Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes"

Transcription

1 OIKOS 94: Copenhagen 2001 Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes Jennifer C. C. Neale and Benjamin N. Sacks Neale, J. C. C. and Sacks, B. N Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes. Oikos 94: We used scat analysis and radiotelemetry to characterize use of foods and habitats by sympatric bobcats and coyotes, and evaluated these in the context of spatial and temporal relationships to assess the potential for, and evidence of, interspecific competition. Bobcats and coyotes exhibited broad and overlapping diets. However, diets of the two predators differed in the relative contributions of small and large prey, with bobcats consuming relatively more rodent and lagomorph biomass and coyotes consuming relatively more ungulate biomass. Consumption among rodent prey species was highly correlated between bobcats and coyotes, indicating no evidence of prey partitioning within this group. Habitat selection by the two predators differed slightly at the landscape scale but not within home ranges. Bobcats and coyotes occupied small, overlapping home ranges, such that the likelihood of interspecific encounters (direct or indirect) was high. Bobcats displayed slight avoidance of overlapping coyote core areas during coyote reproductive seasons (winter and spring), when coyotes are typically most territorial (toward conspecifics), but displayed slight attraction during times of year when coyotes were not engaged in reproductive activities. Relative to coyotes, which were strongly nocturnal, diel activity patterns of bobcats were more diurnal and variable. However, activity patterns were not inversely correlated. Overall, these predators appeared to use resources independently and we found little evidence of negative interactions. Differences in resource use by bobcats and coyotes appeared to relate to fundamental niche differences as opposed to competition-related resource partitioning. J. C. C. Neale and B. N. Sacks, Dept of En ironmental Science, Policy and Management, Uni. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (present address: JCCN: Dept of En ironmental Toxicology, One Shields A enue, Uni. of California, Da is, CA 95616, USA [jcneale@ucda is.edu]; BNS: John Muir Inst. of the En ironment, One Shields A enue, Uni. of California, Da is, CA 95616, USA). Interspecific competition is thought to play an important role in structuring communities (Schoener 1982) and, according to theory, should be especially important in the top trophic level (Hairston et al. 1960, Oksanen et al. 1981). Empirically, the importance of competition among terrestrial carnivores has been difficult to assess due to the paucity of intensive field studies (Palomares and Caro 1999). Accordingly, we investigated resource utilization and interspecific interactions of two mesopredators with greatly overlapping geographic ranges (Nowak 1991), the coyote (Canis latrans) and the bobcat (Lynx rufus), the putative inferior competitor (Litvaitis 1992). Relationships between these two species have been difficult to assess. Because bobcats and coyotes have similar life requisites, they might be expected to compete where they co-occur. Evidence suggestive of competition between bobcats and coyotes includes declining bobcat populations in many parts of North America (Knowlton and Tzilkowski 1979) associated with range expansion of the coyote (Litvaitis and Harrison 1989, Parker 1995), an inverse relationship between popula- Accepted 19 March 2001 Copyright OIKOS 2001 ISSN Printed in Ireland all rights reserved 236 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

2 tion indices of bobcats and coyotes (Linhart and Robinson 1972), apparent increases in bobcat densities following population reduction of coyotes (Nunley 1977, Henke and Bryant 1999), and reports of coyote-caused bobcat mortality (Anderson 1986, Knick 1990). Other studies, however, reported positively related patterns of abundance of bobcats and coyotes (Schnell et al. 1985) or no relationship (Lovell et al. 1998, Main et al. 1999), suggesting a variable or ambiguous relationship. The major niche dimensions that competitors may use to partition life requisites in short supply are habitat and food (Schoener 1986). Contingency models of resource partitioning suggest that when resources are abundant, animals should be maximally specialized in use of food or habitat type (Schoener 1974a); morphological differences are particularly effective in allowing specialization by food size (Schoener 1974b). As food becomes limiting, breadth of food and habitat types used should increase. Unfortunately, theoretical predictions related to competition and resource utilization have largely ignored spatial relationships, which add another layer of complexity to, and interact with, interspecific dynamics. Assessing resource use at the population level and without respect to space or time can generate ambiguous findings with respect to competitive mechanisms, especially when only one niche axis is examined, as in many comparative studies of carnivore food habits. Spatially explicit and temporal patterns of resource overlap and separation can aid interpretation. We investigated use of food and habitat types as well as spatial and temporal relationships between sympatric bobcats and coyotes. Our study took place in northern California during July 1994 December 1995, shortly after the end of a severe drought ( ; Sacks 1998) when resources appeared superabundant (Neale 1996) and predator populations likely were approaching equilibrium levels. Densities of bobcats (Neale 1996) and coyotes (Sacks 1996) at our study site approximated the maxima reported for these species (Camenzind 1978, Hall and Newsom 1978, Jachowski 1981, Andelt 1985, Lembeck 1986), increasing the likelihood of chance encounters. To explore resource use in this context, we (1) characterized diets of the two predators through fecal analysis utilizing two approaches frequency of occurrence and estimated biomass consumption to compare use of foods, (2) investigated habitat selection at both the landscape and within-home range scales using radiotelemetry, (3) assessed spatial relationships on multiple scales, and (4) compared diel activity patterns. Methods Study area The study area was centered on the 21-km 2 Hopland Research and Extension Center (HREC; N, W) in Mendocino County, California, USA. This site was located in the Coast Range mountains in the Russian River drainage and had a primarily southwest aspect; topography was hilly to semi-rugged, with elevations ranging m. Vegetation consisted of a mosaic of four principal types: chaparral, mixed evergreen-deciduous forest (forest), annual grassland (grassland) and woodland (Murphy and Heady 1983). Cover density was greatest in chaparral and forest and least in grassland. The climate was characterized by cool, wet winters and warm, dry summers. Numerous potential prey of coyotes and bobcats occurred on the site including two lagomorph species, 13 rodent species, blacktailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and various birds, reptiles, and invertebrates (Neale 1996). In addition to wild prey, between 900 and 2500 domestic sheep were regularly maintained on the site. Coyotes on the study area suffered high mortality due to routine removal to reduce sheep depredation (Sacks et al. 1999a). Bobcats generally were not associated with sheep kills (Neale et al. 1998) and none were removed during our study. Food habits Scats of bobcats and coyotes were collected bi-weekly from 21 transects (0.5 km in length) established throughout the study area (57% of scats), as well as opportunistically when found fresh (43%). Scats were assigned to predator species based primarily on size and shape (Murie 1954, Danner and Dodd 1982) as well as odor and other sign. Inspection of scats collected from known individuals from traps or during radiotracking confirmed our classification criteria. Approximately 10% of carnivore scats were of ambiguous origin and were discarded. Scats were oven-dried, placed in nylon bags, washed in an automatic clothes washer, and tumbledried, as described by Neale (1996). Hair, teeth, and bone were identified using reference skins, skulls, skeletons, hair keys, and photomicrographs (e.g., Mayer 1952, Glass 1973). Although frequency of occurrence (the percent of scats containing each food item) is commonly used to quantify diets of carnivores, this measure does not accurately reflect the proportional consumption of food items in carnivore diets. For example, frequency of occurrence tends to overestimate vegetative food items (Andelt and Andelt 1984), underestimate large mammalian prey (Weaver 1993), and can be biased with respect to detection of prey in scats due to differences among rodent prey in recovery rates of teeth and hair (Kelly 1991). Therefore, to more accurately assess food habits of these predators, we estimated biomass consumed. Fecal analysis was performed according to specifications of Kelly s (1991) residue-weight model, which OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 237

3 utilized correction factors derived from feeding trials to infer amount consumed from food remains. Depending on the scat contents, analysis involved separating and weighing hair, teeth, and bones, including count and weight of each tooth type present, as well as estimating percent volume for each food item in each scat (Kelly 1991). We used Program SCAT (Version 1.5.1) to estimate biomass consumption represented by scat contents and to calculate the proportion of total biomass represented by each food item. This program did not include a correction factor for reptiles or vegetation. However, based on visual estimates of percent volume, reptile remains did not contribute substantially to prey biomass for either predator. Occurrence of manzanita (Arctostaphylos spp.) berries was high in scats of coyotes (Neale 1996); we therefore calculated a correction factor for manzanita (1.85 g fresh berry consumed per 1 g residue) based on the number of berries represented per gram residue and the average weight of a fresh berry. Items found in scats but excluded from analyses included grass and occasional orchard fruits, as well as very rare occurrences of moles (Scapanus latimanus) and various carnivores. We compared bobcat and coyote food niches based on overall and seasonal diets, with seasonal periods designated as follows: summer (Jul. Sep.), fall (Oct. Dec.), winter (Jan. Mar.), and spring (Apr. Jun.). Rather than pool scats across seasons to estimate overall diets (which would have resulted in biases toward seasons with larger scat samples), we averaged across seasonal values to generate overall values. We calculated measures of dietary breadth (B) and food niche overlap ( ) based on Pianka (1973):, B=1 p i 2 = (p i q i ) p i2 q i2, where p i is the proportion of food item i in the diet of predator p, and q i is the proportion of food item i in the diet of predator q. In this study, a maximum of 13 categories were available such that breadth ranged from 1 (only 1 food item taken) to 13 (all food items taken, in equal proportions). The index of overlap ranges from 0 (complete dissimilarity) to 1 (complete similarity). Overlap indices should be based on resource categories at least as fine as those perceived by the predators (Krebs 1989), thus we categorized prey to the species level whenever possible (Greene and Jaksíc 1983). For comparative purposes, we also calculated overall frequency of occurrence and relative frequency of occurrence (the latter values were expressed as percent of all occurrences, to allow direct comparison with biomass) as well as total and seasonal breadth measures and overlap indices based on frequency of occurrence. An additional 226 coyote scats were analyzed using only frequency of occurrence due to the extensive time requirements of biomass estimation. Radiotelemetry study Bobcats and coyotes were captured using No. 3, padded-jaw leghold traps (Woodstream Corp., Littitz, PA, USA) or homemade snares (coyotes only) with stops to prevent strangulation. Devices were set along roads, ridges, fences, and drainages throughout HREC. Bobcats were sedated with a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride (10 mg ketamine+1.6 mg xylazine/kg body mass). Captured animals were radiocollared, weighed, measured, and examined for reproductive and general condition (Neale 1996, Sacks et al. 1999b). Animal care and handling procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, Univ. of California, Berkeley (Protocol cr ). We conducted radiotelemetry of resident predators throughout the day and night 5 7 d per week using stationary and mobile (hand-held) units as described previously (Neale et al. 1998, Sacks et al. 1999b), locating most individuals at least once per day. Average telemetry error was estimated at 146 m, with 95% of errors 356 m (Sacks 1996). We used program CALHOME (Kie et al. 1996) to calculate annual and seasonal 65% and 90% adaptive kernel (AK) isopleths and annual 95% minimum convex polygons (MCP). The AK ranges reflected intensity of use (Worton 1989); the 65% and 90% isopleths corresponded to core areas and home ranges, respectively (Sacks et al. 1999b). The MCPs were used to bound areas of availability (e.g., of habitat) because, in contrast to AKs, MCPs were relatively insensitive to dispersion of locations (i.e., clumped, uniform, or random). We determined annual home ranges for resident bobcats and coyotes with 100 radiolocations and monitored during 9 months of the study. Home range sizes of bobcats did not vary significantly by sex (Neale 1996) and thus were pooled for estimation. Male and female coyotes of a territorial pair used virtually identical areas; thus we chose one range (the female s) to represent the territory. Seasonal core areas and home ranges were calculated for territorial female coyotes (range= locations per season, X SD=126 69). Habitat selection We assessed habitat selection, i.e., use relative to availability, by bobcats and coyotes at two spatial scales. We used a vegetation map derived from LAND- SAT imagery (Fox et al. 1997) in conjunction with a geographic information system (GIS; ARCVIEW 3.0a, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA) to classify habitats into the four major types 238 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

4 on our study area: chaparral, forest, grassland, and woodland. To compare habitat selection of the two carnivores at the level of home range establishment (i.e., landscape), we calculated habitat composition of the annual 95% MCPs using the GIS. We used individual home ranges as the sample unit and calculated 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals on arcsine transformed mean proportions (Zar 1984: 239). Next, we tested for habitat selection within home ranges by comparing the proportion of each individual s radiolocations in each habitat type (observed) to the proportion of that habitat in the individual s MCP (expected). Previous studies comparing habitat use of bobcats and coyotes (e.g., Major and Sherburne 1987, Litvaitis and Harrison 1989) have used the radiolocation as the sample unit. Although this has been common practice in habitat selection analyses (Neu et al. 1974, Byers et al. 1984), the use of radiolocations instead of individuals as the sample unit amounts to pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984), which in this particular application (i.e., for territorial species) is especially problematic (Litvaitis et al. 1994). To avoid this problem, we calculated habitat selection indices for each individual separately, for each habitat type, as logtransformed ratios ( +1; Zar 1984: ) of observed to expected proportions of radiolocations minus log(2) plus 1 (the last two terms made a selection index of 1 correspond to an observed-to-expected ratio of 1). We calculated 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals of selection indices for each habitat during wet (winter spring) and dry (summer fall) seasons. Spatial relationships We investigated overlap of adjacent bobcat and coyote annual 90% AK home ranges. We used the proportion of a bobcat home range overlapped by a neighboring coyote home range as a measure of interspecific spatial overlap (Bradley and Fagre 1988). Quantification of home range overlap is useful as a descriptor and may indicate the likelihood of encounters. However, with the possible exception of adjacent but non-overlapping home ranges with shared boundaries (indicative of strong interspecific territoriality), this metric is too coarse to indicate anything about avoidance (or attraction) behavior. Previous studies (Major and Sherburne 1987, Litvaitis and Harrison 1989) have attempted (and failed) to detect avoidance or attraction between coyotes and bobcats using a modification of the nearest neighbor analysis (Clark and Evans 1954, Keenan 1981) whereby separation distances of paired simultaneous locations of bobcats and coyotes with adjoining or overlapping home ranges are compared to randomly paired locations of the same two individuals. We used this technique (using locations separated by 1 h) in preliminary analyses and similarly found no avoidance. However, if the distance at which a bobcat would alter its course due to the presence of a coyote is short (e.g., 150 m) relative to radiotelemetry error (which seems likely, especially in dense vegetation or rugged topography), this technique would be extremely insensitive. Further, the distance between two simultaneous locations that are widely separated in time (up to 4 h; Litvaitis and Harrison 1989) is unlikely to differ in any meaningful way from that between randomly paired locations. Therefore, to determine whether bobcats avoided coyotes, we compared use versus availability of coyote core areas by spatially overlapping bobcats. We chose the core area of coyotes because this was the most intensively used portion of the home range, and therefore where territorial behavior would be expected to be most apparent. [We also conducted the analyses using coyote home ranges; results were similar and therefore, to avoid duplication, were not presented here.] Availability of coyote core areas was calculated for each bobcat, corresponding to the proportion of a bobcat s annual 95% MCP overlapping core areas of resident female coyotes. Because coyotes shifted their core areas seasonally, these were calculated separately for each season. Use was indicated by proportions of radiotelemetry locations falling inside coyote cores. Ratios of observed (use) to expected (available) proportions of locations within coyote core areas were used to calculate selection indices as described above (under Habitat selection ). Selection indices were calculated for bobcats with 20 locations in a season. Canids tend to be most territorial towards conspecifics during breeding (winter) and pup-rearing (spring) (Jaeger et al. 1996); it is unknown whether interspecific territoriality between coyotes and bobcats also reflects similar seasonality. Therefore, we tested for seasonal differences in bobcat selection indices for coyote core areas using analysis of variance. Acti ity To evaluate overlap between bobcats and coyotes in time, we examined diel activity patterns during wet and dry seasons. Activity (active, inactive, or ambiguous) was assessed at the time of radiolocation, and was inferred from amplitude fluctuation and bearing shift (Andelt 1985, Major and Sherburne 1987) or pulse-rate variation for a subset of animals (5 bobcats, 1 coyote) that wore motion-sensitive transmitters (Telonics, Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA). Environmental conditions such as high winds can influence amplitude fluctuation. Therefore, we only evaluated activity for locations in which we were confident the animal was active or inactive (55% of locations; Sacks 1996). We calculated proportions of these locations coded as active during eight 3-h diel periods. Only animals with 20 activity-coded locations in a diel period were included in calculations of diel period averages. OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 239

5 Table 1. Proportional biomass (percent of the estimated total biomass of prey consumed represented by each food item) and frequency of occurrence (percent of scats containing each food item) of food items a in bobcat and coyote scats, Jul Dec For direct comparison with proportional biomass, the relative frequency of occurrence of food items (number of occurrences of a food item/total number of occurrences of all items in sample, expressed as percent) is given in parentheses. Values for composite groups are left-justified for clarity. Bobcat Coyote biomass (%) freq. of occ. (%) biomass (%) freq. of occ. (%) n=226 scats n=226 scats, n=311 scats n=537 scats, 416 occurrences 865 occurrences Ungulate a (9.1) (25.6) Deer (6.0) (14.5) Sheep (2.6) (11.6) Lagomorph b (15.1) (5.6) Rodent a (41.3) (26.3) Squirrel c (6.3) (2.5) Woodrat (14.3) (6.4) Pocket gopher (6.1) (5.1) Kangaroo rat (3.0) (1.2) Chipmunk (0.6) (0.4) Vole (13.8) (9.6) Mice d (10.9) (5.3) Bird (6.0) (4.8) Insect (4.6) (7.3) Reptile n/a 17.2 (9.3) n/a 7.8 (4.8) Manzanita (1.3) (20.9) a Ungulate and rodent categories include unidentified large and small mammals, respectively. b Syl ilagus bachmani and Lepus californicus. c Sciurus griseus and Spermophilus beecheyi. d Peromyscus sp. and Reithrodontomys megalotis. Results Food habits Most of the biomass consumed by both predators was represented by three mammalian taxa (ungulates, rodents, and lagomorphs; Table 1). The two predators differed in their relative consumption of large and small prey, with small mammals dominating the bobcat diet and ungulates dominating the coyote diet (Fig. 1). The slope of the regression line in Fig. 1 indicated that for coyotes the proportion of total biomass composed by rodents was 54% that of bobcats. Within the rodent category, however, relative ranking of species was quite similar for bobcats and coyotes (revealed by the close fit of points about the trend line for rodents). Based on biomass, overall niche breadth was 6.71 for bobcats and 4.91 for coyotes; overall niche overlap was Based on frequency of occurrence, overall niche breadth was 8.84 for bobcats and 8.35 for coyotes; overall niche overlap was Prey selection by bobcats and coyotes changed over time, but was not generally linked to season per se (i.e., showing similarity between successive summers or falls). Ungulate consumption by bobcats, although much lower, roughly paralleled that of coyotes over time (Fig. 2A). Bobcats displayed a decreasing trend in rodent consumption and an increasing trend in lagomorph consumption, whereas no consistent trends were evident for coyote consumption of these prey (Fig. 2B, C). Seasonality of manzanita berries in coyote scats was apparent in frequency of occurrence data, which showed manzanita berries frequently consumed by coyotes during summer and fall seasons; in contrast, manzanita berries composed only a small proportion of the biomass consumed in all seasons (Fig. 3). Bobcat seasonal niche breadth, based on biomass, paralleled bob- Fig. 1. Consumption of ungulate, rodent, and lagomorph prey by coyotes versus bobcats, expressed as proportion of the estimated total fresh biomass of prey consumed, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Filled circles represent rodent species, open circles represent deer and sheep. Rodent regression line intercept was constrained to the origin. 240 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

6 cat-coyote niche overlap and both decreased during the latter part of the study; no pattern was evident in coyote niche breadth (Fig. 4A). Seasonal breadth and overlap measures based on frequency of occurrence showed no obvious trends (Fig. 4B). Radiotelemetry study We captured and monitored 13 coyotes and 11 bobcats. Bobcats were categorized by sex and estimated age class at capture, and weights were calculated for adult females (X SE= kg, n=3), subadult males ( kg, n=5), and adult males ( kg, n=3). Average weights ( SE) of coyotes were 9.77 ( 0.34) kg for females and ( 0.63) kg for males. We obtained 2770 radiolocations of bobcats and 4498 radiolocations of coyotes. Of the radiocollared Fig. 2. Proportion of prey biomass consumed by bobcats and coyotes consisting of (A) ungulate, (B) rodent, and (C) lagomorph prey during six seasons, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Seasonal sample sizes for bobcat and coyote scats, respectively: 34, 52 (summer 1994); 20, 52 (fall 1994); 76, 53 (winter 1995); 49, 51 (spring 1995); 27, 51 (summer 1995); and 20, 52 (fall 1995). bobcats, there was one death (cause undetermined) during the study period. All bobcats appeared to be in good condition at initial capture, subsequent captures, and during visual observations. Habitat selection Habitat composition of the 95% MCP was similar for bobcats and coyotes, although coyote home ranges tended to include more grassland and less forest than did bobcat home ranges (Fig. 5). Habitat selection Fig. 3. Seasonal use of manzanita berries by coyotes, as measured by occurrence in scats versus biomass consumed, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 241

7 within home ranges was very similar for bobcats and coyotes in all seasons (Fig. 6). Grassland tended to be used less than expected (based on availability) by both carnivores, but this was significant only for coyotes in winter spring Forest was marginally selected for by coyotes during winter spring 1995 as was woodland for bobcats. Spatial relationships Annual home range size of bobcats averaged ( SE) km 2 (90% AK) and km 2 (95% MCP). Coyote annual home ranges averaged km 2 (90% AK) and km 2 (95% MCP). An average of 16% (range=2 46%) of a bobcat s home range was overlapped by each neighboring coyote home range, and most bobcat home ranges were overlapped by 2 (radiocollared) coyote territories. Coyote territories were mutually exclusive. Fig. 5. Habitat composition of home ranges of bobcats (n= 11) and coyote pairs (n=4), expressed as proportions of the 95% minimum convex polygon consisting of each of four major habitat types, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Error bars correspond to 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals. Bobcat use of coyote core areas, as indicated by selection indices, differed seasonally (F=3.40, df= 5,24, P=0.018). In particular, bobcats avoided coyote core areas most during winter and spring (Fig. 7). Although sample sizes were too small (n=3 large males) to include bobcat body size as a factor in statistical analyses, only small bobcats appeared to avoid coyote cores during winter, whereas all bobcats appeared to avoid coyote core areas during spring (Fig. 8). Acti ity Relative to coyotes, diel activity of bobcats was variable, both within and among seasons (Fig. 9). Whereas coyotes were more consistently nocturnal, bobcats were relatively less active during h in both seasons for which data were collected for this diel period. Coyotes were generally least active during h. Diel activity patterns of bobcats and coyotes were not negatively correlated in any season (r=0.11, P= 0.11, summer fall 1994; r=0.06, P=0.90, winter spring 1995; r=0.26, P=0.26, summer fall 1995). Fig. 4. Seasonal estimates of dietary breadth for bobcats and coyotes, and bobcat coyote food niche overlap, based on (A) biomass consumption and (B) frequency of occurrence of food items, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Discussion Food habits Food use represents a primary mode of resource partitioning between two ecologically similar species. At HREC, overall food niche overlap of bobcats and coyotes was moderate when compared with values from other carnivore studies based on the same index (Jedrzejewska and Jedrzejewski 1998). Dietary differences were primarily associated with prey size. Whereas small 242 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

8 Fig. 6. Habitat selection indices for bobcats (open circles) and coyotes (closed circles) during summer fall 1994 (A, B), winter spring 1995 (C, D), and summer fall 1995 (E, F), Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Values 1=positive selection, 1=negative selection, 1=no selection. Sample sizes were 7, 8, and 5 bobcats, and 4, 4, and 3 coyotes in chronological order. Error bars correspond to 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals. mammals were the principal prey of bobcats, ungulates comprised the bulk of prey biomass for coyotes. In contrast to bobcats, which tend to be solitary (Bailey 1974, Major and Sherburne 1987), coyotes often hunt in pairs or groups, which likely facilitates predation on ungulates (Gese et al. 1988, Gese and Grothe 1995, Sacks et al. 1999b). Body size is often an important constraint on prey size selection as well (Gittleman 1985). Whereas bobcats tend to be slightly smaller than coyotes on average throughout their ranges (Young 1958, Nowak 1991), bobcats on our study area were substantially smaller than coyotes (roughly half the mass on average), which also may have hindered their ability to kill ungulates. Another difference in the diets of bobcats and coyotes in this study was in consumption of vegetation. Because this difference is characteristic of canids and felids generally (Nowak 1991), it clearly reflected differences in fundamental niches of bobcats and coyotes. Interestingly, although most studies of bobcat and coyote food habits have concluded that fruit in the coyote diet but not bobcat diet was a major seasonal niche difference (e.g., Small 1971, Toweill and Anthony 1984, Witmer and DeCalesta 1986, Major and Sherburne 1987, Litvaitis and Harrison 1989, DiBello et al. 1990), the omnivorous status of the coyote contributed little to differences between bobcat and coyote diets in this study. Although manzanita occurred at a high frequency in coyote scats seasonally, it contributed little biomass. Thus, estimates of coyote niche breadth and bobcat coyote overlap based on frequency of occurrence were biased by undue influence of manzanita berries. Food niches of bobcats and coyotes became less similar over the course of our study, based on prey biomass. This pattern, as well as the decreasing trend in bobcat dietary breadth, may have resulted from the partial replacement of rodent species by lagomorphs OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 243

9 (single taxon) in the bobcat diet. The tight relationship between bobcat and coyote consumption within rodent species (Fig. 1) suggested that these predators perceived rodents as a group, which they differentiated from lagomorphs and ungulates by size. When we calculated the seasonal niche breadth indices using lumped prey categories (i.e., rodent, lagomorph, ungulate), bobcat breadth did not decrease over time. Bobcats may have shifted from rodents to lagomorphs as a prey-switching response to changing relative abundances of these prey (Murdoch 1969), although we did not quantify prey abundance. of grassland by both predators was consistent with previous findings for bobcats (May 1981, Koehler and Hornocker 1991), but was uncharacteristic of coyotes, which tend to selectively use such open habitats (e.g., Major and Sherburne 1987). Negative selection of grassland by coyotes in this study was likely related primarily to avoidance of humans (Sacks 1996). Sheep intensively grazed much of the grassland habitat in our study and density of grassland rodents may have been relatively low in this habitat as a result (Hayward et al. 1997), further reducing its attractiveness to coyotes (and bobcats). Habitat selection Habitat segregation may occur independently of interspecific interactions. For example, felids often rely on dense understory cover to facilitate their stalk and ambush style of predation, in contrast to the open pursuit typical of canids (Kleiman and Eisenberg 1973); thus cover and open habitat types might be expected to be selected by bobcats and coyotes, respectively. In this study there was a slight tendency for bobcat home ranges to include more forest and less grassland than coyote home ranges. Further, bobcat home ranges tended to be located at higher elevations, spread along the primary mountain ridge, suggesting some degree of selection for features associated with these areas, such as steep hillsides and rugged, rocky terrain. Within their home ranges bobcats and coyotes displayed nearly identical habitat selection, suggesting that differences at the landscape scale were not related to interspecific interactions. The slight negative selection Fig. 7. Selection indices of observed versus expected use of overlapping coyote core areas by bobcats during six seasons, Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Values 1=positive selection, 1=negative selection, 1=no selection. Sample sizes were 4, 5, 8, 7, 4, and 2 bobcats in chronological order. Error bars correspond to 95% Bonferroni confidence intervals. Spatial relationships The potential for chance encounters between bobcats and coyotes, and hence interference, on the study area was high due to high densities, small home ranges, and high interspecific home range overlap. Whereas exploitation competition, by definition, requires that a resource (usually food) be limiting, behavior associated with interference competition may be present regardless of current resource levels. For example, agonistic behavior and interspecific killing could be cued by detection of a particular species rather than being caused proximately by resource limitation, although such a response could be the evolutionary consequence of past resource competition. Bobcats displayed some avoidance of the most intensively used parts of coyote home ranges during winter and spring, which coincided with coyote breeding and pup-rearing, when coyotes tend to be most territorial toward conspecifics. Core avoidance during winter (coyote breeding) was only apparent for small bobcats, whereas large and small bobcats avoided coyote cores during spring (pup-rearing), when these areas corresponded to den sites, which were probably actively defended. These findings were consistent with other studies indicating that small bobcats (females and young males) are more vulnerable to agonistic interactions with coyotes (Anderson 1986, Litvaitis 1992). We suspect that the observed spatial avoidance of coyote cores by bobcats in this study reflected indirect (e.g., avoiding coyote scent) as opposed to direct (i.e., being chased) interactions. We found no evidence that bobcats were injured or killed by coyotes. Only one radiocollared bobcat died during our study and, although we recovered the carcass too long after death to determine the cause, we found no evidence of attack by another carnivore (e.g., tooth punctures in the skeleton). In addition to the bobcats captured in our study, many others were captured before and after the study during attempts to capture coyotes for other research (e.g., Sacks et al. 1999a, b); none of these bobcats had injuries indicative of coyote attacks. 244 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

10 Fig. 8. Space use by female and small male bobcats (A, B) and large male bobcats (C, D) with respect to coyote territories during winter (A, C) and spring (B, D) 1995, Hopland Research and Extension Center, January 1995 June Seasonal bobcat locations (dots) and annual 95% MCPs (lines; female ranges have dashed line) are overlaid on seasonal coyote territories (shaded polygons; darker shading in core areas). Activity Partitioning of resources in time is rare relative to partitioning by food or habitat types (Schoener 1974a). Temporal segregation among carnivores is usually not an effective means of partitioning resources per se, because shared resources generally are not renewed within a diel period, and thus exploitation competition is not alleviated (Jaksíc et al. 1981). However, temporal spacing may reflect a response to agonistic interactions as with spatial segregation. Toweill (1986) reported different patterns of activity of bobcats and coyotes which he speculated helped to minimize interspecific contact. At HREC, although bobcats displayed some avoidance of coyotes in space, we found no evidence of a corresponding avoidance in time. Activity patterns of bobcats and coyotes were not negatively correlated and although the two predators displayed different diel patterns of activity, these differences did not coincide with seasons when spatial avoidance was most pronounced. In comparison, transient coyotes, which displayed strong spatial avoidance of residents at our study site (Sacks et al. 1999b), displayed diel activity patterns opposite those of resident coyotes (Sacks 1996). Nocturnal activity of resident coyotes was probably due primarily to high human exploitation. During the year previous to this study, no removal of coyotes OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 245

11 was attempted and coyote activity patterns were less nocturnal (Sacks 1996). Bobcats suffered no exploitation and therefore did not share this pressure for nocturnality. Diurnal activity seems to be generally more typical of unexploited populations of bobcats (Kitchings and Story 1978) and coyotes (Gipson and Sealander 1972, Andelt 1985, Kitchen et al. 2000). Bobcat coyote niche relationships Taken together, our findings indicate that bobcats and coyotes used food and habitat resources independently of each other. The avoidance of coyote cores by bobcats during some seasons provided limited evidence of negative relations. However, the lack of evidence of physical harm or of temporal avoidance suggested that such behavior was not especially important, despite generally high densities of the two predators. It seems likely that prey size differences and/or abundance of food alleviated competition between these two carnivores. Other studies of bobcats and coyotes conducted in environments with mild, relatively stable climates had similar results (Witmer and DeCalesta 1986, Bradley and Fagre 1988). In these studies, as in ours, densities of both predators were high, interspecific home range overlap was extensive, and bobcats and coyotes used foods and habitats similarly. These authors did not report any evidence of interspecific avoidance in space or time, agonistic interactions, or coyote-caused bobcat injury or mortality. Fig. 9. Average diel activity of (A) bobcats and (B) coyotes, during summer fall 1994 (n=11 bobcats, 9 coyotes), winter spring 1995 (n=8, 6), and summer fall 1995 (n=5, 3), Hopland Research and Extension Center, July 1994 December Standard error bars and connecting lines are not shown in summer fall 1995 due to small sample sizes and missing data. 246 OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

12 In contrast, studies in harsh environments characterized by long, severe winters, reported that bobcats and coyotes occurred at relatively low densities and occupied large home ranges (Toweill 1986, Major and Sherburne 1987, Litvaitis and Harrison 1989). Bobcats and coyotes displayed moderate to extensive home range overlap but because of large use areas, chance interspecific encounters were likely rare even in overlap areas. High overlap in one niche dimension (e.g., food use) was often related to low overlap in another (e.g., habitat use; Toweill 1986), indicating niche complementarity. Agonistic interactions included at least one bobcat killed by coyotes in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon (Toweill 1986) and one bobcat killed in a trap by coyotes in eastern Maine (Litvaitis and Harrison 1989). Major and Sherburne (1987) working in western Maine reported no evidence of agonistic behavior, but believed that exploitation competition for deer may have been important, and presented evidence that bobcats were in generally worse condition during winter than coyotes. This may have reflected climatic stress rather than interspecific competition with coyotes, as the study area occurred in the northernmost boundary of the bobcat range. Thus, the importance of interspecific competition between bobcats and coyotes seems generally low but perhaps greater in highly seasonal climates characteristic of northern/northeastern North America and mountainous regions of the western U.S. as compared to mild, stable climates of the southern and west-coastal regions. Although prey biomass tends to be lower in northerly regions, low prey biomass per se does not imply prey scarcity because predator biomass on average tends to correspond to average prey biomass (e.g., Knowlton and Gese 1995). However, in northern North America resources regularly become limiting due to harsh winters and, in boreal regions, multiannual cycles in abundance of primary prey provide additional periods of prey scarcity (and abundance; Keith and Windberg 1978, O Donoghue et al. 1998). In contrast, Mediterranean or semi-arid climates of western and southern North America tend to be more stable and predator and prey populations are likely to be closer to equilibrium more of the time, such that prey are rarely very scarce (or abundant) relative to predator abundance. Acknowledgements We thank M. M. Jaeger and HREC for supporting this study. K. Blejwas, J. Dayton, J. Meisler, J. Poor, Jr., and T. Weller provided valuable field assistance. S. Ardley, J. Theade, E. Voight, and volunteers with the University Research Expedition Program helped with scat collection. M. E. Jaeger, K. Finn and C. Wu assisted with scat analysis. G. Trehey and C. Brooks provided GIS expertise and satellite images. Funding and equipment were provided in large part by the USDA National Wildlife Research Center through cooperative agreements with the U. of Calif. at Berkeley (No CA), and with the Div. of Agriculture and Natural Resources of the U. of Calif. (No CA). Additional support was provided by the Dept of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, the A. Starker Leopold endowed chair, and a graduate fellowship (JN) at the U. of Calif. at Berkeley. We thank V. Bakker, N. Belfiore, K. Blejwas, R. Brock, K. Kauhala, R. Lewison, M. Meyer, S. Riley, T. Schoener, A. Suarez, and D. VanVuren for constructive review of the manuscript. References Andelt, W. F Behavioral ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Wildl. Monogr. 94. Andelt, W. F. and Andelt, S. H Diet bias in scat deposition-rate surveys of coyote density. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 12: Anderson, E. M Bobcat behavioral ecology in relation to resource use in southeastern Colorado. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO. Bailey, T. N Social organization in a bobcat population. J. Wildl. Manage. 38: Bradley, L. C. and Fagre, D. B Movements and habitat use by coyotes and bobcats on a ranch in southern Texas. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 42: Byers, C. R., Steinhorst, R. K. and Krausman, P. R Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilizationavailability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 48: Camenzind, F. J Behavioral ecology of coyotes on the National Elk Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming. In: Bekoff, M. (ed.), Coyotes: biology, behavior and management. Academic Press, pp Clark, P. J. and Evans, F. C Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: Danner, D. A. and Dodd, N Comparison of coyote and gray fox scat diameters. J. Wildl. Manage. 46: DiBello, F. J., Arthur, S. M. and Krohn, W. P Food habits of sympatric coyotes, Canis latrans, red foxes, Vulpes ulpes, and bobcats, Lynx rufus, in Maine. Can. Field-Nat. 104: Fox, L. III, Bonser, G. L., Trehey, G. H. et al A wildlife habitat map and database for the ORCA (Oregon-California) Klamath Bioregion derived from Landsat imagery, version 1.0. Gese, E. M. and Grothe, S Analysis of coyote predation on deer and elk during winter in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Am. Midl. Nat. 133: Gese, E. M., Rongstad, O. J. and Mytton, W. R Relationship between coyote group size and diet in southeastern Colorado. J. Wildl. Manage. 52: Gittleman, J. L Carnivore body size: ecological and taxonomic correlates. Oecologia 67: Gipson, P. S. and Sealander, J. A Home range and activity of the coyote in Arkansas. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game Fish Comm. 26: Glass, B. P A key to the skulls of North American mammals. Dept Zoology, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. Greene, H. W. and Jaksíc, F. M Food-niche relationships among sympatric predators: effects of level of prey identification. Oikos 40: Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. and Slobodkin, L. B Community structure, population control, and competition. Am. Nat. 94: Hall, H. T. and Newsom, J. D Summer home ranges and movements of bobcats in bottomland hardwoods of southern Louisiana. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 30: Hayward, B., E. Heske, J. and Painter, C. W Effects of livestock grazing on small mammals at a desert cienaga. J. Wildl. Manage. 61: OIKOS 94:2 (2001) 247

13 Henke, S. E. and Bryant, F. C Effects of coyote removal on the faunal community in western Texas. J. Wildl. Manage. 63: Hurlbert, S. H Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: Jachowski, R. L Proposal to remove the bobcat from Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Federal Register 46: Jaksíc, F. M., Greene, H. W. and Yanez, J. L The guild structure of a community of predatory vertebrates in central Chile. Oecologia 52: Jaeger, M. M., Pandit, R. K. and Haque, E Seasonal differences in territorial behavior by golden jackals in Bangladesh: howling versus confrontation. J. Mammal. 77: Jedrzejewska, B. and Jedrzejewski, W Predation in vertebrate communities: the bialowieza primeval forest as a case study. Springer-Verlag. Keenan, R. J Spatial use of home range among red foxes (Vulpes ulpes) in south-central Ontario. In: Chapman, J. A. and Pursley, D. (eds), Proceedings of the Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Frostburg, MD, Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Inc., pp Keith, L. B. and Windberg, L. A A demographic analysis of the snowshoe hare cycle. Wildl. Monogr. 58: Kelly, B. T Carnivore scat analysis: an evaluation of existing techniques and the development of predictive models of prey consumed. M.S. thesis, Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID. Kie, J. G., Baldwin, J. A. and Evans, C. J Calhome: a program for estimating animal home ranges. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24: Kitchen, A. M., Gese, E. M. and Schauster, E. R Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution. Can. J. Zool. 78: Kitchings, J. T. and Story, J. D Preliminary studies of bobcat activity patterns. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 32: Kleiman, D. G. and Eisenberg, J. F Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Anim. Behav. 21: Knick, S. T Ecology of bobcats relative to exploitation and a prey decline in southeastern Idaho. Wildl. Monogr Knowlton, F. F. and Tzilkowski, W. M Trends in bobcat visitations to scent-station survey lines in western United States, Bobcat Res. Conf. Proc., Natl. Wildl. Fed. Sci. Tech. Ser. 6: Knowlton, F. F. and Gese, E. M Coyote population processes revisited. In: Rollins, D., Richardson, C., Blankenship, T. et al. (eds), Coyotes in the southwest: a compendium of our knowledge. Symposium Proc., Dec , 1995, San Angelo, TX, pp Koehler, G. M. and Hornocker, M. G Seasonal resource use among mountain lions, bobcats, and coyotes. J. Mammal. 72: Krebs, C. J Ecological methodology. Harper and Row. Lembeck, M Long term behavior and population dynamics of an unharvested bobcat population in San Diego County. In: Miller, S. D. and Everett, D. D. (eds), Cats of the World: biology, conservation and management. National Wildlife Federation, pp Linhart, S. B. and Robinson, W. B Some relative carnivore densities in areas under sustained coyote control. J. Mammal. 53: Litvaitis, J. A Niche relations between coyotes and sympatric Carnivora. In: Boer, A. H. (ed.), Ecology and management of the eastern coyote. Wildlife Research Unit, Univ. New Brunswick, pp Litvaitis, J. A. and Harrison, D. J Bobcat-coyote niche relationships during a period of coyote population increase. Can. J. Zool. 67: Litvaitis, J. A., Titus, K. and Anderson, E. M Measuring vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. In: Bookhout, T. A. (ed.), Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, pp Lovell, C. D., Leopold, B. D. and Shropshire, C. C Trends in Mississippi predator populations, Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26: Main, M. B., Walsh, P. B., Portier, K. M. and Coates, S. F Monitoring the expanding range of coyotes in Florida: results of the statewide scent station surveys. Fla. Field Nat. 27: Major, J. T. and Sherburne, J. A Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats and red foxes in western Maine. J. Wildl. Manage. 51: May, D. W Habitat utilization by bobcats in eastern Maine. M.S. thesis, Univ. Maine. Mayer, W. V The hair of California mammals with keys to the dorsal guard hairs of California mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 48: Murdoch, W. W Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr. 39: Murie, O. J A field guide to animal tracks. Houghton Mifflin. Murphy, A. H. and Heady, H. F Vascular plants of the Hopland Field Station, Mendocino County, California. Wasmann J. Biol. 41: Neale, J. C. C Comparative resource use by sympatric bobcats and coyotes: food habits, habitat use, activity, and spatial relationships. M.S. thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA. Neale, J. C. C., Sacks, B. N., Jaeger, M. M. and McCullough, D. R A comparison of bobcat and coyote predation on lambs in north-coastal California. J. Wildl. Manage. 62: Neu, C. W., Byers, C. R. and Peek, J. M A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 38: Nowak, R. M Walker s Mammals of the World. Vol. II, 5th edn. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. Nunley, G. L The effects of coyote control operations on non-target species in New Mexico. Proc. Great Plains Wildl. Damage Control Workshop 3: O Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J. et al Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecology 79: Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J. and Niemelä, P Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat. 118: Palomares, F. and Caro, T. M Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am. Nat. 153: Parker, G Eastern coyote: the story of its success. Nimbus. Pianka, E. R The structure of lizard communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: Sacks, B. N Ecology and behavior of coyotes in relation to depredation and control on a California sheep ranch. M.S. thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley, CA. Sacks, B. N Increasing prevalence of canine heartworm in coyotes from California. J. Wildl. Dis. 34: Sacks, B. N., Blejwas, K. M. and Jaeger, M. M. 1999a. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch. J. Wildl. Manage. 63: OIKOS 94:2 (2001)

Food Item Use by Coyote Pups at Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois

Food Item Use by Coyote Pups at Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science (1993), Volume 86, 3 and 4, pp. 133-137 Food Item Use by Coyote Pups at Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois Brian L. Cypher 1 Cooperative

More information

Coyote. Canis latrans. Other common names. Introduction. Physical Description and Anatomy. Eastern Coyote

Coyote. Canis latrans. Other common names. Introduction. Physical Description and Anatomy. Eastern Coyote Coyote Canis latrans Other common names Eastern Coyote Introduction Coyotes are the largest wild canine with breeding populations in New York State. There is plenty of high quality habitat throughout the

More information

Lab 8 Order Carnivora: Families Canidae, Felidae, and Ursidae Need to know Terms: carnassials, digitigrade, reproductive suppression, Jacobson s organ

Lab 8 Order Carnivora: Families Canidae, Felidae, and Ursidae Need to know Terms: carnassials, digitigrade, reproductive suppression, Jacobson s organ Lab 8 Order Carnivora: Families Canidae, Felidae, and Ursidae Need to know Terms: carnassials, digitigrade, reproductive suppression, Jacobson s organ Family Canidae Canis latrans ID based on skull, photos,

More information

Bobcat. Lynx Rufus. Other common names. Introduction. Physical Description and Anatomy. None

Bobcat. Lynx Rufus. Other common names. Introduction. Physical Description and Anatomy. None Bobcat Lynx Rufus Other common names None Introduction Bobcats are the most common wildcat in North America. Their name comes from the stubby tail, which looks as though it has been bobbed. They are about

More information

Original Draft: 11/4/97 Revised Draft: 6/21/12

Original Draft: 11/4/97 Revised Draft: 6/21/12 Original Draft: 11/4/97 Revised Draft: 6/21/12 Dear Interested Person or Party: The following is a scientific opinion letter requested by Brooks Fahy, Executive Director of Predator Defense. This letter

More information

Behavioral interactions between coyotes, Canis latrans, and wolves, Canis lupus, at ungulate carcasses in southwestern Montana

Behavioral interactions between coyotes, Canis latrans, and wolves, Canis lupus, at ungulate carcasses in southwestern Montana Western North American Naturalist Volume 66 Number 3 Article 12 8-10-2006 Behavioral interactions between coyotes, Canis latrans, and wolves, Canis lupus, at ungulate carcasses in southwestern Montana

More information

Coyote (Canis latrans)

Coyote (Canis latrans) Coyote (Canis latrans) Coyotes are among the most adaptable mammals in North America. They have an enormous geographical distribution and can live in very diverse ecological settings, even successfully

More information

Some Foods Used by Coyotes and Bobcats in Cimarron County, Oklahoma 1954 Through

Some Foods Used by Coyotes and Bobcats in Cimarron County, Oklahoma 1954 Through .180 PROOf OF THE QKLA. ACAD. OF SCI. FOR 1957 Some Foods Used by Coyotes and Bobcats in Cimarron County, Oklahoma 1954 Through 1956 1 RALPH J. ELLIS and SANFORD D. SCBEMNITZ, Oklahoma Cooperative Wildlife

More information

Lynx Update May 25, 2009 INTRODUCTION

Lynx Update May 25, 2009 INTRODUCTION Lynx Update May 25, 2009 INTRODUCTION In an effort to establish a viable population of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) in Colorado, the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) initiated a reintroduction effort

More information

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin Northeast Wyoming 121 Kort Clayton Thunderbird Wildlife Consulting, Inc. My presentation today will hopefully provide a fairly general overview the taxonomy and natural

More information

Trends in Fisher Predation in California A focus on the SNAMP fisher project

Trends in Fisher Predation in California A focus on the SNAMP fisher project Trends in Fisher Predation in California A focus on the SNAMP fisher project Greta M. Wengert Integral Ecology Research Center UC Davis, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory gmwengert@ucdavis.edu Project Collaborators:

More information

Bobcat Interpretive Guide

Bobcat Interpretive Guide Interpretive Guide Exhibit Talking Point: Our job as interpreters is to link what the visitors are seeing to The Zoo's conservation education messages. Our goal is to spark curiosity, create emotional

More information

Factors that describe and determine the territories of canids Keith Steinmann

Factors that describe and determine the territories of canids Keith Steinmann Factors that describe and determine the territories of canids Keith Steinmann A home range is distinguished as the area of a landscape that an individual or pack resides in. A territory is made distinguishable

More information

Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management.

Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management. Bighorn Lamb Production, Survival, and Mortality in South-Central Colorado Author(s): Thomas N. Woodard, R. J. Gutiérrez, William H. Rutherford Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Wildlife Management,

More information

Bobcat Predation on Quail, Birds, and Mesomammals

Bobcat Predation on Quail, Birds, and Mesomammals National Quail Symposium Proceedings Volume 5 Article 9 2002 Bobcat Predation on Quail, Birds, and Mesomammals Michael E. Tewes Texas A&M University Jennifer M. Mock Texas A&M University John H. Young

More information

LESSON 2: Outfoxed? Red and Gray Fox Niches and Adaptations

LESSON 2: Outfoxed? Red and Gray Fox Niches and Adaptations LESSON 2: Outfoxed? Red and Gray Fox Niches and Adaptations GRADES: 6-8 OBJECTIVE: The goal of wildlife ecologists is to study how wild animals interact with their environment. One of the most common questions

More information

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE BLACK-LEGGED TICK, IXODES SCAPULARIS, IN TEXAS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLIMATE VARIATION

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE BLACK-LEGGED TICK, IXODES SCAPULARIS, IN TEXAS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLIMATE VARIATION TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE BLACK-LEGGED TICK, IXODES SCAPULARIS, IN TEXAS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLIMATE VARIATION An Undergraduate Research Scholars Thesis By JOSHUA SANTELISES Submitted

More information

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii Photo by Amy Leist Habitat Use Profile Habitats Used in Nevada Mesquite-Acacia Mojave Lowland Riparian Springs Agriculture Key Habitat Parameters Plant Composition Mesquite, acacia, salt cedar, willow,

More information

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 April 30 June Prepared by

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 April 30 June Prepared by PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT Period Covered: 1 April 30 June 2014 Prepared by John A. Litvaitis, Tyler Mahard, Rory Carroll, and Marian K. Litvaitis Department of Natural Resources

More information

Loss of wildlands could increase wolf-human conflicts, PA G E 4 A conversation about red wolf recovery, PA G E 8

Loss of wildlands could increase wolf-human conflicts, PA G E 4 A conversation about red wolf recovery, PA G E 8 Loss of wildlands could increase wolf-human conflicts, PA G E 4 A conversation about red wolf recovery, PA G E 8 A Closer Look at Red Wolf Recovery A Conversation with Dr. David R. Rabon PHOTOS BY BECKY

More information

Sheikh Muhammad Abdur Rashid Population ecology and management of Water Monitors, Varanus salvator (Laurenti 1768) at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve,

Sheikh Muhammad Abdur Rashid Population ecology and management of Water Monitors, Varanus salvator (Laurenti 1768) at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Author Title Institute Sheikh Muhammad Abdur Rashid Population ecology and management of Water Monitors, Varanus salvator (Laurenti 1768) at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore Thesis (Ph.D.) National

More information

Effects of prey availability and climate across a decade for a desert-dwelling, ectothermic mesopredator. R. Anderson Western Washington University

Effects of prey availability and climate across a decade for a desert-dwelling, ectothermic mesopredator. R. Anderson Western Washington University Effects of prey availability and climate across a decade for a desert-dwelling, ectothermic mesopredator R. Anderson Western Washington University Trophic interactions in desert systems are presumed to

More information

FAUNAL DATA, SAN PEDRO PRESERVATION PROJECT

FAUNAL DATA, SAN PEDRO PRESERVATION PROJECT FAUNAL DATA, SAN PEDRO PRESERVATION PROJECT Jennifer A. Waters Desert Archaeology, Inc. Cite as: Waters, Jennifer A. 2012 Faunal Data, San Pedro Preservation Project. .

More information

Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)

Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) Conservation Status: Near Threatened. FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Pygmy Rabbits dig extensive burrow systems, which are also used by other animals. Loss

More information

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF ROADS AND ASSOCIATED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON SNAKE POPULATIONS IN EASTERN TEXAS

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF ROADS AND ASSOCIATED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON SNAKE POPULATIONS IN EASTERN TEXAS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF ROADS AND ASSOCIATED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON SNAKE POPULATIONS IN EASTERN TEXAS D. Craig Rudolph, Shirley J. Burgdorf, Richard N. Conner, and Richard R. Schaefer, U.

More information

Geoffroy s Cat: Biodiversity Research Project

Geoffroy s Cat: Biodiversity Research Project Geoffroy s Cat: Biodiversity Research Project Viet Nguyen Conservation Biology BES 485 Geoffroy s Cat Geoffroy s Cat (Leopardus geoffroyi) are small, little known spotted wild cat found native to the central

More information

COLORADO LYNX DEN SITE HABITAT PROGRESS REPORT 2006

COLORADO LYNX DEN SITE HABITAT PROGRESS REPORT 2006 COLORADO LYNX DEN SITE HABITAT PROGRESS REPORT 2006 by Grant Merrill Tanya Shenk U.S. Forest Service and Colorado Division of Wildlife Cooperative Effort September 30, 2006 INTRODUCTION Lynx (Lynx canadensis)

More information

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016 Texas Quail Index Result Demonstration Report 2016 Cooperators: Jerry Coplen, County Extension Agent for Knox County Amanda Gobeli, Extension Associate Dr. Dale Rollins, Statewide Coordinator Circle Bar

More information

Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) Productivity and Home Range Characteristics in a Shortgrass Prairie. Rosemary A. Frank and R.

Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) Productivity and Home Range Characteristics in a Shortgrass Prairie. Rosemary A. Frank and R. Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) Productivity and Home Range Characteristics in a Shortgrass Prairie Rosemary A. Frank and R. Scott Lutz 1 Abstract. We studied movements and breeding success of resident

More information

Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2010 Interagency Annual Report

Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2010 Interagency Annual Report Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2010 Interagency Annual Report A cooperative effort by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, Blackfeet

More information

Animal Biodiversity. Teacher Resources - High School (Cycle 1) Biology Redpath Museum

Animal Biodiversity. Teacher Resources - High School (Cycle 1) Biology Redpath Museum Animal Biodiversity Teacher Resources - High School (Cycle 1) Biology Redpath Museum Ecology What defines a habitat? 1. Geographic Location The location of a habitat is determined by its latitude and its

More information

Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone: Park Visitor Attitudes, Expenditures, and Economic Impacts

Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone: Park Visitor Attitudes, Expenditures, and Economic Impacts Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone: Park Visitor Attitudes, Expenditures, and Economic Impacts John W. Duffield, Chris J. Neher, and David A. Patterson Introduction IN 1995, THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

More information

Fisher. Martes pennanti

Fisher. Martes pennanti Fisher Martes pennanti Other common names Fisher cat, pole cat Introduction Fishers are one of only a few predators known to successfully feed on porcupines on a regular basis. They are also known as fisher

More information

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016 Texas Quail Index Result Demonstration Report 2016 Cooperators: Josh Kouns, County Extension Agent for Baylor County Amanda Gobeli, Extension Associate Dr. Dale Rollins, Statewide Coordinator Bill Whitley,

More information

A final programmatic report to: SAVE THE TIGER FUND. Scent Dog Monitoring of Amur Tigers-V ( ) March 1, March 1, 2006

A final programmatic report to: SAVE THE TIGER FUND. Scent Dog Monitoring of Amur Tigers-V ( ) March 1, March 1, 2006 1 A final programmatic report to: SAVE THE TIGER FUND Scent Dog Monitoring of Amur Tigers-V (2005-0013-017) March 1, 2005 - March 1, 2006 Linda Kerley and Galina Salkina PROJECT SUMMARY We used scent-matching

More information

Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata)

Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata) Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata) NMPIF level: Species Conservation Concern, Level 2 (SC2) NMPIF assessment score: 15 NM stewardship responsibility: Moderate National PIF status: Watch List, Stewardship

More information

Evaluation of large-scale baiting programs more surprises from Central West Queensland

Evaluation of large-scale baiting programs more surprises from Central West Queensland Issue 6 February 2000 Department of Natural Resources Issue 15 September 2006 Department of Natural Resources and Water QNRM006261 A co-operative A co-operative project project between between producers

More information

Mice alone and their biodiversity impacts: a 5-year experiment at Maungatautari

Mice alone and their biodiversity impacts: a 5-year experiment at Maungatautari Mice alone and their biodiversity impacts: a 5-year experiment at Maungatautari Deb Wilson, Corinne Watts, John Innes, Neil Fitzgerald, Scott Bartlam, Danny Thornburrow, Cat Kelly, Gary Barker, Mark Smale,

More information

Grey Fox. Urocyon cinereoargenteus

Grey Fox. Urocyon cinereoargenteus Grey Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus Other common names Gray fox, tree fox. Introduction The grey fox is unique in that it can rotate its forearms and has curved claws, making it the only canid in America

More information

Ames, IA Ames, IA (515)

Ames, IA Ames, IA (515) BENEFITS OF A CONSERVATION BUFFER-BASED CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR NORTHERN BOBWHITE AND GRASSLAND SONGBIRDS IN AN INTENSIVE PRODUCTION AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL

More information

Minnesota_mammals_Info_9.doc 11/04/09 -- DRAFT Page 1 of 64. Minnesota mammals

Minnesota_mammals_Info_9.doc 11/04/09 -- DRAFT Page 1 of 64. Minnesota mammals Minnesota_mammals_Info_9.doc 11/04/09 -- DRAFT Page 1 of 64 Minnesota mammals This is a short guide to Minnesota mammals, with information drawn from Hazard s Mammals of, Walker s Mammals of the World,

More information

COMPARING BODY CONDITION ESTIMATES OF ZOO BROTHER S ISLAND TUATARA (SPHENODON GUNTHERI) TO THAT OF THE WILD, A CLINICAL CASE

COMPARING BODY CONDITION ESTIMATES OF ZOO BROTHER S ISLAND TUATARA (SPHENODON GUNTHERI) TO THAT OF THE WILD, A CLINICAL CASE COMPARING BODY CONDITION ESTIMATES OF ZOO BROTHER S ISLAND TUATARA (SPHENODON GUNTHERI) TO THAT OF THE WILD, A CLINICAL CASE Kyle S. Thompson, BS,¹, ²* Michael L. Schlegel, PhD, PAS² ¹Oklahoma State University,

More information

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study Livestock Guard Dog Case Study Jernigan Ranch, Pecos County Dr. Reid Redden Extension Sheep & Goat Specialist Dr. John Tomecek Extension Wildlife Specialist Dr. John Walker Resident Director of Research

More information

Distribution, population dynamics, and habitat analyses of Collared Lizards

Distribution, population dynamics, and habitat analyses of Collared Lizards Distribution, population dynamics, and habitat analyses of Collared Lizards The proposed project focuses on the distribution and population structure of the eastern collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris

More information

ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria

ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria Page 2 of 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SENSITIVITY CRITERIA 3 1.1 Habitats 3 1.2 Species 4 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Habitat sensitivity / vulnerability Criteria...

More information

Rabbits and hares (Lagomorpha)

Rabbits and hares (Lagomorpha) Rabbits and hares (Lagomorpha) Rabbits and hares are part of a small order of mammals called lagomorphs. They are herbivores (feeding only on vegetation) with enlarged front teeth (anterior incisors) which

More information

Objectives: Outline: Idaho Amphibians and Reptiles. Characteristics of Amphibians. Types and Numbers of Amphibians

Objectives: Outline: Idaho Amphibians and Reptiles. Characteristics of Amphibians. Types and Numbers of Amphibians Natural History of Idaho Amphibians and Reptiles Wildlife Ecology, University of Idaho Fall 2005 Charles R. Peterson Herpetology Laboratory Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho Museum of Natural History

More information

A California Education Project of Felidae Conservation Fund by Jeanne Wetzel Chinn 12/3/2012

A California Education Project of Felidae Conservation Fund by Jeanne Wetzel Chinn 12/3/2012 A California Education Project of Felidae Conservation Fund by Jeanne Wetzel Chinn 12/3/2012 Presentation Outline Fragmentation & Connectivity Wolf Distribution Wolves in California The Ecology of Wolves

More information

Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction

Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction New Mexico Supercomputing Challenge Final Report April 2, 2014 Team Number 24 Centennial High School Team Members: Andrew Phillips Teacher: Ms. Hagaman Project Mentor:

More information

SEASONAL CHANGES IN A POPULATION OF DESERT HARVESTMEN, TRACHYRHINUS MARMORATUS (ARACHNIDA: OPILIONES), FROM WESTERN TEXAS

SEASONAL CHANGES IN A POPULATION OF DESERT HARVESTMEN, TRACHYRHINUS MARMORATUS (ARACHNIDA: OPILIONES), FROM WESTERN TEXAS Reprinted from PSYCHE, Vol 99, No. 23, 1992 SEASONAL CHANGES IN A POPULATION OF DESERT HARVESTMEN, TRACHYRHINUS MARMORATUS (ARACHNIDA: OPILIONES), FROM WESTERN TEXAS BY WILLIAM P. MACKAY l, CHE'REE AND

More information

The Greater Sage-grouse: Life History, Distribution, Status and Conservation in Nevada. Governor s Stakeholder Update Meeting January 18 th, 2012

The Greater Sage-grouse: Life History, Distribution, Status and Conservation in Nevada. Governor s Stakeholder Update Meeting January 18 th, 2012 The Greater Sage-grouse: Life History, Distribution, Status and Conservation in Nevada Governor s Stakeholder Update Meeting January 18 th, 2012 The Bird Largest grouse in North America and are dimorphic

More information

Removal of Alaskan Bald Eagles for Translocation to Other States Michael J. Jacobson U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Juneau, AK

Removal of Alaskan Bald Eagles for Translocation to Other States Michael J. Jacobson U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Juneau, AK Removal of Alaskan Bald Eagles for Translocation to Other States Michael J. Jacobson U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Juneau, AK Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were first captured and relocated from

More information

Beefy and the beast Special edition, March 2010

Beefy and the beast Special edition, March 2010 Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Biosecurity Queensland Beefy and the beast Special edition, March 2010 This special edition of Beefy and the beast summarises the findings

More information

Family Soricidae Masked shrew Southeastern shrew (long-tailed shrews)

Family Soricidae Masked shrew Southeastern shrew (long-tailed shrews) Masked shrew Southeastern shrew (long-tailed shrews) Solitary, insectivorous & primarily nocturnal Prefers moist habitats Breeds summer-fall Has 1-2 litters per breeding season Family Soricidae Family

More information

Dredging Impacts on Sea Turtles in the Southeastern USA Background Southeastern USA Sea Turtles Endangered Species Act Effects of Dredging on Sea Turt

Dredging Impacts on Sea Turtles in the Southeastern USA Background Southeastern USA Sea Turtles Endangered Species Act Effects of Dredging on Sea Turt An Update on Dredging Impacts on Sea Turtles in the Southeastern t USA A Historical Review of Protection and An Introduction to the USACE Sea Turtle Data Warehouse D. Dickerson U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

More information

10/03/18 periods 5,7 10/02/18 period 4 Objective: Reptiles and Fish Reptile scales different from fish scales. Explain how.

10/03/18 periods 5,7 10/02/18 period 4 Objective: Reptiles and Fish Reptile scales different from fish scales. Explain how. 10/03/18 periods 5,7 10/02/18 period 4 Objective: Reptiles and Fish Reptile scales different from fish scales. Explain how. Objective: Reptiles and Fish Reptile scales different from fish scales. Explain

More information

SKELETONS: Museum of Osteology Tooth and Eye Dentification Teacher Resource

SKELETONS: Museum of Osteology Tooth and Eye Dentification Teacher Resource SKELETONS: Museum of Osteology Tooth and Eye Dentification Teacher Resource Grade Levels: 3 rd 5 th Grade 3 rd Grade: SC.3.N.1.1 - Raise questions about the natural world, investigate them individually

More information

New York State Mammals. Order Lagomorpha Order Rodentia

New York State Mammals. Order Lagomorpha Order Rodentia New York State Mammals Order Lagomorpha Order Rodentia FAMILY: LEPORIDAE Rabbits and hares Conspicuous tail Fenestra appears as bony latticework Some species molt seasonally Presence of a second incisor

More information

Figure 4.4. Opposite page: The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) can climb trees. (Foto: F. Labhardt)

Figure 4.4. Opposite page: The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) can climb trees. (Foto: F. Labhardt) Figure 4.3. Above: Lightly spotted Eurasian lynx. Below: The somewhat smaller spotted Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus), a rare species found in Spain and Portugal. Figure 4.4. Opposite page: The red fox (Vulpes

More information

Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018

Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018 Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018 Interpretation Guide Status Danger Threats Population Distribution Habitat Diet Size Longevity Social Family Units Reproduction Our Animals Scientific Name Least Concern

More information

Coyotes in legend and culture

Coyotes in legend and culture Coyotes: Wild and free on the urban interface Dana Sanchez Extension Wildlife Specialist Dana.Sanchez@oregonstate.edu 541-737-6003 Coyotes in legend and culture Coyote Canis latrans Canis latrans = barking

More information

Post-Release Success of Captive Bred Louisiana Pine Snakes

Post-Release Success of Captive Bred Louisiana Pine Snakes Post-Release Success of Captive Bred Louisiana Pine Snakes The Louisiana pine snake (Pituophis ruthveni) Most endangered reptile in the U.S. 1 st and only SSP for a U.S. reptile Only 6% of SSP s are for

More information

Lizard Surveying and Monitoring in Biodiversity Sanctuaries

Lizard Surveying and Monitoring in Biodiversity Sanctuaries Lizard Surveying and Monitoring in Biodiversity Sanctuaries Trent Bell (EcoGecko Consultants) Alison Pickett (DOC North Island Skink Recovery Group) First things first I am profoundly deaf I have a Deaf

More information

The Long-term Effect of Precipitation on the Breeding Success of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri in the Judean and Negev Deserts, Israel

The Long-term Effect of Precipitation on the Breeding Success of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri in the Judean and Negev Deserts, Israel Meyburg. B-U. & R. D. Chancellor eds. 1996 Eagle Studies World Working Group on Birds of Prey (WWGBP) Berlin, London & Paris The Long-term Effect of Precipitation on the Breeding Success of Golden Eagles

More information

More panthers, more roadkills Florida panthers once ranged throughout the entire southeastern United States, from South Carolina

More panthers, more roadkills Florida panthers once ranged throughout the entire southeastern United States, from South Carolina Mark Lotz Florida Panther Biologist, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Darrell Land Florida Panther Team Leader, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Florida panther roadkills

More information

Brent Patterson & Lucy Brown Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Wildlife Research & Development Section

Brent Patterson & Lucy Brown Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Wildlife Research & Development Section Coyote & Wolf Biology 101: helping understand depredation on livestock Brent Patterson & Lucy Brown Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Wildlife Research & Development Section 1 Outline 1. Description

More information

Global comparisons of beta diversity among mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians across spatial scales and taxonomic ranks

Global comparisons of beta diversity among mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians across spatial scales and taxonomic ranks Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47 (5): 509 514 (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00043.x Global comparisons of beta diversity among mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians across spatial scales

More information

Pre-lab homework Lab 8: Food chains in the wild.

Pre-lab homework Lab 8: Food chains in the wild. Pre-lab homework Lab 8: Food chains in the wild. Lab Section: Name: Put your field hat on and complete the questions below before coming to lab! The bits of information you and your classmates collect

More information

Monitoring Bobcat (Lynx rufus) Activity at Watering Sites via Camera Traps. Emily P. Shafer ABSTRACT

Monitoring Bobcat (Lynx rufus) Activity at Watering Sites via Camera Traps. Emily P. Shafer ABSTRACT Monitoring Bobcat (Lynx rufus) Activity at Watering Sites via Camera Traps Emily P. Shafer ABSTRACT To more rigorously examine the impact of drought and climate change on terrestrial mammals in Mediterranean

More information

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH Abstract We used an experimental design to treat greater

More information

Big Cat Rescue Presents. Tigrina or Oncilla

Big Cat Rescue Presents. Tigrina or Oncilla Big Cat Rescue Presents Tigrina or Oncilla 1 Tigrina or Oncilla Big Cat Rescue 12802 Easy Street Tampa, Florida 33625 www.bigcatrescue.org Common Name: Oncilla Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata (Vertebrata)

More information

Opossum. Didelphis virginiana

Opossum. Didelphis virginiana Opossum Didelphis virginiana Other common names Virginia Opossum, possum Introduction The opossum is the only marsupial found in the United States. Like kangaroos, another wellknown marsupial, opossums

More information

A Study of Bobwhite Quail Nest Initiation Dates, Clutch Sizes, and Hatch Sizes in Southwest Georgia

A Study of Bobwhite Quail Nest Initiation Dates, Clutch Sizes, and Hatch Sizes in Southwest Georgia National Quail Symposium Proceedings Volume 1 Article 25 1972 A Study of Bobwhite Quail Nest nitiation Dates, Clutch Sizes, and Hatch Sizes in Southwest Georgia Ronald C. Simpson Georgia Game and Fish

More information

The effect of weaning weight on subsequent lamb growth rates

The effect of weaning weight on subsequent lamb growth rates Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 62: 75 79 (2000) 75 The effect of weaning weight on subsequent lamb growth rates T.J. FRASER and D.J. SAVILLE AgResearch, PO Box 60, Lincoln, Canterbury

More information

American Bison (Bison bison)

American Bison (Bison bison) American Bison (Bison bison) The American Bison's recovery from near extinction parallels what happened to the European Bison, Bison bonasus. Once abundant and widespread in northern latitudes, their decline

More information

Detection Project: A Report on the Jaguar in Southeastern Arizona

Detection Project: A Report on the Jaguar in Southeastern Arizona The Borderlands Jaguar Detection Project: A Report on the Jaguar in Southeastern Arizona Jack L. Childs Emil B. McCain Anna Mary Childs Janay Brun Borderlands Jaguar Detection Project The constant barking

More information

Response to SERO sea turtle density analysis from 2007 aerial surveys of the eastern Gulf of Mexico: June 9, 2009

Response to SERO sea turtle density analysis from 2007 aerial surveys of the eastern Gulf of Mexico: June 9, 2009 Response to SERO sea turtle density analysis from 27 aerial surveys of the eastern Gulf of Mexico: June 9, 29 Lance P. Garrison Protected Species and Biodiversity Division Southeast Fisheries Science Center

More information

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments This is Annex 1 of the Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017 2020 as approved by the IUCN SSC Steering Committee

More information

Result Demonstration Report

Result Demonstration Report Result Demonstration Report 2014 Texas Quail Index Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Archer County Cooperator: Brad Mitchell- Mitchell and Parkey Ranches Justin B Gilliam, County Extension Agent for

More information

ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND HOME-RANGE USE OF NESTING LONG-EARED OWLS

ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND HOME-RANGE USE OF NESTING LONG-EARED OWLS Wilson Bull., 100(2), 1988, pp. 204-213 ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND HOME-RANGE USE OF NESTING LONG-EARED OWLS E. H. CRAIG, T. H. CRAIG, AND LEON R. POWERS ABSTRACT.-A study of the movements of two pairs of nesting

More information

Aspect of Bobwhite Quail Mobility During Spring Through Fall Months

Aspect of Bobwhite Quail Mobility During Spring Through Fall Months National Quail Symposium Proceedings Volume 1 Article 24 1972 Aspect of Bobwhite Quail Mobility During Spring Through Fall Months David Urban Southern llinois University Follow this and additional works

More information

Population dynamics of small game. Pekka Helle Natural Resources Institute Finland Luke Oulu

Population dynamics of small game. Pekka Helle Natural Resources Institute Finland Luke Oulu Population dynamics of small game Pekka Helle Natural Resources Institute Finland Luke Oulu Populations tend to vary in size temporally, some species show more variation than others Depends on degree of

More information

Iguana Technical Assistance Workshop. Presented by: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Iguana Technical Assistance Workshop. Presented by: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Iguana Technical Assistance Workshop Presented by: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 1 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Protects and manages 575 species of wildlife 700

More information

Pred-X Field Test Results

Pred-X Field Test Results University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for December 1993

More information

Title of Project: Distribution of the Collared Lizard, Crotophytus collaris, in the Arkansas River Valley and Ouachita Mountains

Title of Project: Distribution of the Collared Lizard, Crotophytus collaris, in the Arkansas River Valley and Ouachita Mountains Title of Project: Distribution of the Collared Lizard, Crotophytus collaris, in the Arkansas River Valley and Ouachita Mountains Project Summary: This project will seek to monitor the status of Collared

More information

Island Fox Update 2011

Island Fox Update 2011 ! page 1 of 5 The island fox offers a dramatic example of how people can come together to make a positive difference for an endangered species. In 1998, s were plummeting on four of the California Channel

More information

Density, growth, and home range of the lizard Uta stansburiana stejnegeri in southern Dona Ana County, New Mexico

Density, growth, and home range of the lizard Uta stansburiana stejnegeri in southern Dona Ana County, New Mexico Great Basin Naturalist Volume 33 Number 2 Article 8 6-30-1973 Density, growth, and home range of the lizard Uta stansburiana stejnegeri in southern Dona Ana County, New Mexico Richard D. Worthington University

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii),

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii), C.5 Desert Tortoise EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii), on the proposed Alta Oak Creek Mojave Wind Generation Project near Mojave, Kern County,

More information

Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma

Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma P-1054 Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State

More information

Wild Fur Identification. an identification aid for Lynx species fur

Wild Fur Identification. an identification aid for Lynx species fur Wild Fur Identification an identification aid for Lynx species fur Wild Fur Identifica- -an identification and classification aid for Lynx species fur pelts. Purpose: There are four species of Lynx including

More information

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West CHAPTER 7 POPULATION ECOLOGY THE WOLF WATCHERS Endangered gray wolves return to the American West THE WOLF WATCHERS Endangered gray wolves return to the American West Main concept Population size and makeup

More information

DO BROWN-HEADED COWBIRDS LAY THEIR EGGS AT RANDOM IN THE NESTS OF RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS?

DO BROWN-HEADED COWBIRDS LAY THEIR EGGS AT RANDOM IN THE NESTS OF RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS? Wilson Bull., 0(4), 989, pp. 599605 DO BROWNHEADED COWBIRDS LAY THEIR EGGS AT RANDOM IN THE NESTS OF REDWINGED BLACKBIRDS? GORDON H. ORTANS, EIVIN RDSKAPT, AND LES D. BELETSKY AssrnAcr.We tested the hypothesis

More information

NORTHERN GOSHAWK NEST SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE COLORADO ROCKIES

NORTHERN GOSHAWK NEST SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE COLORADO ROCKIES NORTHERN GOSHAWK NEST SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE COLORADO ROCKIES WILLIAM C. SHUSTER, P.O. Box 262, Mancos, Colorado 81328 This paper deals with 20 Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) nest sites I studied

More information

ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit

ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit Autumn 2013 Outline (the 5 Components) (1) Background why leporids are such great study subjects (2) About white-tailed jackrabbits (3) The

More information

Re: Proposed Revision To the Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf

Re: Proposed Revision To the Nonessential Experimental Population of the Mexican Wolf December 16, 2013 Public Comments Processing Attn: FWS HQ ES 2013 0073 and FWS R2 ES 2013 0056 Division of Policy and Directive Management United States Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive

More information

TEXAS WILDLIFE JULY 2016 STUDYING THE LIONS OF WEST TEXAS. Photo by Jeff Parker/Explore in Focus.com

TEXAS WILDLIFE JULY 2016 STUDYING THE LIONS OF WEST TEXAS. Photo by Jeff Parker/Explore in Focus.com Photo by Jeff Parker/Explore in Focus.com Studies show that apex predators, such as mountain lions, play a role in preserving biodiversity through top-down regulation of other species. 8 STUDYING THE LIONS

More information

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 October 31 December Prepared by

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 October 31 December Prepared by PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT Period Covered: 1 October 31 December 2013 Prepared by John A. Litvaitis, Tyler Mahard, Marian K. Litvaitis, and Rory Carroll Department of Natural

More information

May Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor,

May Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor, May 2004 Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor, Attached is the revised survey methodology for the blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila). The protocol was developed by the San Joaquin Valley Southern

More information

California Bighorn Sheep Population Inventory Management Units 3-17, 3-31 and March 20 & 27, 2006

California Bighorn Sheep Population Inventory Management Units 3-17, 3-31 and March 20 & 27, 2006 California Bighorn Sheep Population Inventory Management Units 3-17, 3-31 and 3-32 March 20 & 27, 2006 Prepared for: Environmental Stewardship Division Fish and Wildlife Science and Allocation Section

More information

THE FOOD OF THE RED FOX (VULPES VULPES L) AND THE MARTEN (MARTES FOINA, ERXL) IN THE SPRING-SUMMER PERIOD IN OSOGOVO MOUNTAIN

THE FOOD OF THE RED FOX (VULPES VULPES L) AND THE MARTEN (MARTES FOINA, ERXL) IN THE SPRING-SUMMER PERIOD IN OSOGOVO MOUNTAIN PROCEEDINGS OF THE BALKAN SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGY IN PLOVDIV (BULGARIA) FROM 19 TH TILL 21 ST OF MAY 2005 (EDS B. GRUEV, M. NIKOLOVA AND A. DONEV), 2005 (P. 481 488) THE FOOD OF THE RED FOX (VULPES

More information