PALEOZOIC LEPOSPONDYL AMPHIBIANS
|
|
- Bernice York
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AMER. ZOOLOGIST, 5: (1965). PALEOZOIC LEPOSPONDYL AMPHIBIANS DONALD BAIRD Dept. of Geology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey SYNOPSIS. The lepospondyls are urodele-like amphibians of the Paleozoic Era, some o which have been considered ancestral or closely related to reptiles or modern amphibians. Their origin is enigmatic, and the earliest occurrences reveal a long-established division into three contrasting orders: the serpentine aistopods, the newt-like nectrideans and the deceptively reptilian microsaurs. The Subclasses Lepospondyli and Labyrinthodontia are not so disparate as to indicate a polyphyletic origin for the Amphibia. Which subclass gave rise to the present-day Lissamphibia is still disputed, but superficial similarities between lepospondyls and lissamphibians cannot mask the fundamental discrepancies in temporal range and morphology and (apparently) in life history as well. INTRODUCTION During most of the latter third of Paleozoic time, a span of some 90 million years, the swamps, streams, and ponds of the Northern Hemisphere were inhabited by a diverse assortment of amphibians which resembled the modern urodeles in their size range and adaptations. These amphibians are distinguished from their contemporaries, the labyrinthodonts, by vertebral centra which evidently ossified as cylinders around the notochord. By virtue of these "husk vertebrae" they are named Lepospondyli (or colloquially, lepospondyls), and set apart as a subclass of the Amphibia. Within the subclass three distinctive groups are recognized as orders. But classifying these ancient amphibians only emphasizes the fundamental enigma of their relationships. I may as well admit here that the origins and antecedents of the lepospondyls can only be guessed at, the affiliations within the group are obscure, and the connections (if any) between lepospondyls and present-day amphibians are disputed. This paper offers a skimming glimpse of the group in order to discuss (rather than answer) the question of its affinities. In a very real sense this survey is premature, for few of the known genera are adequately known, and several of the most crucial specimens have been lying in museum drawers, unprepared and unstudied or half-studied, for 80 to 100 years. Few paleontologists have showed much interest in lepospondyls as such. To put it bluntly, the saving grace of the lepospondyls has been that some of them look enough like reptiles to have attracted the attention of scientists interested in reptile origins: if they had not been described under a misapprehension, many of these curious amphibians might never have been described at all. For an excellent review of the Lepospondyli we are indebted to Dechaseaux (1955), who has judiciously sifted and weighed the published accounts, though of course much unpublished information was unavailable to her. Three component orders of the subclass can be distinguished with confidence: the limbless ATstopoda, the newt-like Nec- 287 tridea, and the sometimes reptile-like Microsauria. All three orders share a basic characteristic in the form of their vertebrae, which are composed of a single or twinned neural arch and a one-piece, hourglass-shaped centrum which is very probably homologous with that of the living lissamphibians (urodeles, frogs, and apodans), as Williams (1959) has argued. The centrum is thus a pleurocentrum, and the trunk vertebrae lack ossified intercentra, although chevron bones which have been observed in the tails of a few microsaurian genera may well be intercentral in homology. This characteristic lepospondylous vertebra (Fig. 1) occurs in fully developed form in the earliest known representatives of the group, and nothing is known of intermediate stages which might link it with the types of verte-
2 DONALD BAIRD FIG. 1. Trunk vertebrae of representative lcpospondyls. A, the aistopod Phlegethontia (from Gregory, retouched); B, the nectridean Diploceraspis (from Beerbower); C, the microsaur Cardiocephahis (from Gregory, Peabody and Price). brae found in labyrinthodonts or crossopterygian fishes. It simply appears de novo in the fossil record. "UNSEEN FEET": THE AISTOPODS Among lepospondyls, the most ancient pedigree is that of the aistopods which first appear in rocks of early Mississippian age, about 330 million years old. Indeed, aside from the late Devonian ichthyostegids the oldest known aistopod is the oldest known amphibian of any sort. Yet even at that remote date these serpentine amphibians were already highly specialized about as specialized, in fact, as any amphibians living or extinct. Only three genera have been discovered, the last of which became extinct in early Permian time some '260 million years ;igo. Having recently (1964) reviewed the group, I will merely outline its peculiarities here, using the best-known genus Phlegethontia (Figs. 1A, 2) as an example. The skull with its bulbous braincase and temporal fenestrae is amazingly sophisticated for so ancient a tetrapod; no comparable degree of elaboration was attained by labyrinthodonts or reptiles during the Carboniferous. Similar specializations can be seen in the skulls of apodans, lysorophid microsaurs, and amphisbaenid lizards; but Gregory (1948) has made it clear that these similarities are the result of convergent evolution. As comparisons between such highly evolved skulls are more hindrance than help in determining relationships, we must seek more reliable guides in the relatively conservative structures of the postcranial skeleton. The backbone is differentiated into neck, trunk, and tail, and comprises about 230 vertebrae in adults, the number apparently increasing with age. Neural spines are blade-like and the transverse processes are outgrowths of the centrum. The vertebrae FIG. 2. The aistopod Phlrgrthontia (skull from Gregory, skeleton from Dechaseaux). Abbreviations following Fig. 5.
3 PALEOZOIC LEPOSPONDYL AMPHIBIANS 289 are pierced by the spinal nerves, a condition found also in urodeles, but not in nectrideans or microsaurs. Ai'stopod ribs lie with their straight shafts nearly parallel to the body axis, their strange K-shaped proximal ends articulating by the capitulum alone. As in other lepospondyls, the belly is armored with a herringbone pattern of slender bony scales; the dorsal scales (when present) are distinctively pebble- or oatshaped. But the chief peculiarity of the ai'stopods is their total lack of limbs and girdles. Not even a rudiment can be found in any of the well-preserved skeletons from coalswamps of Pennsylvanian age, and the unique early Mississippian skeleton seems to be equally limbless. It might be tempting to speculate that limbs were never present in this lineage, and that ai'stopods originated directly from a crossopterygian fish through the suppression of the fins. Common sense, however, suggests that the obvious dividing-points between neck, trunk, and tail were once marked by girdles. This consideration and the basic similarities between aistopods and the four-legged nectrideans and microsaurs convince me that the forerunner of the aistopods had limbs. If these serpent-amphibians had already lost their appendicular skeletons by early Mississippian time, we must search for their four-legged ancestors among the mists of the Devonian, a period from which very few amphibians (and no lepospondyls) are known at present. Until such an ancestor is unearthed, the origins of the group must remain a mystery. NECTRIDEANS: NEWTS AND ARROWHEADS Probably the lepospondyls most familiar to non-specialists are the horned genera Diplocaidus and Diploceraspis from the early Permian. With their massive sculptured skulls shaped like broad arrows, these bizarre forms readily catch the eye of the museum visitor and student. As extreme evolutionary end-products, however, they offer little help toward an understanding of the Order Xectridea and its affinities. More representative of the order are the FIG. 3. Skulls of the nectrideans Keraterpeton (left) and Sauropleura (from Steen). Pennsylvanian genera such as the jjrimitive horn-bearer Keraterpeton (Figs. 3, 4B), and the urocordylids Ptyonius and Urocordylns. Little about the latter genera will be found in the literature, for Urocordyhis (sensu stricto) is represented by a single skeleton which has never been prepared, while Ptyonius was mistakenly sunk into synonymy in 1930, and has not yet struggled back to the surface. So until paleontologists can catch up with their descriptive chores, the common but somewhat specialized genus Sauropleura (Figs. 3, 4A) must serve as an example. Keraterpeton and Sauropleura, the most newt-like and elegant of the lepospondyls, seem to deserve an ordinal name meaning "girl swimmers." Both clearly show the basic nectridean trademark: a high-sided swimming tail with fan-shaped neural and haemal spines. Unlike those of most ancient tetrapods, the haemal arches are not intercentral in origin, but form an integral part of the pleurocentrum. Accessory articulations between vertebrae are another nectridean characteristic. The relatively short trunk consists of a fixed number of vertebrae bearing two-headed ribs. Limbs and girdles are diminutive but fully formed, with four toes in the forefoot and five in the hindfoot; the sculptured trio of thoracic plates clavicles and interclavicle look very much like those of labyrinthodonts. Belly scales range from needle-like to rhomboidal in different genera, and dorsal scales are unknown. Family variants in the nectridean skull pattern can be seen in Figure 3. Both
4 290 DONALD BAIRD FIG. 4. Reconstructions of lepospondyl skeletons. A, the urocordylid nectridean Sauropleura; B, the horned nectridean Keraterpeton; C, the microsaur Microbrachis (from Steen). families are typically short-snouted and have the usual amphibian pattern of bones in the skull roof. Urocordylids retain a small intertemporal bone, while keraterpetontids have traded it for a horn-shaped enlargement of the tabular which, in primitive genera, apparently connected the skull to the T-shaped upper bone of the shoulder girdle. In the earliest keraterpetontids the palate is closed, with only slit-like openings between the pterygoids and the parasphenoid, but these palatal vacuities widen in the course of time and become broad windows in the terminal genera Diplocaulus and Diploceraspis. Nectrideans make their first appearance, already full-blown and diversified, in lower Pennsylvanian deposits about 300 million years old; like the other lepospondyl orders, they disappear from the scene in early Permian time. Some similarities in vertebral structure which appear to ally nectrideans more closely to ai'stopods than to microsaurs have been pointed out by Gregory, Peabody, and Price (1956), but these resemblances are counterbalanced by the fact that the spinal nerves perforate the vertebrae in aistopods but pass between the vertebrae in nectrideans. Thus the relationship between these orders must be remote at best. To the extent that they are the least specialized and the most labuinthodont-like of the lepospondyls, the Carboniferous nectrideans may be thought to represent the basic stem of the subclass. In all but the most basic features, however, they are so far removed from the other orders that any attempt to reconstruct a composite common ancestor, an eo-lepospondyl, would be largely an exercise in science fiction. MICROSAURS: LITTLE BOCUS REPTILES As the Microsauria form the subject of Dr. Gregory's contribution to this symposium, a brief review for the sake of comparison is sufficient here. Microsaurs, which range from late Mississippian to early Permian time, form a natural but diversified group which has yet to be fully sorted into families (Romer, 1950). They are longtrunked and (for the most part) feeblelimbed, with either three or four toes in the forefoot (Fig. 4C). Their vertebrae, a trademark of the order, are three-piece affairs with one suture dividing the neural arch and another separating arch from centrum. Since ossification may obliterate either suture or both, however, too much importance should not be attached to their condition. Separate caudal chevrons which are presumably intercentral in origin have been reported in Microbrachis and Pantylus. The characteristic dorsal scales are o\al with radial striations superimposed on
5 PALEOZOIC LEPOSPONDVL AMPHIBIANS 291 pasph _JM ^_ FIG. 5. Microsaur skulls. A, Dolichopareias; B, Euryoclus; C, Ostodolepis; D, Microbrachis; E, Hyloplesion (with palate); V, Tuditanus; G. Lysoroplws. Right postparietal stippled, supratemporal hatched. (A-D from Romer; E modified from Dechaseaux; F original, from the newly prepared type specimen; G original, based on Sollas.) a angular d dentary eo exoccipital ep epipterygoid t frontal 1, la lacrimal in, mx maxilla n nasal ABBREVIATIONS FOR FIG. 2, 5, AND 6. p parietal pal palatine pasph parasphenoid pc posttrontal pro, pmx premaxilla po- postorbital pp postparietal prf prefrontal pt pterygoid a concentric growth pattern; the belly scales are rod-like or rhomboidal. Microsaur skulls (Fig. 5) are characterized by the absence of an otic notch and by the large size of the supratemporal bone. The palate is closed in gymnarthrids such as Euryoclus but conspicuous palatal vacuities occur in members of other groups, for example Microbrachis, Hyloplesion and Tuditanus. The genus Tuditanus from the middle of Pennsylvanian of Ohio requires special and apologetic mention because it has erroneously been called a reptile by Baird (1958) and "the oldest known reptile, Eosauravus" by Peabody (1959). Since those papers were q quadrate qj quadra tojugal sa surangular so supraoccipital sp splenial sq squamosal st supratemporal v vomer published, however, preparation of the type specimens has put matters in a different light: Eosauravus is a synonym of Tuditanus, trunk intercentra are not present, the scales are typically microsaurian, the forefoot has only four toes, and the supposedly reptilian tarsus is not irreconcilably different from that of the microsaur Hyloplesion. The deceptive nature of these little tetrapods is doubly illustrated in Fig. 6. Tuditanus, once thought to be a reptile, is now known to be a microsaur; while Cephalerpeton, once thought to be a microsaur, is now known to be a stem-reptile of the family Romeriidae, a structural ancestor
6 292 DONALD BAIRD FIG. 6. Deceptive similarity in skulls of the microsaur Tuditanus (above) and the true reptile Cephalerpeton (original reconstructions from the type specimens). Abbreviations following Fig. 5. for most of the Eureptilia and their offspring the birds and mammals. Besides looking superficially alike, Tuditanus and Cephalerpeton inhabited the same coalswamp and shared the trait of elusiveness, for only two skeletons of each have ever been found. Two problematical groups are mentioned last because not everyone is willing to include them with the microsaurs. Noteworthy for their antiquity are the adelospondyls (Fig. 5A) from the late Mississippian of Scotland, very rare and insufficiently studied. Their skulls are essentially microsaurian, although exceptionally long behind the orbits; the elongate body has microsaur-like vertebrae and a shoulder girdle of sculptured dermal bones; minute but well-developed limbs are present, and three toes can be seen in the forefoot; the belly scales are slender and rhomboidal. Watson (1929), the only previous commentator on adelospondyl taxonomy who has actually examined an adelospondyl, points out the strong similarities between these Mississippian forms and the Pennsylvanian and Permian lysorophids (discussed below). Further research, I predict, will only strengthen the existing evidence that the adelospondyls are an early-divergent family of microsaurs. The lysorophids, or molgophids, range from middle Pennsylvanian to early Permian, 1 and are best known from a Permian species assigned to Lysorophus (Fig. 5G). Like the microsaurs, they have extremely long bodies with relatively tiny limbs, a stemmed interclavicle, and either three or four toes in the forefoot. The skulls are highly specialized with a bulbous braincase (in most genera), a closed palate, and freefloating maxillae and premaxillae. Despite their atypical features, the skulls share the microsaur characteristics of a long postorbital region and a large supratemporal bone; the supraoccipital bone is usually wedged in between the postparietals as in Ostodolepis (Fig. 5C). Molgophid vertebrae are clearly microsaurian in pattern, with or without a divided neural arch, with or without a persistent neurocentral suture. Obscure structures which appear to be paired haemal arches are present in the tail of Molgophis. The scales are feebly ossified, but seem to be of microsaurian type. These peculiar amphibians form a closely knit family which, like so many others mentioned in this paper, is much in need of study. Lysorophids have been assigned hither and yon by various classifiers, but are best interpreted, I believe, as specialized microsaurs. LEPOSPONDYL AFFINITIES The three orders just described are sufficiently clear-cut that their status as natural groups seems beyond question. Despite their peculiarities, these orders share enough basic features to justify brigading them as a subclass of the Amphibia. Their relationships to other amphibian groups, however, are by no means clear. l A supposed lysorophid from the late Triassic has been described by Huene and Bock (1954) under the name Lysoroceplialus. Their specimen is not a lysorophid and probably not an amphibian at all, but appears instead to be the incomplete and ihimaged skull roof of a palaeoniscoid fish.
7 PALEOZOIC LEPOSPONDYL AMPHIBIANS 293 Except in the most specialized forms, the skulls, girdles, and limbs of lepospondyls are essentially similar to those of labyrinthodont amphibians and primitive reptiles. Though the lepospondyl skull and the labyrinthodont skull might conceivably have originated independently of each other at the crossopterygian fish level, a duplicate origin of the tetrapod appendicular skeleton is simply incredible. Thus common sense assures us that the Amphibia must be a monophyletic class, Jarvik (1960) to the contrary notwithstanding. The available evidence which is only sketchily summarized in this paper indicates that the Lepospondyli, Labyrinthodontia, and Eureptilia had a tetrapod ancestor in common, and that this ancestor must have lived well back in Devonian time, some 380 million years ago. Until more ancient tetrapod fossils have been discovered, and until those already discovered have been fully described, there will be little point in further speculation on amphibian origins. Devonian ancestors are to be found not in hypothetical reconstructions but somewhere under a rock. Evidence for and against the lepospondyls as ancestors of the present-day amphibians is presented in the accompanying paper by Dr. Estes, who views the ancient amphibians in the light of the modern groups. Looking backward in time, he concludes that the living Lissamphibia are more plausibly derived from the Labyrinthodontia than from the Lepospondyli. As a student of Paleozoic amphibians I look forward in time to seek their descendants among the Cenozoic forms and come to the same conclusion. The following evidence impresses me most: Lepospondyls disappear from the fossil record in the early Permian, but lissamphibians do not appear until the early Triassic; and no connecting forms are known. The vestigial dorsal scales of apodans resemble those of microsaurs, but are equally similar to the dorsal scales of labyrinthodonts, as Noble (1931) has pointed out. Lissamphibians (aside from sirenids) have pedicillate teeth with a distinct separation between pedicel and crown; lepospondyls do not. Urodeles have spinal nerves which pierce the vertebrae; lepospondyls (aside from aistopods) do not and the totally limbless aistopods can hardly be made into urodele ancestors on the basis of their intravertebral spinal nerves. The open palate of modern amphibians may be derived as easily from that of labyrinthodonts as from that of some microsaurs or nectrideans. Similarities between highly specialized skulls of lepospondyls and lissamphibians should be discounted, for structures which are so obviously subject to convergent evolution make most unreliable guides to kinship. In summary, then, the lissamphibians are remote from the lepospondyls both in time and in structure. Still another line of evidence, however, remains to be considered. THE PROBLEM OF METAMORPHOSIS Juvenile labyrinthodont amphibians, the "branchiosaurs" or "phyllospondyls" of classic authors, are well known for their highly cartilaginous skeletons and filamentous external gills. The smallest individuals differ so much from adult labyrinthodonts, and show so few diagnostic characters, that despairing taxonomists have lumped most of them into the catch-all genus Branchiosaurus (where few of them properly belong, certainly none of the Permian forms). Although limbless tadpoles of labyrinthodonts have not been found, the gill-bearing and semi-ossified "branchiosaurs" are generally accepted as being unmetamorphosed larvae. Both of the main labyrinthodont subdivisions, the rhachitome-stereospondyl group and the anthracosaur group, had larvae of this sort. Furthermore, large, gilled labyrinthodonts which are obviously neotenous are also known. Thus there can be no doubt that metamorphosis (or its alternative, neoteny) was characteristic of the labyrinthodont life cycle. Quite a different situation is found in the Paleozoic lepospondyls. Here, examples from each of the orders show that juvenile individuals are essentially miniature adults, readily assignable to adult-based species
8 294 DONALD BAIRD wherever the specimens are well-enough preserved to be identified at all, and differing from adults only in proportions which are subject to allometric growth. No juvenile lepospondyl shows traces of external gills. Although the matter needs further investigation before positive statements can be made, at present I know of no evidence for metamorphosis in Paleozoic lepospondyls. If the lepospondylous amphibians were characterized by direct development, as seems to be the case, it is difficult to conceive of them as the ancestors of metamorphosing amphibians such as frogs and salamanders. For this additional reason I concur with Estes and other authors in believing that lissamphibian origins are to be sought among the Labyrinthodontia rather than among the Lepospondyli. Parenthetically, let us hope that this observation on the apparent absence of metamorphosis in lepospondyls will not provoke still another attempt to link the microsaurs with the reptiles! Now that the Lissamphibia are accepted as constituting a natural group, the taxonomic status of that group needs to be put into perspective. Under Romer's 1945 classification, the Class Amphibia had been bisected into the Subclass Lepospondyli (the lepospondyls as defined here plus the urodeles and apodans) and the Subclass Apsidospondyli (the labyrinthodonts plus the frogs). When the lissamphibian orders have been subtracted from this system and combined, three alternative placements are possible: to include them as a superorder in the Lepospondyli (where I feel confident they do not belong), to place them in the Apsidospondyli as a superorder equivalent in rank to the Labyrinthodontia (which is more plausible), or to recognize their distinctness in morphology and temporal range by treating them as a third major component of the Amphibia, the Subclass Lissamphibia. The last alternative seems best to me. In that case the categories Apsidospondyli and Labyrinthodontia become conterminous, and most students will doubtless prefer to designate this taxon by the more familiar name. We may thus consider the Class Amphibia as comprising the Subclasses Labyrinthodontia, Lepospondyli, and Lissamphibia. REFERENCES Baird, D The oldest known reptile fauna. Anat. Rec. 132: The a'istopod amphibians surveyed. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, Breviora 206:1-17. Dechaseaux, C Lepospondyli, p In J. Piveteau, ed., Traite de paleontologie, Vol. 5. Masson et Cie., Paris. Gregory, J. T A new limbless vertebrate rom the l'ennsylvanian of Mazon Creek, Illinois. Am. Jour. Sci. 246: Gregory, J. T., F. E. Peabody, and L. I. Price Revision of the Gymnarthridae, American Permian microsaurs. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. (Yale) 10, 77 p. Huene, F., and W. Bock A small amphibian skull from the Upper Triassic of Pennsylvania. Wagner Free Inst. Sci. Bull. 29: Jarvik, E. I960. Theories de 1'evolution des vertebres. Masson et Cie., Paris. 104 p. Noble, G. K The biology of the Amphibia. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 577 p. Peabody, F. E The oldest known reptile, Eosaurainis copei Williston. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 139:1-15. Romer, A. S Vertebrate paleontology. Univ. Chicago Press. 687 p The nature and relationships of the Paleo7oic microsaurs. Am. Jour. Sci. 248: Watson, I). M. S The Carboniferous Amphibia of Scotland. Palaeontologia Hungarica 1: Williams, E. E Gadow's arcualia and the de- \elopment of tetrapod vertebrae. Quart. Rev. Biol. 34:1-32.
THE SKULLS OF ARAEOSCELIS AND CASEA, PERMIAN REPTILES
THE SKULLS OF REOSCELIS ND CSE, PERMIN REPTILES University of Chicago There are few Permian reptiles of greater interest at the present time than the peculiar one I briefly described in this journal' three
More informationPostilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A.
Postilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A. Number 117 18 March 1968 A 7DIAPSID (REPTILIA) PARIETAL FROM THE LOWER PERMIAN OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT L. CARROLL REDPATH
More informationA NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF AMERICAN THEROMORPHA
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF AMERICAN THEROMORPHA MYCTEROSAURUS LONGICEPS S. W. WILLISTON University of Chicago The past summer, Mr. Herman Douthitt, of the University of Chicago paleontological expedition,
More informationTest one stats. Mean Max 101
Test one stats Mean 71.5 Median 72 Max 101 Min 38 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 4 13 23 23 19 9 1 Sarcopterygii Step Out Text, Ch. 6 pp. 119-125; Text Ch. 9; pp. 196-210 Tetrapod Evolution The tetrapods arose
More informationAnatomy. Name Section. The Vertebrate Skeleton
Name Section Anatomy The Vertebrate Skeleton Vertebrate paleontologists get most of their knowledge about past organisms from skeletal remains. Skeletons are useful for gleaning information about an organism
More informationPalaeobiology of Carboniferous/Permian Aïstopod Amphibians
Palaeobiology of Carboniferous/Permian Aïstopod Amphibians Kathleen Aldinger Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Abstract: Aïstopods are the most striking order among the Palaezoic lepospondyl
More informationHONR219D Due 3/29/16 Homework VI
Part 1: Yet More Vertebrate Anatomy!!! HONR219D Due 3/29/16 Homework VI Part 1 builds on homework V by examining the skull in even greater detail. We start with the some of the important bones (thankfully
More informationFish 2/26/13. Chordates 2. Sharks and Rays (about 470 species) Sharks etc Bony fish. Tetrapods. Osteichthans Lobe fins and lungfish
Chordates 2 Sharks etc Bony fish Osteichthans Lobe fins and lungfish Tetrapods ns Reptiles Birds Feb 27, 2013 Chordates ANCESTRAL DEUTEROSTOME Notochord Common ancestor of chordates Head Vertebral column
More informationField Trip: Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH)
Field Trip: Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH) Objectives To observe the diversity of animals. To compare and contrast the various adaptations, body plans, etc. of the animals found at the HMNH.
More informationFishes, Amphibians, Reptiles
Fishes, Amphibians, Reptiles Section 1: What is a Vertebrate? Characteristics of CHORDATES Most are Vertebrates (have a spinal cord) Some point in life cycle all chordates have: Notochord Nerve cord that
More informationVertebrate Structure and Function
Vertebrate Structure and Function Part 1 - Comparing Structure and Function Classification of Vertebrates a. Phylum: Chordata Common Characteristics: Notochord, pharyngeal gill slits, hollow dorsal nerve
More informationWilliston, and as there are many fairly good specimens in the American
56.81.7D :14.71.5 Article VII.- SOME POINTS IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE DIADECTID SKULL. BY R. BROOM. The skull of Diadectes has been described by Cope, Case, v. Huene, and Williston, and as there are many
More informationEvolution of Tetrapods
Evolution of Tetrapods Amphibian-like creatures: The earliest tracks of a four-legged animal were found in Poland in 2010; they are Middle Devonian in age. Amphibians arose from sarcopterygians sometime
More informationUnit 19.3: Amphibians
Unit 19.3: Amphibians Lesson Objectives Describe structure and function in amphibians. Outline the reproduction and development of amphibians. Identify the three living amphibian orders. Describe how amphibians
More informationGeo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1
Geo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1 Systematics is the comparative study of biological diversity with the intent of determining the relationships between organisms. Humankind has always
More informationAMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 782 THE AmzRICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Feb. 20, 1935 New York City 56.81, 7 G (68) A NOTE ON THE CYNODONT, GLOCHINODONTOIDES GRACILIS HAUGHTON BY LIEUWE
More informationAnimal Form and Function. Amphibians. United by several distinguishing apomorphies within the Vertebrata
Animal Form and Function Kight Amphibians Class Amphibia (amphibia = living a double life) United by several distinguishing apomorphies within the Vertebrata 1. Skin Thought Question: For whom are integumentary
More information8/19/2013. Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods. Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods. The geological time scale. The geological time scale.
Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods Next two lectures will deal with: Origin of Tetrapods, transition from water to land. Origin of Amniotes, transition to dry habitats. Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods What
More informationWhat are taxonomy, classification, and systematics?
Topic 2: Comparative Method o Taxonomy, classification, systematics o Importance of phylogenies o A closer look at systematics o Some key concepts o Parts of a cladogram o Groups and characters o Homology
More informationTitle: Phylogenetic Methods and Vertebrate Phylogeny
Title: Phylogenetic Methods and Vertebrate Phylogeny Central Question: How can evolutionary relationships be determined objectively? Sub-questions: 1. What affect does the selection of the outgroup have
More informationINQUIRY & INVESTIGATION
INQUIRY & INVESTIGTION Phylogenies & Tree-Thinking D VID. UM SUSN OFFNER character a trait or feature that varies among a set of taxa (e.g., hair color) character-state a variant of a character that occurs
More informationFrom Slime to Scales: Evolution of Reptiles. Review: Disadvantages of Being an Amphibian
From Slime to Scales: Evolution of Reptiles Review: Disadvantages of Being an Amphibian Gelatinous eggs of amphibians cannot survive out of water, so amphibians are limited in terms of the environments
More informationMay 10, SWBAT analyze and evaluate the scientific evidence provided by the fossil record.
May 10, 2017 Aims: SWBAT analyze and evaluate the scientific evidence provided by the fossil record. Agenda 1. Do Now 2. Class Notes 3. Guided Practice 4. Independent Practice 5. Practicing our AIMS: E.3-Examining
More informationNew Carnivorous Dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia
1955 Doklady, Academy of Sciences USSR 104 (5):779-783 New Carnivorous Dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia E. A. Maleev (translated by F. J. Alcock) The present article is a summary containing
More informationRed Eared Slider Secrets. Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to Years, Most WILL NOT Survive Two Years!
Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to 45-60 Years, Most WILL NOT Survive Two Years! Chris Johnson 2014 2 Red Eared Slider Secrets Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to 45-60 Years, Most
More informationIntroduction to phylogenetic trees and tree-thinking Copyright 2005, D. A. Baum (Free use for non-commercial educational pruposes)
Introduction to phylogenetic trees and tree-thinking Copyright 2005, D. A. Baum (Free use for non-commercial educational pruposes) Phylogenetics is the study of the relationships of organisms to each other.
More informationNatural Sciences 360 Legacy of Life Lecture 3 Dr. Stuart S. Sumida. Phylogeny (and Its Rules) Biogeography
Natural Sciences 360 Legacy of Life Lecture 3 Dr. Stuart S. Sumida Phylogeny (and Its Rules) Biogeography So, what is all the fuss about phylogeny? PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS allows us both define groups
More informationXI B RARY OF THL UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS v BIOUNi
o XI B RARY OF THL UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 590.5 FI v. 37-38 BIOUNi Latest Date stamped below L161 O-1096 A Recently Discovered Phlegethontia from Illinois William D. Turnbull Preparator, Department
More informationLABORATORY EXERCISE 6: CLADISTICS I
Biology 4415/5415 Evolution LABORATORY EXERCISE 6: CLADISTICS I Take a group of organisms. Let s use five: a lungfish, a frog, a crocodile, a flamingo, and a human. How to reconstruct their relationships?
More informationVERTEBRATE READING. Fishes
VERTEBRATE READING Fishes The first vertebrates to become a widespread, predominant life form on earth were fishes. Prior to this, only invertebrates, such as mollusks, worms and squid-like animals, would
More informationIntroduction and methods will follow the same guidelines as for the draft
Locomotion Paper Guidelines Entire paper will be 5-7 double spaced pages (12 pt font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins) without figures (but I still want you to include them, they just don t count towards
More informationWhat is the evidence for evolution?
What is the evidence for evolution? 1. Geographic Distribution 2. Fossil Evidence & Transitional Species 3. Comparative Anatomy 1. Homologous Structures 2. Analogous Structures 3. Vestigial Structures
More informationIntroduction to Cladistic Analysis
3.0 Copyright 2008 by Department of Integrative Biology, University of California-Berkeley Introduction to Cladistic Analysis tunicate lamprey Cladoselache trout lungfish frog four jaws swimbladder or
More information.56 m. (22 in.). COMPSOGNATHOID DINOSAUR FROM THE. Medicine Bow, Wyoming, by the American Museum Expedition
Article XII.-ORNITHOLESTES HERMANNI, A NEW COMPSOGNATHOID DINOSAUR FROM THE UPPER JURASSIC. By HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN. The type skeleton (Amer. Mus. Coll. No. 6I9) of this remarkable animal was discovered
More informationGet the other MEGA courses!
www.thesimplehomeschool.com Simple Schooling BUGS MEGA course is ten weeks of all about bugs! This course grabs your student s attention and never lets go! Grades K-3 Get the other MEGA courses! Simple
More informationAMPHIBIANS. Yuan Wang and Ke-qin Gao
Wang Y, Gao K Q, 2003. Amphibians. In: Chang M M, Chen P J, Wang Y Q, Wang Y (eds.), The Jehol Biota: The Emergence of Feathered Dinosaurs, Beaked Birds, and Flowering Plants. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific
More informationBiology 340 Comparative Embryology Lecture 12 Dr. Stuart Sumida. Evo-Devo Revisited. Development of the Tetrapod Limb
Biology 340 Comparative Embryology Lecture 12 Dr. Stuart Sumida Evo-Devo Revisited Development of the Tetrapod Limb Limbs whether fins or arms/legs for only in particular regions or LIMB FIELDS. Primitively
More informationIntroduction. Learning About Amphibians
Introduction Introduction Welcome to a series of books devoted to the Phylum Chordata. A chordate is an animal that has a spine (backbone), which is made up of small bones called vertebrae. Most chordates
More informationExceptional fossil preservation demonstrates a new mode of axial skeleton elongation in early ray-finned fishes
Supplementary Information Exceptional fossil preservation demonstrates a new mode of axial skeleton elongation in early ray-finned fishes Erin E. Maxwell, Heinz Furrer, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra Supplementary
More informationPEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A. GLYPTOLEPIS FROM THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN OF SCOTLAND
Postilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A. Number 99 April 16, 1966 GLYPTOLEPIS FROM THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN OF SCOTLAND KEITH STEWART THOMSON 1 DEPARTMENT OF
More informationA R T I C L E S STRATIGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTEBRATE FOSSIL FOOTPRINTS COMPARED WITH BODY FOSSILS
A R T I C L E S STRATIGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTEBRATE FOSSIL FOOTPRINTS COMPARED WITH BODY FOSSILS Leonard Brand & James Florence Department of Biology Loma Linda University WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT
More informationBiology 3315 Comparative Vertebrate Morphology Skulls and Visceral Skeletons
Biology 3315 Comparative Vertebrate Morphology Skulls and Visceral Skeletons 1. Head skeleton of lamprey Cyclostomes are highly specialized in both the construction of the chondrocranium and visceral skeleton.
More informationCladistics (reading and making of cladograms)
Cladistics (reading and making of cladograms) Definitions Systematics The branch of biological sciences concerned with classifying organisms Taxon (pl: taxa) Any unit of biological diversity (eg. Animalia,
More informationSOME LITTLE-KNOWN FOSSIL LIZARDS FROM THE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued SWsK \ {^^m ^V ^^ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 91 Washington : 1941 No. 3124 SOME LITTLE-KNOWN FOSSIL LIZARDS FROM THE OLIGOCENE
More informationIntroduction to Herpetology
Introduction to Herpetology Lesson Aims Discuss the nature and scope of reptiles. Identify credible resources, and begin to develop networking with organisations and individuals involved with the study
More informationONLINE APPENDIX 1. Morphological phylogenetic characters scored in this paper. See Poe (2004) for
ONLINE APPENDIX Morphological phylogenetic characters scored in this paper. See Poe () for detailed character descriptions, citations, and justifications for states. Note that codes are changed from a
More informationTupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen
J. Li)ua. Soc. (Zool.) 47, 31 1, pp. 2223-2229 With 3 jgures Printed iii Greut Britrrw October. 1967 New observations on the skull-roof of the holotype of Tupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen BY EIGIL NIELSEN
More informationLABORATORY EXERCISE 7: CLADISTICS I
Biology 4415/5415 Evolution LABORATORY EXERCISE 7: CLADISTICS I Take a group of organisms. Let s use five: a lungfish, a frog, a crocodile, a flamingo, and a human. How to reconstruct their relationships?
More informationd a Name Vertebrate Evolution - Exam 2 1. (12) Fill in the blanks
Vertebrate Evolution - Exam 2 1. (12) Fill in the blanks 100 points Name f e c d a Identify the structures (for c and e, identify the entire structure, not the individual elements. b a. b. c. d. e. f.
More informationResources. Visual Concepts. Chapter Presentation. Copyright by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved.
Chapter Presentation Visual Concepts Transparencies Standardized Test Prep Introduction to Vertebrates Table of Contents Section 1 Vertebrates in the Sea and on Land Section 2 Terrestrial Vertebrates Section
More informationModern Evolutionary Classification. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview Modern Evolutionary Classification
Lesson Overview 18.2 Modern Evolutionary Classification THINK ABOUT IT Darwin s ideas about a tree of life suggested a new way to classify organisms not just based on similarities and differences, but
More informationv:ii-ixi, 'i':;iisimvi'\>!i-:: "^ A%'''''-'^-''S.''v.--..V^'E^'-'-^"-t''gi L I E) R.ARY OF THE VERSITY U N I or ILLINOIS REMO
"^ A%'''''-'^-''S.''v.--..V^'E^'-'-^"-t''gi v:ii-ixi, 'i':;iisimvi'\>!i-:: L I E) R.ARY OF THE U N I VERSITY or ILLINOIS REMO Natural History Survey Librarv GEOLOGICAL SERIES OF FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL
More informationTHE GORGONOPSIAN GENUS, HIPPOSAURUS, AND THE FAMILY ICTIDORHINIDAE * Dr. L.D. Boonstra. Paleontologist, South African Museum, Cape Town
THE GORGONOPSIAN GENUS, HIPPOSAURUS, AND THE FAMILY ICTIDORHINIDAE * by Dr. L.D. Boonstra Paleontologist, South African Museum, Cape Town In 1928 I dug up the complete skeleton of a smallish gorgonopsian
More informationOrigin and Evolution of Birds. Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics
Origin and Evolution of Birds Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics Review of Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Aves Characteristics: wings,
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR. Nirina O. Ratsimbaholison, Ryan N. Felice, and Patrick M. O connor
http://app.pan.pl/som/app61-ratsimbaholison_etal_som.pdf SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR Nirina O. Ratsimbaholison, Ryan N. Felice, and Patrick M. O connor Ontogenetic changes in the craniomandibular
More informationChapter 2 Mammalian Origins. Fig. 2-2 Temporal Openings in the Amniotes
Chapter 2 Mammalian Origins Fig. 2-2 Temporal Openings in the Amniotes 1 Synapsida 1. monophyletic group 2. Single temporal opening below postorbital and squamosal 3. Dominant terrestrial vertebrate group
More informationREPTILES. Scientific Classification of Reptiles To creep. Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Reptilia
Scientific Classification of Reptiles To creep Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Reptilia REPTILES tetrapods - 4 legs adapted for land, hip/girdle Amniotes - animals whose
More informationMammalogy Laboratory 1 - Mammalian Anatomy
Mammalogy Laboratory 1 - Mammalian Anatomy I. The Goal. The goal of the lab is to teach you skeletal anatomy of mammals. We will emphasize the skull because many of the taxonomically important characters
More informationAre Evolutionary Transitional Forms Possible?
What Fossils Can t Tell Us Are Evolutionary Transitional Forms Possible? Dr. Raúl Esperante Geoscience Research Institute Darwin and the Fossil Record Darwin and other evolutionists before suggested that
More informationLab 2 Skeletons and Locomotion
Lab 2 Skeletons and Locomotion Objectives The objectives of this and next week's labs are to introduce you to the comparative skeletal anatomy of vertebrates. As you examine the skeleton of each lineage,
More informationUN? RSITYOF. ILLIiwiS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN NATURAL HIST. SURVEY
UN? RSITYOF ILLIiwiS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN NATURAL HIST. SURVEY FIELDIANA GEOLOGY Published by CHICAGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Volume 10 July 29, 1954 No. 17 FAUNA OF THE VALE AND CHOZA: 7 PELYCOSAURIA:
More informationBio 1B Lecture Outline (please print and bring along) Fall, 2006
Bio 1B Lecture Outline (please print and bring along) Fall, 2006 B.D. Mishler, Dept. of Integrative Biology 2-6810, bmishler@berkeley.edu Evolution lecture #4 -- Phylogenetic Analysis (Cladistics) -- Oct.
More informationEvolution as Fact. The figure below shows transitional fossils in the whale lineage.
Evolution as Fact Evolution is a fact. Organisms descend from others with modification. Phylogeny, the lineage of ancestors and descendants, is the scientific term to Darwin's phrase "descent with modification."
More informationDEUTEROSTOMES. This presentation contains copyrighted material under the educational fair use exemption to the U.S. copyright law.
DEUTEROSTOMES This presentation contains copyrighted material under the educational fair use exemption to the U.S. copyright law. Deuterostome Echinodermata body plan! Body plan! Larvae are bilateral!
More informationUNIT III A. Descent with Modification(Ch19) B. Phylogeny (Ch20) C. Evolution of Populations (Ch21) D. Origin of Species or Speciation (Ch22)
UNIT III A. Descent with Modification(Ch9) B. Phylogeny (Ch2) C. Evolution of Populations (Ch2) D. Origin of Species or Speciation (Ch22) Classification in broad term simply means putting things in classes
More informationThe skull and jaw musculature as guides to the ancestry of salamanders
Zoological Journalofthe Linnean Society, 68: 1-40. With 29 figures January 1980 The skull and jaw musculature as guides to the ancestry of salamanders ROBERT L. CARROLL AND ROBERT HOLMES Redpath Museam,
More informationTAXONOMIC HIERARCHY. science of classification and naming of organisms
TAXONOMIC HIERARCHY Taxonomy - science of classification and naming of organisms Taxonomic Level Kingdom Phylum subphylum Class subclass superorder Order Family Genus Species Example Animalae Chordata
More informationAnimal Diversity wrap-up Lecture 9 Winter 2014
Animal Diversity wrap-up Lecture 9 Winter 2014 1 Animal phylogeny based on morphology & development Fig. 32.10 2 Animal phylogeny based on molecular data Fig. 32.11 New Clades 3 Lophotrochozoa Lophophore:
More informationA Fossil Snake (Elaphe vulpina) From A Pliocene Ash Bed In Nebraska
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 198 A Fossil Snake
More informationCHAPTER 26. Animal Evolution The Vertebrates
CHAPTER 26 Animal Evolution The Vertebrates Impacts, Issues: Interpreting and Misinterpreting the Past No one was around to witness the transitions in the history of life Fossils allow us glimpses into
More informationAmniote Relationships. Reptilian Ancestor. Reptilia. Mesosuarus freshwater dwelling reptile
Amniote Relationships mammals Synapsida turtles lizards,? Anapsida snakes, birds, crocs Diapsida Reptilia Amniota Reptilian Ancestor Mesosuarus freshwater dwelling reptile Reptilia General characteristics
More informationVERTEBRAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DEVONIAN SARCOPTERYGIAN FISH EUSTHENOPTERON FOORDI AND THE POLARITY OF VERTEBRAL EVOLUTION IN NON-AMNIOTE TETRAPODS
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22(3):487 502, September 2002 2002 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology VERTEBRAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DEVONIAN SARCOPTERYGIAN FISH EUSTHENOPTERON FOORDI AND THE POLARITY
More information5 pt. 10 pt. 15 pt. 20 pt. 25 pt
Final Jeopardy Characteristics of Vertebrates Characteristics of Fish Amphibians Reptiles Chapter 16 Vocabulary 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt 10 pt 10 pt 10 pt 10 pt 10 pt 15 pt 15 pt 15 pt 15 pt 15 pt 20 pt
More informationA NEW SPECIES OF EXTINCT TURTLE FROM THE UPPER PLIOCENE OF IDAHO
A NEW SPECIES OF EXTINCT TURTLE FROM THE UPPER PLIOCENE OF IDAHO By Charles W. Gilmore Curator, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology United States National Museum Among the fossils obtained bj^ the Smithsonian
More informationWhat is a dinosaur? Reading Practice
Reading Practice What is a dinosaur? A. Although the name dinosaur is derived from the Greek for "terrible lizard", dinosaurs were not, in fact, lizards at all. Like lizards, dinosaurs are included in
More informationLEIDY, SHOWING THE BONES OF THE FEET 'AND LIMBS
CQNTEUBUTIONS FBOM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY (Confindion of Con&&&m froin UB Muaercm of Gcologg) UNIVERSITY OF ' MICHIGAN VOL V, No. 6, pp. 6W3 (e ph.) DEAXMBER 31,1036 A SPECIMEN OF STYLEMYS NEBRASCENSIS
More informationCh 34: Vertebrate Objective Questions & Diagrams
Ch 34: Vertebrate Objective Questions & Diagrams Invertebrate Chordates and the Origin of Vertebrates 1. Distinguish between the two subgroups of deuterostomes. 2. Describe the four unique characteristics
More informationTuesday, December 6, 11. Mesozoic Life
Mesozoic Life Review of Paleozoic Transgression/regressions and Mountain building events during the paleoozoic act as driving force of evolution. regression of seas and continental uplift create variety
More informationAMERICAN MUSEUM. Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET
AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 U.S.A. NUMBER 2662 NOVEMBER 21, 1978 RONN W. COLDIRON Acroplous vorax
More information8/19/2013. Topic 5: The Origin of Amniotes. What are some stem Amniotes? What are some stem Amniotes? The Amniotic Egg. What is an Amniote?
Topic 5: The Origin of Amniotes Where do amniotes fall out on the vertebrate phylogeny? What are some stem Amniotes? What is an Amniote? What changes were involved with the transition to dry habitats?
More informationCh 1.2 Determining How Species Are Related.notebook February 06, 2018
Name 3 "Big Ideas" from our last notebook lecture: * * * 1 WDYR? Of the following organisms, which is the closest relative of the "Snowy Owl" (Bubo scandiacus)? a) barn owl (Tyto alba) b) saw whet owl
More informationKINGDOM ANIMALIA Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Class Reptilia
KINGDOM ANIMALIA Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Class Reptilia Vertebrate Classes Reptiles are the evolutionary base for the rest of the tetrapods. Early divergence of mammals from reptilian ancestor.
More informationOrigin and Evolution of Birds. Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics
Origin and Evolution of Birds Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics Review of Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Aves Characteristics: wings,
More informationThe earliest reptiles
J. Linn. SOC. (Zool), 45, no. 304, p. 61 With 14 tezt-figures Printed in Great Britain The earliest reptiles BY ROBERT L. CARROLL (Accepted for publication December 1963) Communicated by Errol I. White,
More informationAUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Riek, E. F., 1964. Merostomoidea (Arthropoda, Trilobitomorpha) from the Australian Middle Triassic. Records of the Australian Museum 26(13): 327 332, plate 35.
More informationPhylogeny Reconstruction
Phylogeny Reconstruction Trees, Methods and Characters Reading: Gregory, 2008. Understanding Evolutionary Trees (Polly, 2006) Lab tomorrow Meet in Geology GY522 Bring computers if you have them (they will
More informationYOU SHOULD BRING YOUR TEXT
Field Trip: Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH) Note: There is no pre-lab for this lab. Objectives To observe the diversity of animals. To compare and contrast the various adaptations, body plans,
More informationThe extant amphibians and reptiles are a diverse collection
2 Phylogenetic Systematics and the Origins of Amphibians and Reptiles The extant amphibians and reptiles are a diverse collection of animals with evolutionary histories dating back to the Early Carboniferous
More informationCRANIAL ANATOMY OF ENNATOSAURUS TECTON (SYNAPSIDA: CASEIDAE) FROM THE MIDDLE PERMIAN OF RUSSIA AND THE EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS OF CASEIDAE
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28(1):160 180, March 2008 2008 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology ARTICLE CRANIAL ANATOMY OF ENNATOSAURUS TECTON (SYNAPSIDA: CASEIDAE) FROM THE MIDDLE PERMIAN
More informationLecture 11 Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Lecture 11 Wednesday, September 19, 2012 Phylogenetic tree (phylogeny) Darwin and classification: In the Origin, Darwin said that descent from a common ancestral species could explain why the Linnaean
More informationCLADISTICS Student Packet SUMMARY Phylogeny Phylogenetic trees/cladograms
CLADISTICS Student Packet SUMMARY PHYLOGENETIC TREES AND CLADOGRAMS ARE MODELS OF EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY THAT CAN BE TESTED Phylogeny is the history of descent of organisms from their common ancestor. Phylogenetic
More informationThe Fossil Record of Vertebrate Transitions
The Fossil Record of Vertebrate Transitions The Fossil Evidence of Evolution 1. Fossils show a pattern of change through geologic time of new species appearing in the fossil record that are similar to
More informationGeo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs. LAB 7: Dinosaur diversity- Saurischians
Geo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 7: Dinosaur diversity- Saurischians Last lab you were presented with a review of major ornithischian clades. You also were presented with some of the kinds of plants that
More informationMANSFIELD SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL / SCIENCE / A. There is no God. B. All living things on Earth are related.
The Evidence of Evolution Name: Date: 1. Biological Evolutions makes 2 very bold claims about living creatures.what are they circle 2. A. There is no God. B. All living things on Earth are related. C.
More informationThe Evolution of Chordates
The Evolution of Chordates Phylum Chordata belongs to clade Deuterostomata. Deuterostomes have events of development in common with one another. 1. Coelom from archenteron surrounded by mesodermal tissue.
More informationEvolution. Evolution is change in organisms over time. Evolution does not have a goal; it is often shaped by natural selection (see below).
Evolution Evolution is change in organisms over time. Evolution does not have a goal; it is often shaped by natural selection (see below). Species an interbreeding population of organisms that can produce
More informationFURTHER STUDIES ON TWO SKELETONS OF THE BLACK RIGHT WHALE IN THE NORTH PACIFIC
FURTHER STUDIES ON TWO SKELETONS OF THE BLACK RIGHT WHALE IN THE NORTH PACIFIC HIDEO OMURA, MASAHARU NISHIWAKI* AND TOSHIO KASUYA* ABSTRACT Two skeletons of the black right whale were studied, supplementing
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
In comparison to Proganochelys (Gaffney, 1990), Odontochelys semitestacea is a small turtle. The adult status of the specimen is documented not only by the generally well-ossified appendicular skeleton
More informationCAMBRIDGE, MASS. 4 MAY 2011 NUMBER 523
US ISSN 0006-9698 CAMBRIDGE, MASS. 4 MAY 2011 NUMBER 523 THE SMALLER EMBOLOMEROUS AMPHIBIANS (ANTHRACOSAURIA) FROM THE MIDDLE PENNSYLVANIAN (DESMOINESIAN) LOCALITIES AT LINTON AND FIVE POINTS COAL MINES,
More informationArjan Mann Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1S 5B6; INTRODUCTION METHODS
Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 6:91 96 ISSN 2292-1389 Cranial ornamentation of a large Brachydectes newberryi (Recumbirostra: Molgophidae) from Linton, Ohio, and effects of ontogeny on skull
More information