Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Grant Settle Conditonal Use Permit - PH2018-8

Similar documents
Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Ekard Conditonal Use Permit CU

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

5 September 10, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Agenda Item No.: Date: January 26, 2010

Goodhue County Land Use Management

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION USE ON REVIEW REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS:

NOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER. c/o Bruce Lisser P. O. Box 1109 Mount Vernon, WA 98273

Backyard Chickens. Rules for maintaining chickens in residential zoned areas

2 August 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: BARBARA L. TYNES

SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24, 2013

CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS

Request Conditional Use Permit (Commercial Kennel) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Marchelle Coleman

5 June 13, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CARES, INC.

City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

TOWNSHIP OF WILKINS ORDINANCE NO.:

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

The requested zoning amendment is to allow for day sitting of dogs and domestic cats as a Home Occupation.

ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

Library. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California

Village of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, :05 PM

CITY OF ELEPHANT BUTTE ORDINANCE NO. 154

BARRE TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION

90.10 Establishment or maintenance of boarding or breeding kennels

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

An individual may request an emotional support animal as an accommodation in a campus residential facility if:

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0724 APPLICANTS: David John and Debra E. Sirois CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MATOACA DISTRICT

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND ORDER OF REMAND

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapters: 6.04 Dogs Dog Kennels and Multiple Dog Licenses Vicious Animals. Chapter 6.04 DOGS.

Mille Lacs County Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Public Safety Article 3 - Animals

TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION P. 0. Box 383 Forsyth, Missouri 65653

6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS

December 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page

UNLISTED ACCESSORY USE DETERMINATION: OUTDOOR OFF-LEASH DOG ENCLOSURE ACCESSORY TO EATING PLACE

K E N N E L L I C E N S E A P P L I C A T I O N

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, NORTH CAROLINA

ORDINANCE ARTICLE 2: DEFINITIONS. Amend the definition of Agriculture and add the following definitions:

Coop License Application Village of Roscoe Return Completed Form to ZoningDepartment, Village of Roscoe Main St.

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2007 DEVELOPMENT CODE

WHEREAS, the concept of local sustainability has inspired an interest in backyard and community food production to provide local food sources, and

Page 47-1 rev

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

RESIDENTIAL CHICKEN PERMIT APPLICATION LICENSE FEE $25.00

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Emotional Support Animal

Anthony Richard/Kendra Richard 6885 Mesa Ridge Pkwy. #169 Fountain, CO Phone: March 19, 2018

At a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the County of Warren held in the Warren County Government Center Board Room on May 10, 2017:

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

October 1, 2013 Work Session Discussion Item Potential Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment relating to Animals Animal ordinance research provided by staff

121 E 3200 N (Upper Loop Road) Highway Corridor (HC); Agricultural Protection (AP)

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

ASSISTANCE ANIMAL POLICY AND AGREEMENT

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSON WILLIAMSON, WEST VIRGINIA PET OWNERSHIP POLICY

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 92 OF TITLE IX OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF EAST GRAND RAPIDS

KENNEL BYLAW

City of Brampton Draft Licensing By-law

hens may be kept on residential lots in excess of

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.

Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

APPENDIX C. Burleigh County Housing Authority (BCHA) Dwelling Lease Addendum Pet Policy and Policy for Assistance Animals (Auxiliary Aides)

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Deanna Brekke and Dodd Johnson 4590 Arrowhead Drive Colorado Springs, CO LETTER OF INTENT

Reasons: Why consider allowing backyard chickens in the urban and suburban areas of Saanich?

Selected City Codes Regulating Livestock and Fowl. for the City of Ethridge Tennessee

SAMPLE OF CITY CODES REGARDING CHICKENS

ORDINANCE NO

Waitomo District Dog Control Bylaw 2015

Dog Licensing Regulation

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

CITY OF GRACE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 8, 2018

Dog Control Ordinance

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Owner The Owner is the student who has requested the accommodation and has received approval to bring an ESA into University Housing.

Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL


CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS. Part 1. Keeping of Dogs

June 21, Janes moves to approve R as presented, Hopkins seconds and the motion carries. (Placed on file)

Section 1. The Revised General Ordinances of the Township of West Orange are amended and supplemented to read as follows:

Town of Groveland Regulation of Dog Control, Licensing & Fees Local Law #

CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

Transcription:

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Grant Settle Conditonal Use Permit - PH2018-8 Hearing Date: March 15, 2018 Development Services Department Owner/Applicant: Grant Settle Staff: Dan Lister, (208) 455-5959 dlister@canyonco.org Tax ID: R28536011 Current Zone: A (Agricultural) 2020 Comprehensive Plan: Agricultural Lot Size: 5.045 acres Current Uses: Residential Applicable Canyon County Regulations: CCZO 03-05-09, 07-02-03, 07-07- 05, 07-10-27 Notification 2/23/2018 & 3/7/2018 - Property Owners 2/27/2018 - Publication 1/30/2018 - Agencies 3/5/2018 - Posting Exhibits: 1. FCOs; 2. Applicant s Letter of Intent/Land Use Worksheet; 3. Site Plan; 4. Applicant s Website Introduction Page; 5. Site Visit photos 6. Small Aerial; 7. Vicinity Map; 8. Subdivision Map & Report; 9. Zoning & Classification Map; 10. Dairy, Feedlot, Gravel Pits Map; 11. Case Map; 12. Prime Farmlands Map; 13. Nampa Highway District; 14. Idaho Dept. of Environmental Quality; 15. Idaho Transportation Department; and 16. Large Aerial Request The applicant, Grant Settle, requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow a dog kennel for up to 20 dogs on tax parcel R28536011. The property is located at 9903 Viewpoint Drive, Melba, Idaho; also known as the NW Quarter of Section 21, Township 1N, Range 2W, BM, Canyon County. Background The subject parcel was created by land division (LS2002-149) in 1998. The existing dwelling was constructed in 2005 (BP2005-1033). There is a moveon accessory structure (over 200 square feet) with no building permit. Analysis CCZO 07-02-03: Definitions Kennel: Any portion of land, or any building, structure, enclosure or premises on the same or adjacent parcels, in which canines are housed, groomed, bred, boarded, trained, or sold, in which a total of six (6) or more dogs, three (3) months of age or over are kept or maintained in conformance with Section 03-05-09 (Animal Control Regulations) of the Canyon County Code. Pursuant to 03-05-09 of the Canyon County Code, the owner must obtain a kennel license. Currently, Canyon County Animal Control does not have a kennel license program. However, requirements such as a 600 foot property owner notification, 150 foot buffer between the kennels and nearest neighboring dwelling and noise reduction conditions still must be met. The subject property is zoned A (Agricultural). Pursuant to CCZO 07-10- 27, a kennel is allowed in A Zoning Districts subject to an approved Conditional Use Permit. The parcel is located within an A (Agricultural) Zoning District (Exhibit 9). The surrounding properties are similar in size (5 acre parcels or larger) and use (residential uses with some agricultural uses). The subject parcel and surrounding properties are built on a hillside that slopes north toward Melmont Road (Exhibit 5). Other than the surrounding properties, the average parcel size in the general vicinity are 40 acres. The subject parcel is approximately 1,300 south of an active feedlot. The area does not have any subdivisions. As stated in the applicant s letter of intent (Exhibit 2), the request is to construct a dog kennel/training facility (approximately 1,800 square feet, 20 foot ceiling height) to house up to 20 retrievers. The retrievers are trained to be hunting companions (Exhibit 4). Noise from dogs will be minimized by bark collars and boarding in-doors. The applicant is consistent with 03-05-09(2)B of the Canyon County Code which states:

Location: No kennel shall be established within one hundred fifty feet (150') of any dwelling house other than that of the kennel owner; provided, however, that a kennel license may be issued to establish a kennel within on hundred fifty feet (150') of a dwelling house other than that of the kennel owner upon consent of all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the kennel. The location of the existing dwelling and proposed dog kennel facility are over 150 feet from all dwellings located on adjacent parcels. Conditional Use Permit Criteria Standard of Review for Conditional Use Permit (07-07-05) A. Is the proposed use permitted in the zone by conditional use permit? Canyon County Zoning Ordinance 07-10-27 allows kennels in A Zoning Districts subject to an approved Condition Use Permit. B. What is the nature of the request? The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a dog kennel for up to 20 dogs on tax parcel R28536011 (Exhibit 2, 3 & 4). C. Is the proposed use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? The use is consistent with the following Canyon County Comprehensive Plan policies: Property Rights Policy No. 1- No person shall be deprived of private property without due process of law. Property Rights Policy No. 11- Property owners shall not use their property in a manner that negatively impacts upon the surrounding neighbors or neighborhoods. D. Will the proposed use be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity and/or negatively change the essential character of the area? The area is zoned agricultural. The general area is surrounded by agricultural uses, setting and character, including associated noises, smells and use of agricultural equipment. The existing dwelling and proposed dog kennel structure are similar to structures found within the general vicinity. Therefore, as conditioned, the dog kennel uses will not negatively change the essential character of the area. The use has the potential to impact adjacent neighbors due to dog barking, dogs running at large and dog waste on the subject property. However, the letter of the intent provided by the applicant demonstrates that the property and dogs will be maintained and noise impacts will be reduced by use of bark collars and indoor boarding. As conditioned (see Exhibit 1 for conditions of approval), the use will not be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity. E. Will adequate water, sewer, irrigation, drainage and storm water drainage facilities, and utility systems be provided to accommodate the use; The proposed kennel does not create potential impacts to adequate water, sewer, irrigation, drainage and storm water drainage facilities. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality provide a summary of potential requirements if the use/development meet air quality, water, wastewater, drainage and contamination requirements (Exhibit 14). Upon review, the use does not create an air quality, water, wastewater, drainage or water contamination impact. The project is conditioned to maintain the property and dog facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Disposal of waste is required to be maintained in a manner that does not contribute to potential environmental and water contamination in and around the subject property. Settle Dog Kennel Page 2 of 3 PH2018-8

F. Does legal access to the subject property for the development exist or will it exist at the time of final plat; Access currently exists from Viewpoint Drive, a paved private road. The requested use does not change or impact the legal access. Nampa Highway District has no objections (Exhibit 13). Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has no objections (Exhibit 15). G. Will there be undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns? The proposed request does not increase existing or future traffic patterns (Exhibit 13 & 15). H. Will essential services be provided to accommodate the use including, but not limited to, school facilities, police and fire protection, emergency medical services, irrigation facilities, and will the services be negatively impacted by such use or require additional public funding in order to meet the needs created by the requested use? Staff found that this request does not affect essential services. Comments Public Comments No comments were received. Agency Comments: The following agencies were notified January 30, 2018. The checked boxes indicate agencies that responded by letter. All written comments are attached as exhibits. Idaho Power Southwest District Health Nampa Highway District CC Assessor s Office Sheriff Intermountain Gas Dept. of Water Resources County Weed & Gopher Ambulance Boise Project Board of Control Melba Fire District Dept. of Enviro. Quality Century Link Melba School District County Animal Control Dept. Fish & Game ITD Decision Options The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the conditional use permit, all or in part, as conditioned and/or amended; The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the conditional use request and direct staff to make findings of fact to support this decision; or The Planning and Zoning Commission may continue the discussion and request additional information on specific items. Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission open a public hearing and discuss the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Staff is recommending approval of the request and provided findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval for the Planning and Zoning Commission s consideration found in Exhibit 1. Settle Dog Kennel Page 3 of 3 PH2018-8

March 15, 2018 Canyon County Planning & Zoning Commission Settle Dog Kennel, PH2018-8 Development Services Department Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Conditions of Approval and Order PH2018-8 Grant Settle Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact 1. The applicant is requesting a dog kennel conditional use permit to board 20 dogs (Exhibit 2 & 3). 2. The property is zoned A Agricultural. The subject parcel, R28536011, is approximately 5 acres (Exhibit 9). 3. There is currently a dwelling (BP2005-1033) and illegal move-on accessory structures on the subject property. 4. The property is not located within a city impact area. 5. The property is not located in a mapped floodplain. 6. The property has adequate access from a paved private road, Viewpoint Drive. 7. The property is located within the Melba Fire Protection District. 8. The applicant was noticed in accordance with Canyon County Code 07-05-01 & 03-05-09. Property owners were noticed on February 23, 2018 and March 7, 2018. Agencies were noticed on January 30, 2018. Notice was published on February 27, 2018. Notice was posted on March 5, 2018. 9. All record herein consists of exhibits provided in the public hearing staff report, any late exhibits provided during the public hearing on March 15, 2018 and all information in case file PH2018-8. Conclusions of Law For case file PH2018-8, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds and concludes the following regarding the Standards of Review for Conditional Use Permit (07-07-05). 1. Is the proposed use permitted in the zone by conditional use permit? Conclusion: The proposed use is permitted in the zone by conditional use permit. Canyon County Zoning Ordinance 07-10-27 allows kennels in A Zoning Districts subject to an approved Condition Use Permit. 2. What is the nature of the request? The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a dog kennel for up to 20 dogs on tax parcel R28536011 (Exhibit 2, 3 & 4). 3. Is the proposed use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The use is consistent with the Canyon County Comprehensive Plan, Section 1. Property Rights Property Rights Policy No. 1- No person shall be deprived of private property without due process of law. Property Rights Policy No. 11- Property owners shall not use their property in a manner that negatively impacts upon the surrounding neighbors or neighborhoods. 4. Will the proposed use be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity and/or negatively change the essential character of the area? Conclusion: The proposed use will not be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity and will not negatively change the essential character of the area.

The area is zoned agricultural. The general area is surrounded by agricultural uses, setting and character, including associated noises, smells and use of agricultural equipment. The existing dwelling and proposed dog kennel structure are similar to structures found within the general vicinity. Therefore, as conditioned, the dog kennel uses will not negatively change the essential character of the area. The use has the potential to impact adjacent neighbors due to dog barking, dogs running at large and dog waste on the subject property. However, the letter of the intent provided by the applicant demonstrates that the property and dogs will be maintained and noise impacts will be reduced by use of bark collars and indoor boarding. As conditioned, the use will not be injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity. 5. Will adequate water, sewer, irrigation, drainage and storm water drainage facilities, and utility systems be provided to accommodate the use; Conclusion: Adequate facilities for sewer, irrigation, drainage and storm water drainage facilities, and utility systems exist on the property and will not be impacted by the use. The use will not impact existing water, sewer, irrigation, drainage and storm water drainage facilities. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality provide a summary of potential requirements if the use/development meet air quality, water, wastewater, drainage and contamination requirements (Exhibit 14). Upon review, the use does not create an air quality, water, wastewater, drainage or water contamination impact. The project is conditioned to maintain the property and dog facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Disposal of waste is required to be maintained in a manner that does not contribute to potential environmental and water contamination in and around the subject property. 6. Does legal access to the subject property for the development exist or will it exist at the time of final plat; Conclusion: Legal access exists for the subject property from Viewpoint Drive, a paved private road. The requested use does not change or impact the legal access. Nampa Highway District has no objections (Exhibit 13). Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has no objections (Exhibit 15). 7. Will there be undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns? Conclusion: There will not be undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns. This request will not change or impact the existing or future traffic patterns. 8. Will essential services be provided to accommodate the use including, but not limited to, school facilities, police and fire protection, emergency medical services, irrigation facilities, and will the services be negatively impacted by such use or require additional public funding in order to meet the needs created by the requested use? Conclusion: Essential services will be provided and this application will not negatively impact existing services or require additional public funding. Conditions of Approval The request for a kennel will not significantly affect essential services nor will it negatively impact them. 1. The development shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, rules and regulations that pertain to the subject property and the proposed use which include the following: a. Compliance with Canyon County Public Safety Ordinance Article 5 Animal Control Regulations: 1. Minimize loud, frequent or habitual barking by use of bark collars and indoor boarding. 2. The dog kennel and property shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The operator shall dispose of waste in a manner that does not contribute to potential environmental and water contamination in and around the subject property. Canine waste shall be disposed of at a regular

frequency to the Landfill in accordance with disposal requirements or another approved means of waste disposal. b. A building permit shall be obtained for the proposed dog kennel structure. The structure shall meet all required property line setbacks (30 feet from the front, 20 feet from the rear and 10 feet from the sides). c. Prior to housing 20 dogs on the property, a building permit shall be obtained for the move-on accessory structure currently on the property or evidence shall be submitted to DSD that the structure has been removed. 3. The number of canines on the premises shall not exceed 20. 4. All fencing around the kennel area(s) and property shall be constructed and maintained to ensure that dogs do not run at large or leave the subject property. 5. This permit shall be granted only to the applicant/owner. The use shall expire upon change of ownership. Order Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval contained herein the Planning and Zoning Commission approves Case #PH2018-8, a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a dog kennel for up to 20 dogs on tax parcel R28536011. The property is located at 9903 Viewpoint Drive, Melba, Idaho; also known as the NW Quarter of Section 21, Township 1N, Range 2W, BM, Canyon County. APPROVED this day of, 2018. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CANYON COUNTY, IDAHO Chairman, Richard Hall State of Idaho ) County of Canyon County ) SS On this day of, in the year of 2018, before me, a notary public, personally appeared, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he (she) executed the same. Notary: My Commission Expires: