On the Evolution of Feathers from an Aerodynamic and Constructional View Point 1
|
|
- Rolf Marsh
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AMER. ZOOL., 40: (2000) On the Evolution of Feathers from an Aerodynamic and Constructional View Point 1 SAMUEL F. TARSITANO, 2, *ANTHONY P. RUSSELL, FRANCIS HORNE,* CHRISTOPHER PLUMMER,* AND KAREN MILLERCHIP* *Biology Department, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada SYNOPSIS. The evolution of birds and feathers are examined in terms of the aerodynamic constraints imposed by the arboreal and cursorial models of flight evolution. The cursorial origin of flight is associated with the putative coelurosaurian ancestry of birds. As presently known, coelurosaurs have a center of mass located in the pelvic region and an elongated pubis that is ventrally or anteriorly directed. Both of these characteristics make it difficult to postulate an origin of flight that would involve a gliding phase because the abdomen cannot be flattened into an aerodynamic shape. Moreover, the cursorial model must counteract gravity using the hindlimb and, thus, selection for the power requirement for lift-off would not focus on the forelimb. Therefore, if the hypothesis proposing a coelurosaurian ancestry of birds is to remain viable, it must be via an as yet undiscovered taxon that is compatible with the morphological and aerodynamic constraints imposed by flight evolution. The arboreal model, currently centers around non-dinosaurian taxa and is more parsimonious in that early archosaurs have short pubes that do not preclude an aerodynamic body profile. Moreover, the arboreal proavis uses gravity to create the airflow over the body surfaces and is, thus, energy efficient. Consideration of the initial aerodynamic roles of feathers and feather design are consistent with a precursory gliding phase. Whether avian ancestry lies among coelurosaur theropods or earlier archosaurs, we must remain mindful of the complex aerodynamic dictates of gliding and powered flight and avoid formalistic approaches that coopt sister taxa, with their known body form, as functional ancestors. INTRODUCTION Two current theories purport to explain the origin of avian flight arboreal and cursorial. The arboreal theory usually involves the consideration of a small early archosaur as an ancestor (Marsh, 1880; Heilmann, 1927; Bock, 1965, 1985), whereas the cursorial theory generally implicates a small coelurosaurian dinosaur as an ancestor (Lowe, 1935; Ostrom, 1974, 1976; Caple et al., 1983; Gauthier, 1986). Extensive reviews of the history of these theories and the origin of birds can be found in Heilmann (1927) and Stephan (1974). In the context of these theories, much has been written about 1 From the Symposium Evolutionary Origin of Feathers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 6 10 January 1999, at Denver, Colorado. 2 st04@swt.edu the flight capabilities of Archaeopteryx, as it already had a well-developed array of modern flight feathers (de Beer, 1954; Feduccia and Tordoff, 1979). The wing morphology and the asymmetrical nature of the feather vanes indicate that Archaeopteryx was already a flier (de Beer, 1954; George and Berger, 1966; Parkes, 1966; Feduccia and Tordoff, 1979; Feduccia, 1985; Norberg, 1985). Thus, Archaeopteryx is far removed from the time in avian evolution when the first attempts at flight were undertaken. However, it is axiomatic that morphological preadaptations existed among the earliest members of what was to become the proavian lineage to accommodate behavioral changes that would lead to the development of flight (Von Wahlert, 1965). Taking this into account, we can examine the two opposing views of the origin of flight to see if they have equal probability from a functional morphological standpoint. 676
2 EVOLUTION OF FEATHERS 677 The arboreal model hypothesizes that the proavis was a small early archosaur that leaped from branch to branch, or from a branch to a tree trunk, and that this behavior was key in the origin of the first flying archosaur (Heilmann, 1927). The cursorial theory maintains that the proavis was a bipedal coelurosaurian dinosaur which, by leaping to catch insects in its mouth, became adapted to flight (Ostrom, 1976; Gauthier and Padian, 1985; Padian and Chiappe, 1998). Peter Griffiths (personal communication) advocates an arboreal coelurosaur and, thus departs from most supporters of the coelurosaurian ancestry of birds who claim a cursorial habit (Ostrom, 1976; Gauthier and Padian, 1985; Padian and Chiappe, 1998). We herein endeavor to divorce, in the first instance, considerations of taxonomic ancestry in our contemplation of flight origins and deal with aspects of aerodynamics. Only secondarily is it necessary to consider morphology as demonstrated by known fossil taxa as potential ancestors. This is so since regardless of the taxonomic starting point, each morphology must deal with the effects of drag, lift and thrust. Definitions and discussions of these topics that include laminar and turbulent flow and vortex formation are to be found in White (1974); Nachtigall (1977); Ellington (1980, 1984, 1991); Vennard and Street (1982); Tucker (1990), and Vogel (1988). The primary characters of birds are feathers without which birds cannot fly (in air). Therefore it is necessary to examine the conditions under which, and the purposes for which, feathers may have evolved, and how these might relate to selective factors implicating them in flight. Feathers make their first appearance in the fossil record with Archaeopteryx in the Upper Jurassic. Clearly, they must have originated earlier than this, because the feathers of Archaeopteryx already reflect the morphology typical of those of modern birds. The evolution of feathers from reptilian scales has been advocated to be in direct association with the origin of flight (Marsh, 1880; Heilmann, 1927; Parkes, 1966), although the exact mechanisms or stages of feather formation are wanting in such hypotheses. An alternative hypothesis posits that feathers evolved first as sun screens to aid in thermoregulation, and were only later modified for flight (Regal, 1975, 1985). Dyck (1985) proposed that feathers were evolved for water repellence, this being based upon the grooved surface the barbs bestow on a feather s dorsal surface that aids in the ease with which water rolls off the birds body. Moving in fluids: General considerations If we assume that feathers were at least exapted in part for flight, then we can ask what selective forces may have operated to promote the elongation of scales (if feathers are transformed from scales) or protofeathers (if feathers are de novo structures). Protofeathers occur as a result of a developmental change during the formation of scales (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1974; Zeltinger and Sawyer, 1991). This developmental alteration would be manifested in its initial stages by the elongation of the dermal papilla above the skin level and/or the formation of barbs in the structure. In their early stages of evolution it is likely the barbs would be parallel to one another before a rachis is formed. This condition is present in developing contour and flight feathers (Davies, 1889). The arboreal or elevation model Consideration of the physical phenomena of airflow with respect to morphological stages of feather formation may provide insight into the probable selective forces promoting their evolution. Of what benefit would elongated scales or protofeathers be to an arboreal or cliff dwelling proavis? Jumping between trees or branches, falling, would be assisted if morphology provided mechanisms that would either result in slowing the proavis before impact (increasing the drag on the body), or aiding in lift by maintaining a turbulent boundary layer over the body surfaces that prevents separation at high angles of attack. Separation of the boundary layer from the body surface would decrease lift and might be avoided with small-scale turbulence generation. Animals that resort to this sort of behavior (jumping between trees and the ground) and that lack specialized structures to slow the rate of descent flatten themselves and
3 678 S. F. TARSITANO ET AL. FIG. 1. A diagrammatic representation of stages in the evolution of a wing. The upper row (A C) represents turbulence generating protofeathers used also as steering and braking devices. The bottom row (D F) represents the transition from large scale turbulence generation to lift generation with the elongation and curvature of the protofeathers. At this point feathers would also act as turbulators to create small scale turbulence allowing the flow to remain on the wing and thus reduce pressure drag. Modified after Tarsitano, spread their limbs in order to use the body as an airfoil for lift generation (Oliver, 1951; Heyer and Pongapipatana, 1970; Russell, 1979). The angle of attack and degree of flattening of the body contour will determine the ratio of lift vs. drag generated while in the air. Templin (1977) has pointed to the necessity of slowing down to about six meters per second before impact in order to avoid injury. While this minimum speed to avoid injury would vary depending upon the organism, it is still an important point to consider. We know from feather development (Davies, 1889) that presumptive feathers are oriented in a posterior direction and are not elevated more than forty degrees above the horizontal. Thus, in the earliest stages of the evolution of flight in the trees down scenario, when the proavis has not achieved modern feather morphology, what would be the selective advantage to the elongation of scales or protofeathers? Would the protofeathers function in order to effect transition to a turbulent flow (Fig. 1a, b) or would they act as turbulators (or vortex generators) to reattach a separated flow due to high angles of attack the body experienced? We offer the hypothesis that the protofeathers are not themselves producing lift, but rather are producing turbulence. Whether this turbulence is used to enhance lift on the body by allowing the boundary layer to remain attached to the body surfaces, including the limbs, or whether the protofeathers were creating enough turbulence that would lead to separation of the boundary layer from the body surfaces is unknown. Theoretically projections from a surface can lead to turbulence (White, 1974; Vennard and Smith, 1982; Cummings and Bragg, 1996). A criteron for determining whether protofeathers or any other projection will cause transition is that the non-dimensional roughness height, ku/n, be larger than 150, where k is the roughness height, U is the free stream velocity, and n is the kinematic viscosity. For protofeathers that are 4 mm in length and exposed to a flow of 6 m/second, a value of 1,600 is reached, well above the limit to induce turbulence. In experiments we conducted using protofeather models placed in a water tunnel at 10 cm/sec, we found that 4 mm projections inclined in a posterior direction at an angle of 39 degrees above the skin caused turbulence (Fig. 2). This is significant because the turbulence we observed did not cause separation from the model surface, indicating the possibility that protofeathers could have had an aerodynamic function associated with lift. Disturbances in the boundary layer can either lead to an increase in lift or a loss of lift depending upon whether the turbulence enables the boundary layer to adhere to the surface of the body (White, 1974; Vennard and Street, 1982). If such turbulence is large enough, the boundary layer may separate from the body surface and, thus, increase the pressure drag on the body or induce a stall depending upon the position of the separation along the body or wing (Mal-
4 EVOLUTION OF FEATHERS 679 FIG. 2. Flow visualization of flat plate and protofeather models in water tunnel operating at 10 cm/sec. A. laminar flow over a smooth plate. B D. Turbulence generated by protofeathers 4 mm in length and inclined at degree angle. This implies that protofeathers could indeed affect the flow characteristics over the body of a protoavis. kiel and Mayle, 1996; Huang et al., 1996). It is possible that the turbulence generated by projections (in our case protofeathers) could theoretically prevent boundary layer separation at different angles of attack (Abdel-Rahman and Chakroun, 1997). Projections into the boundary layer have been shown to behave in this manner (Carlson and Lumley, 1996; Debisschop and Nieuwstadt, 1996; Abdel-Rahman and Chakroun, 1997), although at different Reynolds numbers than might be experienced by evolving protobirds (Sundaram et al., 1996; Kerho and Bragg, 1997). Along these lines, we suggest that the early stages of flight had to do with lift generation whereby differential airflow over a cambered body surface generated a vertical force on the animal s body (Peters and Gutmann, 1984). This lifting force centered initially more on the body than the forelimbs and was used to extend a glide between trees or branches. The first step in the evolution of bird flight was a change in behavior that resulted in the proavis leaping between branches (Von Wahlert, 1965; Russell, 1979). The protofeathers were selected for maintaining the boundary layer on the body surfaces at varying angles of attack. Any hypothesis concerning feather evolution must account for the elongation of not only the flight and contour feathers, but also the feathers (termed coverts) which overlap the remiges anteriorly along the wing. This feather elongation and distribution may be explained in the following way. Because the boundary layer will increase in thickness across the chord of the protowing, it is more likely (Vogel, 1983), that the more posteriorly placed protofeathers would elongate more than those placed at the leading edge of the limb (Fig. 1e). We suggest this hypothesis in light of the necessity to increase the roughness past the subviscous layer of the boundary layer (White, 1974; Vennard and Street, 1982; Kerho and Bragg, 1997) in order to initiate transition from a laminar to turbulent flow. Are elongated scales found in the integument of archosaurs? Unfortunately, the integumentary form in probable arboreal early archosaurs, such as Megalancosaurus, is unknown. However, many crocodilians, such as alligators and gharials, have elon-
5 680 S. F. TARSITANO ET AL. gated scales on the trailing edges of their hindlimbs and a tuberculate scale pattern on the forelimb. The presence of scale elongation in crocodilians reinforces the possibility that archosaurs leading to birds might have possessed similar modifications. Thus, there might have been a developmental constraint as to how, and in which direction, scale elongation could have proceeded. As elongation of protofeathers proceeded, an airfoil with tapered trailing edge would be developed and thus a higher lift to drag ratio could evolve. The protofeather elongation on the limb would lead to the upper surface of the protowing being cambered. With changes in the angle of attack of the wing, changes in lift could be accomplished with no additional or specialized mechanisms, utilizing only the pre-existing deltoid and pectoral musculature. Once the forelimb was a wing (i.e., an organ capable of producing more lift than drag), selection would favor enhancement of the pectoral adductor musculature to resist the lifting forces on the wings. In summary, our observations of smooth limbs in water tunnel tests showed mainly laminar flow over the limb s surface. Roughened surfaces with protofeathers created turbulence whereas the smooth surface did not (Fig. 2). Both smooth and rough surface models were tested at a Reynolds number of 90,000. At this point in time, we suggest that protofeathers could have added directly to lift on the body by preventing the separation of flow and thereby actually narrowing the wake behind the animal. The limbs might have been used for steering using turbulence generation. Testing of small chord, model limbs with protofeathers is necessary to understand the flow patterns and lift/drag ratios. To state at this time that protofeathers would add to lift generation operating in the manner of modern feathers is premature given the difference between mathematical predictions of drag coefficients and their actual measurements on models (Vennard and Street, 1982). Garner et al. (1999) who postulated that flight evolved as a mechanism to support pouncing onto prey from an elevated position support the viewpoint that limb protofeathers were used to generate turbulence. Their scenario suggested that early stages of flight were based upon drag developed by the protowings that later were exapted for lift generation as postulated by Tarsitano (1985). This change might have been exaptive because the protofeathers would impart eventually a curvature to the protowing. The curvature would allow differential airflow over its surfaces producing lift and a tapered posterior edge, to reducing pressure drag of the limb by streamlining (Tarsitano, 1985). The cursorial model Turning to the cursorial model of the origin of avian flight, we are faced with quite a different set of circumstances. The cursorial proavis, taken to be a coelurosaur (Ostrom, 1976; Gauthier and Padian, 1985; Padian and Chiappe, 1998) must run or jump in order to create an air current for flight. How would elongating the scales (or forming protofeathers) in the earliest stages of a cursorial model benefit such an ancestor? For an animal running to gain speed, exposure of as much surface area as possible would be counterproductive and unlikely to favor elongated scales or protofeathers. In the early stages of such a scenario, most lift would be generated by the body surface. The large hindlimbs oscillating during locomotion would cause largescale turbulence and separation of flow from the body surfaces, leading to increased drag. The faster the animal ran, the greater the production of drag because parasite drag increases with the square of forward velocity (Pennycuick, 1972; Nachtigall, 1977; Vogel, 1983; Rayner, 1985). Therefore, by running, a cursorial proavis would expend energy only to induce detrimental drag (Tarsitano, 1985). Our water tunnel tests on dinosaur models indicated that this scenario is close to the truth. These models, patterned after Compsognathus, created large-scale turbulence where the water flow separated from the body at the pelvic region. This did not happen with the quadrupedal early archosaur model that had laterally oriented limbs and a flat abdomen. In contrast to an arboreal model, a cursorial proavis must work against gravity (Tucker, 1938). Leaping into the air from
6 EVOLUTION OF FEATHERS 681 the ground would reduce forward velocity and maneuverability (Rayner, 1985), making it more difficult to effect a lift-off in the nascent stages of the development of the protowing which could not generate more lift than drag. It seems clear that during running, a bipedal cursorial coelurosaur would benefit most by presenting the least amount of surface area to the air, in order to minimize profile drag (pressure and skin friction drag) and to prevent airflow separation from the body. Thus, the elongation of scales in such forms as presently known seems unlikely (Tarsitano, 1985). Other important factors in the evolution of flight are size, volume distribution, and surface area. Both the cursorial and arboreal models of flight require a small archosaur, but the proposed coelurosaurian proavis is relatively large: the smallest Compsognathus corallestris (nearly complete specimen) adult is over one meter in length (Taquet, 1985). This size is far too large to fit either the model of Caple et al. (1983) or its revised version (Balda et al., 1985) that requires at least 50% of the body weight to be compensated for by generated lift. Neither the size factor, nor the body proportions (a width of 3 cm and a length of 15 cm), as advocated in the Caple et al. (1983) model, approximate any known adult theropod including the newly discovered Sinosauropteryx. For example, in the model proposed by Caple et al. (1983), the hindlimbs are extremely small and the tail is short. However, a prominent feature of all coelurosaurs is large hindlimbs and long tail. The tail of the model coelurosaur is too short to be used as a counterbalance organ (see Charig, 1972). A model based on a hypothetical morphology is of limited use in terms of ancestor descendant or sister group scenarios, but is instructive from a functional standpoint. The large hindlimbs of coelurosaurs (where the forelimbs are less than 70% of the hindlimb length) demonstrate their cursorial nature (Charig, 1972) as does their posteriorly placed center of mass. This contrasts with the quadrupedal stance and gait of early archosaurs. The cursorial theory requires a well-developed hindlimb and pelvic girdle because the hindlimb must provide the induced velocity for lift-off. As Rayner (1985) pointed out, as soon as the proavis leaped from the ground it would lose velocity, and gravity would act against its forward and upward motion. Thus, in order to gain height to make gliding effective, the proavis would have to leap, but to what end? Leaping to catch a flying insect is energetically costly, especially at the level of flight capability of the proavis, where the insect, with powered flight capability, would have an advantage in maneuverability. The cursorial theory proposed by Caple et al. (1983) is not energetically efficient, because gravity must be overcome by the power output of the hindlimb. The only alternative is for the cursorial proavis to run downhill, taking advantage of the negative energy requirements of this type of behavior (Goldspink, 1977). In fact, we offer this suggestion as an addendum to the cursorial theory because, energetically, it provides a less expensive strategy to produce the induced velocity. In the arboreal proavis there is minimal energy expenditure to initiate flight, because the organism works with gravity and drag, whereas the cursorial proavis must work against gravity and drag (Norberg, 1985; Tarsitano, 1985). The arboreal starting point, requires only that a small archosaur, perhaps the size of a gliding gecko (some cm long) takes the first leap to enter a new adaptive zone (Tarsitano, 1985). In order to create any airflow about the body surfaces, the arboreal proavis need only fall (see parallel arguments about the origin of insect flight, Kukulova- Peck, 1983). Thus gravity would have worked with the arboreal proavis, and little energy would have had to be expended in order to enter a new adaptive zone (Norberg, 1985; Tarsitano, 1985). In contrast a running coelurosaur would have a good deal of baggage to carry, in the form of the mass of the pelvis and hindlimbs (the hindlimbs once airborne are no longer able to produce power but are still a major source of drag) that would have to be to overcome by the relatively small forelimbs. In addition, there has never been any evidence for feathered forelimbs in any dinosaur and thus the hypothesis that lift pro-
7 682 S. F. TARSITANO ET AL. duction of any significance from such limbs is dubious. The forelimb/hindlimb ratios of coelurosaurs are unlike those of Archaeopteryx. Ostrom (1976), in fact, reported the forelimbs of Deinonychus were about 66% of the hindlimb length. In Archaeopteryx, the forelimb length exceeds that of the hind-limb and thus the forelimbs are over 100% of the hindlimbs. Those coelurosaurs with the largest forelimbs are so large and heavy as to preclude the evolution of flight. The smaller theropods, such as Compsognathus longipes, have forelimb/hindlimb ratios of under 40% (Ostrom, 1978). These limb ratios demonstrate how Archaeopteryx differs from its theropod cousins. The thecodont, Megalancosaurus (Calzavara et al., 1981), has elongated forelimbs; thus a comparison of relative limb lengths in this form with those of Archaeopteryx might well be instructive. Even if provided with protofeathers, the relatively short forelimbs of known coelurosaurs would not have been able to provide the surface area during the early stages of wing evolution necessary to lift the mass of the animal. This is the stumbling block of any cursorial theory. It is most probable that a proavis did not start to fly with the wing span and aspect ratio typical of Archaeopteryx, but with a moderately-developed forelimb possessed of slightly elongated protofeathers. In addition, the vertically oriented pubes in Deinonychus and other Asian coelurosaurs would further counteract lift by forming a V shaped ventral surface rather than a flattened or concave surface for gliding. Lizards that leap to launch a glide flatten the abdomen (Russell, 1979), to make effective use of the body as an airfoil. In contrast to early archosaurs with short pubes (Ewer, 1965), morphologically-known coelurosaurs would have been incapable of flattening the abdomen and thus would gain little lift from their body form. Furthermore, a quadruped or semibiped has a body shape that would be much more concordant with the body shape and center of mass dictated by the requirements of the development of flight. This is so because the center of mass would be more anterior in such forms than the center of mass in an archosaurian biped. Therefore, any lift required from a feathered tail would be less than in a biped. For these reasons, the only tetrapods that have demonstrably given rise to flight are quadrupeds. The major requirements for early gliding without help from elongated scales or protofeathers is small size, a flattened ventrum, and body proportions that do not have any massive areas to cause unbalanced rotations and pressure drag. These conditions are not met by any known coelurosaurs. The primitive, antero-ventrally directed pubes in coelurosaurs might have precluded their flattening the belly for gliding. Thus, the major source of lift the body is inconsistent with the demands of flight and alone may have precluded the evolution of flight in any known coelurosaurs, if our arguments hold that a gliding stage is a necessary intermediate. For these reasons coelurosaurs possessing a different morphology than that presently known should be sought. Regardless of whether they begin flight from a cursorial or arboreal mode their morphology should be more compatible with the aerodynamic constraints of body shape and weight distribution. A wind-tunnel test of a Deinonychus model would help to determine drag coefficients of the body shape and at what point elongated scales or protofeathers would provide enough lift to support a glide. Those who have suggested that there was no gliding stage in the evolution of avian flight (e.g., Gauthier and Padian, 1985) have neglected the morphological and physiological constraints on active flight (see George and Berger, 1966; Tucker, 1973; Greenwalt, 1975 and Clark, 1977 for excellent discussions). Furthermore, a terrestrial takeoff requires the most complex wing stroke (Brown, 1951), and thus is unlikely to evolve before gliding. In this way, the balance system proposed by Peters and Gutmann (1985) can be developed as the evolution of flight proceeded and there is no need for any morphological prerequisites for flight save the ability to flatten the abdomen (Russell, 1979). To summarize, the reasons for arguing against a cursorially launched flight using known coelurosaur body morphology are:
8 EVOLUTION OF FEATHERS 683 1) extremely high energetic requirements of a ground-based take-off; 2) the placement of the center of mass in the pelvic region instead of in the thorax; 3) a body shape that precludes the production of a body gliding surface; and 4) hindlimb and pelvic girdle morphology that creates large-scale turbulence. Paleontologists (Padian and Chiappe, 1998) who favor the cursorial theory have not effectively dealt with the aforementioned criticisms. A groundlaunched flight is only possible after the evolution of a feathered wing and wing stroke had been evolved (Burgers and Chiappe, 1999). The evolution of feathers A problem common to both the arboreal and cursorial theories of the origin of avian flight lies in the evolution of the structure of the feather itself. In the wings of modern birds, or even Archaeopteryx, overlapping remiges act to brace the feathers against the lifting force of the wing. Strengthening of the feathers vane is facilitated by the formation of hooklets on the ends of the barbules, which attach to the barbules of an adjacent barb (Davies, 1889; Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972; Dyck, 1985). Pennycuick (1972) presented a scenario to account for this morphology. According to his explanation, the lifting forces acting on the wing would tend to curl the edges of protofeathers upward, increasing the induced drag on the wing (due to vortex formation; see Rayner, 1985 and Norberg, 1996 for an explanation). If the edges of the protofeather developed corrugations, these would help to eliminate the bending moments at the boundaries of the protofeather. Inward extensions of these corrugations toward the midline of the protofeather would result in the production of barbs. Our examination of feather development has cast doubt upon this scenario because barbs do not form in this way, but rather emanate as parallel rods from the circular collar (Davies, 1889; Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972). The growth of the rachis gives the barbs their angle on the vane (Lillie and Juhn, 1938). Our studies indicate that the barbs are not uniform in morphology or thickness along their lengths and that this morphological detail may help contribute to the angle they make with the rachis. Corrugations can only occur at the vane edges to form barbs in the flat plate scenario used by Regal (1975, 1985), only if the keratin strands making up these protobarbs are already directed outward toward the vane boundaries. The development of barbs from the circular collar precludes the corrugation hypothesis. The method of feather formation and vane morphology can be used to corroborate the hypothesis that feathers were selected for a flight function. Regal (1975, 1985) illustrated the protofeather with the protobarbs oriented parallel to the rachis and extending outward as horizontal plates. Feather development and vane construction shows that the barbs are oriented at 90 degrees to the long axis of the rachis (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972) and not horizontally placed, as in the model posited by Regal (1985). Horizontally oriented barbs will fulfill a sun screen function, but such an arrangement would be wholly incapable of preventing the buckling of either the protofeather or modern feathers that are subjected to aerodynamic forces. Barbs are actually oriented with their widths facing in a dorso ventral plane to resist these bending forces. Therefore, if Regal (1985) were correct, the developmental plan for barb formation would have to have completely reoriented itself, so that the barbs could function in an aerodynamic mode. If feathers were evolved for insulation and then exapted for flight it is difficult to understand why such a complex structure was developed for the initial purpose. Hair-like structures would have been simpler to build. Thus the developmental complexity of feathers contradicts Regal s (1985) interpretation on both biomechanical and embryological grounds. CONCLUSIONS While the systematic relationships of birds have been extensively studied, concomitant arguments about the origin of avian flight have generally been constrained by forcing transitions from a putative relative of known body form, rather than arguing from the standpoint of aerodynamic principles. In addition, few proponents of var-
9 684 S. F. TARSITANO ET AL. ious theories have tested their flight models experimentally. At the present time, we know more about theropod evolution than of small arboreal early archosaurs. Since coelurosaurs are well represented in the fossil record, we should be able to find theropods whose morphology fits the aerodynamic constraints of evolving flight in birds. Instead, we discover that theropods differ from the aerodynamic form that would fit the model that Caple et al. (1983) postulated. Coelurosaurs are too large and are anatomically specialized for cursorial locomotion. Accordingly, paleontologists, saddled with a cursorial archosaur, have had to disregard the drawbacks of a highly specialized pelvis and hindlimb and propose theories of flight that contain unsound energetic and ecological hypotheses in order to get a theropod derivative off the ground (Ostrom, 1976; Padian, 1982; Caple et al. 1983). Coelurosaurs, as presently known, are morphologically unsuited for flight of any kind. In order to better fit the aerodynamic model a coelurosaur should be found that have the following features: 1) forelimbs as long or longer than the hindlimbs; 2) small enough size that wing loading would be within the realm of gliding; 3) either short pubes or an opisthopubic condition that oriented the pubes nearly parallel with a horizontal ischium to make body gliding possible; 4) a center of mass in front of the pelvis; and 5) a well-developed and opposable hallux (an arboreal character not found in known coelurosaurs) and coracoids that were oriented in two planes, indicating an elongation over the known coelurosaur condition (Tarsitano and Hecht, 1980). Aerodynamic evaluation is consistent in its indication of a lightly built, small archosaur that could use a favorable surface to volume ratio and gravity to cover relatively long distances in its environment at less energetic cost (Tucker, 1973; Rayner, 1985; Tarsitano, 1985). Testing of models in wind tunnels is necessary to support the morphological starting points of avian flight and the aerodynamic function of protofeathers. Wind tunnel testing should concentrate on the lift/drag ratios of both coelurosaurian and early archosaur body shapes. Such tests should be applied to protofeather models to determine how the protofeathers affect the charactistics of the boundary layer at various sizes and distributions on the limb and body surfaces. Moreover testing of protofeathers on limb and body models at different angles of attack are needed to determine how such protofeathers would benefit an archosaur in a gliding mode. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Paul Maderson and Dominique Homberger for inviting us to participate in this symposium. In addition, we thank them for reviewing the manuscript over the course of its development. Thanks to Linda Treub, Larry Martin, Ulla Norberg, Philip Burgers and Carl Haux for their review and suggestions for this manuscript. Special thanks are also due to David Bogard of the University of Texas at Austin for allowing us use of the Turbulence and Turbine Cooling Research Laboratory and for his contributions to the aerodynamic explanations in this paper, and to Larry Martin, Max Hecht and Alan Feduccia for many discussions on the evolution of birds. We thank the National Science Foundation for travel support to attend this symposium. REFERENCES Abdel-Rahman, A. A. and W. M. Chakroun Surface roughness effects on flow over airfoils. Wind Engineering 21(3): Balda, R. P., G. Caple and W. R. Willis Comparison of the gliding to flapping sequence with the flapping to gliding sequence. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Bock, W. J The role of adaptive mechanisms in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool. 14: Bock, W. J The arboreal origin of flight. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura Museums, Eichstätt. Bragg, M. B. and G. M. Gregorek Experimental study of airfoil performance with vortex generators. J. Aircraft. 24: Brown, R. H. L Flapping flight. Ibis 93: Burgers, P. and L. M. Chiappe The wing of Archaeopteryx as a primary thrust generator. Nature 399: Calzavara, M., G. Muscio, and R. Wild Mega-
10 EVOLUTION OF FEATHERS 685 lancosaurus preonensis, n. g., n. sp., a new reptile from the Norian of Friuli, Italy. Atti Mus. Fruil. Storia. Nat. 2: Caple, G., R. P. Balda, and W. R. Willis The physics of leaping animals and the evolution of preflight. Am. Nat. 121: Carlson, H. A. and J. L. Lumley Flow over an obstacle emerging from the wall of a channel. AIAA Journal 34: Charig, A. J The evolution of the archosaur pelvis and hindlimb: An explanation in functional terms. In K. A. Joysey and T. S. Kemp (eds.), Studies in vertebrate evolution, pp Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. Clark, B. D Energetics of hovering flight and the origin of bats. In M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major patterns in vertebrate evolution, pp Plenum Press, New York and London. Cummings, M. J. and M. B. Bragg Boundarylayer transition due to isolated three-dimensional roughness on the airfoil leading edge. AIAA Journal 347: Davies, H. R Die Entwicklung der Feder und ihre Beziehungen zu anderen Integumentgebilden. Gegenbaurs Morph. Jahrb. 15: de Beer, G. R Archaeopteryx lithographica: A study based upon the British Museum specimen. British Museum (Natural History), London. Debisschop, J. R. and F. T. M. Nieuwstadt Turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient: Effectiveness of riblets. AIAA Journal 34: Dyck, J The evolution of feathers. Zool. Scr. 14: Ellington, C. P Vortices and hovering flight. In W. Nachtigall (ed.), Instationäre Effekete an schwingenden Tierflügel, pp Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden. Ellington, C. P The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 305: Ellington, C. P Aerodynamics and the origin of insect flight. Adv. Insect Physiol. 23: Ewer, R. F The anatomy of the thecodont reptile, Euparkeria capensis, Broom. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. (B) 248: Feduccia, A. and H. B. Tordoff Feathers of Archaeopteryx: Asymmetric vanes indicate aerodynamic function. Science 203:1021. Feduccia, A On why the dinosaur did not evolve feathers. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Garner, J. P., G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas On the origins of birds: The sequence of character acquistition in the evolution of avian flight. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 266: Gauthier, J Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. In K. Padian (ed.), The origin of birds and the evolution of flight, pp Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. Gauthier, J. and K. Padian Phylogenetic, functional and aerodynamic analyses of the origin of birds and their flight. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura- Museums, Eichstätt. George, J. C. and A. J. Berger Avian myology. Academic Press, New York and London. Goldspink, G Mechanics and energetics of muscle in animals of different sizes, with particular reference to the muscle fibre composition of vertebrate muscle. In T. J. Pedley (ed.), Scale effects in animal locomotion, pp Academic Press, New York. Greenwalt, C. H The flight of birds. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. New Series. 65: Part 4, Heilmann, G The origin of birds. Witherby, London. Heyer, W. R. and S. Pongapipatana Gliding speeds of Ptychozoan lionatum (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) and Chrysopelea ornata (Reptilia: Colubridae). Herpetologica 26: Huang, R. F., W. W. Shy, and S. W. Lin Influence of surface flow on Aerodynamic loads of a cantilever wing. AIAA J. 34: Kerho, M. F. and M. B. Bragg Airfoil boundary layer development and transition with large leading-edge roughness. AIAA J. 35: Kukulova-Peck, J The origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from the arthropodan leg. Can. J. Zool. 6: Lillie, F. R. and M. Juhn The physiology of the feather. II General principles of development with special reference to the after feather. Physiol. Zool. 11: Lowe, P. R On the relationships of the Struthiones to the dinosaurs. Ibis 13: Lucas, A. M. and P. R. Stettenheim Avian anatomy. Integument. Agricultural Handbook 362. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Marsh, O Odontornithes: A monograph on the extinct toothed birds of North America. Report of the geological exploration of the fortieth parallel, Vol. 7. Professional papers of the Engineer Department, U. S. Army, no. 18. Malkiel, E. and R. E. Mayle Transition in a separation bubble. J. Turbomachinery 118: Nachtigall, W Die Bedeutung der Reynolds Zahl in der Schwimmphysiologie und Flugbiophysik. Fortschr. Zool. 168: Norberg, R. Å Function of vane asymmetry and shaft curvature in bird flight feathers: Inference on flight ability of Archaeopteryx. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Norberg, U. M Evolution of flight in birds: Aerodynamic, mechanical and ecological aspects. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Norberg, U. M Energetics of flight. In C. Carey
11 686 S. F. TARSITANO ET AL. (ed.), Avian energetics and nutritional ecology, pp Chapman and Hall, New York. Oliver, J. A Gliding in amphibians and reptiles, with a remark on an arboreal adaptation in the lizard Anolis carolinensis carolinensis Voigt. Amer. Nat. 85: Ostrom, J. H Archaeopteryx and the origin of flight. Quart. Rev. Biol. 49: Ostrom, J. H Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 8: Ostrom, J. H The osteology of Compsognathus longipes Wagner. Zitteliana 4: Padian, K Macroevolution and the origin of major adaptations: Vertebrate flight as a paradigm for the analysis of patterns. Proc. Third North Amer. Paleo. Conv. 2: Padian, K. and L. S. Chiappe The origin of birds and their flight. Sci. Amer. 278: Parkes, K. C Some speculations of the origin of feathers. The Living Bird 5: Pennycuick, C. J Animal flight, Studies in Biology no. 33. The Camelot Press Ltd., Southampton. Peters, D. S. and W. F. Gutmann Constructional and functional preconditions for the transition to powered flight in vertebrates. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Rayner, J. M. V Cursorial gliding in protobirds: An expanded version of a discussion contribution. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Regal, P The evolutionary origin of feathers. Quart. Rev. Bio. 50: Regal, P Common Sense and reconstructions of the biology of fossils: Archaeopteryx and feathers. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp. Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Russell, A. P The origin of parachuting locomotion in gekkonid lizards (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 65: Stephan, B Urvögel. Neue Brahm-Bücherei no A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt. Sundaram, S., P. R. Viswanath, and S. Rudrakumar Viscous drag reduction using riblets on NACA 0012 airfoil to moderate incidence. AIAA J. 34: Taquet, P Two new Jurassic specimens of coelurosaurs (Dinosauria). In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura- Museums, Eichstätt. Tarsitano, S The morphological and aerodynamic constraints on the origin of birds and avian flight. In M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.), The beginnings of birds, pp Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstätt. Tarsitano, S. and M. K. Hecht A re-consideration of the reptilian relationships of Archaeopteryx. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 69: Templin, R. J Size limits in flying animals. In M. K. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major patterns in vertebrate evolution, pp Plenum Press, New York. Tucker, B. W Functional evolutionary morphology: The origin of birds. In Sir G. de Beer (ed.), Evolution, pp Clarendon Press, Oxford. Tucker, V. A Bird metabolism during flight: Evaluation of a theory. J. Exp. Biol. 58: Vennard J. K. and R. L. Street Elementary fluid mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Vogel, S Life in moving fluids. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Vogel, S Life s devices. Princeton University Press, Princeton. von Wahlert, G The role of ecological factors in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool. 14: White, F. M Viscous fluid flow, McGraw-Hill, New York. Zeltinger, J. and R. H. Sawyer, Avian scale development. Dev. Biol. 149:55 65.
The wing of Archaeopteryx as a primary thrust generator
Page 1 of 5 The wing of Archaeopteryx as a primary thrust generator Nature 399, pp. 60-62 (1999) Macmillan Publishers Ltd. PHILLIP BURGERS* AND LUIS M. CHIAPPE * San Diego Natural History Museum, PO Box
More informationOrigin and Evolution of Birds. Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics
Origin and Evolution of Birds Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics Review of Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Aves Characteristics: wings,
More informationOrigin and Evolution of Birds. Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics
Origin and Evolution of Birds Read: Chapters 1-3 in Gill but limited review of systematics Review of Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class: Aves Characteristics: wings,
More informationAccepted Manuscript. News & Views. Primary feather vane asymmetry should not be used to predict the flight capabilities of feathered fossils
Accepted Manuscript News & Views Primary feather vane asymmetry should not be used to predict the flight capabilities of feathered fossils Xia Wang, Robert L. Nudds, Colin Palmer, Gareth J. Dyke PII: S2095-9273(17)30453-X
More informationThe Origin of Birds. Technical name for birds is Aves, and avian means of or concerning birds.
The Origin of Birds Technical name for birds is Aves, and avian means of or concerning birds. Birds have many unusual synapomorphies among modern animals: [ Synapomorphies (shared derived characters),
More informationVideo Assignments. Microraptor PBS The Four-winged Dinosaur Mark Davis SUNY Cortland Library Online
Video Assignments Microraptor PBS The Four-winged Dinosaur Mark Davis SUNY Cortland Library Online Radiolab Apocalyptical http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k52vd4wbdlw&feature=youtu.be Minute 13 through minute
More information8/19/2013. Topic 14: Body support & locomotion. What structures are used for locomotion? What structures are used for locomotion?
Topic 4: Body support & locomotion What are components of locomotion? What structures are used for locomotion? How does locomotion happen? Forces Lever systems What is the difference between performance
More informationBarney to Big Bird: The Origin of Birds. Caudipteryx. The fuzzy raptor. Solnhofen Limestone, cont d
Barney to Big Bird: The Origin of Birds Caudipteryx The fuzzy raptor The discovery of feathered dinosaurs in Liaoning, China, has excited the many paleontologists who suspected a direct link between dinosaurs
More informationComparative Physiology 2007 Second Midterm Exam. 1) 8 pts. 2) 14 pts. 3) 12 pts. 4) 17 pts. 5) 10 pts. 6) 8 pts. 7) 12 pts. 8) 10 pts. 9) 9 pts.
Name: Comparative Physiology 2007 Second Midterm Exam 1) 8 pts 2) 14 pts 3) 12 pts 4) 17 pts 5) 10 pts 6) 8 pts 7) 12 pts 8) 10 pts 9) 9 pts Total 1. Cells I and II, shown below, are found in the gills
More informationTitle: Phylogenetic Methods and Vertebrate Phylogeny
Title: Phylogenetic Methods and Vertebrate Phylogeny Central Question: How can evolutionary relationships be determined objectively? Sub-questions: 1. What affect does the selection of the outgroup have
More informationAs a rebuttal to Darwin s (1859) explanation of the
What Use Is Half a Wing in the Ecology and Evolution of Birds? KENNETH P. DIAL, ROSS J. RANDALL, AND TERRY R. DIAL The use of incipient wings during ontogeny in living birds reveals not only the function
More informationRecall: The Earliest Thoughts about Flying Took place before the days of science.
Recall: The Earliest Thoughts about Flying Took place before the days of science. Before man began to investigate with carefully planned experiments, and to figure things out in an orderly fashion. Men
More informationAnatomy. Name Section. The Vertebrate Skeleton
Name Section Anatomy The Vertebrate Skeleton Vertebrate paleontologists get most of their knowledge about past organisms from skeletal remains. Skeletons are useful for gleaning information about an organism
More informationGravity-defying Behaviors: Identifying Models for Protoaves 1
AMER. ZOOL., 40:664 675 (2000) Gravity-defying Behaviors: Identifying Models for Protoaves 1 NICHOLAS R. GEIST 2, * AND ALAN FEDUCCIA *Department of Zoology, 3029 Cordley Hall, Oregon State University,
More informationIntroduction and methods will follow the same guidelines as for the draft
Locomotion Paper Guidelines Entire paper will be 5-7 double spaced pages (12 pt font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins) without figures (but I still want you to include them, they just don t count towards
More informationRemains of the pterosaur, a cousin of the dinosaur, are found on every continent. Richard Monastersky reports
Reading Practice Remains of the pterosaur, a cousin of the dinosaur, are found on every continent. Richard Monastersky reports PTEROSAURS Remains of the pterosaur, a cousin of the dinosaur, are found on
More informationBiology 340 Comparative Embryology Lecture 12 Dr. Stuart Sumida. Evo-Devo Revisited. Development of the Tetrapod Limb
Biology 340 Comparative Embryology Lecture 12 Dr. Stuart Sumida Evo-Devo Revisited Development of the Tetrapod Limb Limbs whether fins or arms/legs for only in particular regions or LIMB FIELDS. Primitively
More informationThe Evolution of Birds & the Origin of Flight
The Evolution of Birds & the Origin of Flight Archaeopteryx Solnhofen quarry Oldest known bird, but not ancestral to modern birds Inhabited coastal habitats where it probably glided between conifers, cycads,
More informationTetrapod Similarites The Origins of Birds
Tetrapod Similarites The Origins of Birds Birds Reptiles Mammals Integument Feathers, scales Scales Hair Digestive Horny bill Teeth Teeth Skeletal Fusion of bones Some fusion Some fusion Reduction in number
More informationWhat is the evidence for evolution?
What is the evidence for evolution? 1. Geographic Distribution 2. Fossil Evidence & Transitional Species 3. Comparative Anatomy 1. Homologous Structures 2. Analogous Structures 3. Vestigial Structures
More informationThe Fossil Record of Vertebrate Transitions
The Fossil Record of Vertebrate Transitions The Fossil Evidence of Evolution 1. Fossils show a pattern of change through geologic time of new species appearing in the fossil record that are similar to
More informationGeo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1
Geo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1 Systematics is the comparative study of biological diversity with the intent of determining the relationships between organisms. Humankind has always
More informationFrom Reptiles to Aves
First Vertebrates From Reptiles to Aves Evolutions of Fish to Amphibians Evolution of Amphibians to Reptiles Evolution of Reptiles to Dinosaurs to Birds Common Ancestor of Birds and Reptiles: Thecodonts
More informationDo the traits of organisms provide evidence for evolution?
PhyloStrat Tutorial Do the traits of organisms provide evidence for evolution? Consider two hypotheses about where Earth s organisms came from. The first hypothesis is from John Ray, an influential British
More informationEvolution as Fact. The figure below shows transitional fossils in the whale lineage.
Evolution as Fact Evolution is a fact. Organisms descend from others with modification. Phylogeny, the lineage of ancestors and descendants, is the scientific term to Darwin's phrase "descent with modification."
More informationCLADISTICS Student Packet SUMMARY Phylogeny Phylogenetic trees/cladograms
CLADISTICS Student Packet SUMMARY PHYLOGENETIC TREES AND CLADOGRAMS ARE MODELS OF EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY THAT CAN BE TESTED Phylogeny is the history of descent of organisms from their common ancestor. Phylogenetic
More informationIntroduction to phylogenetic trees and tree-thinking Copyright 2005, D. A. Baum (Free use for non-commercial educational pruposes)
Introduction to phylogenetic trees and tree-thinking Copyright 2005, D. A. Baum (Free use for non-commercial educational pruposes) Phylogenetics is the study of the relationships of organisms to each other.
More informationGeo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs. LAB 7: Dinosaur diversity- Saurischians
Geo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 7: Dinosaur diversity- Saurischians Last lab you were presented with a review of major ornithischian clades. You also were presented with some of the kinds of plants that
More informationINQUIRY & INVESTIGATION
INQUIRY & INVESTIGTION Phylogenies & Tree-Thinking D VID. UM SUSN OFFNER character a trait or feature that varies among a set of taxa (e.g., hair color) character-state a variant of a character that occurs
More informationG E N E R A L S C I E N C E N O T E S
G E N E R A L S C I E N C E N O T E S RECENT DEBATE OVER ARCHAEOPTERYX By Venus E. Clausen, Geoscience Research Institute WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT Archaeopteryx is considered to be an important example
More informationInterpreting Evolutionary Trees Honors Integrated Science 4 Name Per.
Interpreting Evolutionary Trees Honors Integrated Science 4 Name Per. Introduction Imagine a single diagram representing the evolutionary relationships between everything that has ever lived. If life evolved
More informationWhat is a dinosaur? Reading Practice
Reading Practice What is a dinosaur? A. Although the name dinosaur is derived from the Greek for "terrible lizard", dinosaurs were not, in fact, lizards at all. Like lizards, dinosaurs are included in
More informationd a Name Vertebrate Evolution - Exam 2 1. (12) Fill in the blanks
Vertebrate Evolution - Exam 2 1. (12) Fill in the blanks 100 points Name f e c d a Identify the structures (for c and e, identify the entire structure, not the individual elements. b a. b. c. d. e. f.
More information. Key words.-avian evolution, bird flight, locomotion.
Evolution. 50(1), 1996, pp. 331-340 LOCOMOTOR MODULES AND THE EVOLUTION OF AVIAN FLIGHT STEPHEN M. GATESy i AND KENNETH P. DIAL 2 Division ofbiological Sciences, University ofmontana, Missoula, Montana
More informationModern Evolutionary Classification. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview Modern Evolutionary Classification
Lesson Overview 18.2 Modern Evolutionary Classification THINK ABOUT IT Darwin s ideas about a tree of life suggested a new way to classify organisms not just based on similarities and differences, but
More informationEvidence for Evolution by Natural Selection. Hunting for evolution clues Elementary, my dear, Darwin!
Evidence for Evolution by Natural Selection Hunting for evolution clues Elementary, my dear, Darwin! 2006-2007 Evidence supporting evolution Fossil record shows change over time Anatomical record comparing
More informationCladistics (reading and making of cladograms)
Cladistics (reading and making of cladograms) Definitions Systematics The branch of biological sciences concerned with classifying organisms Taxon (pl: taxa) Any unit of biological diversity (eg. Animalia,
More informationThese small issues are easily addressed by small changes in wording, and should in no way delay publication of this first- rate paper.
Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): This paper reports on a highly significant discovery and associated analysis that are likely to be of broad interest to the scientific community.
More informationNREM/ZOOL 4464 Ornithology Dr. Tim O Connell Lectures February, 2015
NREM/ZOOL 4464 Ornithology Dr. Tim O Connell Lectures 12 14 9 13 February, 2015 Modern hierarchy of life on earth: Domain Kingdom Phylum (plural phyla ) Class Order Family Genus (plural genera ) Species
More informationAnimal Form and Function. Amphibians. United by several distinguishing apomorphies within the Vertebrata
Animal Form and Function Kight Amphibians Class Amphibia (amphibia = living a double life) United by several distinguishing apomorphies within the Vertebrata 1. Skin Thought Question: For whom are integumentary
More informationShedding Light on the Dinosaur-Bird Connection
Shedding Light on the Dinosaur-Bird Connection This text is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History. When people think of dinosaurs, two types generally come to mind: the huge herbivores
More informationd. Wrist bones. Pacific salmon life cycle. Atlantic salmon (different genus) can spawn more than once.
Lecture III.5b Answers to HW 1. (2 pts). Tiktaalik bridges the gap between fish and tetrapods by virtue of possessing which of the following? a. Humerus. b. Radius. c. Ulna. d. Wrist bones. 2. (2 pts)
More informationRed Eared Slider Secrets. Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to Years, Most WILL NOT Survive Two Years!
Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to 45-60 Years, Most WILL NOT Survive Two Years! Chris Johnson 2014 2 Red Eared Slider Secrets Although Most Red-Eared Sliders Can Live Up to 45-60 Years, Most
More informationThe Origin of Birds and Their Flight
The Origin of Birds and Their Flight Anatomical and aerodynamic analyses of fossils and living birds show that birds evolved from small, predatory dinosaurs that lived on the ground by Kevin Padian and
More informationDiapsida. BIO2135 Animal Form and Function. Page 1. Diapsida (Reptilia, Sauropsida) Amniote eggs. Amniote egg. Temporal fenestra.
Diapsida (Reptilia, Sauropsida) Vertebrate phylogeny Mixini Chondrichthyes Sarcopterygii Mammalia Pteromyzontida Actinopterygii Amphibia Reptilia! 1! Amniota (autapomorphies) Costal ventilation Amniote
More informationDiapsida. BIO2135 Animal Form and Function. Page 1. Diapsida (Reptilia, Sauropsida) Amniote egg. Membranes. Vertebrate phylogeny
Diapsida (Reptilia, Sauropsida) 1 Vertebrate phylogeny Mixini Chondrichthyes Sarcopterygii Mammalia Pteromyzontida Actinopterygii Amphibia Reptilia!! Amniota (autapomorphies) Costal ventilation Amniote
More informationFrom Slime to Scales: Evolution of Reptiles. Review: Disadvantages of Being an Amphibian
From Slime to Scales: Evolution of Reptiles Review: Disadvantages of Being an Amphibian Gelatinous eggs of amphibians cannot survive out of water, so amphibians are limited in terms of the environments
More informationPERSPECTIVES IN ORNITHOLOGY ARCHAEOPTERYX 2007: QUO VADIS?
PERSPECTIVES IN ORNITHOLOGY ARCHAEOPTERYX 2007: QUO VADIS? Author(s): Alan Feduccia, Larry D. Martin, Sam Tarsitano Source: The Auk, 124(2):373-380. Published By: The American Ornithologists' Union https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[373:pioaqv]2.0.co;2
More informationNon-Dinosaurians of the Mesozoic
Non-Dinosaurians of the Mesozoic Calling the Mesozoic the Age of Dinosaurs is actually not quite correct Not all reptiles of the Mesozoic were dinosaurs. Many reptiles (and other amniotes) have returned
More informationName Date Class. From the list below, choose the term that best completes each sentence.
Name Date Class Structure and Function of Vertebrates Review and Reinforce Birds Understanding Main Ideas Answer the following questions. 1. What are four characteristics that all birds share? 2. What
More informationWhat is evolution? Transitional fossils: evidence for evolution. In its broadest sense, evolution is simply the change in life through time.
Transitional fossils: evidence for evolution http://domain- of- darwin.deviantart.com/art/no- Transitional- Fossils- 52231284 Western MA Atheists and Secular Humanists 28 May 2016 What is evolution? In
More informationLecture 11 Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Lecture 11 Wednesday, September 19, 2012 Phylogenetic tree (phylogeny) Darwin and classification: In the Origin, Darwin said that descent from a common ancestral species could explain why the Linnaean
More informationPostilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A.
Postilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A. Number 117 18 March 1968 A 7DIAPSID (REPTILIA) PARIETAL FROM THE LOWER PERMIAN OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT L. CARROLL REDPATH
More informationthe Feather or the Bird?
Which Came First, the Feather or the Bird? FEATHERS EVOLVED in carnivorous, bipedal dinosaurs before the origin of birds. The creatures depicted here are reconstructions of fossils found recently in northern
More information17.2 Classification Based on Evolutionary Relationships Organization of all that speciation!
Organization of all that speciation! Patterns of evolution.. Taxonomy gets an over haul! Using more than morphology! 3 domains, 6 kingdoms KEY CONCEPT Modern classification is based on evolutionary relationships.
More informationLesson 7. References: Chapter 6: Chapter 12: Reading for Next Lesson: Chapter 6:
Lesson 7 Lesson Outline: Embryonic Origins of the Dermis Specializations of the Dermis o Scales in Fish o Dermal Armour in Tetrapods Epidermal/Dermal Interactions o Feathers o Hair o Teeth Objectives:
More informationName: GEOL 104 Dinosaurs: A Natural History Video Assignment. DUE: Wed. Oct. 20
GEOL 104 Dinosaurs: A Natural History Video Assignment DUE: Wed. Oct. 20 Documentaries represent one of the main media by which scientific information reaches the general public. For this assignment, you
More informationBiology Slide 1 of 50
Biology 1 of 50 2 of 50 What Is a Reptile? What are the characteristics of reptiles? 3 of 50 What Is a Reptile? What Is a Reptile? A reptile is a vertebrate that has dry, scaly skin, lungs, and terrestrial
More information8/19/2013. What is convergence? Topic 11: Convergence. What is convergence? What is convergence? What is convergence? What is convergence?
Topic 11: Convergence What are the classic herp examples? Have they been formally studied? Emerald Tree Boas and Green Tree Pythons show a remarkable level of convergence Photos KP Bergmann, Philadelphia
More informationConservation (last three 3 lecture periods, mostly as a led discussion). We can't cover everything, but that should serve as a rough outline.
Comments on the rest of the semester: Subjects to be discussed: Temperature relationships. Echolocation. Conservation (last three 3 lecture periods, mostly as a led discussion). Possibly (in order of importance):
More informationBiology 1B Evolution Lecture 11 (March 19, 2010), Insights from the Fossil Record and Evo-Devo
Biology 1B Evolution Lecture 11 (March 19, 2010), Insights from the Fossil Record and Evo-Devo Extinction Important points on extinction rates: Background rate of extinctions per million species per year:
More information1 Describe the anatomy and function of the turtle shell. 2 Describe respiration in turtles. How does the shell affect respiration?
GVZ 2017 Practice Questions Set 1 Test 3 1 Describe the anatomy and function of the turtle shell. 2 Describe respiration in turtles. How does the shell affect respiration? 3 According to the most recent
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Early version, also known as pre-print
Godefroit, P., Sinitsa, S. M., Dhouailly, D., Bolotsky, Y. L., Sizov, A. V., McNamara, M. E.,... Spagna, P. (2014). Dinosaur evolution. A Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur from Siberia with both feathers
More informationMay 10, SWBAT analyze and evaluate the scientific evidence provided by the fossil record.
May 10, 2017 Aims: SWBAT analyze and evaluate the scientific evidence provided by the fossil record. Agenda 1. Do Now 2. Class Notes 3. Guided Practice 4. Independent Practice 5. Practicing our AIMS: E.3-Examining
More informationModern taxonomy. Building family trees 10/10/2011. Knowing a lot about lots of creatures. Tom Hartman. Systematics includes: 1.
Modern taxonomy Building family trees Tom Hartman www.tuatara9.co.uk Classification has moved away from the simple grouping of organisms according to their similarities (phenetics) and has become the study
More informationBio 1B Lecture Outline (please print and bring along) Fall, 2006
Bio 1B Lecture Outline (please print and bring along) Fall, 2006 B.D. Mishler, Dept. of Integrative Biology 2-6810, bmishler@berkeley.edu Evolution lecture #4 -- Phylogenetic Analysis (Cladistics) -- Oct.
More informationTHE GORGONOPSIAN GENUS, HIPPOSAURUS, AND THE FAMILY ICTIDORHINIDAE * Dr. L.D. Boonstra. Paleontologist, South African Museum, Cape Town
THE GORGONOPSIAN GENUS, HIPPOSAURUS, AND THE FAMILY ICTIDORHINIDAE * by Dr. L.D. Boonstra Paleontologist, South African Museum, Cape Town In 1928 I dug up the complete skeleton of a smallish gorgonopsian
More informationTAXONOMIC HIERARCHY. science of classification and naming of organisms
TAXONOMIC HIERARCHY Taxonomy - science of classification and naming of organisms Taxonomic Level Kingdom Phylum subphylum Class subclass superorder Order Family Genus Species Example Animalae Chordata
More informationKINEMATICS OF FLAP-BOUNDING FLIGHT IN THE ZEBRA FINCH OVER A WIDE RANGE OF SPEEDS
The Journal of Experimental Biology 22, 1725 1739 (1999) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JEB192 1725 KINEMATICS OF FLAP-BOUNDING FLIGHT IN THE ZEBRA FINCH OVER A WIDE RANGE
More information2 nd Term Final. Revision Sheet. Students Name: Grade: 11 A/B. Subject: Biology. Teacher Signature. Page 1 of 11
2 nd Term Final Revision Sheet Students Name: Grade: 11 A/B Subject: Biology Teacher Signature Page 1 of 11 Nour Al Maref International School Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Biology Worksheet (2 nd Term) Chapter-26
More information1/9/2013. Divisions of the Skeleton: Topic 8: Appendicular Skeleton. Appendicular Components. Appendicular Components
/9/203 Topic 8: Appendicular Skeleton Divisions of the Skeleton: Cranial Postcranial What makes up the appendicular skeleton? What is the pattern of serial homology of the limbs? Tetrapod front limb morphology
More information6. The lifetime Darwinian fitness of one organism is greater than that of another organism if: A. it lives longer than the other B. it is able to outc
1. The money in the kingdom of Florin consists of bills with the value written on the front, and pictures of members of the royal family on the back. To test the hypothesis that all of the Florinese $5
More informationMammalogy Lecture 8 - Evolution of Ear Ossicles
Mammalogy Lecture 8 - Evolution of Ear Ossicles I. To begin, let s examine briefly the end point, that is, modern mammalian ears. Inner Ear The cochlea contains sensory cells for hearing and balance. -
More informationFish 2/26/13. Chordates 2. Sharks and Rays (about 470 species) Sharks etc Bony fish. Tetrapods. Osteichthans Lobe fins and lungfish
Chordates 2 Sharks etc Bony fish Osteichthans Lobe fins and lungfish Tetrapods ns Reptiles Birds Feb 27, 2013 Chordates ANCESTRAL DEUTEROSTOME Notochord Common ancestor of chordates Head Vertebral column
More information9. Summary & General Discussion CHAPTER 9 SUMMARY & GENERAL DISCUSSION
9. Summary & General Discussion CHAPTER 9 SUMMARY & GENERAL DISCUSSION 143 The Evolution of the Paleognathous Birds 144 9. Summary & General Discussion General Summary The evolutionary history of the Palaeognathae
More informationMechanism of a Crocodile s Circulatory System
Mechanism of a Crocodile s Circulatory System Figure 1. A crocodile diving at Botswana (Nachoum, A. 2017) Ever wonder in one of those animal documentaries we watch in television, wherein a crocodile glides
More informationS06-5 Selection for feather structure. 1 Introduction
52(Supplement): 131 135, 2006 S06-5 Selection for feather structure Edward H. BURTT Jr. 1, Jann M. ICHIDA 2 1. Dept. of Zoology, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA; ehburtt@owu.edu 2. Dept.
More informationClass Reptilia Testudines Squamata Crocodilia Sphenodontia
Class Reptilia Testudines (around 300 species Tortoises and Turtles) Squamata (around 7,900 species Snakes, Lizards and amphisbaenids) Crocodilia (around 23 species Alligators, Crocodiles, Caimans and
More informationmuscles (enhancing biting strength). Possible states: none, one, or two.
Reconstructing Evolutionary Relationships S-1 Practice Exercise: Phylogeny of Terrestrial Vertebrates In this example we will construct a phylogenetic hypothesis of the relationships between seven taxa
More informationFossilized remains of cat-sized flying reptile found in British Columbia
Fossilized remains of cat-sized flying reptile found in British Columbia By Washington Post, adapted by Newsela staff on 09.06.16 Word Count 768 An artist's impression of the small-bodied, Late Cretaceous
More informationLOWER CRETACEOUS OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
A NEW DINOSAUR, STP^GOSAURUS MARSHl, FROM THE LOWER CRETACEOUS OF SOUTH DAKOTA. By Frederic A. Lucas, Curator, Divisioii of Coiiipnrative Anatomy, in charge, of Section of Vertebrate Fossils. The name
More informationLABORATORY EXERCISE 6: CLADISTICS I
Biology 4415/5415 Evolution LABORATORY EXERCISE 6: CLADISTICS I Take a group of organisms. Let s use five: a lungfish, a frog, a crocodile, a flamingo, and a human. How to reconstruct their relationships?
More informationCrocs and Birds as Dino models Crocs and birds united with dinos by morphology Both also have parental care and vocal communication between offspring
Chapter 16. Mesozoic Diapsids Phylogenetic relationships Earliest from late carboniferous stem diapsids Petrolacosaurus Lineage split into two: Archosauromorpha Crocs, birds, dinos, pterosaurs Lepidosauromorpha
More informationField Trip: Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH)
Field Trip: Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH) Objectives To observe the diversity of animals. To compare and contrast the various adaptations, body plans, etc. of the animals found at the HMNH.
More informationVERTEBRATE READING. Fishes
VERTEBRATE READING Fishes The first vertebrates to become a widespread, predominant life form on earth were fishes. Prior to this, only invertebrates, such as mollusks, worms and squid-like animals, would
More informationVertebrate Locomotion: Aquatic
Vertebrate Locomotion: Aquatic Swimming Nearly all vertebrates can swim Sole form of locomotion for fish and larval amphibians Primary swimmers Terrestrial vertebrates that readapt to aquatic life still
More informationChapter 3 Doubts about Darwinism. Case for Creator
Chapter 3 Doubts about Darwinism Case for Creator Thousands of atheists gather in DC for reason rally Alice Ann Bailey (June 16, 1880 December 15, 1949) No Need for God Laid the foundation of the New Age
More informationA short history of research on Archaeopteryx and its relationship with dinosaurs
A short history of research on Archaeopteryx and its relationship with dinosaurs PETER WELLNHOFER Gelbenholzener Strasse 36, D-82256 Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany (e-mail: p.wellnhofer@t-online.de) Abstract:
More informationCarnivore An animal that feeds chiefly on the flesh of other animals.
Name: School: Date: Bipedalism A form of terrestrial locomotion where an organism moves by means of its two rear limbs, or legs. An animal that usually moves in a bipedal manner is known as a biped, meaning
More informationNAME: DATE: SECTION:
NAME: DATE: SECTION: MCAS PREP PACKET EVOLUTION AND BIODIVERSITY 1. Which of the following observations best supports the conclusion that dolphins and sharks do not have a recent common ancestor? A. Dolphins
More informationGreat Transitions: The Origin of Birds IN-DEPTH FILM GUIDE
IN-DEPTH FILM GUIDE DESCRIPTION In the short film (http://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/greattransitions-origin-birds), we join University of Texas paleontologist Dr. Julia Clarke on a journey to uncover
More informationAre Evolutionary Transitional Forms Possible?
What Fossils Can t Tell Us Are Evolutionary Transitional Forms Possible? Dr. Raúl Esperante Geoscience Research Institute Darwin and the Fossil Record Darwin and other evolutionists before suggested that
More informationOn the Discovery of the earliest fossil bird in China (Sinosauropteryx gen. nov.) and the origin of birds
On the Discovery of the earliest fossil bird in China (Sinosauropteryx gen. nov.) and the origin of birds by Qiang Ji and Shu an Ji Chinese Geological Museum, Beijing Chinese Geology Volume 233 1996 pp.
More informationClass Reptilia. Lecture 19: Animal Classification. Adaptations for life on land
Lecture 19: Animal Classification Class Reptilia Adaptations for life on land بيض جنيني egg. Amniotic Water-tight scales. One occipital condyle one point of attachement of the skull with the vertebral
More informationTuesday, December 6, 11. Mesozoic Life
Mesozoic Life Review of Paleozoic Transgression/regressions and Mountain building events during the paleoozoic act as driving force of evolution. regression of seas and continental uplift create variety
More informationExceptional fossil preservation demonstrates a new mode of axial skeleton elongation in early ray-finned fishes
Supplementary Information Exceptional fossil preservation demonstrates a new mode of axial skeleton elongation in early ray-finned fishes Erin E. Maxwell, Heinz Furrer, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra Supplementary
More informationPlestiodon (=Eumeces) fasciatus Family Scincidae
Plestiodon (=Eumeces) fasciatus Family Scincidae Living specimens: - Five distinct longitudinal light lines on dorsum - Juveniles have bright blue tail - Head of male reddish during breeding season - Old
More informationWhy Archaeopteryx did not run over water
Ming San Ma, Whee Ky Ma, Ilja Nieuwland and Ronald R. Easley Why Archaeopteryx did not run over water Zusammenfassung In der 2000-Nummer von Archaeopteryx schlägt der Marinebiologe John Videler ein neues
More informationPhylogeny Reconstruction
Phylogeny Reconstruction Trees, Methods and Characters Reading: Gregory, 2008. Understanding Evolutionary Trees (Polly, 2006) Lab tomorrow Meet in Geology GY522 Bring computers if you have them (they will
More informationUNIT III A. Descent with Modification(Ch19) B. Phylogeny (Ch20) C. Evolution of Populations (Ch21) D. Origin of Species or Speciation (Ch22)
UNIT III A. Descent with Modification(Ch9) B. Phylogeny (Ch2) C. Evolution of Populations (Ch2) D. Origin of Species or Speciation (Ch22) Classification in broad term simply means putting things in classes
More information