I alternative form of permanent identification for dogs, and clarify standards for outdoor

Similar documents
RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

ORDINANCE NO

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

San Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

Library. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )


Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

Chapter 6.08 ANIMAL CONTROL

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 91 AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE LICENSING OF DOGS & CATS WITHIN THE CITY OF BROWNTON

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

8 SEC. 37. KEEPING AND FEEDING OF SMAll ANIMALS, POULTRY AND GAM

Dog Licensing Regulation

TOWN OF LUDLOW, VERMONT DOG ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CHAPTER 2.26 ANIMAL CONTROL

93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS

Title 8 ANIMALS. Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals. 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs. 8-3 Keeping of Livestock

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existing ordinances regulating dogs is inadequate and in need of substantial revision,

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

DANGEROUS DOGS AND WILD ANIMALS

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS Dog Control Bylaw

California Code of Regulations Health and Safety Code. Division 105. Communicable Disease Control. Chapter 1 Rabies Control

TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322

ORDINANCE NO. 15,735

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

ORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

ORDINANCE NO. 14,155

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 7-1 PUBLIC HEARING. Date: June 17, Subject: Subject Property: Citywide. 1. Declare the Hearing Open: Mayor Duhovic

Island requires the regulation thereof in the public interest, convenience and necessity.

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG

CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY

Section 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

Draft for Public Hearing. Town of East Haddam. Chapter (Number to be Assigned) CONTROL OF ANIMALS ORDINANCE

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BURKE ADOPTED: OCTOBER 1, 2001 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 1, 2001 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

Westwego, Code of Ordinances Page 1

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 6, 2007

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

Title 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and

Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS

41.4,41<5,41.15,41.19,41.20 and to: (1) expand the authority of the Department

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

2.1 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE CITY OF HERNANDO, MISSISSIPPI

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

DOG CONTROL AND LICENSE LAW OF THE TOWN OF CAMPBELL Local Law No. 2 of the Year 2010

St. Paul City Ordinance

DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance

c) Owners walking their dog( s) in public areas are required to pick up and properly dispose of stool waste deposited from their dog( s).

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN, KANSAS:

205 ANIMAL REGULATIONS

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 92 OF TITLE IX OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF EAST GRAND RAPIDS

BY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

CHAPTER 4 ANIMALS. Sub-Chapter A. Dogs

Animal Control Law Village of Bergen Local Law Number 2 of 2018

ORDINANCE NO

D. "Poundmaster" means any person or entity appointed by the Council to discharge the duties provided for under this Section.

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

Transcription:

051606 FLE NO.,_--=.;=.==--- ORDNANCE NO._=_--'- _ 1 [Penalties related to vicious and dangerous dogs.] 2 3 Ordinance amending Article 1, Section 42.2 of the San Francisco Health Code to 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 transfer authority for registration of vicious and dangerous dogs from the Department i of Public Health to the Department of Animal Care & Control, increase the vicious and dangerous dog registration fee from $50 to $250, allow for microchipping as an alternative form of permanent identification for dogs, and clarify standards for outdoor enclosures; amending Section 42.3 to adjust hearing deadlines for vicious and dangerous dog hearings; and amending Section 42.4 making a second or subsequent violation within any 12-month period from the initial incident punishable as a misdemeanor, and to allocate dog registration fees and fines collected for violations of 12 13 Sections 42 through 42.3 to the Department of Animal Care & Control for enforcement of the vicious and dangerous dog program; and making environmental findings. 14 15 16 Note: Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman; deletions are strikethrough italics Times New RemaH. Board amendment additions are double underlined. Board amendment deletions are strikethrough normal. 17 Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: 18 Section 1. Article 1, Section 42.2 of the San Francisco Health Code is hereby 19 amended to read as follows: 20 SEC. 42.2. REGSTRATON. 21 Any dog found to be vicious and dangerous either as a result of (1) the actions of the 22 dog constituting vicious and dangerous behavior occurring in the presence of an animal, 23 control officer, or representative of the Department of Public Health or Police Department; and 24 upon finding after hearing under Section 42.3; (2) a signed complaint or a verbal complaint 25 with corroborating evidence by an animal control officer or representative of the Department of i Supervisor Bevan Dufty, BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 1 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog legislation\penalty.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Public Health or Police Department; and (3) upon a finding after hearing under Section 42.3,, shall be registered with the Department of Public Health, Bureau ofcemmunicable Disease Central, Animal Bite [m'cstig,' l!ion UnitAnimal Care and Control. All such dogs should be registered within 10 days of the effective date of the finding. The Department of Public Heallh Animal Care and Control shall establish a registration fee not-to exceed Q[$JtJ25O. conditions: Furthermore the keeping of a registered dog shall be subject to the following (a) Permanently AfrLXeddentification Number md Tattoo. The owner, guardian or keeper shall have the licensing number assigned to such dog, or such other identification number as the City shall determine, tallooed permanently affixed to the dog by a licensed veterinarian or other Department authorized agencylindividualdepartment a/public Health representative on the dog's upper inner lip, inner thigh or elsewhere as directed by the 14 Department of Public HealthAnimal Care and Control. For the purposes of this section 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "i toepermanently affixed' shall be defined as any permanent numbering of a dog by means of indelible or permanent ink or by microchip with the number designated by the Department of Public HealthAnimal Care and Control, or any other permanent method of flttooingaffixing the identification number acceptable to the Department of Public HealthAnimal Care and Control. (b) Display of Sign. The owner, guardian or keeper shall display a sign on his or her premises warning that there is a vicious and dangerous dog on the premises. Said sign shall be visible and capable of being read from the fronting street or public highway. i (c) Confinement ndoors. No registered dog may be kept on a porch, patio or in any part of a house or structure that would allow the dog to exit such building on its own volition except to a secured enclosure. n addition, no such dog may be kept in a house or structure Supervisor Bevan Dutty BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 2 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog leqis!ation\penatty.doc

1 when the windows are open or when screen windows or screen doors are the only obstacles 2 preventing the dog from exiting the structure. 3 (d) Confinement Outdoors. When outside, all registered dogs shall be confined in a 4 secure enclosure, except when necessary to obtain veterinary care or to comply with 5 commands or directions of a City official. All such enclosures must be adequately lighted and 6 ventilated and kept in a-clean-and sanitary. and humane conditions, 7 Whenever necessity requires a registered dog to be outside of the enclosure, the dog 8 shall be securely muzzled and restrained with a chain having a minimum tensile strength of 9 300 pounds and not exceeding three feet in length, with handgrip, and shall be under the 10 direct control and supervision of the owner, guardian or keeper of the dog. 11 (e) Reserved. 12 (f) dentification Photographs. All owners, keepers or harborers of a registered dog 13 must, within 10 days of the effective date of this ordinance, provide to the Director of the 14 Department o(animal Care and Control, Cemmunicabk Discasc Central, or his-ef-~er designee 15 two color photographs of the registered animal clearly showing the color and approximate size 16 of the animal. 17 (g) Reporting Requirements. All owners, keepers or harborers of a registered dog 18 must, within 10 days of the incident, report the following information in writing to the Director 19 of the Department o(animal Care and Control, Cemmunicable Disease Centrel. or his-ef-~er 20 designee: 21 (1) The removal from the City or death of a registered dog; 22 (2) The new address of a registered dog owner or guardian should the owner or 23 guardian move within City limits. 24 (h) Sale or Transfer of Ownership Prohibited. No person shall sell, barter or in any 25 other way dispose of a dog registered with the City to any person within the City; provided that Supervisor Bevan Dully BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 3 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog leqislatiorupenalty.doc

1 the owner or guardian of a registered dog may sell or otherwise dispose of a registered dog or 2 the offspring of such dog to persons who neither reside within the City nor intend to train, 3 keep, harbor, own, or in any way possess such animal in the City providing written approval of 4 such sale or transfer by an authorized officer or employee of the city or county where the dog 5 is intended to be kept. 6 (i) Violation of Registration Requirements. t shall be unlawful for the owner, 7 guardian, keeper or harborer of a dog registered with the City to fail to comply with the 8 requirements and conditions set forth in this ordinance regarding registration. Any dog found 9 to be the subject of a violation of these registration requirements shall be subject to seizure 10 and impoundment. n addition, failure to comply will be cause for the revocation of the license 11 of such animal resulting in the immediate removal of the animal from the City. 12 Section 2. Article 1, Section 42.3 of the San Francisco Health Code is hereby 13 amended to read as follows: 14 SEC. 42.3. SEZURE OF DOG: HEARNGS. 15 (a) Subjectto Seizure. Upon the receipt of a signed complaint, or upon the personal 16 observation of an Animal Control Officer, or a representative of the Department of Public 17 Health or Police Department, that a dog is vicious and dangerous, and said dog is on its 18 owner, guardian, keeper or harborer's property, the Animal Control Officer, or the Department 19 of Public Health or Police Department representative, may find the dog presents a danger and 20 is subject to seizure and impoundment. Upon a finding that the dog is subject to seizure, 21 written notice of such finding shall be made to the owner, guardian, keeper or any adult in 22 apparent control or possession of the dog. Prior to the seizure of the dog, the owner, 23 guardian, or keeper of the dog shall be entitled to a hearing as described in paragraph (c) of 24 this section. 25 (b) mmediate Seizure. Supervisor Bevan Dutty BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 4 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog legislation\penalty.doc

1 (i) Should any Animal Control Officer, representative of the Department of Public 2 Health or the Police Department determine that probable cause exists to believe that a dog is 3 vicious and dangerous and cannot be properly controlled, such dog is subject to immediate 4 seizure. The owner, guardian, or keeper of the dog shall be entitled to a hearing upon seizure 5 as described in paragraph (c) of this section, and upon the hearing the owner or guardian of 6 any dog found to be vicious or dangerous shall be assessed the costs of sheltering the dog 7 and of administering the ordinance. 8 (ii) Upon the receipt of a signed complaint, or upon the personal observation of an 9 Animal Control Officer, or a representative of the Department of Public Health or Police 10 Department, that a dog has killed or wounded, or assisted in killing or wounding any domestic 11 animal, or has attacked, assaulted, bit or otherwise injured any person or assisted in 12 attacking, assaulting, biting or otherwise injuring any person, such dog shall be subject to 13 immediate seizure and impoundment. The owner, guardian, or keeper of the dog shall be 14 entitled to a hearing upon seizure as described in paragraph (c) of this section. 15 (c)(i) Prior to the seizure of any dog authorized by paragraph (a) and within three days 16 of the seizure of any dog pursuant to paragraph (b) a hearing officer shall inform, in writing, 17 the owner, guardian, or keeper of the dog that the person's dog is alleged to be vicious and 18 dangerous and be subject to penalties under this ordinance. Unless the hearing is waived by 19 the owner, guardian, or keeper of the dog, or the hearing is scheduled on an agreed-upon 20 date net later than 3Ddaysji-em the date Grthe ineiden«, the hearing officer shall fix a time not less 21 than.j{}f5 nor more than 6()90 days from the date efi.hat the ineident enforcement agency locates 22 the dog and/or the owner, guardian or keeper, and fix a place for said hearing and cause all 23 parties to be notified, not less than BfO days before the daydate of such hearing. The hearing 24 may be informal and the rules of evidence not strictly observed. t shall not be necessary, for 25 the City, to prove that the owner, guardian, or keeper of the dog knew that the dog was Supervisor Bevan Dutty BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 5 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog legislation\penaty.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 vicious and dangerous. Within 15 days following the hearing, the hearing officer shall issue his or her decision to all parties. (ii) Should the hearing officer find the dog to be vicious and dangerous, the hearing officer shall order the dog be registered pursuant to Section 42.2, and that the dog be spayed or neutered. The hearing officer may, in addition, order other remedies as may be appropriate for the safety of the public, including, but not limited to, an order that the dog and the owner, guardian, keeper and any person in control of the dog attend and complete a basic obedience, course under an approved and recognized obedience trainer or dog-training organization. f [ the hearing officer finds that the owner, guardian, keeper, or other person in control of the dog has not or cannot adequately control his or her dogs, the hearing officer may also prohibit that person or persons from owning or possessing dogs for a period of three years from the date of the order. (iii) n the event the hearing officer concludes that the dog is vicious and dangerous 14 and that the health, safety and welfare of the community is not adequately addressed by the 15 16 17 18 requirements provided in Section 42.3(c)(ii), the hearing officer may order the dog destroyed. i (iv) The decision of the hearing officer is final. Section 3. Article 1, Section 42.4 of the San Francisco Health Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 19 ' Section 42.4. PENALTY; MSDEMEANOR OR NFRACTON. 20 21 22 Any person who violates any provision of Sections 42 through 42.6-1 shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor or infraction. \ (a) f charged as an infraction, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be a 23 fine not exceeding $500. A second or subsequent violation within any 12-month period from the 24 r initial incident will be punishable as a misdemeanor. 25 Supervisor Bevan Dutty BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 6 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog legisration\pena tty.doc

1 (b) f charged as a misdemeanor, the penalty upon conviction of such person, shall be 2 imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not to exceed one year or by a fine not exceeding 3 $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Upon conviction of a misdemeanor the court 4 may prohibit the person from owning, keeping or otherwise being in control of a dog within the 5 City and County for a period of one year. Violation of that prohibition shall constitute a 6 misdemeanor. 7 (c) The complaint charging such violation shall specify whether the violation charged is 8 a misdemeanor or an infraction. 9 (dl Allocation or[ees and fines collected. All fees and the City's share orall fines collected 10 under this section shall be used only bv the Animal Care and Control Department to fund the 11 enforcement o(the vicious and dangerous dog program as set forth in this Section. 12 Section 4. The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in 13 this Ordinance are in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California 14 Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of 15 the Board of Supervisors in File No. 0;::; 11.06 and is incorporated herein by reference. v 16 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 17 DENNS J. HERRERA, City Attorney 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: il Supervisor Bevan Dulty 'i BOARD OF SUPERVSORS Page 7 n:\pubpro\rkatz\dog legislabon\penalty.doc

City and County of San Francisco Tails Ordinance City Hall Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 File Number: OS606 Date Passed: Ordinance amending Article 1, Section 42.2 of the San Francisco Health Code to transfer authority for reqrstration of vicious and dangerous dogs from the Department of Public Health to the Department of Animal Care & Control, increase the vicious and dangerous dog registration fee from $50 to $250, allow for microchipping as an alternative form of permanent identification for dogs, and clarify standards for outdoor enclosures; amending Section 42.3 to adjust hearing deadlines for vicious and dangerous dog hearings; and amending Section 42.4 making a second or subsequent violation within any 12 month period from the initial incident punishable as a misdemeanor, and to allocate dog registration fees and fines collected for violations of Sections 42 through 42.3 to the Department of Animal Care & Control for enforcement of the vicious and dangerous dog program; and making environmental findings. November S, 200S Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FRST READNG Ayes: 10 - Alioto-Pier, Ammiano, Daly, Dufty, Ma, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Mirkarirni, Peskin, Sandoval Excused: - Elsbemd November 22, 200S Board of Supervisors - FNALLY PASSED Ayes: - Alioto-Pier, Ammiano, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Ma, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Mirkarimi, Peskin, Sandoval City and County ofsan Francisco Printed at 2:17 PM on 11/22/05

File No. 051606 hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was FNALLY PASSED on November 22, 2005 by the Board of Snpervisors of the City and County of San Francisco. Date Approved. Clerk oftfie BOr.. i!. t / -'-/t---~ ayor Gavin Newsom File No. 051606 City and County of San Francisco Tails Report 2 Printed at 2:17 PM on H/22/0S