Appendix 21: Frequency and Percentage Tables for Questionnaire results of Finds Liaison Officer survey

Similar documents
Humber Bay Park Project Survey Online Summary of Findings Report

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE: MULTI-COUNTRY SURVEY

What do visitors to Royal National Park know about the endangered broad-headed snake?

Three Creeks Animal Health Survey. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development Food Safety and Animal Health Division December 1, 2011

PENNVET BEHAVIOR APP Pet Owner Instructions

Title: Let s all take care of our pets. Category: years

Policy on Animals on Campus

People food for pets was generally considered unhealthy, with 65% of pet owners and 67% of veterinary professionals agreeing.

For publication. The Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 Designation of the Public Spaces Protection Order (Dog control) (HW1140)

Loving Animals Providing Smiles

Survey of Husbandry Practices

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existing ordinances regulating dogs is inadequate and in need of substantial revision,

Protect your dog against theft

Service Dog Application

Proposed New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project

I131 Feline Intake Form

Owner s Name. Address. Primary Phone Alternate Phone. . Security Word (used for pick up verification) Other person authorized to pick up dog

Case 2:14-cv KJM-KJN Document 2-5 Filed 02/03/14 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT E

Parks & Recreation Commissioners Meeting Department of Parks & Recreation Boise City Bonneville Room City Hall

Surveys of the Street and Private Dog Population: Kalhaar Bungalows, Gujarat India

Transfer of the Family Platysternidae from Appendix II to Appendix I. Proponent: United States of America and Viet Nam. Ref. CoP16 Prop.

Smart bark control collar BC-2. User manual

DkIT B.Sc. in Veterinary Nursing Frequently Asked Questions

We are proposing this survey in order to collect your ideas about certain changes which need to be made in order to improve the wellbeing of our dogs.

DECISION AND SECTION 43 STATEMENT TO THE VETERINARY COUNCIL BY THE COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE: CAC Dr Alfa 1. Complaint from Miss Bravo

Puppy Application. Referred by: If not referred to us, how did you hear about Genteel Standard Poodles?

Application for Adoption Questionnaire

Cognitive Analytic Therapy (CAT) Patient Information Leaflet

Auld Sod English Cocker Spaniels P.O. Box 760 Tracyton, WA (360)

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

EDWARD RYDER of 40 Selkirk Road, Jimboomba, states:-

The Animal Welfare League of Arlington. Foster Care Application

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on June 2, 2003) THIRD REPRINT S.B. 231 MARCH 4, Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Do you know the helpline number in case of a stray animal in

Establishing a routine

Hello! Sincerely, Cari Bishop Program Assistant

LANGSTANE HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PET POLICY

Freedom of Information Request on Pet Shop Licensing 2016

Criteria for Selecting Species of Greatest Conservation Need

We are investigating dog body shape and pet food labels. This survey contains 4 sections. It should take 5 minutes to complete.

Sex: Male Bitch. Is the dog: Spayed Neutered Entire. Type of Coat Short Semi Long haired

Mutt Mitt Survey Summary Results of surveys of Mutt Mitt station sponsors and users

Collection of quantitative data on the use of antimicrobial agents including the establishment of an OIE database

4--Why are Community Documents So Difficult to Read and Revise?

THE CORPORATION OF TOWN OF PETROLIA. BY-LAW NO. 10 of 2009

University Animal Care Committee (UACC) Terms of Reference

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for. Hine's Emerald (Somatochlora hineana)

5 June 13, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CARES, INC.

Livestock Identification / Registration among the West Eurasia Countries. Results of a Survey

Veterinary Emergency Medical Assistance Application

G2Z National Cat Action Plan Draft 1 feedback survey report. Powered by

Dog Pre-Adoption Application (rev )

2014 Albany Residents Community Survey

Background, Key Issues, SLC Policies, Existing Parks, National Comparison. Voice & Tag Program, Fee Program, Limited Hours, Volunteer Roles

Street Paws Preliminary Adoption Application

KleeCan Alaskan Klee Kai In-Home Breeding Program Prospective Owner Questionnaire Roger Laycock September 2014 KleeCan.Com

IRS DEFINED NON-PROFIT CANINE RESCUE KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

CECIL COUNTY HOBBY KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON CRIME PREVENTION, CORRECTIONS & SAFETY FINAL ANALYSIS

PetSpy Advanced Dog Training System, Model M86N

Report to ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & REGULATIONS Committee for decision

To choke or not to choke How positive reinforcement has affected the use of choke collars in dog training

Dangerous Dogs. Standard Operating Procedure

Frequently Asked Questions

What we heard. Protecting the rights of people who rely on guide and service animals in Nova Scotia. Public discussion

Policy on Iowa s Turtle Harvest

Cat Survey Key Findings Report. Released March 2014 Multnomah County Animal Services

102 Animals on University Property

RENO V. AUSTIN: ANIMAL-SHELTER REFORM EFFORTS IN TWO EXPANDING U.S. CITIES PRODUCE DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT FIRST-YEAR RESULTS

Puppy Application. Relationship to Applicant Home Address City State Zip . Do you plan on showing this puppy?

PUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDERS DOG CONTROLS CULTURE AND LEISURE (COUNCILLOR PETER BRADBURY)

Judging Approval Process Effective March 1, Frequently Asked Questions

Ledy VanKavage, Esq. Sr. Legislative Attorney 2/14/2017. Past Chair of American Bar Association s Animal Law Committee

FRISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Latest revision: 8/2017)

Please fill in all questions. If something does not apply, please enter N/A.

Neighbourhood Manager, Neighbourhoods Business Manager, Neighbourhoods Services Manager, Care and Support Business Manager, Care and Support

SERVICE ANIMALS IN PUBLIC PLACES

MO PATRIOT PAWS APPLICATION. NAME: Date: CITY: STATE: ZIP (9 DIGITS): - I AM CURRENTLY: ACTIVE DUTY RETIRED DISCHARGED (TYPE: )

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA

PEANUT S PLACE BULLY RESCUE

Webkinz Friend Requests

Page 1 of 10. Assistance Dogs and Pat Dogs Procedure

MO PATRIOT PAWS APPLICATION. NAME: Date: CITY: STATE: ZIP (9 DIGITS): - I AM CURRENTLY: RETIRED DISCHARGED (TYPE): )

HOW TO PREVENT ESCAPES...AND WHAT TO DO IF YOUR DOG GETS AWAY

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

Esther Thelwell, Senior Environmental Health Officer

Ayla's Acres No-Kill Animal Rescue Dog Adoption Form

NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD **MINUTES** June 1, 2016

Should Veterinarians Discuss the Costs of Health Care with Our Clients?

THE LAY OBSERVERS REPORT TO COUNCIL AND THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE S RESPONSE

Trends in exposure of veterinarians to physical and chemical hazards and use of

LICENCE CONDITIONS FOR HOME BOARDING (DOGS) ANIMAL BOARDING ESTABLISHMENTS ACT 1963

Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan

Searching Contaminated Scenes for Evidence

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What do boys and their mothers in my housing society think about street dogs? Kian Hamirani Aged 9 India

In Home Service/ Hearing/ Companion Dog. In Home Service/ Hearing/ Companion Dog Questionnaire

STRAY DOGS SURVEY 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE NORTH LITTLE ROCK AND BEEBE, ARKANSAS

Transcription:

Appendix 21: Frequency and age Tables for Questionnaire results of Finds Liaison Officer survey Question 3a: How long have you worked for the PAS in your current position? Frequency 0-6 months 2 9.5 9.5 9.5 1-2 years 2 9.5 9.5 19.0 2-3 years 8 38.1 38.1 57.1 Over 3 years 9 42.9 42.9 100.0 100.0 Question 3b: How long have you worked for the PAS in total? Frequency 0-6 months 1 4.8 4.8 4.8 1-2 years 3 14.3 14.3 19.0 2-3 years 6 28.6 28.6 47.6 Over 3 years 11 52.4 52.4 100.0 100.0 Question 4: Number of known metal detecting clubs in your area Frequency 1 1 4.8 4.8 4.8 2 1 4.8 4.8 9.5 4 4 19.0 19.0 28.6 5 3 14.3 14.3 42.9 6 3 14.3 14.3 57.1 7 4 19.0 19.0 76.2 8 1 4.8 4.8 81.0 9 1 4.8 4.8 85.7 11 1 4.8 4.8 90.5 12 2 9.5 9.5 100.0 100.0 434

Question 4a: Number of clubs who responded to contact made by a FLO (you or a predecessor) Frequency 1 1 4.8 4.8 4.8 2 1 4.8 4.8 9.5 3 2 9.5 9.5 19.0 4 5 23.8 23.8 42.9 5 3 14.3 14.3 57.1 6 2 9.5 9.5 66.7 7 2 9.5 9.5 76.2 8 2 9.5 9.5 85.7 9 1 4.8 4.8 90.5 11 1 4.8 4.8 95.2 12 1 4.8 4.8 100.0 100.0 Frequency Yes 2 9.5 9.5 9.5 No 19 90.5 90.5 100.0 100.0 Question 4b: Number of clubs who made contact themselves with PAS without initial communication from a FLO Frequency 0 10 47.6 55.6 55.6 1 4 19.0 22.2 77.8 2 3 14.3 16.7 94.4 3 1 4.8 5.6 100.0 Total 18 85.7 100.0 Missing System 3 14.3 435

Frequency Yes 3 14.3 16.7 16.7 No 15 71.4 83.3 100.0 Total 18 85.7 100.0 Missing System 3 14.3 Question 4c: Number of clubs who have been invited to work with PAS but have declined Frequency 0 17 81.0 81.0 81.0 1 3 14.3 14.3 95.2 5 1 4.8 4.8 100.0 100.0 Frequency Yes 2 9.5 10.0 10.0 No 18 85.7 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 4.8 436

Question 4d: Number of metal detecting clubs that have worked with PAS Frequency 0 1 4.8 5.9 5.9 2 1 4.8 5.9 11.8 3 1 4.8 5.9 17.6 4 4 19.0 23.5 41.2 5 3 14.3 17.6 58.8 6 2 9.5 11.8 70.6 7 1 4.8 5.9 76.5 8 1 4.8 5.9 82.4 9 1 4.8 5.9 88.2 11 1 4.8 5.9 94.1 12 1 4.8 5.9 100.0 Total 17 81.0 100.0 Missing System 4 19.0 Frequency Yes 2 9.5 12.5 12.5 No 14 66.7 87.5 100.0 Total 16 76.2 100.0 Missing System 5 23.8 Question 4e: Number of clubs that have not been contacted by PAS (and any reasons why) Frequency 0 19 90.5 95.0 95.0 4 1 4.8 5.0 100.0 Missing System 1 4.8 437

Frequency Yes 2 9.5 10.0 10.0 No 18 85.7 90.0 100.0 Missin System g 1 4.8 Question 5: Number of individual metal-detector users (i.e. non-club members) who you see per annum. Frequency 0 1 4.8 5.3 5.3 10 2 9.5 10.5 15.8 15 3 14.3 15.8 31.6 20 5 23.8 26.3 57.9 25 1 4.8 5.3 63.2 40 1 4.8 5.3 68.4 45 1 4.8 5.3 73.7 50 2 9.5 10.5 84.2 75 1 4.8 5.3 89.5 100 1 4.8 5.3 94.7 350 1 4.8 5.3 100.0 Total 19 90.5 100.0 Missin System g 2 9.5 Frequency Yes 17 81.0 89.5 89.5 No 2 9.5 10.5 100.0 Total 19 90.5 100.0 Missing System 2 9.5 438

Question 6: Number of metal-detector users known to you who have contacts with other archaeologists/heritage specialists e.g. community archaeologist or museum staff, but no direct contact with PAS. Frequency 0 11 52.4 57.9 57.9 1 2 9.5 10.5 68.4 3 2 9.5 10.5 78.9 4 1 4.8 5.3 84.2 6 1 4.8 5.3 89.5 10 1 4.8 5.3 94.7 30 1 4.8 5.3 100.0 Total 19 90.5 100.0 Missing System 2 9.5 Frequency Yes 12 57.1 60.0 60.0 No 8 38.1 40.0 100.0 Missing System 1 4.8 Question 7: Would you say that there has been an increase or decrease of metaldetector user involvement with PAS in your region in the past three years? Frequency Increase 15 71.4 71.4 71.4 Decrease 2 9.5 9.5 81.0 Neither 4 19.0 19.0 100.0 100.0 439

Question 8: Are you aware of any serious incidents of nighthawking in your region? Frequency Yes 14 66.7 66.7 66.7 No 7 33.3 33.3 100.0 100.0 Question 8a: If yes, how many incidents in the past 12 months? Frequency 5 23.8 23.8 23.8 0 1 4.8 4.8 28.6 0.5 1 4.8 4.8 33.3 1 1 4.8 4.8 38.1 2 2 9.5 9.5 47.6 3 1 4.8 4.8 52.4 4, although the real figure is probably higher 1 4.8 4.8 57.1 5 1 4.8 4.8 61.9 About four major incidents and several small incidents 1 4.8 4.8 66.7 At least 3 1 4.8 4.8 71.4 I do not know specific incidents, only rumours and 1 4.8 4.8 76.2 vague reports. I often hear rumours that people are night-hawkers or that fields have been nighthawked but non of this can be 1 4.8 4.8 81.0 substantiated. As far as I am aware there are no major sites in my area Impossible to quantify, but anecdotal evidence suggests that it is widespread and regularly occurring. 1 4.8 4.8 85.7 Many rumours, but mainly unsubstantiated 1 4.8 4.8 90.5 Not serious but evidence of pits in two incidents last year 1 4.8 4.8 95.2 One - reported police 1 4.8 4.8 100.0 100.0 440

Frequency Yes 11 52.4 84.6 84.6 No 2 9.5 15.4 100.0 Total 13 61.9 100.0 Missing System 8 38.1 Question 8b: Are there any specific sites/areas that seem to be particularly vulnerable to nighthawking? Frequency Yes 13 61.9 65.0 65.0 No 6 28.6 30.0 95.0 Not sure 1 4.8 5.0 100.0 Missing System 1 4.8 Question 8c: Have there been, to your knowledge, any convictions or attempted convictions for nighthawking in your region in the past three years? Frequency Yes 3 14.3 14.3 14.3 No 14 66.7 66.7 81.0 Not sure 4 19.0 19.0 100.0 100.0 441