CARBAPENEM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE (KPC CRE)

Similar documents
Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs The Same, but Different. Sara Nausheen, MD Kevin Kern, PharmD

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

Antimicrobial Stewardship:

Infection Control of Emerging Diseases

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

9/30/2016. Dr. Janell Mayer, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS Dr. Lindsey Votaw, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Fighting MDR Pathogens in the ICU

Antimicrobial Stewardship

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

Antibiotic Stewardship in Nursing Homes SAM GUREVITZ PHARM D, CGP ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR BUTLER UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCE

Antimicrobial Stewardship 101

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Preventing and Responding to Antibiotic Resistant Infections in New Hampshire

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

Witchcraft for Gram negatives

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Antibiotic Stewardship in the LTC Setting

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Mono- versus Bitherapy for Management of HAP/VAP in the ICU

Solution Title: Antibiotic Stewardship: A Journey Toward the Triple Aim

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

11/22/2016. Antimicrobial Stewardship Update Disclosures. Outline. No conflicts of interest to disclose

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

Cost high. acceptable. worst. best. acceptable. Cost low

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

Infectious Disease 101: Helping the Consultant Pharmacist with Stewardship Principles

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

UPDATE ON ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP REGULATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AMS PROGRAM

4/3/2017 CLINICAL PEARLS: UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Breaking the Ring. β-lactamases and the Great Arms Race. Bryce M Kayhart, PharmD, BCPS PGY2 Pharmacotherapy Resident Mayo Clinic - Rochester

LEARNING OBJECTIVES ANTIMICROBIAL USES AND ABUSES INFECTIOUS DISEASE SCARES

It s Time to Regulate Antimicrobial Stewardship Standards in Acute Care Settings. Emily Heil, PharmD, BCPS-AQ ID, AAHIVP

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program 2 nd Quarter

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

Antimicrobial stewardship in managing septic patients

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Taking Action to Prevent and Manage Multidrug-resistant Organisms and C. difficile in the Nursing Home: Part 1 Reviewing the organisms

MAGNITUDE OF ANTIMICROBIAL USE. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Acute and Long Term Healthcare Facilities: Design, Implementation and Challenges

The International Collaborative Conference in Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Recommendations Regarding Use of Rapid Blood Pathogen Identification Panel Data

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

Antimicrobial Stewardship/Statewide Antibiogram. Felicia Matthews Senior Consultant, Pharmacy Specialty BD MedMined Services

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

CF WELL Pharmacology: Microbiology & Antibiotics

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

PRACTIC GUIDELINES for APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTICS USE

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Antimicrobial Stewardship Advisory Committee Meeting

Best Practices: Goals of Antimicrobial Stewardship

The Rise of Antibiotic Resistance: Is It Too Late?

Antibiotic Resistance in the Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Settings: Strategies for Stewardship

Antimicrobial Stewardship

ETX0282, a Novel Oral Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Collecting and Interpreting Stewardship Data: Breakout Session

Sustaining an Antimicrobial Stewardship

Microbiology Basics and Applications to Clinical Practice

Rise of Resistance: From MRSA to CRE

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Antibiotic Stewardship: The Facility Role and Implementation. Tim Cozad, LPN, Lead LTC Health Facilities Surveyor

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

11/10/2016. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Disclosures. Educational Need/Practice Gap. Objectives. Case #1

Using Web-Based Instruction Modules to Improve Practitioner Knowledge at Yale New Haven Hospital on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance and

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Jump Starting Antimicrobial Stewardship

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Pharmacist Coordinated Antimicrobial Therapy: OPAT and Transitions of Care

Antimicrobial Stewardship: Stopping the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance

Geriatric Mental Health Partnership

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE FROM SENTINEL PUBLIC HOSPITALS, SOUTH AFRICA, 2014

Antimicrobial Stewardship Basics Why, What, Who, and How. Philip Chung, PharmD, MS, BCPS ASAP Community Network Pharmacy Coordinator October 12, 2017

ADC 2016 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao

Other β-lactamase Inhibitor (BLI) Combinations: Focus on VNRX-5133, WCK 5222 and ETX2514SUL

Optimizing Selection of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in the Era of Precision Medicine

Antibiotic Stewardship in the Hospital Setting

Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistance and Preparation of an Enhanced Antibiogram at the Local Level. janet hindler

Infection Prevention Highlights for the Medical Staff. Pamela Rohrbach MSN, RN, CIC Director of Infection Prevention

Bad Bugs. Pharmacist Learning Objectives. Antimicrobial Resistance. Patient Case. Pharmacy Technician Learning Objectives 4/8/2016

Transcription:

CARBAPENEM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE (KPC CRE)

Bartsch SM et al. Potential economic burden of carbapenem-resistent Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the United States. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23(1):48e9-e16.

INDIANA CP-CRE CASES, 2016-2018 60 Total: 355 Total: 294 Total: 153 50 2016 2017 2018 Cases 40 30 20 Average: 27 10 0 Month *Preliminary 2018 data represents 1/1/2018 5/31/2018

INDIANA CP-CRE CASES BY DISTRICT, 2016-2018 State: 802 District 1: 358 District 2: 29 District 3: 62 District 4: 18 District 5: 176 District 6: 86 District 7: 40 District 8: 16 District 9: 17 District 10: 0 *Preliminary 2018 data represents 1/1/2018 5/31/2018

INDIANA CP-CRE CASES, 2016-2018 802 CP-CRE cases ORGANISMS 621 KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE 55 SERRATIA MARCESCENS MECHANISMS 44 ESCHERICHIA COLI 740 KPC 36 ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE COMPLEX 18 NDM 18 CITROBACTER FREUNDII COMPLEX 15 VIM 14 KLEBSIELLA OXYTOCA 9 OXA-48-LIKE 6 CITROBACTER KOSERI 20 UNKNOWN 3 PROTEUS MIRABILIS 2 KLEBSIELLA AEROGENES 1 PROVIDENCIA RETTGERI 1 LECLERCIA ADECARBOXYLATA 1 MORGANELLA MORGANII *Preliminary 2018 data represents 1/1/2018 5/31/2018

1. 2. Most bacteria have 1 or 2 mechanisms of resistance. P. aeruginosa & Acinetobacter use ALL FOUR! 3. 4. 9

CRE Carbapenemase Producing (CP-CRE) Multiple Mechanisms KPC NDM VIM OXA SME IMI Porin Enzyme Efflux Ceftaz/avibactam Meropenem/ vaborbactam Polymixins Aztreonam Aztreonam PLUS Ceftaz/avibactam Polymixins

VICIOUS CYCLE Fluoroquinolones ES Cephalosporins ESBLs Tigecycline, Colistin Nursing Home LTAC Hemodialysis Carbapenem Use Carbapenemase

The selection of the optimal antimicrobial drug regimen, including dose, route, and duration of therapy Right Drug Right Dose Right Diagnosis Antimicrobial Stewardship Right Duration Barlam, TF et al. Guideline for Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program, CID 2016

Leadership Commitment Hospital administration supports efforts to improve antimicrobial use Accountability Identify a single leader responsible for program outcomes Training in AMS Drug Expertise Identify a pharmacist to co-lead Action Develop interventions or policies to improve antibiotic use Tracking & Reporting Monitor prescribing patterns Report on antimicrobial use, patient outcomes, and resistance patterns Education Educate staff and patients about resistance and optimal prescribing CDC. Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2014

AMS TEAM ID MD* ID PharmD* Information Technologist Infection Preventionist Patient Quality Improvement Clinicians Nurses Laboratory *Recommended to have specific training/expertise in antimicrobial stewardship

Formulary Management Education Combat the Emergence of Resistance Guidelines & Order Sets Dose Optimization Antimicrobial Stewardship De-escalation Length of Therapy Selection of Antimicrobial Control Costs Diagnosis Dellit TH. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(2):159-77. Lawrence KL, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;179:434-438. Improve Clinical Outcomes Rapid Diagnostics & Microbiology IV to PO

1. 2. 3.

3 days 7 days 10 days 14 days 14-21 days 28 days 28-56 days Chastre J, et al. JAMA 2003; 290: 2588-98

STUDY DETAILS STUDY DESIGN OUTCOMES Stamm WE, et al. Acute renal infection in women: Treatment with TMP-SMX or Ampicillin for 2 or 6 Weeks Prospective, randomized trial 2 weeks of treatment was as efficacious as 6 weeks of treatment Longer duration was less well tolerated (more adverse effects) Longer duration was associated with increased recurrence (20% for 2 weeks and 36% for 6 weeks) Published 1987 Included 60 patients Treatment groups: Ampicillin PO or TMP/SMX PO Duration: 2 or 6 weeks Gupta K, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(5): e103-e120. Stamm WE, et al. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 341.

Days of IV Vancomycin Therapy vs. VRE Infection Risk 1.5 1-3 days 3.2 4-7 days 5.4 >7 days None Also saw increased risk of VRE infection with use of fluoroquinolones and meropenem Antibiotics may drive resistance outside of their own class Gouliouris T et al. Duration of exposure of multiple antibiotics is associated with increased risk of VRE bacteremia: a nested case-control study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:1692-1699.

LARGE IMPACT

Redefining the Antibiotic Stewardship Team: Recommendations from the American Nurses Association/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Workgroup on the Role of Registered Nurses in Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Practices. 2017. CDC

If the answer is yes to all these questions, discussion about switching to oral antibiotics is appropriate

Early Switch Therapy Moderate to severe PNA LOS -3.34days 95%CI -4.42, -2.25 Adverse events OR 0.65 95%CI 0.48, 0.89 No difference in treatment success OR 0.92 95%CI 0.61, 1.39 No difference in Recurrence OR 1.81 95%CI 0.7, 4.72 No difference in Mortality OR 0.81 95%CI 0.49, 1.33 CAP (Meta of 3 studies) Mean LOS -3.04days 95%CI -4.9 to -1.19 Mandel LA, et al. CID 2007;44(suppl 2):S27-72.

ARE CULTURES REALLY THAT IMPORTANT TO ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP? 31

IMPACT OF CULTURE RESULTS Need to Treat or Not Treat Drive Order Sets / Empiric Treatments Impact Quality Metrics (ie. CAUTI) Drug Selection Influence Drug Formulary Decisions Antibiotic Resistance Dose Selection Annual Antibiogram Report Patient Outcomes Duration of Treatment Isolation Precautions Cost of Care 32

WHY IS TECHNIQUE IMPORTANT? NEITHER REQUIRE ANTIBIOTICS! Normal Flora of the Skin Staphylococci (Coagulase-negative) Staphylococcus aureus Diphtheroids (corynebacterium) Streptococci sp. 33

KEYS TO SUCCESS 34

SWABS & SENDING SPECIMENS 35 (Adapted from Perry AG, et al. [2014]. Clinical nursing skills & techniques [8th ed]. St. Louis: Mosby.)

Microbiology Workflow Blood Drawn t=0 Gram Stain t=8 h Samples Plated for Sub-culture t=24-36h Resistance Testing Culture Results t=48-72h

COST OF MICROBIOLOGY LAB WORK-UP Deep wound culture performed $387* $900* 37 *Cost does not include tech time

~10% 95% of patients report a penicillin allergy are not allergic Sacco KA. Allergy 2017; 72:1288-1296

40 Vancomycin Cefazolin 35 30 25 % Patients 20 15 10 5 0 Treatment Failure(1) Mortality (2) 1. Stryjewski ME. Clin Infect Dis.2007;44:190-6. 2. Kim S. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2008;52(1):192-197.

Study Details Study Design Results Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(7):904-910. Prospective, cohort study conducted on the ID service at 3 academic hospitals N=507 patients 95 (19%) had β-lactam allergies Beta-lactam was preferred therapy in 72 (76%) J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:790-796. Retrospective, matched cohort study of patients admitted to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals 51,582 unique subjects with PCN allergy were casematched with 2 controls When β-lactam preferred, 25 (35%) did not receive preferred treatment, despite 13 (52%) reported as non-severe reactions Patients who did not receive preferred βlactam therapy had greater risk of adverse events (aor, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.28-7.89) vs those w/o allergy Patients receiving preferred β-lactam therapy had similar risk of adverse events vs those w/o allergy (aor, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.62-2.87) Cases w/ PCN allergy averaged 0.59 (9.9%; 95% ci, 0.47-0.71) more hospital days vs controls Cases were treated w/ more FQs, clindamycin, and vancomycin (P<0.0001) vs controls Cases had 23.4% (95% CI, 15.6% to 31.7%) more C.difficile, 14.1% (95% CI, 7.1% to 2`.6%) more MRSA, and 30.1% (95% CI, 12.5% to 50.4%) more VRE vs controls

Urticaria/Hives Wheezing Shortness of Breath Angioedema Anaphylaxis Stephen s Johnson Syndrome N/V (Intolerance) Headache (Intolerance) Diarrhea (Intolerance) Family History (not a true allergy) Known side effects of medications Additional Questions: How long ago was the reaction? What antibiotics have they tolerated since?

Odds Ratio of Receiving Carbapenem AMS intervention Prior B-lactam PCN allergy 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Al-Hasan, MN, et al.pharmacotherap.2018,38(1):42-50. 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION OR MIC S I R

Concentration Cmax:MIC AUC:MIC T>MIC MIC 0 Time (hours) AUC = Area under the concentration time curve Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration

Drug Time>MIC Susceptible (µg/ml) Piperacillin/ tazobactam 16 Ceftriaxone 1 Cefepime 8 Meropenem P. aeruginosa Peak:MIC Enterobacteriaceae 2 1 Tobramycin 4 Ciprofloxacin 1

Susceptible (µg/ml) Peak Serum Concentration (µg/ml) Piperacillin/ tazobactam 16 242 Ceftriaxone 1 150 Cefepime 8 164 Drug Time>MIC Fluoroquinolone Meropenem P. aeruginosa Peak:MIC Selection PCN Aminoglycoside BS PCN 1-2 Cephalosporin 3-4 Cephalosporin Carbapenem 25 Enterobacteriaceae 2 1 Tobramycin 4 21 Ciprofloxacin 1 3.6

Exposure & Colonization Disruption of intestinal flora Inadequate host immune response Spore transmission McFarland, LV. J Med Microbiol 2005;54:101-111. CDI

Burdette SD, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44(8): 1142. 2016 Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Days of Antibiotic Therapy vs. Adjusted CDI Hazard Ratio <4 days Reference Stevens V et al. CID 2011;53(1):42-48. 1.4 4-7 days 95% CI 0.8, 2.4 3.0 8-18 days 95% CI 1.9, 5.0 7.8 >18 days 95% CI 4.6, 13.4 1 drug Reference 2.5 2 drugs 95% CI 1.6, 4.0 3.3 3-4 drugs 95% CI 2.2, 5.2 9.6 5 drugs 95% CI 6.1, 15.1 Number of Antibiotics vs. Adjusted CDI Hazard Ratio

Antibiotic CDI Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Fluoroquinolones 4.0 (2.7, 5.9) Aminoglycosides 0.9 (0.3, 3.0) Clindamycin 1.9 (0.8, 4.4) 3 rd /4 th Generation Cephalosporins 3.1 (1.9, 5.2) Stevens V et al. CID 2011;53(1):42-48.