International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Similar documents
Cattle Foot Care And Lameness control

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LAMENESS IN DAIRY COWS

Lameness Information and Evaluation Factsheet

De Tolakker Organic dairy farm at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Long and short term strategies to improve claw health and to reduce lameness

CAUSES OF DISPOSAL OF MURRAH BUFFALO FROM AN ORGANISED HERD

Nigel B. Cook MRCVS Clinical Associate Professor in Food Animal Production Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine

What the Research Shows about the Use of Rubber Floors for Cows

FAIL. Animal Welfare vs Sustainability. 8,776 cows in 67 UK herds. Mean lameness prevalence of 39.1%!!!!!!

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF HOOF DISORDERS USING FUNCTIONAL HOOF TRIMMING IN ORGANISED DAIRY FARMS

Technical. Preventing lameness in dairy cows: Hoof lesions; their identification, treatment, management and prevention. N 5 9 9

Claw lesions as a predictor of lameness in breeding sows Deen, J., Anil, S.S. and Anil, L. University of Minnesota USA

Genetic Achievements of Claw Health by Breeding

Trigger Factors for Lameness and the Dual Role of Cow Comfort in Herd Lameness Dynamics

HOOF MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO LOCOMOTION SCORES AND CLAW DISORDERS IN DAIRY PRIMIPAROUS COWS

Lameness and Hoof Health

Impact of Flooring on Claw Health and Lameness

Cattle lameness: a problem of cows that starts in heifers

LOCOMOTION SCORING OF DAIRY CATTLE DC - 300

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

Evaluate Environment (page 7-8)

Environmental and genetic effects on claw disorders in Finnish dairy cattle

Foot Health - A Foundation of Animal Care. Karl Burgi Dairyland Hoof Care Institute, Inc Baraboo WI

Stronger Together Minnesota Dairy Growth Summit February 9 th, Trevor Ames DVM MS DACVIM Professor and Dean

RESEARCH OPINIONS IN ANIMAL & VETERINARY SCIENCES

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Claw Health Traits in Spanish Dairy Cattle N. Charfeddine 1, I. Yánez 2 & M. A. Pérez-Cabal 2

Decreasing Lameness and Increasing Cow Comfort on Alberta Dairy Farms

THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS IN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

INDEX. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type. LAMENESS

Cost benefit module animal health

Behavioral Changes Around Calving and their Relationship to Transition Cow Health

Lameness in Irish pigs. Laura Boyle Teagasc Moorepark

Objectives. Lameness in cattle. Herd management of musculoskeletal disorders in. Common musculoskeletal problems. Diseases of the hoof horn

Herd health challenges in high yielding dairy cow systems

THE EFFECTS OF FARM ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT ON LAMINITIS

Dairy Herdsman Certificate

COW WELFARE ASSESSEMENT TIE STALL SCORING (COMPILATION)

Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium & 8th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants

Experts on mastitis evaluate the efficiency of management measures to prevent the disease

Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium & 8th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants

Treatment Strategies for Digital Dermatitis for the UK

ARE YOU RUNNING YOUR HOOF BATH PROPERLY?

EFFECT OF THE FED SHATAVARI ( ASPARAGUS RACEMOSUS) ON BODY WEIGHT AND PUBERTY OF SAHIWAL HEIFERS

Lameness Control in Dairy Herds

Guidelines for selecting good feet and structure. Dr Sarel Van Amstel Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine

SOP - Claws. SOP - Claws describe working routines that are important to secure claw health and minimize spread af infection between animals.

LAMENESS IN DAIRY CATTLE. G. L. Stokka, J. F. Smith, J. R. Dunham, and T. Van Anne

Health traits and their role for sustainability improvement of dairy production

Don t be so lame- Time to Implement Solutions to Sore Feet

Dealing with dairy cow lameness applying knowledge on farm

Lameness, Hoof and Leg Issues in Dairy Cows

Diseases and Health. Dairy Hub Training Booklets. Titles. Healthy Animals - Prosperous Farmers

Progress of type harmonisation

Flooring materials for fed cattle

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 4, 2017,

Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research ISSN (Print) (Online)

Estimation of Milk Losses due to Fasciolosis in Uttarakhand

Rearing heifers to calve at 24 months

Policies of UK Supermarkets: Liquid milk

For more information, see The InCalf Book, Chapter 8: Calf and heifer management and your InCalf Fertility Focus report.

What is Dairy Production Medicine?

GENETIC SELECTION FOR MILK QUALITY WHERE ARE WE? David Erf Dairy Technical Services Geneticist Zoetis

DISEASE MONITORING AND EXTENSION SYSTEM FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN DAIRY INDUSTRY

Guidelines for Type Classification of Cattle and Buffalo

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCE CURRICULUM. Unit 1: Animals in Society/Global Perspective

Balancing Dairy Business and Animal Welfare. Franklyn Garry

South West Scotland Dairy Monitor Farm Willie Fleming Hillhead Kirkpatrick-Fleming Lockerbie, DG11 3NQ Tel:

Estimating the Cost of Disease in The Vital 90 TM Days

Aus dem Institut für Tierhygiene, Tierschutz und Nutztierethologie der Tierärztlichen Hochschule Hannover. Welfare of Dairy Cows:

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Effect of Flooring and/or Flooring Surfaces on Lameness Disorders in Dairy Cattle

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

Measures to improve dairy cow foot health: consequences for farmer income and dairy cow welfare

Research Article ARTICLE HISTORY ABSTRACT

Herd-level risk factors for seven different foot lesions in Ontario Holstein cattle housed in tie stalls or free stalls

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

JF Akinrinmade & OI Ogungbenro*

Lameness and claw lesions as influenced by stall environment and cow comfort

Treatment Strategies to control Parasitic Roundworms In Cattle

Locomotion and hoof disease in cows in the first year of productive life in a slatted floor barn

Foot lesions in lame cows on 10 dairy farms in Ireland

The Heifer Facility Puzzle: The New Puzzle Pieces

The incidence of foot ailments in few districts of central and north karnataka with emphasis on management of lameness in large ruminants

Impact of FMD on milk yield, mastitis, fertility and culling on a large-scale dairy farm in Kenya

VIKRANK Customized index

Claw Health Data recording in Spanish dairy cattle

OUTSTANDING TEAM OF NORWEGIAN RED SIRES NOW AVAILABLE FROM GENETICS AUSTRALIA. Writes John Harle

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

Gross Pathology. Johne s disease. Johne s Disease: The ostrich approach just isn t working! The result: Damaged intestine

GET YOUR CATTLE PERFORMANCE READY WITH MULTIMIN IMPROVING FERTILITY IN BEEF CATTLE

Structure & Purpose The claw, or hard hoof, has two purposes: toe and partially back again.

Selective Breeding vs. Natural Selection

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Mobility. Measuring mobility using the AssureWel protocol. Dairy Cattle Welfare Outcome Assessment Explanation of measures

Incidence and Management of Bovine Claw Affections and Their Economic Impact: A Field Study on Dairy Farms

Buffalo Breeds In Maharashtra (India)

Claw Health Data Recording in Spanish Dairy Cattle

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Charmany Dairy Herd Newsletter Oct. 29 th Nov. 4 th Daily Events

Transcription:

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016, 3346 3351 ISSN 2278-3687 (O) 2277-663X (P) INCIDENCE OF HOOF DISORDERS IN BOVINE OF SOUTH GUJARAT H.D. Bhatt, N.H. Kelawala, V.S. Dabas, R.H. Bhatt, S.K. Jhala, D.N. Suthar and V.D. Dodia* Department of Veterinary Surgery & Radiology, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari E-mail: dr.vaibhavsinh@gmail.com (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: Door to door surveillance of 3241 animals (1480 cattle and 1761 Buffalo) was carried out in and around Navsari district and nearby districts, Gujarat, from which 125 clinical cases related to hoof disorders were identified. The hoof affections were classified as per species, breeds, age, location, lesions, feeding practices and flooring. Amongst these 125 (3.86%) clinical cases of hoof disorders, 77 (2.38%) cases in cattle and 48 (1.48%) buffaloes were recorded. The breed wise distribution of hoof disorders in affected cattle revealed highest rate of occurrence in Holstein Friesian 54/77 (70.13%) followed by Gir 15/77 (19.48%) and crossbred 08/77 (10.39%), whereas, in buffaloes highest incidence was recorded in Mehsani 31/48 (64.58%), followed by nondescript 08/48 (16.67%), Jaffrabadi 06/48 (12.50%) and Surti 03/48 (06.25%). Hind limbs were found affected to a greater extent (82; 66%) as compared to fore limbs (43; 34.4%). Housing condition was the key factor in occurrence of hoof problems in cattle and buffalo population. The prevalence rate was higher among cattle (7.94%) and buffaloes (3.08%) tied permanently on the pakka floor with limited housing area for exercise. Keywords: Hoof disorders, cattle, Pakka floor, Gujarat. Introduction Globally, livestock production is growing rapidly as a result of increasing demand for animal products. This holds also true for the dairy industry, the re of which are dairy cows whose well being, health and welfare are important for successful milk production and economic success. Lameness and claw disorders constitute a significant health and welfare problem in modern dairy farming (Somers, 2004). Foot and leg disorders tend to increase along with increased production and more confined management systems (Beusker, 2007). Compared to the cow s natural environment when grazing, today's confined dairy systems hardly achieve requirements for comfortable lying, standing and walking; and hygiene is often poor (Bergsten, 2010). Lameness was ranked third in losses from dairy diseases, following mastitis and fertility problems (Baggot, 1982) and it is a recognized Received Sep 17, 2016 * Published Oct 2, 2016 * www.ijset.net

3347 H.D. Bhatt, N.H. Kelawala, V.S. Dabas, R.H. Bhatt, S.K. Jhala, D.N. Suthar and V.D. Dodia problem in most dairy herds throughout the world. Producers and herd managers agree, it is an ever-present challenge and with modern dairy management practices, lameness rates continue to rise (Burgi, 2006). The majority of lameness (>90%) involves the foot. Claw diseases are a primary cause of lameness in most herds and are predisposed by laminitis and confinement on concrete (Manson and Offer, 2007). The hoof is a complex structure that plays a key role in many aspects of the animal s overall health and productivity. Although an animal with hoof problems may be able to function, chances are that optimal animal production and performance will be reduced depending upon the severity of the problem (Hepworth et al., 2004). Manure slurry, mud, and otherwise wet conditions seem to favour the occurrence of diseases; however specific data to support these thoughts is limited (Shearer and Amstel, 2000). Nutritional status of animal also plays a vital role. Each essential nutrient for the hoof horn plays a unique role in the production of normal high-quality hoof horn and all must be present in optimal amounts for hoof horn to have maximum strength and cementing (Seymour, 1998). The key to preventing lameness is by making the correct lameness diagnosis (Burgi, 2006) and by maintaining a sound hoof management, animal owners can reduce their economic losses and increase their chances for profit in the future (Hepworth et al., 2004). Material and Method In a study, door to door surveillance of 3241 animals (1480 cattle and 1761 Buffalo) was carried out in and around Navsari district and nearby districts, Gujarat, from which 125 clinical cases related to hoof disorders were identified. Herd details and managemental information were recorded followed by collecting information of affected animal such as species, breed, age, lactation and sex of the animal; hoof problem faced; and other relevant information were collected from the livestock owners in predefined proformas. The affections were classified as per species, breeds, age, anatomical location of the affection, lesions, feeding practices and flooring. Results and Discussion Species wise prevalence of hoof problems was higher I n cattle (5.20%) as compared to buffaloes (2.73%). The incidence of axial rotation was highest in cattle (35.06%), while, incidence of overgrown hooves (54.17%) was highest in buffaloes.

Incidence of Hoof Disorders in Bovine of. 3348 Table 1: Overall incidence rate of hoof disorders recorded during the survey Cattle Buffalo Total Total number of animals surveyed 1480 1761 3241 Clinical cases of hoof disorders 77 48 125 age (%) 5.20 2.73 3.86 Prevalence rate (%) on the basis of overall population surveyed 2.38 1.48 3.86 Chart 1 and 2: Breed wise incidences of hoof disorders in cattle and buffalo population surveyed Chart 3: Prevalence of foot lesions as per Lactation Incidence as per lactation Cattle Buffalo 41.56 31.25 23.38 24.68 25.00 29.17 2.60 0 7.79 14.58 < 1st lactation 1st lactation 2nd lactation 3rd lactation >3rd lactation

3349 H.D. Bhatt, N.H. Kelawala, V.S. Dabas, R.H. Bhatt, S.K. Jhala, D.N. Suthar and V.D. Dodia Chart 4: Anatomical location wise incidences of hoof lesions in lateral and medial claw among fore and hind limbs Incidence as per anatomical location Lateral claw Medial claw Both Claw 78.05 46.51 27.91 25.58 7.32 14.63 Fore Limb Hind Limb Housing condition was the main factor in occurrence of hoof problems in cattle and buffalo population. The prevalence rate was higher among cattle (7.34%) and buffaloes (3.08%) tied permanently on the pakka floor with no access to exercise with limited housing area. Cattle maintained on kachcha floor without any facilities for exercise showed higher prevalence (4.15%) as compared to those given access to physical exercise in mixed flooring (2.86%). However, contrary results were observed in buffaloes tied over kachcha floor with prevalence (2.19%) than in buffaloes maintained over mixed type flooring (2.30%; Table 2). Table 2: Floor type wise incidences hoof lesions Kachha floor Pakka floor Mixed Overall Species Number Number Number Number Cattle 13/313 4.15 50/681 7.34 14/486 2.86 77/1480 5.20 Buffalo 7/319 2.19 31/1007 3.08 10/435 2.30 48/1761 2.73 Total 20/632 3.16 81/1688 4.80 24/921 2.60 125/3241 3.86 Out of 125 affected animals, 27/661 (4.08%) were maintained on high conrate diet, 69/1732 (3.98%) on normal conrate diet and 29/848 (3.42%) animals were maintained on the low conrate diet (Table 3).

Incidence of Hoof Disorders in Bovine of. 3350 Table 3: Feeding practices wise incidences of hoof disorders Feeding practices No. of affected animals Population surveyed age (%) >50% of Milk Production 27 661 4.08 (27/661) 50% of Milk Production 69 1732 3.98 (69/1732) < 50 % of Milk Production 29 848 3.42 (29/848) Total 125 3241 3.86 (125/3241) The incidence in cattle (5.20%) was higher as compared to that in buffaloes (2.73%). The incidence rate indicated in present study is less than that of 25 to 38 per reported in exotic dairy cattle (Prentice and Neal, 1972; Whitaker, 1983; Shearer, 1992; Smillie et al., 1996; Cook, 2002) and also less than 9.2 to 58 per in zebu and cross bred dairy cattle of north India (Gogoi et al., 1981; Kalasi et al., 2002; Jain et al., 2006). Incidence of hoof disorders in buffaloes (2.73%) is less than that of Mahla (2010) who reported 12.88 per which may be due regular access to grazing. Our results are in concurrence with that of Mahla (2010) who reported highest incidence in cattle (22.91%) and buffaloes (17.05) maintained on pakka floor than in cattle (12.61%) and buffaloes (10.68%) maintained on kachcha floor. Conclusion The present survey covered 3241 animals, out of which 1480 cattle and 1761 buffaloes. Amongst these 125 (3.86%) clinical cases of hoof disorders, 77 (2.38%) cases in cattle and 48 (1.48%) buffaloes were recorded. Species wise prevalence of hoof problems was higher in cattle (5.20%) as compared to buffaloes (2.73%). The breed wise distribution of hoof disorders in affected cattle revealed highest rate of occurrence in Holstein Friesian 54/77 (70.13%) followed by Gir 15/77 (19.48%) and crossbred 08/77 (10.39%), whereas, in buffaloes highest incidence was recorded in Mehsani 31/48 (64.58%), followed by nondescript 08/48 (16.67%), Jaffrabadi 06/48 (12.50%) and Surti 03/48 (06.25%). In cattle and buffaloes, the lowest incidence of hoof disorders (1.6%) was recorded in young animals (upto heifer stage) and highest incidence (36.8%) in the adult animals (higher than 3 rd lactation). In case of buffaloes, maximum hoof lesions were observed in 2 nd lactation animals (31.25%) while in cattle, more foot lesions were recorded in older animals (41.56%). Hind limbs were found affected to a greater extent (82; 66%) as compared to fore limbs (43; 34.4%). Within the limb, lateral claw was found most affected in hind limb (64; 78.05%) and medial claw in fore-limb (20; 46.51%). However, in certain animals, both claws were affected in fore-limb (11; 25.58%) and in hind limb (12; 14.63%).

3351 H.D. Bhatt, N.H. Kelawala, V.S. Dabas, R.H. Bhatt, S.K. Jhala, D.N. Suthar and V.D. Dodia Housing condition was the key factor in occurrence of hoof problems in cattle and buffalo population. The prevalence rate was higher among cattle (7.94%) and buffaloes (3.08%) tied permanently on the pakka floor with limited housing area for exercise. Cattle maintained on kachha floor without any facilities for exercise showed higher prevalence (4.15%) as compared to those given access to physical exercise in mixed flooring (2.86%). However, contrary results were observed in buffaloes tied over kachcha floor with low prevalence (2.19%) than in buffaloes maintained over mixed type flooring (2.30%). Out of total 3241 animals surveyed, 661 (20.39%) were maintained on higher amount of conrate (more than 50% of milk production) feed in the diet followed by 1732 (53.44%) animals on normal amount of conrate feed (50% of milk production) in the diet and rest 848 (26.16%) on the low amount of conrate feed (less than 50% of milk production) in the diet. Out of 125 affected animals of the total, highest incidence 27/661 (4.08%) was observed amongst the animals maintained on conrate diet more than 50 per of milk production, followed by 69/1732 (3.98%) and 29/848 (3.42%) in animals maintained on normal and low amount of conrate in diet. References [1] Somers, J. (2004). Claw Disorders and Disturbed Locomotion in Dairy Cows: the Effect of Floor Systems and Implications for Animal Welfare Ph.D. Thesis Utrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - With summary in Dutch. [2] Beusker, N. (2007). Welfare of Dairy Cows: Lameness in Cattle A Literature Review, Hannover. [3] Bergsten, C. (2010). Impact of Flooring on Claw Health and Lameness. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 22: 241-251 [4] Baggot, D. G. (1982). Losses due to lameness caused by physical contact with buildings. Technical Journal, Farm Buildings Association, Oxford, 30: 12-15 [5] Burgi, K. (2006). Dairy cattle lameness: causes and effects. Dairyland Hoof Care Institute Hepworth, K., Neary, M. and Kenyon, S. (2004). Extension Veterinarian. Hoof Anatomy, Care and Management in Livestock. [6] Mahla, J. K. (2010). Studies on incidence and management of hoof disorders in commercial dairy farms around Anand. M.V.Sc. Thesis. Submitted to Anand Agricultural University, Anand. [7] Jain, P., Sharma, V. K. and Khairwel, S. (2006). Incidence of foot lesions in dairy cattle farm. Indian Vet. J., 83(3): 325-327. [8] Manson, G and Offer, J. (2007). Preventing lameness in dairy cows; Hoof lesions; their identification, treatment, management and prevention.