 DOGS.

TOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

ANIMAL CONTROL IN BROWN COUNTY. Impoundment and Disposition of Animals Redemption and Destruction of Impounded Animals

Chief Administrative Officer or CAO means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village or their designate.

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

ORDINANCE NO. 1534(06)

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA BY-LAW NUMBER

Town of Castleton ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

TOWN OF PERU LOCAL LAW NO. OF THE YEAR Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Peru as follows:

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

Draft for Public Hearing. Town of East Haddam. Chapter (Number to be Assigned) CONTROL OF ANIMALS ORDINANCE

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

Dog Licensing Regulation

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE SALMO. BYLAW #585 As Amended by Bylaw #624, 2011

ORDINANCE NO. 536 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OCEAN SHORES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;

CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

This chapter will be known as the "Dogs and Other Animals Control Local Law of the Town of Skaneateles."

CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 92 OF TITLE IX OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF EAST GRAND RAPIDS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL


TITLE 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS

Transcription:

CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: AprilS, 2016 SUBJECT: DEPT OF ORIGIN: Reducing certain animal violations from class 3 misdemeanor to petty offense City Manager DATE SUBMITTED: March 28, 2016 SUBMITTED BY: Toby Cotter, City Manager on behalf of Council Member Steve D'Amico SUMMARY: This request is to amend Chapter 6.08, Dogs and Cats, of the Bullhead City Municipal Code, by amending the penalties for violations for length of leashes, license and tag violations and first offenses for barking dog violations, and reducing them from class 3 misdemeanors to petty offenses. The significant result of the amendments makes these offenses, except for second or subsequent barking dog violations, not eligible for jail sentences but subject to fines of not more than $300. Fines are still subject to applicable surcharges and fees as required by state law. FISCAL IMPACT: None Finance Department ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 2016-~, adopting the amendments by reference. Resolution No. 2016R-~, declaring the amendments a public record. Text of new ordinance "Animal Care and Welfare Amendments 2016." LEGAL REVIEW: RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 2016- fi by adopting and adding the provisions contained within that document attached hereto and entitled "Animal Care and Welfare Amendments 2016" to the Bullhead City Municipal Code; and declaring the document a public record under Resolution No. 2016R-~. APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY: CITY CLERK'S USE ONLY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN Resolution No. Ordinance No. Approved Other Continued To: Referred To: Denied FileNo. BHC-16 (10/2001) Revised (06/13/06) j:\forms\council comm form.doc

ORDINANCE NO. 2016-5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6.08, DOGS AND CATS, OF THE BULLHEAD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE. BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona: SECTION 1: That certain document known as "Animal Care and Welfare Amendments 20 16" with one paper copy and one electronic copy on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona, and which document is made a public record by Resolution No. 2016R-Jk of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona, is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this ordinance. SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the amendment to the fee schedule adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of. competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION 3: The ordinance will become effective 30 days from the date this ordinance is passed and adopted by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona, this 5th day of April, 2016. Tom Brady, Mayor ATTEST: Date: -------------------- Susan Stein, Fl MC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gamet K. Emery, City Attorney

RESOLUTION NO. 2016R-1 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED "ANIMAL CARE AND WELFARE AMENDMENTS 2016." BE IT RESOLVED BY the Mayor and Council of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona, that certain document entitled "Animal Care and Welfare Amendments 2016" with one paper and one electronic copy on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the City Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bullhead City, Arizona this 5th day of April, 2016. Tom Brady, Mayor ATTEST: Date: -------------------- Susan Stein, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gamet K. Emery, City Attorney

ANIMAL CARE AND WELFARE AMENDMENTS 2016 Chapter 6.08 DOGS AND CATS Sections: 6.08.010 Definitions. 6.08.015 Number of pets per residence. 6.08.020 Public nuisance. 6.08.030 Animal at large while in estrus- Prohibited. 6.08.040 Running at large. 6.08.045 Dog at large- Restitution. 6.08.050 Slaughter of animals. 6.08.060 Disturbing the peace. 6.08.070 License required. 6.08.080 License fees. -- 6.08.090 Tags. 6.08.100 License transfer. 6.08.120 Rabies vaccination prerequisite to License issuance. 6.08.130 Proof of neutering. 6.08.140 Impoundment of dog at large or Cat that is a public nuisance Notice to owner. 6.08.150 Length of impoundment. 6.08.160 Redemption. 6.08.170 Adoption. 6.08.180 Treatment of injured or diseased Dogs or cats. 6.08.190 False or misleading reports to Enforcement officers. 6.08.040- Running at large. A. No person owning, keeping, possessing, harboring or maintaining a dog shall allow such dog to be at _: ---large.-adog-is not deemed to be at large: 1. While it is tethered and restrained by a leash, chain, rope or cord so as to keep the dog completely on the premises where secured and of sufficient strength to control its actions; 2. While it is restrained by a leash of not more than eight feet in length or twenty feet in length if the dog is in the Colorado river, and of sufficient strength to control its actions and is accompanied by a person of sufficient strength who in fact controls the dog; 3. While it is actively engaged in dog obedience training accompanied by and under the control of his owner or trainer with a dog leash sufficient in length and strength to control the dog; Page 1

4. While the dog is confined by an enclosure, including any city dog park; 5. While the dog is being used for hunting purposes; 6. While such dog is being exhibited at a kennel club show; 7. While such dog is engaged in races approved by the Arizona Racing Commission. 8. An enforcement officer shall either apprehend and impound any dog running at large contrary to the provisions of this section, cite the owner into city court, or both. C. When it is necessary for the protection of people or property, any duly appointed enforcement officer who has reasonable cause to believe that a dog at large is a vicious dog and who reasonably believes that the dog cannot be safely captured and impounded, may take appropriate steps to capture or destroy the vicious dog as humanely as possible with due regard for the safety of all humans or other animals. D. A violation of this section carries a minimum fine of two hundred dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. A second violation within six months of the date of commission of the first, carries a minimum fine of five hundred dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. The preceding minimum fine ffiare inapplicable when the violation consists only of a leash exceeding the maximum allowable length. and in that case. is a petty offense, plus applicable surcharges and fees as a first offense. E. A violation of this section which involves the dog at large biting another dog carries a minimum fine of five hundred dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. A second offense within six months of the date of commission of the first, elevates the offense to a Class 1 misdemeanor and carries a minimum fine of one thousand dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. F. A violation of this section which involves the dog at large biting a person is a Class 1 misdemeanor and carries a minimum fine of one thousand dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. A second offense within six months of the date of commission of the first, carries a minimum fine of two thousand dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. G. "Biting" for purposes of this section carries the same meaning as that described for "bites" under Section 6.04.020 herein. (Ord. No. 2014-13, 1, 6-17-2014; Ord. 98-917 2 (part): Ord. 86-76 5: prior code 6-2-1) 6.08.060 - Disturbing the peace. A. Any person who keeps or permits to remain on any premises within the city any "barking dog" as defined by this code is guilty of a violation of this section, provided that, during the time the dog(s) is/are barking, no person is trespassing or threatening to trespass or no person is teasing or provoking the dog(s). B. Any person living within three hundred feet of the location of and being disturbed by a "barking dog," as defined by this code, may request a police officer or animal control officer to issue a citation to the owner of the dog(s) disturbing the peace. The "barking dog" must occur within the presence of the police officer or animal control officer and be to the extent that a reasonable person could be disturbed by the "barking dog." C. A violation of this section is punishable as a petty offense, plus applicable surcharges and fees. Any subsequent offense within six months of the date of commission of the first, carries the penalties.netwith&tafl.ei+rg the penalty....outlined in Section 6.04.140, at the prosecutgfs--er-cwft's--giscretion aa--effense--tlfltler this sectioa--fnay--ge--re itig8 1-t-&-a-petty~ fine of net-rner:e than thfee-huadred dollars, plus applicable surcharges and fees. Page 2

(Ord. No. 2014-13, 1, 6-17-2014; Ord. 2012-4, 3, 4-3-2012; Ord. 2003-36, 8; Ord. 98-917, 2 (part); Ord. 95-748, 1; prior code, 6-2-2) 6.08.070 - license required. It is unlawful for any person to own, harbor or keep a dog, cat or pot-bellied pig over four months of age without a Bullhead City license for such animal residing in the Bullhead City limits more than sixty consecutive days within a period of one year. Not>.vithstanding the preceding provision, any person under requirement to license an animal and has not done so, 'Nill not be issued a citation or prosecuted for that failure so long as the person voluntarily appears at a city animal shelter with the animal and licenses the animal pursuant to the requirements of this Title 6 between August 1, 2014 and October 31, 2014. This exception only applies if the person appears 'Nithout first having been issued a citation or complaint or having been the subject of a police report concerning the behavior or licensing of the animal. A violation of this section is punishable as a petty offense. plus applicable surcharges and fees. (Ord. No. 2014-13, 1, 6-17-2014; Ord. 98-917 2 (part): prior code 6-2-4) 6.08.090 - Tags. A. Each dog or cat licensed under the terms of this chapter shall receive, at the time of licensing, a tag on which shall be inscribed the name of the city, the number of the license, and the year in which it expires. The tag shall be attached to a collar which shall be worn by the dog or cat at all times except as otherwise provided. Whenever a dog or cat tag is lost, a duplicate tag will be issued for a fee set by the comprehensive fee schedule. B. Dogs, while being used for hunting, or dogs and cats while being exhibited at an approved kennel club event, or dogs engaged in races approved by the Arizona Racing Commission, and while such dogs and cats are being transported to and from such events, need not wear a collar or harness with a valid license attached, provided that they are properly vaccinated, licensed and controlled. C. Any person who counterfeits or attempts to counterfeit an official dog or cat tag, or removes such tag from any dog or cat for the purpose of willful and malicious mischief, or places a dog or cat tag upon a dog or cat, unless the tag was issued to that dog or cat, is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. Any other violation of this section is punishable as a petty offense. plus applicable surcharges and fees. (Ord. 98-917 2 (part): prior code 6-2-6) Page 3