Determination of Zerdava Dog (Kapi Kopegi) Raised in Northeast of Turkey

Transcription

1 Journal of Veterinary Advances Determination of Zerdava Dog (Kapi Kopegi) Raised in Northeast of Turkey Yilmaz O. and Ertugrul M. J Vet Adv 2012, 2(9): Online version is available on:

2 ISSN: YILMAZ AND ERTUGRUL Original Article Determination of Zerdava Dog (Kapi Kopegi) Raised in Northeast of Turkey 1 Yilmaz O. and 2 Ertugrul M. 1 Igdir University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, 76100, Igdir. 2 Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, 06110, Ankara. Abstract This is the first document on Turkish Zerdava dogs raised in northeast of Anatolia. This study was carried out to define the morphologic traits of the Turkish Zerdava dogs raised in east of Turkey comparing with some other native dog breeds of Turkey. To this end, a total of 39 (19 male and 20 female) dogs was analyzed using the Minitab 15 statistical software program using ANOVA and Student s t-test. Descriptive statistics and comparison results were for height at shoulders 51.2±0.35, height at rump 51.6±0.28, body length 56.3±0.35, heart girth circumference 50±1.43, chest width 25.6±0.22, cannon circumference 9.4±0.14, and head length 19.4±0.17 cm respectively. The Zerdava dogs reached mature body weight and size at around 18 months of age. Keywords: Hunting dog, phenotypic trait, live weight, body measurement, genetic resource. Corresponding author: Igdir University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, 76100, Igdir, Phone: Ext: 1225, Faximile: Received on: 16 Sep 2012 Revised on: 20 Sep 2012 Accepted on: 25 Sep 2012 Online Published on: 30 Sep J. Vet. Adv., 2012, 2(9):

3 DETERMINATION OF ZERDAVA DOG (KAPI KOPEGI) RAISED IN... Introduction In Turkey there are about dozen of native dog breeds, five of which are livestock guardian dogs listed in Table 1. In Turkey there are native dog breeds of Kangal (Karabash) Shepherd, Akbash Shepherd, Kars (Caucasian) Shepherd, Karaman, Tazi (Sighthound), Tarsus Catalburun (Fork-nose), Dikkulak (Erect-ear), Zerdava, Koyun (Bayburt Kelpi), Fino of Tonyadogs. The Fino of Tonya (FoT) dog is also locally called as Kobi. Among Turkish dog breeds Kangal dog is the most common and rest of them are local or regional dog breeds. Kangal, Akbash, Kars, Karaman, and Rize Koyun dogs are flock guardian dog breeds. Tazi is a hound and Catalburun is a gun dog. Dikkulak, Zerdava and FoT are used as watch dog (Pugnetti 2001, Anonymous 2005, Yilmaz 2007 a, Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 a, Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 b, Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 c, Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 d ). Table 1: Some morphologic traits of various Turkish Dog Breeds Trait LW (kg) HS (cm) HR (cm) BL (cm) HGC (cm) CD (cm) CC (cm) Breed TKnS* TAS* TKrS* TT* TC* D/Z* * TKnS= Turkish Kangal (Shepherd) (Yilmaz 2007), TAS= Turkish Akbas Shepherd (Yilmaz 2011 e ), TKrS= Turkish Kars (Shepherd) (Yilmaz 2011 f ), TT= Turkis Tazi (Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 c ), TC= Tarsus Catalburun (Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 d ), D/Z= Dikkulak (erect-ear)/zagar (Yilmaz and Ertugrul 2011 a ). The Zerdava dog (Figure 1 and 2) is a hunting dog which is used to hunt boars, foxes, and jackals. Nowadays Zerdava dogs are used as a watch dog rather than hunting dog. Only one type of colour pattern can be seen. Main colour is dark brown or liver brown. On chest, legs, chest and point of tail there is white colour based with small dark spots. At the point of tail there is white. White colour based area with small dark spots around neck is locally called as peskir. The small dark spots on white colour based are locally called as pul. Eye colour is yellowish-brown rather than brown. This breed is potentially dangers to strangers. Zerdava Dogs are very brave, energetic and agile dogs. According to Zerdava owners, they chase a lure even for several days. They do not affair from wolves, so they are hunt by wolves in winter session. This is the main reason of decreasing number of Zerdava dogs during last several years (pers. com.). The aim of this study is to present some morphologic traits of Zerdava Dogs by minding sex, region and age factors and by comparing with other dog breeds. Fig. 1: An example of Zerdava Dog in its characteristic coat colour. 458 J. Vet. Adv., 2012, 2(9):

4 YILMAZ AND ERTUGRUL length (HL) were measured using a graduated plastic tape. Body sizes were measured using methods explained by Spira (1982). Statistical Analysis The data obtained were analyzed using the Minitab 15 statistical software program. Descriptive statistics for body dimensions were analyzed using ANOVA and Student s T-Test that also determined the impact of sex, country and age group on the response variables of HS, HR, BL, HGC, CD, CC and HL (Anonymous 2011). Results and Discussion Fig. 2: An example of Zerdava Dog in its characteristic coat colour. Materials and Methods Experimental animals The Zerdava dogs in this study were surveyed in November 2011 in the province of Trabzon (40 53 N; E) ( A total of 39 dogs, 19 male and 20 female, were studied. The dogs were aged between 1 and 7 years, and divided into three age groups: months, months, and months. In the first group there were 5 males and 11 females; in the second group there were 7 males and 6 females, and in the third group there were 7 males and 3 females. The ages of dogs were determined from the information given by their owners. Measurements The sampled dogs were measured for height at shoulders (HS), height at rump (HR), body length (BL), and chest depth (CD) by using a measuring stick calibrated in centimetres. Other linear measures such as hearth girth circumferences (HGC), cannon circumferences (CC) and head The effects of sex, region and age on phenotypic traits were summarized in Table 2. Between male and female dogs there were no significant differences for all morphological traits except the traits of HR and HL. For all results obtained male dogs yielded higher values than females except for the traits of BL and CC (P<0.01). For those traits male dogs yielded higher values than females. The impact of region on body sizes were given in Table 2. The Zerdava dogs in counties of Macka were significantly different from others on measurements for the traits of CD; CC (P<0.05), and HL (P<0.01). The dogs raised in Macka were larger than the dogs raised in Merkez, Akcaabat and Tonya. With respect to age, the descriptive statistics and comparison results showed that there were significant differences among dogs (Table 2). Among the three age groups, 1-2 year-old Zerdava dogs were significantly different to the other two groups for HS, HR, BL, CD (P<0.01), and HL (P<0.05). After 18 months of age, there is minor difference for all traits. It can be concluded that the Zerdava dogs grow up to 18 months, and after then there is only minor growth. 459 J. Vet. Adv., 2012, 2(9):

5 Age (Month ) Region Sex DETERMINATION OF ZERDAVA DOG (KAPI KOPEGI) RAISED IN... Table 2: Descriptive statistics and comparison results of the phenotypic traits of Zerdava dogs for different sexes, regions, and ages. Traits HS (cm) HR (cm) BL (cm) HGC HL (cm) CD (cm) CC (cm) (cm) Overall (n=39) 51.2± ± ± ± ± ± ±0.17 Male (n=19) 51.8± B± ± ± ± ± B±0.19 Female (n=20) 50.7± A± ± ± ± ± A±0.26 Akçaabat (n=12) 51.3± ± ± ± AB± AB± a±0.32 Maçka (n=11) 52.3± ± ± ± B± B± b±0.27 Merkez (n=13) 50.6± ± ± ± AB±0.29 9A± a±0.18 Tonya (n=3) 50± ± ± ± A± AB± ab± (n=16) 49.4a± a± a± ± a±0.27 9± a± (n=13) 52b± b± b± ± b± ± b± (n=10) 53.1b± b± b± ± ab± ± b±0.34 a, b = P<0.01; A, B = P<0.05 * There were no significant differences between means showed by the same letters of alphabet in the same column and factor group. In this study observed results (Table 2) were compared with other native dog breeds of Turkey (Table 1). According to overall mean results Zerdava dogs were smaller than TKnS, TKrS, TAS, and TT, but larger than D/Z and TC dogs related with body sizes. The TT dogs had the closest resemblance to Zerdava dogs in body sizes. The phenotypic correlation coefficient values summarized in the Table 3 showed that all observed traits were affected by selected factors except the traits of HS-HGC, HR-HGC, BL-HGC, HGC-CD, HGC-CC and CD-CC. The highest value was found between HS and HR (r = 0.90) (P<0.01). Other high values were found FOR HS-BL (r = 0.76), HR-BL (r = 0.74), HS-CC (r = 0.68), CC-HL (r = 0.65), HR-BL (r = 0.66), HR-CC (r = 0.64) those were higher than r = 0.60 (P<0.01). The correlations of HS-BL, BL-HL, HS-CD, HR-CD, and BL-CD also yielded higher values those higher than r = 0.40 (P<0.01). The lowest value (r = 0.30) was found between HGC and CD (P<0.04). Other low correlation values were found between HS-HGC (r = 0.30), HR-HGC (r = 0.28), BL-HGC (r = 0.203), HGC-CD (r = 0.41), HGC-CC (r = 0.28), and CD- CC (r = 0.19). There were no negative correlations between the all traits. Table 3. Phenotypic correlation coefficient values (r) between body measurements in Kars Shepherd dogs. Traits HS HR BL HGC CD CC HR 0.90** BL 0.76** 0.74** HGC CD 0.51** 0.47** 0.43** 0.04 CC 0.68** 0.64** 0.36* HL 0.60** 0.66** 0.51** 0.34* 0.40* 0.65** *P<0.05, **P<0.01 Conclusion The overall results of this study demonstrate that Zerdava dogs are mid-size watch dogs. They have minor resemblance to the Tarsus Catalburun (Fork-nose) dogs according to body sizes. Zerdava dogs are much larger than the other Turkish dog breeds of TC and D/Z dogs but smaller than TKnS, TkrS, TAS, and TT dogs. The Zerdava dogs grow up to 18 months of age and then there is only minor growth. It can be concluded that Zerdava dogs reach mature body weight and size at around 18 months. 460 J. Vet. Adv., 2012, 2(9):

6 YILMAZ AND ERTUGRUL Acknowledgements This study was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ertugrul (Ankara University, Turkey) and I gratefully thank him. I would also like to thank Prof. Dr. Firat Cengiz (Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey), Prof. Dr. Ensar Baspinar (Ankara University, Turkey), Prof. Dr. Ibrahim Zafer Arik (Akdeniz University, Turkey), Prof. Dr. Saim Boztepe (Selcuk University, Turkey), Prof. Dr. Askin Kor (Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey), and Assist. Prof. Dr. Ozgur Koskan (Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey) for their constructive comments. I am gratefully indebted to Dr Peta Jones (Donkey Power, South Africa) for editing in English. References Anonymous. (2005). Federation Cynologique Internationale- Limited Edition. Cynological Association, Istanbul (Turkey). Anonymous. (2011). Minitab 15 Computer Program. Pugnetti G (2001). Kopek Ansiklopedisi. Arkadas Yayinlari, Ankara. Yılmaz O (2006). Breeds of Livestock Protection Dogs (unpublished PhD seminar). Ankara University, Ankara. Yılmaz O (2007 a ). Some Morphological Characteristics of Kangal Dogs Raised in Various Regions of Turkey (unpublished PhD thesis). University of Ankara, Ankara. Yılmaz O (2007 b ). Turkish Kangal (Karabash) Shepherd Dog. Impress Printing Comp. Ankara. Yilmaz O, Ertugrul M (2011 a ). Some Morphological Traits of the Zagar (erect-ear) Dog in Turkey. Igdir U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi. 1(2): Yilmaz, O. and Ertugrul, M. (2011 b ). Spread Story of Kangal (Karabash) Shepherd Dogs in The World. Igdir U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi. 1(3): Yilmaz O, Ertugrul M (2011 c ). Some morphological characteristics of Turkish Tazi (Sighthound). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21 (4): Yilmaz, O. and Ertugrul, M. (2011 d ). Some Morphological Characteristics of the Tarsus Fork-nose Dog in Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, Bulgaria 18(1): Yilmaz O (2011 e ). Some Morphological Characteristics of the Akbash Shepherd Dog in Turkey. Bitlis Eren U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi. 2(1): Yilmaz O (2011 f ). Determination of Kars (Caucasian) Shepherd Dog Raised in Turkey. Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Science. 6 (3): in press. (accessed on ) 461 J. Vet. Adv., 2012, 2(9):