IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NOS. 08 CRS 55147, Defendant.

Similar documents
Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division VERIFIED COMPLAINT IN REM

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP JANET STARICHA, Petitioner,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division. ) v- ) CRIMINAL NO. 3:07CR274 SUMMARY OF THH FACTS

MIKE BOYD, MR. LEONARD: May I proceed? THE COURT: You may. DIRECT EXAMINATION. Q. Mr. Boyd, please introduce yourself to the Court.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division

BBC LEARNING ENGLISH Alice in Wonderland Part 10: Alice's evidence

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Lesson 4: Mock Trial: Jackson, Wyoming vs. Stone Fox

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-11-''''''''''' STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 147th JUDICIAL. v. DISTRICT COURT OF

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, FLORIDA

County Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 1 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

TMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:

CITATION: Streicher v. The Corporation of the Township of Perth East, 2014 ONSC 1643 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: DC JR DATE: ONTARIO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

United States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07CV397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master

Phone: Fax: Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:15-CV-42-BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDINANCE NO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE NORTH LITTLE ROCK AND BEEBE, ARKANSAS

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

Who Let the Dogs Out?

Cam in the Classroom: Mrs. Hill s Wildlife Club Fort Bragg, NC

GUIDELINES FOR AFFILIATES WHEN DEALING WITH AGGRESSIVE DOGS

Captioning. About Your Hosts TransCen, Inc. 3/2/2018. Who Let the Dogs Out? Service Animals in Shelter Settings

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Steve Nicely (Defense K-9 Expert) Update. By Terry Fleck

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-588

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

Owner s Name. Address. Primary Phone Alternate Phone. . Security Word (used for pick up verification) Other person authorized to pick up dog

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

DOG BITES 101 IN ARKANSAS. Recovery can be sought from not only the animal s owner, but sometimes from other responsible individuals as well

This article shall be referred to as "Angel's Law" and may sometimes be referred to herein as "this ordinance."

ANNUAL REPORT DOG CONTROL POLICY AND PRACTICES

DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY. RECEIVED and FILED by the NEW JERSEY STATE BO4?D CF VETERINARY MED/CAL EXAMINERS on this date of: // /V- ccf

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS WITNESS STATEMENT

United States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07C V397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AFFIDAVIT OF JOSHUA R. RADANDT

DATE -OF FINAL PASSAGE.

City of San Mateo BARKING DOG COMPLAINTS

BOARD & TRAIN ENROLLMENT AGREEMENT

Qualifications of Exhibitor

Local Government Law Bulletin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

WORCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS MINUTES FOR CAFÉ MIRAGE JUNE 20, 2018

Adjudicator: David TR Parker QC Heard: March 14, 2016 Decision: March 19, 2016

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

Case 3:16-cv JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 9

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. IN RE: DR. CARLTON R. KIBBEE, DVM D/B/A ANIMAL FITNESS 258 Monument Rd, Hinsdale, NH ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

The Board of the Town of Schroon, in regular session convened, ordains as follows:

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

OPEN NINTH: CONVERSATIONS BEYOND THE COURTROOM K9TH PROGRAM...EVERYONE'S BEST FRIEND EPISODE 19 MARCH 23, 2017 HOSTED BY: FREDERICK J.

Ordinance Fact Sheet FROM: TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: January 27, 2014 CITY ATTORNEY

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA

FRISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Latest revision: 8/2017)

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

PREDICATE QUESTIONS FOR K9 OFFICERS FOR CERTIFICATION AS AN EXPERT WITNESS

(3) A physical description of each such animal, including any pet names to which it might respond;

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

ANTIOCH ANIMAL SERVICES

Foster Application. Facebook.com/furrytailendingscaninerescue us at Susan Daniele, President

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY SCHWANK, COSTA, BLAKE, BREWSTER AND VULAKOVICH, JUNE 2, 2017

WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW CAPTAIN JOHN LUONGO

SOFIA FASOLAS, Respondent, BOBCAT OF NEW YORK, INC., ET AL.,

Advocating for Children with Disabilities Using a Facility Dog

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

MEMORANDUM JOHN ROGERS, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR HEATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE ON TETHERING MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. October 29, 2013

6 Bourbon St. D Peabody, MA CONTACT INFORMATION

SEMINOLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANIMAL SERVICES LIMITED REVIEW OF ANIMAL DISPOSITION REPORT NO APRIL 2009

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existing ordinances regulating dogs is inadequate and in need of substantial revision,

INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT TOWN OF MONROE - TOWN OF WOODBURY DOG CONTROL SERVICES

Animal Control Budget Unit 2760

a script from by Rachel Benjamin Stomach Legs Nose Arms Hands

PURPOSE: Establish guidelines regarding the use of canines by the Sedgwick County Sheriff s Office.

Rottweiler Hearts Rescue


Transcription:

NORTH CAROLINA WILKES COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NOS. 08 CRS 55147, 09 CRS 375-377 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, vs. EDWARD ANTHONY FARON, Defendant. CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY This is to certify that the requested transcript in the above-entitled case, which was heard at the February 9, 2009, criminal Session of the superior Court of wilkes County, wilkesboro, North carolina, was requested of Mildred P. Jones on March 4, 2009, and the transcript was delivered and/or mailed to the attorney(s) of record as indicated below on March 27, 2009. Mi ~d P. JlafIes,CVR offlclal Court Reporter 23rd Judicial District Susan Rosenau (original, Mailed via 1304 Rhode Island Avenue, NW priority Mail on 3/27/09) washington, DC 20005 Charles Fred Bauer wilkesboro, NC (Copy, Hand-delivered 3/30/09) MildredP. Jones, CVR OfficialCourtReporter 23rd Judicial P.O. Box219. Sparta, NC 28675 336.372.3001 District

/' NORTH WILKES CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NOS. 08 CRS 55147, 09 CRS 375-377 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, vs. EDWARD ANTHONY FARON, Defendant. TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING The above-captioned case coming on for hearing at the February 9, 2009, Criminal session of the Superior Court of wilkes county, wilkesboro, North carolina, before the Honorable Edwin wilson, Jr., judge presiding, the following proceedings were had, to wit: APPEARANCES Appearing for the State: Charles Fred Bauer, Esquire Assistant District 23rd prosecutorial Attorney District wilkes County Courthouse 500 Courthouse Drive wilkesboro, North carolina 336.667.6361 28697 Appearing for the Defendant: Brendan C. Edge, Esquire P.O. Box 3064 Mooresville, North carolina 28117 704.662.0806 Reported by: Mildred P. Jones, CVR ORIGINAL

State vs. Faron - 02/16/09 Page 2 (proceedings begin at 10:37 a.m., Monday, 2" February 16, 2009.) 3 THE COURT: All right. 4 5 MR. BAUER: Ms. Arrington, if you would stand up please and state your name for Judge wilson. 6 MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: Amanda Arrington. 7" I'm the North carolina State Director for the Humane 8" society of the United States. And our concern is that the 9" only offer of help has been from Best Friends, but they are 10" not offering to take these dogs. 11 THE COURT: They are not offering to take 12 " the dogs? 13 MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: They are offering to 14" assist. That is their language that they used. That means 15" it would still be the county's responsibility. And in 16" their own words, it costs about $190,000 per dog to 17" rehabilitate them. 18 THE COURT: $190,000 to rehabilitate a dog? 19 20 21 MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: Yes, sir. THE COURT: That's what Best Friends says? MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: Yes. 22 (Brief pause.) 23 THE COURT: why is this the so-called ~" humane thing to do? 25 MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: To euthanize? - - -- - -- - --

State vs. Faron- 02/16/09 Page 3 THE COURT: YeS, ma'am. 2 MS. AMANDA ARRINGTON: For the dogs 311 themselves, I think, because of the way that they were 411 bred. I think it is an unrealistic expectation for us to 511 ask these dogs that have been bred generations for fighting 611 to become regular pets. And it's an even bigger thing to 7 II ask people to take on that responsibility and the county to 8 take on both the financial burden and the liability. 9 You know, we could be a couple years down 1011 the road and one of these dogs could do something, and I 11II think it ultimately could come back on the county of 12II wi 1kes. 13 II (Bri ef pause.) 14 THE COURT: sir, did you want to add 15 II somethi ng? 16 MR. CHRIS SCHINDLER: I'm chris schindler. 17 II I'm the Deputy Manager, Animal Fighting Law Enforcement, 1811 Humane society of the united States. Your Honor, I 1911 basically agree with all the things that everyone else has 20II said. These dogs have been bred for generations upon 21II generations for a single purpose of animal fighting; the ~ II puppies included. 23II They all have been b red to di sp 1ay those 2411 traits of gameness and these things that dog fighters look 25II for. people don't come from allover the world to obtain

State vs. Faron - 02/16/09 Page 4 dogs from Ed Faron because, you know, they are just a 2 II regular 3 II because pit bull. They come to obtain dogs from him they are known for their capabilities in fighting. 411 You can't -- you know, even the puppies, 5 II you know, as you have heard, have been displaying those 611 you know, those tendencies to start fighting with each 7 II other, and that's something you are going to see as they 811 grow older. 911 Most of these dogs, you won't know their 10II true capability until they are at least 18 months old. 11 II These guys don't even test them for fighting purposes until 12II they are 18 months old. So the likelihood of being able to 1311 hold these dogs until they are almost two years old to find 14II out how dangerous they may be is unrealistic. I mean, 15II housing them just for now has cost, you know, maybe more 1611 than $60,000, just to hold them until now, to this point. 1711 I mean, these dogs, they are not on the 18II same level. You know, people speak about the Michael vick 1911 dogs. Those dogs have not even been rehabilitated. 20 (Brief pause.) 21 (proceeding concluded at 10:52 a.m.) 22 - - - - - - - -

State vs. Faron - 2/16/09 Page 5 NORTH CAROLINA 2 COUNTY OF WILKES 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CERTIFICATE I, Mildred P. Jones, the officer before whom the foregoing proceeding was taken, do hereby certify that said hearing, pages 1 through 4, is a true, correct, and verbatim transcript of said proceeding. I further certify that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which this proceeding was heard; and, further, that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties thereto, and am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action. 15 16 17 18 19 20 /- 21 22 23 24 25 official Court Reporter 23rd Judicial District P.O. Box 219 sparta, NC 28675 336.372.3001