Washoe County Animal Control Board
|
|
- Jessie Ryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Washoe County Animal Control Board DRAFT of Minutes Tuesday ~ March 13, 2018~ 2:00 p.m. WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL SERVICES CENTER CLASSROOM 2825 LONGLEY LANE, RENO, NEVADA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] MEMBERS Richard Simmonds, Chair Elaine Carrick, Vice-chair Trudy Brussard Linda Church Paul B. Davis Kathryn Hass Tim Stoffel Chair Simmonds called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established PRESENT: Elaine Carrick, Linda Church, Paul Davis, Trudy Brussard, Richard Simmonds and Tim Stoffel. ABSENT: Kathryn Hass Jen Gustafson Deputy District Attorney, was also present. Chair Simmonds noted that comment is limited to three minutes with slightly more time allotted to the applicants as deemed necessary. Chair Simmonds explained that questions to the board during the public comment portions of the meeting agenda could not be answered but could be added as future agenda item at the discretion of the body. However, Chair Simmonds believes this is the last meeting of the Washoe County Animal Control Board. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Non-action item) There were no public comments. 3. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 12, 2017, MINUTES [For possible action] Hearing no public comment Chair Simmonds asked for Board discussion or a motion. It was moved by Member Davis, seconded by Member Church, to approve the December 12, 2017, minutes as submitted. The motion carried with Member Haas absent. 4. KENNEL PERMIT APPEAL HEARING [For possible action] A review discussion and possible action to approve, deny or otherwise modify a kennel permit to allow Alexander Elrod to keep five (5) dogs at Kernite Street, Reno, Nevada. Cynthia Doak - Regional Animal Services, commented that the appellant had reduced to three dogs and that the permit was no longer needed. No specific action needed or taken. 5. KENNEL PERMIT APPEAL HEARING [For possible action] A review discussion and possible action to approve, deny or otherwise modify a kennel permit to allow Melanie Peck to keep nine (9) dogs at 1070 Tapadero Trail, Reno, Nevada.
2 Page 2 of 10 Cynthia Doak Regional Animal Services, noted that five objections had been received and that the initial call for service was due to an open door that resulted in the WCSO (Washoe County Sheriff's Office) responding and subsequently contacting Animal Services about dogs at large. During the initial call unsanitary conditions were observed. Officer Doak commented that Ms. Peck has taken steps to reduce the number of animals and clean the premises making a better situation for the animals. Officer Doak commented that Ms. Peck s daughter had come to help capture the dogs but did not have a key to the house. Officer Ueda can provide an update on the conditions of the animals and inside of the house as she conducted follow-up inspections. Officer Ueda commented that the residence had been cleaned and that the dogs did bark upon her arrival but quieted rather quickly. Although the fencing is in need of some repair the house did not show signs of feces with only a minor urine odor. All of the dogs were friendly and responsive. All but one of the dogs are Yorkie mixes with the largest of the dogs being an Australian Husky. Officer Ueda noted that while all the females are spayed, only one of the three males is neutered. Ms. Peck is working with rescue organizations to find homes and further reduce the number of dogs on-site. Chair Simmonds opened the public hearing. Melanie Peck commented that she believes her neighbors have legitimate complaints and that she is working to mitigate the issues. Ms. Peck noted that there were two unexpected litters from the same female in the course of four months. While she did find homes for some of the puppies one was returned in a starving condition that has made her hyper-responsible and cautious in finding homes. Ms. Peck then outlined the special needs of some of the dogs including a deformed cleft palate, white shaker syndrome and another with a massive overbite. Ms. Peck outlined measures she has taken to reduce the barking by only allowing the dogs outside when she is with them and drew attention to letters received from surrounding neighbors. Ms. Peck. Explained that she has eight dogs and that she will have the rest of the males neutered if required. Ms. Peck explained that she was not moving forward with finding new homes pending the outcome of the kennel permit hearing. Katherine Sanford recommended that the permit be approved as she never hears barking and lives across the street. George Bradley stated that his property is directly west of the applicant s back yard and that he is opposed to the number of dogs as he believes that three dogs are plenty. Mr. Bradley noted that as the breeze changes direction the odor is offensive. Although the instances of barking are now sporadic he still believes that anything more than three dogs is too many. Ray Black stated the he too was opposed to the permit pointing out that while there is less noise during winter months spring is on the way and the dogs will most likely spend more time outdoors and bark until they are let back in. Mr. Black commented that the noise makes it difficult to enjoy his backyard and that the odor is unpleasant. Mr. Black does not believe that it will get any better in terms of cleaning up the mess nor is her property the most sanitary in his opinion. Cheryl Schricker commented that while she loves animals this neighborhood is not the proper place for a kennel. Ms. Schricker noted that it was her husband that called WCSO when the front door was left open and dogs were running in and out. Of concern is leaving the dogs inside while Ms. Peck is
3 Page 3 of 10 away working without access to the outdoors. Ms. Schricker does not believe this is in the best interests of the dogs nor would it be sanitary or appropriate to the neighborhood. Chair Simmonds closed the public hearing. Member Davis commented that while he believes Ms. Peck to be a compassionate and caring person for the animals and is making an effort to address issues, he cannot support the request based on the testimony heard Member Stoffel questioned whether a compromise of reducing to five dogs in consideration of the neighbors. Jen Gustafson Deputy District Attorney, commented that the board could take action to limit the number of dogs to less than the eight being requested by the applicant. Member Brussard noted that special needs dogs would be difficult to adopt out and that the suggested reduction would alleviate some of the noise and smell concerns expressed by neighbors. Member Carrick noted that neighbors are entitled to having quiet and had expressed themselves very well. Member Carrick suggested a temporary 6-month permit with Animal Control Officers checking the situation every two weeks with a review in six months to determine whether there was any improvement and issue a final decision. Member Davis agreed that would be a nice compromise and asked if a reduction in the number of dogs would be favored. Ms. Gustafson pointed out that there was no mechanism to allow a temporary permit. Therefore, the Board needs to determine whether or not the permit can be granted. Ms. Gustafson pointed out that violations of conditions in approved kennel permits can result in the kennel permit being revoked. Member Church commented that while she cannot support eight dogs, she can support five dogs and emphasized that neighbors have a right to enjoy their property without noise and odor. Member Church favors a 30-day review with neighbors being contacted to determine whether the situation has improved. Member Davis commented that he believes this is a fair compromise that he can support. Member Stoffel suggested a modification to not only reduce to five dogs with a condition that it be completed in 45-days since there is no provisional permit.. In response to a question from Chair Simmonds Ms. Gustafson commented that it was up to the Chair to determine whether or not to accept additional public comment. During the discussion it was suggested that perhaps it would be better to have a 60-day review. As the discussion continued it was pointed out that while 30-days is probably sufficient 45-days is a good compromise for review.
4 Page 4 of 10 Chair Simmonds reopened public comment. Ms. Herndon noted that in 45-days neighbor s windows might still be closed. However the primary concern is the odor and noise once summer arrives and windows are open. Additionally, how are neighbors going to know which dogs are kept and which ones are adopted. Chair Simmonds explained that once the permit and conditions are issued neighbors may contact Animal Services to voice concerns and file complaints. Animal Services then has the ability to revoke the permit. Member Davis explained that the revocation would not come back to this body as it is being disbanded after tonight s (March 13, 2018) meeting. Ms. Herndon explained that she had no desire to be awakened in the middle of the night by barking dogs. Mr. Black commented that while he appreciates Ms. Peck s endeavors to resolve the issues it is his belief that reducing the number of dogs to five from eight will not make much difference and that the neighbors would have to start over. Therefore, Mr. Black believes that a decision should be made. Ms. Peck explained her confusion about continued barking complaints as she only takes the dogs out for a walk five at a time. Ms. Peck pointed out that she has tried to reduce the barking by keeping all the dogs inside over the past six weeks and that she appreciates the efforts of the Animal Control Board. Ms. Peck stated she would accept the compromise proposed by the board. Officer Doak explained that once a permit is issued a second violation issued within a year may result in suspension, fines and civil actions that can result in the revocation permit. Violations include dogs at large, barking and unsanitary issues. Ms. Schricker noted that barking can still be heard and that if bark collars are in use it would seem that no barking would be heard. Ms. Schricker stated that 5 dogs is still too many. Member Davis commented that he believes Ms. Peck has made a good faith effort to address concerns. Member Davis pointed out that an approved kennel permit can be suspended or revised and that he favors a compromise of not more than five dogs with a 45-day review. Member Carrick concurred with the reduction to five dogs with a 45 day review. Additionally, Member Carrick recommended that a Condition be added that all animals be spayed/neutered as male dogs tend to be louder and more aggressive if not neutered. Member Davis concurred with the proposed condition. It was moved by Member Carrick, seconded by Member Davis, that the kennel permit to allow Melanie Peck to keep five (5) dogs at 1070 Tapadero Trail, Reno, Nevada, be approved on the basis that the factual findings required by Washoe County Code and (3) can be made based on the evidence provided by Animal Control Officers, the applicant and other witnesses. Member Carrick conditioned the permit: 1) not more than five dogs; 2) all dogs to
5 Page 5 of 10 be spayed neutered; and 3 that Animal Services will review the situation in 45-days to determine that barking has abated. Chair Simmonds stated that he would abstain as the applicant s father is a close friend. The motion carried: Members Brussard, Carrick, Church, Davis and Stoffel assenting; Chair Simmonds abstaining and Member Hass absent. Chair Simmonds read the appeal process into the record. Chair Simmonds stated that items 6 and 7 would be heard and discussed concurrently with separate motions. 6. KENNEL PERMIT APPEAL HEARING [For possible action] A review discussion and possible action to approve, deny or otherwise modify a kennel permit to allow Kitty McWilliams and Susan Hickman to keep six (6) dogs at 130 East Arroyo Street, Reno, Nevada. 7. CATTERY PERMIT APPEAL HEARING [For possible action] A review discussion and possible action to approve, deny or otherwise modify a cattery permit to allow Kitty McWilliams and Susan Hickman to keep twelve (12) cats at 130 East Arroyo Street, Reno, Nevada. Cynthia Doak Regional Animal Services, commented that Kitty McWilliams has had a kennel permit for about ten years before there was a regulation on the number of cats that could be kept without a cattery permit. Officer Doak noted that Ms. McWilliams had moved thus requiring both a kennel and cattery permit. Officer Doak noted that four objections had been received, including one with an attorney s address that Animal Services were unable to contact. Officer Doak noted that the permits are in both names with joint ownership of the animals. Nancy Ueda Regional Animal Services, commented that the house will be used as the kennel and that the dogs are mostly kept indoors. The applicants have been advised that the dogs cannot be outside unless supervised by an adult. The yard was clean upon inspection with the dogs in good condition. Officer Ueda noted that the property also has dog houses outside so that animals have shelter. The cats are typically kept in the basement area with outside access provided via a basement window to a screen enclosed area with perches. Officer Ueda noted that all animals are up to date on vaccinations and except those that are too elderly or have health conditions that preclude certain vaccines. A certificate of vaccination exemptions has been received from the veterinarian. Officer Ueda noted that the smell was minimal and that all animals appeared healthy. It appears that there is little interaction between the dogs and cats. Kitty McWilliams submitted photographs (copies on file) and noted that she had lived at the Sierra Manor location in the past with a number of her cats. Ms. McWilliams noted that Doctor Davenport of Pinion Animal Hospital is her veterinarian. Ms. McWilliams outlined her previous experience as a night keeper for elephants and big cats in San Andreas, California. Ms. McWilliams noted that she had moved the used litter container closer to her home and that she spent time daily cleaning cat boxes in the basement as well as cleaning dog feces from the yard. Ms. McWilliams noted that her daughter sometimes visits with her dog Moe that while not a problem barker has a high-pitched bark. Currently there are renovations underway to install new windows and siding that has caused the dogs to bark. However, that work is drawing to a close, hopefully in the next 30-days.
6 Page 6 of 10 Susan Hickman noted that she is the property owner and that she has talked to neighbors on either side and that Ms. McWilliams takes good care of the animals. Joanne Geron outlined her objections due to barking, odor, specifically the outdoor run for the cats. Ms. Geron noted that she had moved to a residential neighborhood not a kennel neighborhood and that she does not wish to live next to a kennel. Given the declining health of the neighbor (Ms. Hickman) she does not think it fair to the animals to grant the permit. R. J. Myers noted that he has been living next to the property owner since 1997 when she erected a 5-foot fence and built several structures on the property without proper permits. Mr. Myers drew attention to a structure that drains onto his property and that he is allergic to cats. Mr. Myers questioned the number of complaints that have been filed with Animal Services. Robert Salik commented that 34 cat carriers with cats and ten dogs were moved onto the property in the middle of the night. Mr. Salik explained that there has been a barkfest since the animals were brought onto the property and that the ladies have disrespected surrounding neighbors. Mr. Salik stated that he disagrees with allowing that many animals. Randall Miller commented that he had smelled animal waste and that he has to pass the house to get to his mailbox that causes the dogs to bark. Mr. Miller noted concerns about noise and odor associated with this number of animals. Chair Simmonds closed the public hearing. Member Carrick recalled comments about the location used for storage of used cat litter as well as noise issues. Member Carrick drew attention to the age of the animals noting that some of the issues may resolve themselves by attrition. Therefore, Member Carrick suggested that the number of animals be allowed to decline through attrition with a provision that no new animals may be brought in. Member Church gave credit for the care and experience of the applicant and noted her concerns about the number of dogs and cats in a single home. Member Church stated that due to the number of animals she could not support the request. Member Dais concurred with Member Church that there were too many animals. Member Brussard commented that the building permit issues were not pertinent to this body and that the applicant had good accreditation and history in the care of animals, which is hard to object to. Member Stoffel commented that it would be difficult to move the elderly animals and that he does understand the concerns of neighbors. Therefore, it is difficult to determine how he would vote. It was moved by Member Carrick, seconded by Member Brussard, that the kennel permit to allow Kitty McWilliams and Susan Hickman, to keep six (6) dogs at 130 Arroyo Street, Reno, Nevada, be approved on the basis that the factual findings required by Washoe County Code
7 Page 7 of and (3) can be made based on the evidence provided by Animal Control Officers, the applicant and other witnesses. Member Stoffel recommended a condition that the number of animals be reduced by natural attrition to the legal limit. Member Carrick accepted the Condition that the number of dogs be reduced by natural attrition to the legal limit, Member Brussard accepted the condition. The motion carried: Members Carrick, Brussard, Stoffel and Chair Simmonds assenting; Members Church and Davis dissenting; and Member Haas absent. Responding to Member Brussard s inquiry about the number of cats, Officer Ueda explained that while the number of cats was not counted it was close to twelve. It was moved by Member Carrick, seconded by Member Stoffel, that the cattery permit to allow Kitty McWilliams and Susan Hickman, to keep twelve (12) cats at 130 Arroyo Street, Reno, Nevada, be approved on the basis that the factual findings required by Washoe County Code and (3) can be made based on the evidence provided by Animal Control Officers, the applicant and other witnesses. Member Carrick conditioned the permit: that the number of cats be reduced by natural attrition. The motion carried: Members Carrick, Brussard, Stoffel and Chair Simmonds assenting; Members Church and Davis dissenting; and Member Haas absent. Chair Simmonds read the appeal process. The meeting recessed at 3:38 p.m. and reconvened at 3:44 p.m. 8. KENNEL PERMIT APPEAL HEARING [For possible action] A review discussion and possible action to approve, deny or otherwise modify a kennel permit to allow Florence Vazquez and Nadeen Vazquez to keep four (4) dogs at 7006 Mozart Court, Sun Valley, Nevada. Cynthia Doak Regional Animal Services, provided an overview of the request noting that there had been a complaint of dogs at large. Officer Doak also noted that there were previous Notices of Civil Penalty for failure to license that has gone to collections. Additionally, one of the objectors is the Highland Ranch Home Owners Association. Responding to Member Davis inquiry about objections from an HOA, Jen Gustafson Deputy District Attorney explained that while the Animal Control Board could not enforce HOA rules/regulations there may be information that is pertinent to the purview of the ACB and should therefore be heard. Jeff Brooks Regional Animal Control, outlined the inspection of the property on January 20, 2018, noting that the yard is unkempt and not landscaped. The applicant, who is not present, is aware that the dogs must be supervised by an adult when outside. Although the yard is unkempt there are no breaks in the fencing and does not appear to be unsafe for the dogs. The applicant was not present.
8 Page 8 of 10 Responding to Chair Simmonds comment that the simple solution would be to adopt out one of the puppies, Officer Brooks noted that there had not been any discussion about reducing the number of animals and that the applicant appeared to be fully vested in going through the kennel permit process. Officer Doak reiterated that previous fines have not been paid and have been sent to collection. Piper Case Highland Ranch HOA, submitted photos of the property noting that it appears that the property is being used as multifamily. Of particular concern is that the kennel license could lead to a commercial use. Ms. Case noted the ongoing issues with the property owner including property maintenance, debris and fencing issues. Additionally, there is a vehicle on the property with a broken window that could be detrimental to the animals welfare. Therefore, Ms. Case believes the permit should be denied. Ms. Case noted that the applicant has an extensive history of fines and violations. Ms. Case noted that Washoe County had required that the applicant clean up the property. Tyler Bolton Highland Ranch HOA, noted that the issues of concern to the HOA as it pertains to this body are the health and welfare of the animals that may be harmed by the broken windshield. Officer Brooks noted that the inspection did not indicate any excessive feces at the time of inspection. Mr. Bolton commented that property maintenance is a recurring issue and that he is opposed to the permit request. Jorge Munoz noted his concerns with the proposal noting that the dogs barking excessively and that there is damage to the fencing. The dogs appear to come out every 20 minutes or so and are not controlled in any fashion. Mr. Munoz commented that the traffic in and out of the property appears to be that of a drug house and that he has taken measure to protect himself. Therefore, Mr. Munoz is opposed to the request. Chair Simmonds closed the public hearing. Member Carrick noted that the applicant is allowed to have up to three dogs and that the two dogs that are not spayed/neutered could be an issue in the future. Member Davis commented that he would not support the request and voiced his concerns about the remaining three. Chair Simmonds reopened the public hearing. Mr. Munoz commented that he felt that the rule of three gave the applicant a reason to default in the future. Chair Simmonds noted that the Board could not require that the applicant not have any dogs and that it would be up to Regional Animal Services staff to investigate and take action on any animal welfare issues brought to their attention.
9 Page 9 of 10 Officer Brooks noted that the normal process allow up to 30 days to reduce after which the fine process begins, followed by a criminal citation that can then be taken to court. At that point a judge can issue an injunction, which is something that neither the ACB or Animal Services staff has the authority to do. Mr. Bolton noted that the applicant is not the homeowner and that it is unclear if the permit can be issued to a tenant of rental property. Chair Simmonds noted that an objection from the property owner would be needed before that could be used for denial. Member Stoffel pointed out previous issues with not paying fines and the applicant s absence at the public hearing making it difficult to support the request. Member Davis noted his concerns about animal health and welfare and the disregard of the applicant to previous citations and fines. It was moved by Member Stoffel, seconded by Member Brussard, to disapprove the kennel permit application of Florence Vazquez and Nadeen Vazquez, to keep more than three dogs at 7006 Mozart Court, Sun Valley, Nevada, due to: 1) failure to represent themselves at the hearing; and 2) failure to take care of obligations of previous citations. Member Davis noted his concern about the use of failure to appear as part of a motion that could be used to argue the denial. Member Stoffel withdrew the motion. Member Brussard withdrew the second. Jen Gustafson Deputy District Attorney, pointed out that the permit can only be denied when it violates state or local ordinance, endangers the health safety and welfare of persons living in the County and must be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. It was moved by Member Stoffel, seconded by Member Davis to disapprove the kennel permit application of Florence Vazquez and Nadeen Vazquez, to keep more than three dogs at 7006 Mozart Court, Sun Valley, Nevada, due to the inability to keep the animals in a safe and properly contained manner. During a brief discussion it was pointed out that this was the only option under current ordinance that could be taken. The motion carried: with Member Haas absent. Member Stoffel read the appeal process into the record. 9. UNCONTESTED KENNEL PERMIT APPLICATION APPROVALS [Non-action item] An informational update on the number of uncontested cattery/kennel permits issued by Animal Services since December 12, 2017.
10 Page 10 of 10 Cynthia Doak Regional Animal Services, commented that there have been no objections with one in the licensing process. Another pending permit has 72-hours to reapply and that ten new applications fall under the new ordinance. Officer Doak also explained that one permit had to be rescheduled and that the veterinarian clinic had to cancel and reschedule the appointment. 10. DIRECTOR S REPORT [Non-action item] - An informational update on the Department of Regional Animal Services programs, statistics, emerging developments, financial updates, and other matters properly related thereto. There was no Director s Report. 11. PUBLIC COMMENT [Non-action item] Shyanne Schull Director, thanked the Board for their service and handling of some very challenging applications over time and provided Service Award Certificates of Appreciation to the members present (Ms. Hass Award will be sent to her). Ms. Schull then invited members to stay for refreshments and a bit of socializing. Linda Church recalled coming to the board in June 2006 when Mitch Schneider was the Manager and is now training service dogs for Veterans with PTSD. Ms. Church noted that Bobby Smith had acted as Director until Mrs. Schull was brought in. Ms. Church commented that while she has never had or used a computer Officers Doak and Ueda have been very helpful in providing her with paper copies of the documents for the meetings. Ms. Church then recalled a telephone call from Robert Cox to the ladies serving on this board to assure their safe arrival home from a meeting on a snowy night. 12. ADJOURNMENT [Non-action item] Chair Simmonds adjourned the meeting at 4:20 p.m.
Washoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] Chair Simmonds called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. PRESENT: Trudy Brussard, Linda Church,
More informationWashoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] Chair Simmonds called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. PRESENT: Trudy Brussard, Elaine Carrick,
More informationWashoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] Chair Carrick called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. PRESENT: Trudy Brussard, Elaine Carrick,
More informationWashoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] Chair Simmonds called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. Chair Simmonds outlined the time limitation
More informationWashoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] Chair Simmonds called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. A quorum was established. Chair Simmonds asked that cellphones be
More informationWashoe County Animal Control Board
Washoe County Animal Control Board MINUTES Tuesday ~ ~ 6:30 P.M. WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL SERVICES CENTER CLASSROOM 2825 LONGLEY LANE, RENO, NEVADA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL [Non-action item] MEMBERS
More informationBILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.
SUMMARY: An ordinance amending Washoe County Code Chapter 55 by vacating the animal control board; and by amending provisions related to a variance permit to keep more than three dogs and/or seven cats
More informationA regular meeting of the Village of Victor Planning Board was held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at the Village Hall, 60 East Main Street.
A regular meeting of the Village of Victor Planning Board was held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at the Village Hall, 60 East Main Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Meg CHaides Charles Criss Steven Van
More informationCounty of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES
County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE TITLE 6 ANIMALS CHAPTER 6.20 KENNELS/CATTERIES SECTION 6.20.010. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS.
More informationANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS
CITY OF SOUTH PORTLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS AN ANNUAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE KEEPING OF ANY DOMESTICATED CHICKENS IN THE CITY OF SOUTH PORTLAND. ADDITIONALLY,
More informationDecember 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page
December 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page Chairperson Bavis called the regular meeting of the Planning Board to order at 7:34PM. Members present were Chairperson Gene Bavis, Rick Johnson, Elaine Leasure,
More information6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS
TITLE 6 - ANIMALS 6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS Contents: 6.04.010 License Fee. 6.04.020 Penalty for Overdue License Fee. 6.04.030 Registration - Tags. 6.04.035 Violation of 6.04.030
More informationVillage of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, :05 PM
Village of East Dundee - Board Meeting Agenda - 08/10/2015 Call to Order Roll Call Village of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, 2015 06:05 PM Public
More informationExhibit 6-2 Policy Overview
Exhibit 6-2 Policy Overview Old Policy New Policy Chapter 14 and Exhibit 14-1 Exhibit 6-2 14.1 Nomenclature 14.1.A Is the Animal a Pet or Assistive 6-2.1 Pets versus Assistive Animals Animal? 14.2 Family
More informationORDINANCE # WHEREAS, backyard and urban chickens eat noxious weeds and insects; and
ORDINANCE #2009-01 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 17.00, ZONING, WITH THE ADDITION OF A NEW CHAPTER 17.52, KEEPING LIMITED NUMBERS OF FOWL, SPECIFICALLY HEN CHICKENS FOR EGGS AND ESTABLISHING MAINTENANCE
More informationTHE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1_8_1_9_:_{ O An ordinance amending Sections 53.18.5 and 53.63 and adding Section 53.34.3 to Article 3, Chapter 5 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to authorize the Department of Animal
More informationPET OWNERSHIP (ELDERLY / DISABLED, FAMILY, SCATTERED HOUSING & APARTMENT COMPLEXES) FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ted Ortiviz 201 S. Victoria Ave. Pueblo, CO 81003-3434 Phone (719) 542-6741 (Voice/TTY) (719) 584-7621 Fax (719) 546-5395 PET OWNERSHIP (ELDERLY / DISABLED, FAMILY, SCATTERED HOUSING
More informationPET POLICY. Family Housing: Anderson Lane Apartments & Meadow Lane Apartments
Housing Authority of the City of Old Town PET POLICY Family Housing: Anderson Lane Apartments & Meadow Lane Apartments - 1 - A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this policy is to establish the Old Town Housing
More informationSec Mandatory spaying and neutering. a. 1. Requirement. No person may own, keep, or harbor an unaltered and unspayed dog or cat in
Sec. 6.08.120 Mandatory spaying and neutering. a. 1. Requirement. No person may own, keep, or harbor an unaltered and unspayed dog or cat in violation of this section. An owner or custodian of an unaltered
More informationCHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS
CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS Section 343.01. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the keeping of animals as pets within the City in order
More informationTAUNTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET POLICY
TAUNTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET POLICY Residents of units owned and managed by the Taunton Housing Authority (the "Authority") may own and keep common household pets, provided, that they manage such pets
More informationClementina Arroyo Glenn Barnett Frank Bodeman Daniel Hutchinson Veronica Martinez Bruce Richetts Margaret Whelan
AGENDA ALHAMBRA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Joslyn Adult Center 210 N. Chapel Avenue, Alhambra CA 91801 April 2, 2015 7:00 p.m. Commissioners Albert Lu Clementina Arroyo Glenn Barnett
More informationPet, Service Animal, and Assistance Animal Policy
I. INTRODUCTION The Worcester Housing Authority ( WHA ) Pet, Service Animal, and Assistance Animal Policy provides rules and guidelines for the ownership and care of common household pets, and explains
More informationSan Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance
San Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance SEC. 43. DEFINITION OF PIT BULL. (a) Definition. For the purposes of this Article, the word "pit bull" includes any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier,
More informationLEGISLATURE
00 00 LEGISLATURE 00 AN ACT to amend 0. () (j); and to create. and. () (a). of the statutes; relating to: regulation of persons who sell dogs or operate animal shelters or animal control facilities, granting
More informationLOCATION OF PETS WITHIN THE BUILDING
These rules are intended to serve as pet ownership guidelines for (property name). Modification of these rules is permitted, but must first be cleared by the management and ownership of (property name)
More informationCity of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297
City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 15 AND CHAPTER 118 OF THE SOUTH ST. PAUL CITY CODE RELATING TO RAISING OF CHICKENS ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
More informationREASONABLE ACCOMMODATION PET POLICY ELDERLY/DISABLED PROJECTS. Feeding of stray animals will be considered as having an unauthorized animal.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION PET POLICY ELDERLY/DISABLED PROJECTS INTRODUCTION The purpose of this policy is to establish the BHA's policy and procedures for ownership of pets in elderly and disabled units
More informationORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON ADDING CHAPTER 6.56 TO THE RIPON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE MANDATORY SPAYING AND NEUTURING OF PIT BULL BREEDS BE IT ORDAINED BY
More informationMEMORANDUM JOHN ROGERS, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR HEATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL JOHN ROGERS, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR HEATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 12.20.080
More informationCHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted 02/16/2000 Amended 05/19/2004 Amended 04/20/2011 Amended 05/07/2014 604-1 Purpose... 1 604-2 Definitions... 1 1. ABANDONED ANIMAL:... 1
More informationMONAHANS HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Revised 6/14/2016)
MONAHANS HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Revised 6/14/2016) A. EXEMPTIONS These rules do not apply to assistance animals needed by a person with a documented disability who has a disability-related
More informationPublic Hearing Conditional Use Permit request by Krapu for a Dog Kennel August 30, 2004 reconvened September 7, 2004 Eureka Town Hall
Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit request by Krapu for a Dog Kennel August 30, 2004 reconvened September 7, 2004 Eureka Town Hall The public hearing of August 30, 2004 was reopened at 8:13 p.m. by
More informationProcedures for Assistance Animal in Residential Facilities
Procedures for Assistance Animal in Residential Facilities The George Washington University (GW) recognizes the importance of assistance animals to individuals with disabilities. The following procedures
More informationLibrary. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California
faq downloads submit ords tech support related links Library San Francisco, California This online version of the San Francisco Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 198-11, File No. 110788, approved
More informationTOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted - April 7, 2009 Effective - May 7, 2009 Amended March 2, 2010 1 TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section 1. Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this ordinance
More informationFRANCISCAN VILLAGE ANIMAL OWNERSHIP RULES
FRANCISCAN VILLAGE ANIMAL OWNERSHIP RULES (Including Pets and Assistance Animal s) Summary: "The TENANT is permitted to keep common household pets in his/her dwelling unit (subject to the provisions in
More informationOffice of Disability Support Services dss.catholic.edu Guidelines for Support Animals
Office of Disability Support Services dss.catholic.edu 202-319-5211 cua-dss@cua.edu Guidelines for Support Animals The Catholic University of America ( University ) is committed to providing reasonable
More informationPET POLICY FOR SENIOR AND DISABLED PROPERTIES HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE
PET POLICY FOR SENIOR AND DISABLED PROPERTIES HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE EXCLUSIONS Assistance or Companion animals that are needed as a reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities
More informationHOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY
2640 Fountain View Drive Houston, Texas 77057 713.260.0500 P 713.260.0547 TTY www.housingforhouston.com HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY A. EXEMPTION FROM THE PET RULES FOR ASSISTIVE ANIMALS
More informationPET POLICY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE
PET POLICY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE EXCLUSIONS Assistance or Companion animals that are needed as a reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities are not considered pets, and
More informationAn individual may request an emotional support animal as an accommodation in a campus residential facility if:
Austin College Policy Regarding the Use of Animals for Accommodation It is the policy of Austin College to provide equal access and reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities to participate
More informationTown of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151
Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151 ANIMAL ORDINANCE Ordinance # Whereby, the Town of Niagara, Marinette County, does hereby adopt Ordinance #, Animal Ordinance, for the purpose of regulating certain
More informationREQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Department Approval: TP Item Description: REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 1.0 REQUESTED ACTION: DATE: 12/05/07 ITEM NO: 5b Agenda Section: PUBLIC HEARING Request by Faegre and Benson (on behalf
More informationAddendum J PET OWNERSHIP POLICY
Addendum J PET OWNERSHIP POLICY A. Pet Rules The following rules shall apply for the keeping of pets by Residents living in the units operated by the Housing Authority. These rules do not apply to animals
More informationCHICKENS & DUCKS IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
CHICKENS & DUCKS IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY License application and Information packet On November 18 th 2013, The Anne Arundel County Council passed Bill 79-13 regarding chickens and ducks in residential
More informationROCKFORD HOUSING COMMISSION PET POLICY RESOLUTION 10/04.01 REVISED: MAY 23, 2011 COMMON HOUSEHOLD PETS ARE DEFINED AS:
ROCKFORD HOUSING COMMISSION PET POLICY RESOLUTION 10/04.01 REVISED: MAY 23, 2011 In compliance with Section 227 of Title II of the Housing and Urban Recovery Act of 1983, the Rockford Housing Commission
More informationANTI-DOG ENFORCEMENT - What Every Dog Owner Needs to Know
WHAT TO DO WHEN ANIMAL CONTROL COMES KNOCKING by George J. Eigenhauser Jr. (he is an attorney at law licensed in the State of California since 1979 and practices in the areas of civil litigation and estate
More informationFRISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Latest revision: 8/2017)
FRISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Latest revision: 8/2017) A. EXEMPTIONS These rules do not apply to service or companion animals needed by a person with a documented disability who has a
More information508.02 DEFINITIONS. When used in this article, the following words, terms, and phrases, and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates
More informationocpetinfo.com (714) Tips for owners of Barking Dogs:. The key to silencing barking is understanding
Tips for owners of Barking Dogs:. The key to silencing barking is understanding why your dog is barking to find the appropriate solution. Provide your dog with plenty of space and increase their amount
More informationChapter 60. Animals. Article I. Dogs. Article II. Cats Prohibited Conduct Definitions License
Chapter 60. Animals Article I. Dogs 60-3. Prohibited Conduct It shall be unlawful for any owner of a dog to: I. Own more than four (4) dogs. Household dogs and cats must not exceed a combined total of
More informationDepartment of Code Compliance
Department of Code Compliance Animal Shelter Advisory Commission s Recommended Changes to Chapter 7 Animals of the Dallas City Code Presented to the Quality of Life and Government Services Committee April
More informationService Animal Procedure, Student and Community Procedure
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY PROCEDURE Service Animal Procedure, Student and Community Procedure Procedure Administrator: Chief Officer for Institutional Diversity and Equity Authority: Americans with Disabilities
More informationSTAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010
STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA DATE: September 21, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010 TITLE OF ITEM: Ordinance Mandating Spay and Neutering Programs
More informationPOLICIES. Austin Peay State University. Animals on Campus
Page 1 Austin Peay State University Animals on Campus POLICIES Issued: (Date President approves policy) Responsible Vice President for Student Affairs and General Official: Counsel Office of Student Affairs
More information2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90
Date of enactment: December 1, 2009 2009 Assembly Bill 250 Date of publication*: December 15, 2009 2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90 AN ACT to amend 20.115 (2) (j) and 93.21 (5) (a); and to create 173.41 and 778.25
More informationPet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision
Purpose: Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision www.stonehengecondoassociation.com The purpose of these rules, effective May 15, 2011, are to establish reasonable requirements for the keeping of dogs
More informationINFORMATION TO HELP WITH BARKING DOGS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX
INFORMATION TO HELP WITH BARKING DOGS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX When there is a problem with barking dogs, it is helpful to talk to or leave a note for the animal owner. Although this may be difficult to
More informationChapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN
Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN ARTICLE I Title, Legislative Findings, and Authority 190-1. Short title. 190-2. Findings. 190-3. Statutory authority. ARTICLE II Definitions 190-4. Definitions. ARTICLE III Permitting
More informationTOWN COUNCIL AGENDA January 9, :00 P.M. 2. CART Presentation. 1. Budget Workshop
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA January 9, 2017 7:00 P.M. The Town Council meeting will be held in the Moose Hill Council Chambers, Town Hall, 268B Mammoth Road, Londonderry, NH. Regular meetings are cablecast live
More informationPage 47-1 rev
47.01 47.11(1) CHAPTER 47 ANIMAL CONTROL 47.01 Title. 47.02 Purpose. 47.03 Authority. 47.04 Administration. 47.05 Application. 47.06 Definitions. [47.07-47.10 reserved.] 47.11 Rabies Vaccinations Required.
More informationPaul Revere Village - Rules and Regulations
Use of Units Each condo within Paul Revere Village is to be utilized as a single-family residence only in accordance with the Millbury Zoning by-laws. Home offices are permitted but are restricted from
More informationBrandeis University Policy for Residential Students regarding Support Animals
Overview Brandeis University Policy for Residential Students regarding Support Animals Animals, including pets, are not permitted in Brandeis University housing with the exception of fish, as noted in
More informationPlease read the following information completely prior to completing the applications. Please Print Neatly!
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 411 Maxwell Frye Road, Millersville, Maryland, 21108 Phone: (410) 222-8900 Fax: (410) 222-8915 www.aacounty.org/animalcontrol DOG FANCIER INFORMATION & APPLICATION Please
More informationANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE COUNTY OF MUSKEGON. Ordinance No September 12, 2006
ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE COUNTY OF MUSKEGON Ordinance No. 2006-463 September 12, 2006 Amended: December 11, 2008 September 13, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article I General Provisions... 1 Section 101 Short
More informationService Animal and Assistance Animal Policy. Accessibility Services. Director of Accessibility Services
3341-2-42 Service Animal and Assistance Animal Policy. Applicability All University units Responsible Unit Policy Administrator Accessibility Services Director of Accessibility Services (A) Policy Statement
More informationMEMORANDUM. June 10 th, To: Members of Common Council. From: Belinda Lewis, Director Animal Care and Control
MEMORANDUM June 10 th, 2014 To: Members of Common Council From: Belinda Lewis, Director Animal Care and Control Subject: Proposed Ordinance Repeal/ Replace: Chapter 91 Why Now? We ve been reviewing areas
More informationHOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSON WILLIAMSON, WEST VIRGINIA PET OWNERSHIP POLICY
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSON WILLIAMSON, WEST VIRGINIA PET OWNERSHIP POLICY Adopted by PHA Board of Commissioners Resolution No.: Date of Adoption: Effective Date of Implementation: Authorized
More informationAN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY
More informationORDINANCE # AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE IV, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, CHAPTER VIII, ANIMAL CONTROL
First Reading: 01/09/17 Second Reading/Public Hearing: 02/06/17 Adopted: 02/06/17 ORDINANCE #2017-01 AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE IV, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, CHAPTER VIII, ANIMAL
More informationVILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.
VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 1595 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 608, ANIMALS, OF THE VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK CODIFIED ORDINANCES BY ADDING NEW SUBCHAPTER 608.22, A MANAGED
More informationBEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND ORDER OF REMAND
BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND ORDER OF REMAND Applicant: File No: Request: Travis Lundgren 16645 Dike Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 PL08-0439 Special Use Permit Location: 16645 Dike
More informationTitle 8 ANIMALS. Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals. 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs. 8-3 Keeping of Livestock
Title 8 ANIMALS Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs 8-3 Keeping of Livestock 1 Chapter 8-1 CRUELTY TO DUMB ANIMALS Sections: 8-1-1 Abuse of Animals 8-1-2 Violations; Penalty
More informationRussian Relief Association of St.Sergius of Radonezh
PET POLICY INTRODUCTION The purpose of this policy is to establish the RRA s policy and procedures for ownership of pets. Feeding stray animals will be considered as having an unauthorized animal. Violation
More informationEmotional Support Animal
Emotional Support Animal Corporate Owner: Executive Vice President Operational Owner: Director of the Success Center Effective Date: 9/2/2016 Last Revision Date: 9/2/2016 Revision Cycle: Annual I. Purpose
More informationLOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD
Town of STRATFORD, FULTON COUNTY, NEW YORK Local Law No. 1 of the year 2017 SECTION 1. Purpose The Town Board of the Town of Stratford finds that the running at large and other uncontrolled behavior of
More informationReferred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government
HEARING 6/4/13 11am State House Rm 437 & 1pm State House Rm A2 SUPPORT SB1103 An Act Relative to Protecting Puppies & Kittens [Sen. Spilka (D)] SUPPORT HB1826 An Act Relative to Protecting Puppies & Kittens
More informationBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER 2001-4 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS, VACCINATION OF DOGS AND THEIR IDENTIFICATION, CONTROL OF VICIOUS DOGS AND
More informationGreat Basin College. Student Housing. Emotional Support Animal Policy and Agreement Policy
Great Basin College Student Housing Emotional Support Animal Policy and Agreement Policy GBC recognizes the importance of Service Animals as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act
More informationPASCO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
PASCO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES THE MINUTES WERE PREPARED IN AGENDA ORDER AS PUBLISHED AND NOT IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THE ITEMS WERE HEARD November 7, 2007 7:15 p.m. - West Pasco
More informationService and Assistance Animals Policy & Procedure
Service and Assistance Animals Policy & Procedure Adopted: February 12, 2014 Animals, including pets, are not permitted in College buildings or the residence hall with the exception of approved Service
More informationTitle 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
Title 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS Chapter 723: FACILITY LICENSES Table of Contents Part 9. ANIMAL WELFARE... Section 3931. KENNELS (REPEALED)... 3 Section 3931-A. BREEDING KENNELS... 3 Section 3931-B. WOLF
More informationRemember all animals must be PRE-APPROVED!
Remember all animals must be PRE-APPROVED! Should your animal be approved to live at the Village, the following items are required on the day your animal moves in. Only dogs, cats, and fish (no larger
More informationNancy Snyder asked what type of permits did her obtain? Answer: Captive White Tail Deer form from Division of Wildlife.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING 7134 East Sparta Ave. S.E., Magnolia, Ohio June 14, 2016 APPEAL #381 Cory Crank is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to keep wild and exotic animals in a residential district.
More information!! Equal Housing Opportunity
ISLAND ELDERLY HOUSING, INC. PET POLICY It is the intent of Island Elderly Housing, Inc. (IEH) to provide an environment that supports the health and safety of IEH residents and to protect the rights of
More informationPerry County Housing Authority PET POLICY Effective April 1, 2013
Perry County Housing Authority PET POLICY Effective April 1, 2013 1. APPLICATION Perry County Housing Authority will allow tenants to have pets in their units, provided PCHA has been notified and issued
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION RIVIERA CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC.,
More informationCity of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF ANIMAL SERVICES COMMISSIONERS TARIQ A. KHERO PRESIDENT KATHLEEN RIORDAN VICE PRESIDENT MARIE ATAKE GLENN S. BROWN ARCHIE J. QUINCEY JR. City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR
More information(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:
505.16 VICIOUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS (a) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this section: (1) "Director of Public Safety" means the City official
More informationCHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL
CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL SECTION: 5-4-1: Definitions 5-4-2: License Required (Repealed) 5-4-3: License Fees (Repealed) 5-4-4: Unidentified Dogs Running at Large 5-4-5: Record of License (Repealed) 5-4-6:
More informationChapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Animal Control
Chapter 2 Animals Part 1 Animal Control 2-101. Short Title 2-102. Definitions 2-103. Running at Large Prohibited 2-104. Seizure and Impounding of Animals Running at Large and Redemption 2-105. Curbing
More informationChapter 10. PETS [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G]
INTRODUCTION Chapter 10 PETS [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G] This chapter explains the PHA's policies on the keeping of pets and describes any criteria or standards pertaining to the policies.
More informationCITY COUNCIL JUNE 10, :00 PM
CITY COUNCIL JUNE 10, 2015 7:00 PM Meeting was called to order by Emily Chatterton at 7:00 pm. Present: Council: Bryce Wood, Emily Chatterton, And Joyce Bayles Also present: Damon Yardley (did not sign
More informationORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY LAND DEVELOPMENT
More informationBISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO. 2009-02 ADOPTED June 24, 2009 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Paiute Tribal Ordinance No. 2009-02 Regulating the Vaccination
More informationDOG BYLAWS. 3. There will be a late charge per dog for licensing after March 31 st. There will be no exceptions to this requirement.
DOG BYLAWS Section 1: Licensing: The owner or keeper of a dog kept within the Town of Heath shall cause the dog to be licensed individually or part of a kennel license, as provided in this Bylaw and Chapter
More informationOffice of Residence Life Pet Friendly Community - Procedures
Office of Residence Life Pet Friendly Community - Procedures Southeast Missouri State University allows residential students the opportunity to have their family pet live with them on campus in select
More informationCITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )
CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. #647-05-18-89) 13.01 DOGS - (Ord. #647-5-18-89) (1) Statutes Adopted. The current and future provisions of Ch. 174, Wis. Stats., defining
More informationPET POLICY (FAMILY) FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI
PET POLICY (FAMILY) FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI PET OWNERSHIP Section 526 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 added a new Section 31 ( Pet Ownership
More information